Law or morality: which is the true measure of a civilized society?

Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 21, 2024
This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection […]

This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection of social welfare. Only by building systems and institutions that safeguard and enhance the well-being of society as a whole can we foster a healthy interaction between individuals and communities, leading humanity toward a future that is happier, fairer, and more dignified.

I. The limits of law and morality

Law, as the foundation of social governance, emphasizes rules and order. Yet it cannot cover the full complexity of human life, nor can it directly address individual happiness. While law can restrain harmful behavior, it cannot cultivate kindness or compassion. For example, the law may punish theft, but it cannot legislate that everyone must help the poor.

Morality, on the other hand, rests on personal conscience and shared social values. Its weakness lies in the absence of enforceability and universal application. Moral understanding differs across cultures, education, and personal experience, which makes it difficult for morality to serve as a consistent guide in diverse societies.

Relying solely on morality also risks hypocrisy. Some people even stand on a moral high ground and place moral demands on the most vulnerable, using morality as a tool to exploit others. History has shown many such cases, and the same patterns still appear today—for example, when victims are judged and blamed instead of being supported. This shows that relying only on morality to guide society is not enough; in fact, it can sometimes do real harm.

II. Social welfare: the true measure of a civilized society

A truly civilized society is not defined by how laws and morals balance or clash, but by whether it can generate social welfare. Social welfare meets people’s basic needs, improves their quality of life, and fosters a deeper sense of well-being. This is what allows a society to keep moving forward.

1. Creating social welfare

The creation of social welfare is the first step toward a more advanced society. With innovative policies and systems, we can provide fair opportunities for more people. For example, ongoing improvements in universal education and comprehensive healthcare are signs of real progress. Of course, many current education and healthcare systems still fall short. That is why people must keep pushing for fairness in access and excellence in outcomes, instead of simply accepting the status quo. Only by continuously creating conditions for genuine happiness can individuals thrive, and only then can society rise to a higher level of civilization.

2. Producing social welfare

Producing social welfare is the key step that turns ideas into reality. It is the continuation of welfare creation and includes expanding access to education, building more healthcare facilities, and providing standardized social services. For example, in many developed countries, public funding combined with the participation of social enterprises has built efficient and diverse systems of welfare delivery. This not only gives people real, practical support but also drives the overall progress of society and civilization.

3. Social welfare protection

Social welfare protection ensures that everyone can meet basic needs when facing risks such as illness, unemployment, or aging. It is not just about caring for individuals, but also about maintaining social stability. For example, a well-designed pension system allows the elderly to enjoy their later years while easing the financial burden on younger generations. Such welfare protection marks a key stage in human civilization, moving from “survival of the fittest” to a model of cooperation and shared prosperity.

III. A happy society built on social welfare

When a society places the creation, delivery, and protection of social welfare at its core, law and morality no longer stand in opposition—they become complementary tools serving the same goal. Law provides the enforcement and security needed to implement welfare, while morality adds warmth and care to its creation. At Yicheng Commonweal, we continue to study and analyze this approach.

For example, the social welfare systems in Nordic countries are often hailed as models of modern civilization. Through policies such as free education, universal healthcare, and childcare subsidies, these nations have built highly developed welfare societies grounded in both law and morality. Such societies allow every individual to live with dignity while raising the overall standard of living. However, Nordic welfare systems primarily focus on maintaining basic living standards and lack mechanisms for the ongoing creation and production of welfare. They rely heavily on continuous government funding and taxpayer contributions. If mechanisms for welfare creation and production were incorporated at the source, these systems could generate social value continuously, moving beyond the current model that depends so heavily on fiscal input.

IV. Yicheng Commonweal: Cultivating the Welfare of Our Civilization

At Yicheng Commonweal, we understand that true happiness and civilization stem from the comprehensive development of social welfare. That is why we are committed to driving welfare creation, improving welfare production, and ensuring fair access through innovative public initiatives. We believe that civilization is not an abstract concept—it is the tangible experience of well-being, the cultivation of kindness, and the nurturing of responsibility.

By establishing inclusive public-benefit organizations, commonweal union, and social enterprises, we continuously introduce services that create, produce, and safeguard social welfare. In doing so, we cultivate well-being in people’s lives, offering hope and support to those in need. This sowing of welfare not only transforms individual lives but also fundamentally elevates the overall happiness and civility of society.

Conclusion

Social happiness and civilization come from creating, providing, and protecting social welfare. Through a well-developed social welfare system, the value of law and morality can be fully realized, ensuring both individual quality of life and overall social progress.

The measure of civilization does not lie in abstract theoretical debates, but in the tangible sowing of welfare through action. Every innovation in social welfare and every improvement in individual lives pushes society toward a brighter future. The true source of happiness and civilization is the welfare society we collectively create, produce, and protect.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

社会公民经济如何重构“就业、失业与基本收入制度”

社会公民经济如何重构“就业、失业与基本收入制度”

Kishou · Feb 5, 2026

前言:就业不是“谋生”,而是公民存在于社会中的基本许可 在资本经济的意识形态中,“就业”被粗暴地简化为一个工具性定义:“有岗位→ 才有收入→ 有收入才能生存”。这种逻辑将人的生存权与资本的雇用需求牢固捆绑,使得“没有岗位”被系统性地默认等同于“你对社会没价值”。 “失业”被道德化地污名为个人能力不足、市场竞争淘汰、自我失败的证明,进而导致个体在精神上的自我羞辱。 “基本收入”(UBI)则被制度性地污名化为“养懒人”、破坏效率、违背神圣的市场规律的异端福利。 然而,在社会公民经济的框架下,这一整套基于恐惧和效率至上的认知必须被彻底颠覆: 就业不是市场偶然赏赐的机会,而是公民参与社会生产、服务与分享文明成果的基本权利。 失业不是个人能力问题,而是技术迭代、产业变迁所产生的结构性风险。 基本收入不是施舍,而是公民作为“社会共同体成员”所应享有的、对社会共同资产的最低分红权。 这是“以资本为中心的高效市场社会”与“以人为本的公民文明社会”之间,在伦理和制度上的根本分水岭。 一、资本经济下的就业本质:不是“让人活”,而是“用人榨值” 在资本主导的经济结构中,就业的底层驱动逻辑是冰冷而单一的:不是为了解决人的生存和尊严,而是为了最大化地降低生产成本和提高资本回报率。 劳动力被视为可替换的、有价格的投入要素,而非拥有主观能动性的社会成员。 于是,系统自然形成了一种冷酷且不断优化的剥削结构: 有用的人(高性价比)→ 留在系统里,接受无限内卷和绩效考核。 暂时没用的人(低性价比/需转型)→ 被系统丢弃,成为待价而沽的风险个体。 再也没用的人(技术性淘汰)→ 被文明遗弃,成为社会救助的负担。 所谓“灵活就业”、“弹性用工”、“自由职业”,在很多时候不过是资本对“无稳定保障、无社保覆盖、无组织工会”的劳动力进行剥削的文明包装。资本并不关心劳动者能否长期稳定地生活、发展和养老,它只关心你当下这一刻的“边际成本与边际收益是否足够高”。 二、社会公民经济对“就业”的重新定义:不是岗位,而是“社会参与权” 在社会公民经济中,我们必须将“就业”的定义从狭隘的“为资本提供岗位服务”升级为:“公民参与社会生产、公共服务、治理、照护与知识创造的制度性通道。” 这意味着,有价值的劳动不再只等同于“能产生直接财务利润”的劳动,它包括但不限于: 公共服务型就业(Public Service Jobs): 政府、公益组织提供的,面向全民的基础服务。 社会照护型就业(Social Care): 针对老人、儿童、残障人士的照料和情感支持。 社区建设与文化型就业(Community & Cultural): 社区治理、文化传承、艺术创作、非盈利性教育。 生态修复型就业(Ecological Restoration): 环境保护、污染治理、可持续发展项目。 价值认定原则: 只要你的劳动具备以下特征: 对社会有真实且不可替代的价值(Real Social Value)。 对公共安全与韧性有真实贡献(Public Resilience Contribution)。 对共同体的存续有真实支撑(Communal Support)。 它就应当被视为正当就业,并获得稳定的、具备尊严的收入与制度保障。否则,一个社会必然会陷入“真实有价值的事(如照护、基础科研)没人做,纯资本回报高但价值低的事(如金融投机、广告内卷)挤破头”的结构性荒谬。 三、失业的文明定性:不是“失败者”,而是“结构性风险承受者” 在资本经济的道德叙事中,失业是一种个体失败的耻辱,被制度性地隐喻为不努力、能力差、不适应市场。这种羞辱性定性极大地增加了社会的不稳定性和个体的精神负担。 但在社会公民经济中,失业的真实本质必须被非道德化、客观化地定性为:技术迭代、产业转移、全球资本波动、政策调整等系统力量所导致的“结构性牺牲”(Structural Sacrifice)。 核心逻辑是: […]

The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods

The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods

Kishou · Feb 1, 2026

Introduction: A Global Surrender of Time Amid a profound global demographic reversal, virtually all modern nations are performing the same quiet yet decisive institutional surgery: delaying retirement ages, extending contribution periods, and recalibrating benefit expectations. Technocrats package this transformation as “the necessary response to the aging crisis,” while fiscal departments frame it as “rational adjustments […]

read more

Related Content

Human morality will always stand above workplace rules
Avatar photo
Kishou · Oct 30, 2024
This article explores the relationship between workplace rules and human morality, emphasizing that moral values stand above regulations. While rules help ensure work efficiency, they cannot replace the ability to discern right from wrong. The article calls for integrating morality into professional practice in order to foster deeper human care and promote social harmony.
Civilization Leaders: Pioneering Leadership for a Brighter Future
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 22, 2024
In a rapidly changing globalized world, the traditional image of leadership—as decision-makers and managers leveraging power, resources, and influence to meet organizational goals—is beginning to feel outdated. As societies grow more complex, future leaders must go beyond administration, fostering collaboration across divides, and charting a path toward a more enlightened and inclusive civilization. They are […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
View All Content