Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

反文明:愚かな指導者に共通する病理

反文明:愚かな指導者に共通する病理

Kishou · Jul 20, 2025

序論 文明とは、人類が自らの内なる野性や無秩序を乗り越え、共存、尊厳、自由、そして秩序を追い求める営みです。それは決して権力を飾り立て、国威を誇示するための道具ではなく、人類が原始の暴力、蒙昧な儀式、そして強権による支配から抜け出すための唯一の道筋なのです。 その核心には、一人ひとりの生命への尊重、公民の自由の保障、社会の公正の維持、人類運命共同体の追求、そして多様な価値観の尊重があります。 真の文明は、以下の五つの要素を欠かすことができません。 偉大な国家、そして優れた指導者は皆、これを治国の理念としてきました。 しかし残念なことに、歴史を振り返れば、文明の向かう先とは正反対の論理で国を動かし、暴力、支配、私利、そして偽善に浸る、浅慮で冷酷な為政者が後を絶ちません。彼らは文明に背を向け、運命共同体の理念に反し、最終的に国家を大きな災禍へと導くのです。 彼らは国家という名を借りて反文明的な行いをし、民族の大義を盾に非人道的な振る舞いに走ります。支配、殺戮、欺瞞、洗脳、そして抑圧に酔いしれ、ついには国家を国民を縛る枷(かせ)へと変え、民衆を家畜同然に扱い、自らは歴史の罪人として、その名を汚れた歴史の一頁に刻むことになります。 一、愚かな指導者にみられる六つの特徴 反文明的な政権や国家指導者の行動は、驚くほど似通っており、以下の六つの共通点を持っています。 1. 国家を私物化し、人民を奉仕のための道具と見なす。 国家は指導者個人のものとされ、政権、軍隊、法律、資源のすべてがその手に収められます。民衆は、意のままに動かされ、搾取され、あるいは囚われ、管理されるだけの対象となります。 2. 人類文明の発展に逆行し、民衆を敵視する。 彼らは、公民の自由を守り、国民の暮らしを豊かにし、公正な社会を築くことを自らの使命とは考えません。むしろ、人民を便利な道具として、国民を使役の兵、税の源泉、そして思想統制の対象としか見ていないのです。 人類の文明に背を向ける国家の指導者は、本質的に国民全体の敵であり、すべての公民の幸福と利益に反する存在です。これこそ、最も極端で愚かな統治の形と言えるでしょう。 3. 国民全体の幸福を忘れ、個人の利益をむさぼる。 彼らは人々の苦しみに目を向けず、国民全体の幸福や尊厳を顧みません。すべては自らの権力欲、富、そして一族の利益、あるいはごく一部の特権階級の立場を守るためなのです。 このような極端に利己的で他者を顧みない政治は、文明が重んじる価値への乱暴な挑戦であり、国家を衰退させる元凶です。 4. 世界に敵を作り、国内の不正や矛盾から目を逸らさせる。 貧富の格差、税金の不正使用、腐敗の蔓延、不公平な利益分配、偏った資源配分、社会的な抑圧といった国内問題への不満を逸らすため、愚かな指導者は古典的な手法に頼ります。すなわち、世界中に仮想敵を作り「外部の脅威」を煽ることで、民族感情を利用し、支配層が国民の税金を着服し、富を独占してきた悪行を覆い隠すのです。これは、今日でも一部の政権が用いている旧弊な統治論理です。 5. 人々の覚醒を妨げ、市民社会の芽を摘む。 文明の核心とは、公民が自律的に目覚め、個人として自立し、社会に参加することにあります。しかし彼らは言論を封じ、思想を抑圧し、自由を奪い、表現活動を阻害します。知識人、宗教団体、公益組織、メディアに圧力をかけることで、社会全体を無関心で、無気力で、ただ権力に従順なだけの状態に陥らせるのです。 6. 人類運命共同体という視点を拒み、孤立と閉塞を招く。 愚かな指導者は、極端な民族主義や自国第一主義を助長しがちです。世界の文明との対話を拒み、人類の運命が相互に繋がっているという現実から目を背け、自国を思考停止した閉鎖的な社会、いわば情報から隔離された孤島にしようとします。それは最終的に、孤立、衰退、そして自滅へと続く道です。 このようなやり方は、短期的には民衆を操れるかもしれません。しかし長い目で見れば、必ず国家の孤立と民心の離反、社会の分断を招き、やがては混乱と衰亡に至るのです。 二、反文明的統治がもたらす五つの弊害 歴史と現代社会の教訓をまとめると、反文明的な政権には、以下の五つの弊害が共通して見られます。 1. 言論を封じ、思想を統制し、異論を許さず、あらゆる批判を封殺する。自由、尊厳、平等、平和といった普遍的な文明の価値観について、世界と対話することを拒絶する。 2.民族主義、強権主義、国家至上主義、指導者崇拝を国民への精神的な麻薬として利用し、人々の感情を扇動する。彼らが「国家よりも公民が上である」と語ることは決してありません。 3. 法を支配者の都合の良い道具へと変質させ、権力者の特権を黙認する。正義の番人であるべき法が、権力者に奉仕するための鉄の掟と化してしまう。 4. 国民の税金を搾取し、国の資源を独占し、権力者とそれに連なる集団が好き放題に振る舞うのを許し、富が常に特定の層にのみ流れる仕組みを作り上げる。 5. 市民社会を機能不全に陥らせ、独立した知識人、宗教団体、公益団体、自由なメディアを抑圧する。そして「外部の脅威」を口実に、内部の腐敗や不正から人々の目を逸らさせる。 この五つが同時に存在する政権は、間違いなく反文明的であり、愚かな指導者が国を率いている証左です。残念ながら、これらすべてを今なお続けている国家があります。省みることなく愚かな行いを常態化させた結果、徳のある人々は志を阻まれ、国のために力を尽くす道すら閉ざされてしまうのです。 三、反文明政権に訪れる必然の結末 歴史は、文明の道から外れた者が、たとえ一時的に権勢を誇ろうとも、最後には必ず滅びることを繰り返し示してきました。 アッシリア帝国は苛烈な支配によって滅び、秦の始皇帝は思想を弾圧しましたが、その王朝は二代で幕を閉じました。ナチス・ドイツは何百万もの人々の命を奪い、やがて灰燼に帰しました。クメール・ルージュは自国民を虐殺し、歴史に断罪される犯罪者となりました。 非人道的、反文明的な行いをする者は、歴史の流れの中で必ず淘汰されるのです。 その一方で、永きにわたり存続する国家は、いずれも文明的な秩序を尊び、個人の尊厳を守り、思想の自由を認め、法の支配を徹底し、多様な文化を受け入れ、社会が運命を共にするという視点を大切にしています。これこそ、文明国家と優れた指導者が進むべき道なのです。 最後に 最も愚かな国家指導者とは、常に反文明、反人類という道へと突き進む者たちです。彼らは浅はかで、貪欲で、利己的で、冷酷であり、人々が真実に目覚めることを恐れます。だからこそ、民を虐げ、富を奪い、自由を抑圧し、仮想敵を作り出し、人々の幸福を無情にも踏みにじるのです。 しかし、文明の歯車は止まることなく回り続け、偽りはいつか暴かれ、専制は必ず終わりを迎えます。 文明の勝利は、暴力や欺瞞によって得られるものでは決してありません。それは、次のような力によってもたらされるのです。 1. 良識ある人々の目覚め。沈黙を良しとしない人々の粘り強さ。そして、偽りを退け、真実と向き合う勇気を持つ人々の存在。 2. 市民一人ひとりの自覚、制度としての正義、そして人類は運命共同体であるという理念の確立。 […]

反文明,是愚蠢领导者的通病

反文明,是愚蠢领导者的通病

Kishou · Jul 20, 2025

前言 文明,是人类对自身野性与无序的反思,是对共存、尊严、自由与秩序的追求。它从来不是装饰权力、炫耀国威的工具,而是人类摆脱原始暴力、愚昧祭祀与强权统治的唯一道路。 它的核心,是尊重个体生命、保障公民自由、维护社会公正、追求人类社会命运共同体与尊重多元价值。 真正的文明,必须具备五大要素: 凡伟大国家、文明领导者,皆以此为治国纲领。 可令人遗憾的是,历史上偏偏总有愚蠢短视、自私冷酷之徒,执政逻辑与文明方向南辕北辙,迷恋暴力、掌控、私利与伪善。他们背离文明,悖逆命运共同体,最终将国家推向灾难。 他们以国家之名,行反文明之实;以民族大义,行反人类文明之暴行。他们醉心于掌控、屠杀、谎言、洗脑与压制,最终使国家沦为枷锁,使民众沦为牲口,使自己沦为历史的罪人,钉在历史的耻辱柱上。 一、愚蠢领导者的六大特征 任何反文明政权或者国家领导者,其行为模式皆惊人相似,具备以下六大共性: 1. 将国家化为私人物品,人民沦为供役之物。 国家被当成私人工具,政权、军队、法律、资源尽数纳于手中,民众成为随意驱使、收割、监禁、控制的对象。 2. 背离人类文明方向,等同于以人民为敌。 他们不以保障公民自由、改善国民福祉、构建社会公正为己任,反而将人民视为工具,国民视作劳役之兵、税收之源、意识形态的附庸。 凡背离人类文明的国家,其领导者本质上就是在与人民为敌,与全体公民的幸福利益为敌。这是最极端、最愚蠢的统治方式。 3. 抛弃全民幸福,沉溺个人私利。 他们无视百姓疾苦,将全体人民的幸福与尊严抛诸脑后,只为满足自身权欲、财富与世袭利益,乃至少数集团的特权体系。 这种极端自私、罔顾他人的政治生态,是对文明价值最粗暴的践踏,也是国家灭亡的根源。 4. 全球树敌,掩盖国内罪恶与不公。 为了转移国内对贫富差距、纳税被侵吞、腐败横行、利益分配不公、资源分配畸形、社会压制等问题的不满,愚蠢的领导者惯用伎俩:在全球四处树立敌人,制造“外部威胁”,煽动民族情绪,掩盖自己长期利用统治阶层侵占国民纳税、剥削资源、利益私吞的恶行。这正是当今个别政权仍在沿用的旧式统治逻辑。 5. 持续压制觉醒,摧毁公民社会。 文明的核心是公民觉醒、人格独立、社会参与,而他们封锁言论、压制思想、扼杀自由、剥夺表达,打压知识阶层、宗教信仰、公益组织、媒体,致社会沦为犬儒、麻木、唯命是从之众。 6. 拒绝人类社会命运共同体观,制造孤立闭塞。 愚蠢的领导者习惯极端民族主义、国家利己主义盛行,拒绝与世界文明对话,否定全球人类社会命运相连的现实,试图将国家变成一个低智蚂蚁王国,封闭物理与信息孤岛,终致孤立、衰亡、自毁前程。 这种操作短期或可愚弄民众,长期必导致国家孤立、民心尽失、社会撕裂,终致动荡衰亡。 二、反文明统治的五大恶行 总结历史与现实教训,反文明政权皆具五大恶行: 1. 封锁言论,压制思想,扼杀异议,剥夺批判空间。拒绝参与全球文明价值对话,反对自由、尊严、公民平等与世界和平理念 2. 鼓吹民族主义、强权主义、国家至上、领袖崇拜作为国家精神麻醉剂,操纵民众情绪制造精神鸦片。永远不会说,一切公民至上。 3. 将法律沦为统治工具,纵容权贵特权。法律成了魔鬼的利爪与毒绳。将正义法则庸俗化为服务权贵的铁律。 4. 掠夺纳税、侵吞资源,纵容权贵与寡头集团,利益只向上流集团倾斜。 5. 摧毁公民社会,打压独立知识阶层、宗教信仰、公益团体与自由媒体。制造“外部威胁”,转移内部腐烂与罪恶。 这五条,一旦在一国政权并存,便是反文明政权、愚蠢领导者当道的铁证。可惜这一切,今日仍有国家照抄。从来不知悔改,愚蠢成了常客, 结果让有德之士,有志难施,报国无门。 三、反文明政权的必然结局 历史无数次证明,凡与文明背道而驰者,虽一时苟活,终必覆灭。 亚述帝国灭于暴政;秦始皇焚书坑儒,二世而亡;纳粹德国戕害六百万犹太人,终至灰飞烟灭;红色高棉血洗柬埔寨,最终沦为历史罪案。 凡行反人类、反文明者,必在历史洪流中覆亡。 而真正得以长存者,无不重视文明秩序,保护公民人格,尊重思想自由,保障法治独立,接纳多元文化,推崇社会命运共同体观。这才是文明国家与文明领导者应有之道。 结语 最愚蠢的国家领导者,总在反文明、反人类文明方向驰骋。短视、贪婪、自私、冷酷、恐惧觉醒——他们驱赶人民、掠夺纳税、压制自由、树立敌人,残忍践踏公民幸福。 可是,文明的车轮滚滚向前,谎言终将粉碎,专制终会崩塌。 文明胜利,靠的从来不是暴力,不是谎言,而是靠: 1. 有良知者的觉醒,是不肯沉默者的坚持,是敢于拒绝伪善、直面真相的人群。 […]

read more

Related Content

The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
The Cost of Extending Pension Contribution Periods
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 1, 2026
Introduction: A Global Surrender of Time Amid a profound global demographic reversal, virtually all modern nations are performing the same quiet yet decisive institutional surgery: delaying retirement ages, extending contribution periods, and recalibrating benefit expectations. Technocrats package this transformation as “the necessary response to the aging crisis,” while fiscal departments frame it as “rational adjustments […]
The Social Citizen Capitalist Society: A New Framework for Civic Participation
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 23, 2025
With the development of democracy, the scope of career choices for citizens will expand beyond the boundaries of nations, organizations, and regions. It will slowly transform the traditional national identity to a broader, deeper, and more democratic sense of social citizenship. Driven by widespread civic education, people will form various forms of social unities that […]
How capitalism’s financial system intensifies class immobility
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jan 20, 2025
Modern finance is rife with inequality. Ordinary individuals are left at an informational and resource disadvantage, increasing their financial risks in investment. In contrast, capitalists exploit insider knowledge and market control to generate massive gains, widening the gap in wealth and solidifying class divides. Urgent reforms are necessary to curb these injustices.
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”
How the Socio-Civic Economy Reconstructs “Employment, Unemployment, and Basic Income Systems”
Avatar photo
Kishou · Feb 5, 2026
Preface: Employment is Not Just a “Livelihood,” but a Basic License for Civic Existence In capitalist ideology, “employment” is brutally reduced to a purely instrumental equation: “Job → Income → Survival.” This logic chains human existence to capital’s hiring whims, systematically equating joblessness with social worthlessness. Unemployment becomes morally weaponized—branded as proof of personal inadequacy, market […]
View All Content