Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

孝の正しい解釈:それは愚者の徳ではなく、智者の道である

孝の正しい解釈:それは愚者の徳ではなく、智者の道である

Daohe · Jul 26, 2025

——「孝」における正義と、その境界線—— 一、孝の本義は、とうに世界から誤解されている 「孝」という文字は、本来、「老」と「子」から構成され、「子が老いた親の生命を受け継ぎ、その血脈と道義を継続していく」という意味合いを持っています。しかし、現実の社会に根付く中で、この二文字は権力によって再形成され、感情によって歪められ、次第に「親への服従」を覆い隠すための隠れ蓑へと堕落していきました。 ある家庭では、孝は沈黙と化しました。疑問を呈することも、反論することも、自分自身の道を選ぶことも許されません。 ある文化では、孝は犠牲と化しました。自由を放棄し、愛情を放棄し、尊厳を放棄することが求められます。 さらに深刻なことに、ある種の制度の中では、孝は道具と化しました。世代間の暴力や権力による抑圧を覆い隠すための、倫理として利用されるのです。 こうして、「孝」が本来持っていた意味——生命への感謝と継承の道——は、個人の自由を捧げる儀式へと、そして人格の尊厳を蝕む行為へと成り下がってしまったのです。 私たちは、この「孝道」という概念を、道徳という神棚から現実の人間社会へと引き下ろし、改めて解体してみる必要があり、またそうしなければなりません。 二、孝は生まれながらの美徳ではなく、濫用されうる権力構造である 私たちは、「孝」そのものの価値を疑うことはありません。しかし、ある事実を長らく見過ごしてきました。 「孝」とは、本質的に、「下方から上方へ責任を負う」という倫理構造である、という事実です。この構造は、権力が不均衡な家庭内において、一方的な抑圧の様式へと極めて容易に変化します。 親は、生まれながらにして「養育した」という道徳的な優位性を握っています。一方で子供は、感情的にも物質的にも親に依存する中で、「言うことを聞く」存在として馴化させられます。この構造が、もし知恵によって調和されなければ、「愚孝(ぐこう)」の深淵へと容易に滑り落ちてしまいます。 愚かな孝行の背後にあるのは、愛ではなく、恐怖です。感謝ではなく、馴服です。人間性の輝きではなく、制度的な病理なのです。 三、真の孝道とは、「孝正」と「孝愛」の結合であり、人間としての成熟した状態である 1. 「孝正」:道義を守り、境界を設け、悪に加担せず、盲従しない 孝正の「正」とは、すなわち正義の「正」です。 真の孝とは、親子の情に屈することではなく、その情を守り、正しい方向へと導くことです。子供は親の意志の延長線上にある存在ではなく、判断力、境界感覚、そして人格の尊厳を持つ、独立した個人です。 もし親が偏屈であったり、執着に囚われていたり、圧力をかけてきたり、あるいは悪事を働いたりした場合、真の孝とは、あえてそれを諫め、気づかせ、軌道修正を促す勇気を持つことであり、頭を下げ、見て見ぬふりをし、沈黙することではありません。 社会の堕落は、「親に真実を告げられないことを、孝行と見なす」ことから始まります。 家庭の病理は、「親の過ちを、天命として受け入れる」ことから始まります。 「孝正」とは、親への愛を、正義と理性という土台の上に築くことであり、「敬意はあっても盲信せず、愛はあっても溺愛しない」ことなのです。 2. “「孝愛」:知恵をもって情を受け止め、慈悲をもってその人生を照らす 愛は、孝における血肉です。愛のない孝は、冷たい命令に過ぎません。 しかし、知恵のない愛は、感情による窒息死のようなものです。 「孝愛」は、親の機嫌を取ることでも、言いなりになることでもなく、ましてや感情を取引材料にして支配権を交換することでもありません。 真の孝愛とは、親を理解し、同時に親を導くことです。その孤独に寄り添い、同時にその理性を守ることです。その身体を労り、同時にその魂を養うことです。 親がもはや強者ではなく、認知能力や体力、言葉を失った老人となった時、子供の孝とは「借金を返す」ことではなく、「人生を全うさせてあげる」ことです。「あなたが私にしてくれた分を、私が返す」のではなく、「かつてあなたが私の誕生を守ってくれたように、私はあなたの安らかな終焉を守りたい」と願うことなのです。 四、孝道は道徳的な訓戒ではなく、魂が成熟するための修行である 「孝」とは、決して弱者の責任ではなく、強者の試練です。 愚者は「孝順(親に従うこと)」を求め、智者は「孝道(孝の道)」を修めます。 なぜなら、孝道が真に試しているのは、膝を屈することができるかどうかではなく、その心が責任を担うことができるかどうか、だからです。 それは、一人の人間に対して、以下のことを問いかけます。 孝とは、「良い子」になるためにあるのではありません。「一人の成熟した大人」になるためにあるのです。 五、世代間関係の真相:孝道の破綻は、社会が向き合いたがらない文明の病である 多くの国や文化において、「孝」は静かに崩壊しています。しかし、誰もそれが病に罹っていると、公言する勇気がありません。 私たちが見ているのは、孝道の崩壊です。それは、子供たちが冷淡だからではありません。「孝」を支えるべき「制度的な受け皿」が空っぽになり、「感情的な相互信頼」が失われ、「文化的な基盤」が引き裂かれてしまったからなのです。 これは、「孝行かどうか」という個人の問題ではなく、「構造的な病」の問題なのです。 六、本源への回帰:三教の智慧が示す、孝の究極的な姿 儒教・道教・仏教の三教が最終的に指し示している「孝」とは、倫理的な命令ではなく、心の目覚めです。孝は、道の現れであり、愛の浄化であり、魂の修行なのです。 結語:孝は、人類文明の一面を映す鏡である 私たちが求めるべきは、偽善的な孝道の宣伝でも、感情を人質に取るような道徳劇でもありません。 私たちが求めるべきは、「孝」を再び人間性の高みへと引き上げ、それが人格の尊厳の延長となり、愛の知恵の体現となり、正義と温情の融合となるようにすることです。 孝は、生命への抑圧であってはなりません。それは、生命と生命の間で交わされる、最も真実で、最も自由で、最も無私なる響き合いであるべきです。 願わくは、私たちが、風が吹く時には老いていく親の身を守り、誤解の中にあっても真理の声を覆い隠さず、千鈞の重圧の中でも、なお仁愛の心を守り通せますように。 そうして初めて、私たちは「孝道」の名を辱めることなく、この世に生を受けた意味を全うすることができるのです。   Photo By Dietmar Rabich

孝道的正确解读:不是愚人之德,而是智者之道

孝道的正确解读:不是愚人之德,而是智者之道

Daohe · Jul 26, 2025

——“孝”的正义与界限 一、孝之本义,早已被世界误解 “孝”字,本由“老”与“子”构成,寓意“子承老命,续其血脉与道义”。然而,进入现实社会后,这两个字却被权力重塑、情感扭曲,逐渐堕落为“服从父母”的遮羞布。 在一些家庭中,孝变成了沉默——不能质疑,不能反驳,不能选择自己; 在一些文化中,孝变成了牺牲——放弃自由,放弃爱情,放弃尊严; 更严重的是,在某些制度中,孝成了工具——一个用来掩饰代际暴力与权力压迫的伦理外衣。 于是,“孝”的本义——对生命的感恩与传承之道,沦为对个体自由的献祭、对人格尊严的吞噬。 我们有必要,也必须,重新拆解“孝道”这个概念,从道德神坛拉回现实人间。 二、孝不是天生的美德,而是一种可被滥用的权力结构 我们从不质疑“孝”本身的价值,但却长期忽略一个事实: “孝”本质上,是一种“向上负责”的伦理结构。它极易在权力不对等的家庭中,演化为单向度的压迫模式。 父母天然握有“养育”的道德高地,而子女在情感与物质双重依赖中,被驯化为“听话”的存在。这种结构若没有智慧调和,极易滑向“愚孝”的深渊: 愚孝的背后,不是爱,而是恐惧;不是感恩,而是驯服;不是人性光辉,而是制度病灶。 三、真正的孝道,是“孝正”与“孝爱”的结合,是人之为人的成熟状态 1. “孝正”:守道有界,不助恶,不盲从 孝正之“正”,即正义之“正”。 真正的孝,不是对亲情的屈服,而是对亲情的守护与导正。子女不是父母意志的延长,而是拥有判断力、边界感与人格尊严的独立个体。 如果父母偏执、执迷、施压、行恶,真正的孝,是敢于劝止、提醒、纠偏,而不是低头、回避、沉默。 一个社会的堕落,从“把不敢对父母说真话视为孝顺”开始; 一个家庭的病变,从“把父母的错误当作天命接受”开始。 孝正,是对父母的爱建立在正义与理性的基座之上,是“有敬而不盲、有爱而不溺”。 2. “孝爱”:以智慧承情,以慈悲照命 爱是孝的血肉。没有爱的孝,是冷的命令; 但没有智慧的爱,是一种情感的溺死。 孝爱不等于讨好,不等于顺从,更不是用情感来交换控制权。 真正的孝爱,是理解父母,也引导父母;是体贴其孤独,也守护其理智;是照料其身体,也滋养其灵魂。 当父母不再是强者,而变成失智、失力、失语的老年人时,子女的孝不是“还债”,而是“成全”。不是“你亏我多少我补多少”,而是“你曾护我出生,我愿护你善终”。 四、孝道不是道德训诫,而是一场灵魂成熟的修行 “孝”,从来不是弱者的责任,而是强者的试炼。 愚者求“孝顺”,智者修“孝道”。 因为孝道真正考验的,从来不是膝盖能不能跪,而是心能不能承担。 它考验一个人: 孝不是为了做一个“好孩子”,而是为了做一个“完整的大人”。 五、代际关系的真相:孝道的失败,是社会不愿面对的文明病 在许多国家和文化中,“孝”已悄然崩塌,却没人敢公开说它已经病了。 我们看到的是:孝道崩坏,不是因为子女冷漠,而是因为孝被抽空了“制度承载”、失去了“情感互信”、撕裂了“文化基础”。 这不是一个“孝不孝”的问题,而是一个“结构病”的问题。 六、回归本源:三教智慧对孝的终极揭示 三教最终一致指向的“孝”,不是伦理命令,而是心性觉醒。孝是道的表现,是爱之净化,是灵魂之修。 结语:孝,是人类文明的一面镜子 我们要的,不是伪善的孝道宣传,也不是情绪勒索式的道德剧本。 我们要的,是让“孝”重新站在人的高度之上,成为人格尊严的延展、爱之智慧的体现、正义与温情的融合。 孝不该是对生命的压迫,而该是生命之间最真实、最自由、最无私的回响。 愿我们,能在风起时护父母老去之身,能在误解中不掩真理之声,能在千钧之重中仍守仁爱之心。 如此,我们方不辱“孝道”之名,也不负人世此行。   Photo By Dietmar Rabich

read more

Related Content

Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Individual Effort And Empowering: 6 Interesting Points
Avatar photo
Daohe · Dec 31, 2024
In many societies, the narrative of individual effort reigns supreme. We are taught from a young age that hard work and perseverance are the keys to success. While this belief in the power of personal determination can be empowering, it often comes at the cost of ignoring the broader systemic forces that shape our lives. […]
Letting go of the past is the beginning of rebirth
Letting go of the past is the beginning of rebirth
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 20, 2025
“Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift.” As we go through life, it’s natural to look back on the past. Many people get stuck in their memories, whether holding on to past successes or dwelling on regrets. But looking back doesn’t mean we should stay trapped there. The real purpose […]
View All Content