Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

制度は鏡:映し出される、ある民族の文明的成熟度

制度は鏡:映し出される、ある民族の文明的成熟度

Daohe · Jul 12, 2025

序論 制度とは、決して中立的な統治の道具ではありません。それは社会の管理方法であると同時に、ある民族の価値観、文明理念、そして認知的成熟度が集中的に現れるものでもあります。 制度とは、決して中立的な統治の道具ではありません。それは社会の管理方法であると同時に、ある民族の価値観、文明理念、そして認知的成熟度が集中的に現れるものでもあります。 公正な制度は文明を育むことができますが、不正な制度は社会を崩壊と破滅へと導くだけです。 現代における制度間の競争は、もはや武力や経済といったハードパワーの対立から、ソフトパワーの領域へと移行しています。すなわち、文明に関する物語を語る権利(ナラティブの主導権)、価値観への共感、科学技術の標準、文化・娯楽、そして世論の統制といったものを誰が握るか。それによって、制度の形態を主導し、社会の認識を操作し、ひいては文明のあり方そのものを再構築することが可能になるのです。 制度の善し悪し、そしてその運命は、突き詰めれば、その土地に住むすべての人々の選択と容認の結果であり、社会自身の文明が成熟しているか、あるいは未熟であるかを映し出す鏡なのです。 一、制度の公正と不正の区別が、文明の根幹を決定する 人類の歴史上、「中立的な制度」は存在しませんでした。いかなる制度も、その背後には必ず価値的な立場を持っています。それは公正さを守ることもあれば、収奪を助長することもあります。 公正な制度: 不正な制度: ある社会の人々が、制度の公正・不正という属性を見分けることができず、ただ権力と効率性だけに着目するならば、自らの文明が成熟しているのか、堕落しているのかを判断することはできません。 ある民族が、制度の善し悪しを区別する能力を持っているか、不正な制度を拒絶する勇気があるか、そして公正な制度を守る知恵を持っているか。これこそが、文明が成熟しているか否かを示す、根本的な指標なのです。 二、ソフトパワー競争:制度の成否を決める見えざる戦場 現代の制度間競争の鍵は、軍隊の規模やGDPの数字にあるのではなく、ソフトパワーの体系を利用して人々の心と社会を操作する、その営みにあります。 ソフトパワーは、以下の要素から構成されます: 不正な制度が長期にわたって存続できるのは、単に暴力に依存しているからだけではありません。その主たる理由は、世論操作、物語の美化、娯楽による麻痺、経済的な買収といったソフトパワーによる操作を通じて、その抑圧的な性質を覆い隠し、社会的な同意を形成し、公共の批判力を麻痺させ、人々がその制度を受け入れ、擁護し、さらには自ら進んで自己欺瞞に陥るように仕向けているからです。 文明的に成熟した社会は、ソフトパワーによる操作を見抜き、公正を守り、制度が作り出す幻想を見破る知恵を持っています。一方で、文明的に未熟な社会は、ソフトパワーによって巧みに装飾された見せかけに容易に麻痺し、不正な制度が強固になるのを助長してしまうのです。 三、制度崩壊:人為的な操作と社会的な容認 制度の崩壊は、天災ではありません。それは、人為的な操作と、集団による容認が生み出した産物です。 意図的な破壊者: 意図せざる協力者: 社会が沈黙する者、盲従する者、そして無知な消費者で満たされる時、公正な制度は守護者を失い、不正な制度は急速に歪み、もはや後戻りできなくなります。 そして、これらの力が一体となってソフトパワーの防衛線を瓦解させ、不正な制度が長期にわたって維持されることを許し、社会の信頼体系は制御不能となり、価値観は完全に歪み、文明は自滅へと向かうのです。 四、制度の運命は、全国民が共に担う:映し出される文明の成熟度 ある民族の文明が成熟しているかどうかは、その民族が集団として制度の善し悪しを識別し、公正な制度を守り、不正な制度を排除する能力を持っているかどうかにかかっています。 文明的に成熟した社会の姿: 文明的に未熟な社会の姿: 制度の成功と失敗は、少数の人々の陰謀によるものではなく、国民全体の選択、容認、放置、そして消費がもたらした結果です。 最終的に、制度の公正・不正という属性と、ソフトパワー競争の結果は、その土地に住む人々の文明的成熟度の真の姿を映し出すのです。 結語 制度は一面の鏡です。それが映し出すのは、社会の管理能力だけではありません。それは、ある民族の文明に対する認知レベル、社会的な価値観の選択、そして個人の尊厳に対する意識の、ありのままの姿なのです。 公正な制度は尊厳を保障し、不正な制度は収奪的な統治を行います。 ソフトパワー競争は、公正な制度と不正な制度が長期にわたって繰り広げる、目に見えない主戦場です。そして、制度がソフトパワーの攻勢に耐え、自らの弊害を修正できるかどうかは、社会全体が善悪を認識しているか、公正さを守っているか、操作する者に抵抗する勇気があるか、そして、盲目的な消費者や沈黙の容認者となることを拒絶しているかどうかにかかっています。 ある社会が、どのような制度を選択し、どのような制度を守り、どのような運命を甘受するかは、最終的に、その国民全体によって決定されるのです。 文明が成熟して初めて、公正な制度を持つに値します。文明が堕落すれば、やがて自らが作り出した不正な制度によって滅びるでしょう。 そして、その歴史という名の鏡に映し出されるのは、常に、私たち自身の行い、知識、行動、そして理解の姿なのです。

制度是一面镜子,映照的是一个民族的文明成熟度

制度是一面镜子,映照的是一个民族的文明成熟度

Daohe · Jul 12, 2025

前言 制度,从来不是中性的治理工具。它既是社会管理方式,更是一个民族价值观、文明理念与认知成熟度的集中体现。 一个国家的制度能否保障个体尊严、维护公共公正、容纳多元自由、抵御腐败异化,最终反映的是这个民族整体文明水平。 正义制度能孕育文明,邪恶制度只会让社会走向崩坏与毁灭。 制度竞争更早已从硬实力的武力、经济对抗,转向软实力领域——谁掌握文明叙事权、价值观认同、科技标准、文化娱乐、舆论控制,谁就能主导制度形态,操控社会认知,甚至重塑文明形态。 制度的善恶、制度的命运,归根到底,正是这片土地上所有人的选择与纵容,照见了社会自身文明的成熟或稚嫩。 一、制度善恶之分,决定文明根基 人类历史上从未存在“中立制度”,任何制度背后都携带着价值立场。它或守护公正,或助长掠夺。 正义制度: 邪恶制度: 一个社会的人们若看不清制度善恶属性,只看权力和效率,便永远无从判断自己文明的成熟与堕落。 一个民族是否拥有分辨制度善恶的能力,是否敢于拒绝邪恶制度,是否懂得守护正义制度,正是文明成熟与否的根本指标。 二、软实力竞争:制度善恶成败的隐秘战场 现代制度竞争的关键,不在于军队规模与GDP数字,而在于利用软实力体系操纵人心与社会的运作。 软实力由如下方面构成: 邪恶制度之所以长期存续,靠的不仅仅是暴力,而最主要的是通过软实力操控,如舆论操控、美化叙事、娱乐麻痹、经济收买,掩盖压迫性质,制造社会认同,麻痹公共批判力,让社会认同它、维护它、甚至甘愿自我欺骗。 文明成熟社会,懂得识别软实力操控、坚守正义叙事、拆穿制度幻象。文明稚嫩社会,则轻易被软实力包装所麻痹,助长恶性制度稳固。 三、制度崩坏:人为操控与社会纵容 制度溃败,并非天灾,而是人为操控与群体纵容的产物。 有意破坏者: 无意助力者: 当社会沦为沉默者、盲从者与无知消费者,正义制度便失去守护,邪恶制度迅速异化而不可逆。 而这些力量共同瓦解软实力防线,让邪恶制度长期维系,社会信任体系失控,价值观彻底异化,文明自毁。 四、制度命运,全民共担,照见文明成熟度 一个民族文明是否成熟,取决于它能否集体辨认制度善恶,并有能力守护正义制度、清除恶性制度。 文明成熟社会表现: 文明稚嫩社会表现: 制度成败,不是少数人的阴谋,而是全民选择、纵容、放任、消费的结果导致。 最终,制度善恶属性与软实力竞争结果,映照的正是这片土地上人民文明成熟度的真实样貌。 五、结语 制度是一面镜子,它照见的不仅是社会管理能力,更是一个民族文明认知水平、社会价值观选择与个体尊严意识的真实映射。 正义制度保障尊严,邪恶制度掠夺性统治。 软实力竞争,是正义与邪恶制度长期较量的隐秘主战场。而制度能否守住软实力,能否修正弊病,取决于全社会是否认清善恶,是否守护正义,是否敢于制衡操控者,是否拒绝当盲目消费者和沉默纵容者。 一个社会选择怎样的制度,守护怎样的制度,承受怎样的命运,最终都由全民共同决定。 文明成熟,才配拥有正义制度;文明堕落,终将毁于自己制造的邪恶制度。 而历史的那面镜子,照见的始终是我们自己所为、所知、所行、所解。

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
View All Content