The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Juin 20, 2025
Introduction Since the birth of life, faith has always played an essential role in it. Throughout every stage of human society, faith has never been absent. From primitive totems and religious worship to modern national narratives and the belief in technological supremacy, faith has been a driving force that sustains collective identity, shapes personal values, […]

Introduction

Since the birth of life, faith has always played an essential role in it. Throughout every stage of human society, faith has never been absent. From primitive totems and religious worship to modern national narratives and the belief in technological supremacy, faith has been a driving force that sustains collective identity, shapes personal values, and advances the evolution of civilization.

But in today’s world, where civilization faces crises, technology brings new risks, wealth is highly concentrated, and spiritual emptiness is widespread, traditional systems of faith can no longer meet the spiritual needs of people or the demands of modern society.

In a system of complete citizenship, modern citizens need to embrace two core kinds of faith: the spiritual faith of social citizens and the civilizational faith of social citizens. These go beyond traditional religions, correct the distortions of today’s consumer-driven beliefs, and provide the values needed for a rational and well-ordered future civilization.

I. The dilemma and transformation of faith in civil society

In the past, human societies often relied on faith tied to divine authority, monarchs, churches, tribes, nations, or ideologies. On one hand, these beliefs helped unite communities and enforce moral norms. On the other hand, they became tools of control, limiting individual spiritual freedom and the autonomy of life’s value.

Although modern society has gradually become more secular and technological, new challenges of faith have quietly emerged:

  • The supremacy of science and the belief in technology’s omnipotence have led to a disregard for the intrinsic value of human beings.
  • Consumerism and the entertainment industry have fostered nihilism and spiritual numbness.
  • Elite power groups use data, algorithms, and media manipulation to recreate a form of “technological divinity.”
  • Religious faith has become formalistic, turning into a tool for wealth accumulation and power struggles.

Therefore, if modern civilization is to save itself, civil society must establish a new system of faith that reflects the spirit of the times, has practical value, and resists alienation—namely, the two core faiths of complete citizens.

II. The spiritual faith of social citizens: Awareness of life’s origin

1. Origins and transcendence

The original meaning of religion came from awe and inquiry into the mysteries of the universe, life, and destiny. At first, it served as moral guidance and comfort for human existence. Later, however, it became systematized into doctrines, intertwined with power, and was distorted into a tool of control.

The spiritual faith of modern citizens seeks to break free from the chains of rigid doctrines, return to the essence of life, and liberate individual spiritual freedom.

2. The meaning of spiritual faith

The spiritual faith of social citizens emphasizes:

  • The dignity of life as independent, and the soul as inherently free
  • Inner conscience as supreme, with external deities stepping aside
  • Awareness of the self, reverence for life, and respect for all beings
  • Conscious spiritual practice, compassion for others, and mutual support in altruism

This faith is not tied to any particular religion, yet it honors the benevolent wisdom found in all cultural heritages. It calls on individuals to face life, the inner self, and destiny directly—not relying on salvation or placing hope in another world, but achieving a dignified life here and now.

3. The social value of spiritual faith

  • Prevents the total alienation of human nature in a materialistic society
  • Builds inner stability for individuals and reduces the risk of social psychological disorders
  • Restores citizens’ self-respect, self-confidence, and capacity for self-reflection
  • Cultivates a civic character grounded in autonomy, freedom, equality, mutual support, and compassion

III. The civilizational faith of social citizens: Safeguarding rational order

1. Origins and vigilance

Since the Enlightenment, reason, science, technology, and institutions have gradually replaced divine authority, bloodline, and tribal ethics as the foundation of social governance. Faith in rational civilization is a product of this modern process.

But the illnesses of today’s civilization are becoming increasingly visible:

  • Technology has been turned into a tool of surveillance and control.
  • Wealth is highly concentrated, and signs of technological dictatorship have appeared.
  • Democratic systems often operate in form but without genuine public support.

The civilizational faith of social citizens seeks to restore a healthy balance between reason, science, institutions, and social justice—ensuring that technology and systems serve humanity rather than erode individual freedom.

2. The meaning of civilizational faith

  • It trusts in scientific progress, yet refuses to accept technological enslavement.
  • It upholds fairness in institutions, yet stays alert to the dangers of concentrated power.
  • It seeks material prosperity, yet stands against greed and oligarchic monopoly.
  • It values social progress, yet rejects civilizational colonialism and cultural dominance.

Civilizational faith affirms that technology must serve human freedom, institutions must safeguard human dignity, wealth must benefit the public, and society must remain open to diversity.

3. The social value of civilizational faith

  • Ensuring that the progress of technological civilization stays on the right track
  • Preventing systemic exploitation and technological authoritarianism
  • Guarding against the subversion of democracy and fairness by powerful capital groups
  • Building a healthy system of social cooperation and shared governance

IV. The symbiotic logic of dual faith

In the system of complete citizenship, spiritual faith protects inner dignity, while civilizational faith safeguards external order. The two complement and balance each other:

  • Spiritual faith prevents civilizational progress from falling into empty material expansion
  • Civilizational faith prevents spiritual faith from drifting into nihilism or chaotic freedom

Only when the two are united can citizens develop a well-rounded character, society maintain stability, civilization sustain its order, and humanity secure a sustainable future.

V. The responsibility of civilization-oriented public welfare organizations

Civilization-oriented public welfare organizations, such as Yicheng Commonweal, must take on the following responsibilities in our time:

  • Rebuilding the civic faith system
  • Promoting the ideas of spiritual faith and civilizational faith
  • Cultivating complete citizens who embrace both forms of faith
  • Advancing the reconstruction of institutional civilization based on complete citizenship

This is not only an update of a faith system but also the necessary path for humanity’s self-rescue in the evolution of future civilization.

Conclusion

The two forms of faith for complete citizens are the only path for humanity to keep advancing, for individual souls to resist alienation, and for social order to remain free from dictatorship. The crises of today’s civilization, the confusion of technology, and the loss of faith all stem from the absence of a belief system that truly belongs to citizens themselves and to modern civilization as a whole.

If there is any hope in our time, it will be born among complete citizens who hold both spiritual faith and civilizational faith.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs « Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems »

How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs « Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems »

Kishou · Fév 5, 2026

Preface: Employment is Not Just a « Livelihood, » but a Basic License for Civic Existence In capitalist ideology, « employment » is brutally reduced to a purely instrumental equation: « Job → Income → Survival. » This logic chains human existence to capital’s hiring whims, systematically equating joblessness with social worthlessness. Unemployment becomes morally weaponized—branded as proof of personal inadequacy, market […]

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

社会市民経済はどのように「雇用・失業・ベーシックインカム制度」を再構築するか

Kishou · Fév 5, 2026

前言:雇用は「生計」ではなく、市民が社会に存在するための「基本的許可」である 資本経済のイデオロギーでは、「雇用」は道具的な定義に乱暴に単純化されています。 「仕事がある→収入がある→収入があって初めて生きていける」 この論理は人の生存権と資本の雇用需要を強固に結びつけ、「仕事がない」ことを「あなたは社会に価値がない」とシステム的に決めつけてしまいます。 「失業」は道徳的な汚名を着せられます。 個人の能力不足、市場競争での脱落、自分の責任による失敗の証拠として扱われ、本人の心の中で自分を責める気持ちを生み出します。 「ベーシックインカム(UBI)」は制度的にタブー視されます。 「怠け者を甘やかすもの」「効率を損なうもの」「神聖な市場の法則に逆らう異端の福祉」として排斥されています。 しかし、社会市民経済(Socio-Civic Economy)の考え方では、恐怖と効率至上主義に基づくこうした認識を根本から変える必要があります。 雇用とは: 市場がたまたま与えてくれる機会ではなく、市民が社会の生産活動やサービス、そして文明の成果を分かち合うことに参加する「基本的な権利」です。 失業とは: 個人の能力の問題ではなく、技術の進歩や産業の変化によって生まれる「構造的なリスク」です。 ベーシックインカムとは: 施しではなく、市民が「社会共同体の一員」として当然受け取るべき、社会の共有財産に対する「最低限の配当」です。 これは、「資本中心の効率的な市場社会」と「人間中心の市民文明社会」との間にある、倫理的かつ制度的な根本の分水嶺です。 一、資本経済下の雇用の本質:「人を活かす」のではなく「価値を搾り取る」 資本が主導する経済では、雇用の根本的な目的は冷酷で単純です。 人の生存や尊厳を守るためではありません。生産コストを下げ、資本の利益を最大化することが目的です。 労働者は、自分で考え行動する社会の一員としてではなく、いつでも取り替えのきく「値段のついた部品」として扱われます。 こうして、システムは冷酷で絶えず最適化される搾取の仕組みを自然に作り出します: 使える人(コスパが良い) → システムに残り、終わりのない競争と成果評価を受け入れる 今は使えない人(コスパが悪い/転職が必要) → システムから捨てられ、安く買い叩かれるのを待つリスクを背負う個人になる もう使えない人(技術の進歩で不要になった) → 文明から見捨てられ、社会保障の重荷となる いわゆる「ギグワーク」「柔軟な働き方」「フリーランス」の多くは、実際には資本による巧妙な搾取です。 安定した保障も社会保険も労働組合もない労働者を利用するための「聞こえの良い言葉」に過ぎません。 資本は、労働者が長期的に安定して暮らし、成長し、老後を過ごせるかどうかには関心がありません。関心があるのは、今この瞬間の「コストと利益が十分に見合うかどうか」だけです。 二、社会市民経済による「雇用」の再定義:ポストではなく「社会参画権」 社会市民経済では、「雇用」の定義を根本から変える必要があります。 狭い意味での「資本に労働力を提供すること」から、「市民が社会の生産活動、公共サービス、統治、ケア、知識創造に参加するための制度的な道筋」へと発展させなければなりません。 これは、価値ある労働がもはや「直接お金を生む労働」だけではないことを意味します。 以下のような労働も含まれます(ただし、これらに限定されません): 公共サービス型雇用(Public Service Jobs): 政府や非営利組織が提供する、全市民向けの基礎的なサービス。 社会ケア型雇用(Social Care): 高齢者、子供、障害を持つ人々へのケアと感情的サポート。 コミュニティ建設・文化型雇用(Community & Cultural): 地域統治、文化継承、芸術創作、非営利的な教育。 生態系修復型雇用(Ecological Restoration): 環境保護、汚染対策、持続可能な発展プロジェクト。 価値認定の原則: あなたの労働が以下の特徴を備えている限り: 社会に対して真実かつ代替不可能な価値(Real Social Value)を持っている。 公共の安全とレジリエンス(強靭性)に対して真実の貢献(Public Resilience Contribution)をしている。 共同体の存続に対して真実の支え(Communal Support)となっている。 そうした労働は正当な仕事として認められ、安定した尊厳ある収入と制度的な保障を受けるべきです。 そうでなければ、社会は必然的におかしな状況に陥ります。本当に価値のあること(介護や基礎研究など)をする人がいなくなり、お金にはなるが価値の低いこと(金融投機や広告の過当競争など)に人が殺到するという構造的な矛盾です。 三、失業の文明的定性:「敗者」ではなく「構造的リスクの引き受け手」 資本経済の道徳観では、失業は個人の失敗という恥です。 努力不足、能力不足、市場への適応力不足として制度的に扱われてきました。この屈辱的な決めつけは、社会の不安定さと個人の精神的な重荷を大幅に増やしています。 しかし社会市民経済では、失業の本当の性質を道徳的な判断から切り離し、客観的に捉え直す必要があります。 失業とは、技術の進歩、産業の移転、世界的な資本の変動、政策の変更などのシステム全体の力によって引き起こされる「構造的な犠牲」なのです。 核心となる論理: 核心となる考え方: […]

read more

Related Content

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Juin 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Brand new world: the origin and future of humanity’s ultimate form of civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Mai 18, 2025
1. The historical roots of the brand new world Many people today believe that the modern world is chaotic and fragmented, and that civilization seems to be heading nowhere. But in truth, the current state of the world did not appear out of nowhere. From the very beginning, human society has moved forward through struggles […]
The ultimate mission of institutional evolution: to end poverty and eliminate ignorance
Avatar photo
Kishou · Juin 14, 2025
— The era of complete civic systems Introduction: The structural predicament of civilizational progress Since the dawn of human society, civilization has struggled forward through cycles of shifting power structures and governance models. From tribal clans and slave-based states to feudal monarchies and dynastic regimes, and eventually to modern nation-states, systems of governance have undergone […]
Information colonialism in the digital age: how civil voices are silenced and sovereignty is stolen
Information colonialism in the digital age: how civil voices are silenced and sovereignty is stolen
Avatar photo
Daohe · Juin 8, 2025
Since the advent of the digital age, information has evolved beyond a simple tool of communication. It has become a resource for governance, a weapon of perception, and a means of social control. Freedom of speech and information sovereignty—both fundamental for protecting human dignity, group identity, and holding power to account—are now under systematic erosion. […]
View All Content