Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

现代伪善国度经济繁荣的秘诀“单一政策指令经济”

Kishou · May 23, 2025

在现代世界经济体系中,现代“奇迹型”国家里,经济似乎总是充满活力:数据光鲜、指标飘红、项目井喷、产业政策不断。而一切看似的“市场繁荣”,实际上却有着一个极为高效的运行秘诀——“单一的政府政策指令经济”。是的,这不是计划经济,也不是自由市场经济,而是一种更具适应性的混合体:政府发话,经济运转;民众听话,财富生成。 这种模式既不需要市场机制的复杂博弈,也无需企业家的冒险精神,更不需要什么公平竞争。只要政策一挥手,资金就能精准流向“重点领域”;只要你肯点头,资源立马倾斜到“鼓励产业”;只要企业听话,就能“获得补贴”,哪怕效率低、创新无、风险高也无妨。 这正是伪善国度经济的精髓所在——表面尊重市场,实则掌控一切。在这里,“自由经济”是用来安抚民众与骗取外资的口号,而真正起决定作用的,是一纸文件与一声命令。只要牢牢掌握话语权、审批权与财政分配权,就能永远保证财富在“值得拥有的人”手中循环。 至于那些梦想创新、自主、自由的市场参与者?对不起,财富游戏早有剧本,你的角色只是“配角”,或者更准确地说,是“交税的群众演员”。 在这样高明的制度安排下,国家看似在腾飞,政府不断积累财富,舆论鼓掌叫好,数据一路向上——一切都好得不能更好。除了民众,除了企业家,除了被管控的经济本身。 一、披着市场的外衣,抵制市场的灵魂 在现代伪善国度的经济舞台上,“市场”只是道具,真正的主角从不登台,却掌控全场。 为了稳住内外人心,他们总是高举“市场经济”的旗帜,宣称“我们坚持市场在资源配置中起决定性作用”,说得比唱的还动听。口头上赞美创新创业,出台各种“支持民营经济”的文件,仿佛即将进入自由竞争的黄金时代。 但转身之间,审批照旧垄断、许可证依旧紧握、融资通道层层设卡、资源价格政策操控如旧。民间资本想要生存,不是拼效率,不是比技术,而是看你是否“识趣”、是否“站好队”。一旦谁天真地真搞自由市场,那就如同裸泳者踏进了有鲨鱼的池塘——结局可想而知。 他们对市场活动的控制是精妙的,甚至艺术性的:允许你开公司,但不许你跑得快;让你活着,但不给你壮大;允许你赚钱,但最好不要赚得比官方更聪明。 自由的口号用来安民,真实的控制用来致富——当然,只是让权贵致富。 二、政策即法规,权力即价格:政府主导经济的“神迹”逻辑 在这些现代国度中,政策不是工具,而是上帝。经济学原理是参考,领导意图才是纲领。没有哪个产业是真正“自然发展”的,一切成长都必须经过“指定路线”。 此时,市场逻辑、价格机制、供需规律不过是象征性的术语,被一种名为“政治经济学”的混合体所吞噬。 “政治经济学”的本质,不是理论上的交叉学科,而是一切经济事务归属政治决策的遮羞布。土地归政策、资金归审批、市场归导向、创新归汇报,而一切失败归你,一切成功归它。 政策即价格,指令即投资,资源配给不是效率优先,而是忠诚优先;利润不是由市场决定,而是由接近权力的人分配。 这不是经济学,这是“政治经济炼金术”——既懂金钱流动,更懂权力布局。产业风口不是由供需决定,而是由“开会的意图”决定;投资回报不是由市场效率驱动,而是靠“靠山背景”托起。 更妙的是,他们还设立了众多“经济智库”,以学术外衣包装政策意志,让一切指令都披上“科学”的外壳。 “为政以术”的巅峰在于:不仅统管经济,还教会人们如何相信这一切理所当然。 于是,真正的企业家变成了“政策捕手”;产业升级变成了“造概念”;科技投入变成了“投领导所好”;研究院变成了“政策润笔中心”。 三、掏空民间经济,打造“听话者生存经济体” 在这套伪善经济系统里,最大的敌人,不是通货膨胀,不是全球贸易壁垒,也不是经济周期,而是——不听话的民营经济。 因为他们知道,真正的自由经济体,意味着企业有独立思想,有资本积累能力,有政治影响力。而这些,都会对“一元化的政治经济秩序”构成威胁。所以,最聪明的方式不是一刀切清除,而是温水煮青蛙式地掏空你、驯化你、改造你。 你想贷款?要符合“引导产业”;你想上市?得符合“价值导向”;你想扩张?先看看你有没有“政治风险”;你想活得长久?那你得“保持低调”。 最终,民营企业慢慢变成“政策依附型”,利润模式从“市场竞争”转向“跑关系得补贴”;经营逻辑从“提高效率”变成“懂得听话”;企业文化从“挑战不可能”,变成“按文件执行”。 这就是“听话者经济”:你不是被淘汰,是被教育;不是没机会,是你不够配合。而你最值得骄傲的资产,不是技术、不是产品,而是你身后的领导是谁。 四、制造“自由vs计划”的幻象,掩盖真正的贫瘠之源 为了掩盖真相,伪善国度非常擅长制造概念迷雾。他们故意向公众灌输一种二元划分:不是“自由市场”,就是“计划经济”;不是“放任资本”,就是“国家调控”。 他们从不提真正控制资源配置、阻碍财富创造的,是“单一的政府政策指令经济”——一个把政治权力当成经济引擎的制度结构。 在这种结构下,一切经济行为都像踩在地雷阵上:路线偏一点,就成“违规”;发展快一点,就成“风险”;独立说句话,就成“异议”;你越有实力,就越成为眼中钉肉中刺。  而所有人却在这种误导中自我催眠——以为计划经济是过去式,自由市场是目标,而当下的困境只是“转型期的阵痛”。 他们不知道,这种“政策主导+权力配置+伪自由外衣经济模式”的混合结构,才是真正的民众经济贫瘠之源。它不是暂时的妥协,而是一种精密设计;不是路径中的弯路,而是通向深渊的主道。 结语:繁荣是财富的幻觉,贫瘠枷锁是你的常态 当一个国家的经济繁荣需要靠政府政策成了唯一指令,当经济变成权力的附庸,当“听话”成了发展的前提时,这样的国家就不再是一个经济体,而是一座披着金色外衣的监狱。 财富,并不会在这样的体制中增长,它只会流向权力结构的顶端,变成一种抽干百姓血汗、扼杀企业精神、摧毁自由意志的装饰。 而这正是现代伪善国度的最大魔术:用“经济发展”的名义,建造“资源集中”的高墙;用“自由市场”的名词,实施“政治优先”的铁律。最终,让民众一边呼喊富强,一边走进永远贫瘠的深渊。 他们的财富,是你自由的代价;他们的稳定,是你创造力的牺牲;他们的制度,是你梦想的坟墓。 而他们之所以还能高喊“经济奇迹”,只因你还未醒来,还在为一纸补贴欢呼,为一次审批感恩,为一个许可证而俯身。 你若始终听话,他们就能一直富有。这,才是他们真正的繁荣之道。

非公民制度下的“苟且偷生”与公民制度下的“尊严荣耀”

Yicheng · May 21, 2025

世间的社会制度大致可分两类,一类叫非公民制度,一类叫公民制度。这两种制度,看似只是权力结构不同,其实背后决定了一个国家的国民性格、社会运行逻辑、人际交往方式,甚至连价值观、语言习惯、审美趣味都天差地别。 制度不同,社会走向不同,个体活法也截然不同。 一、非公民制度:人人苟且,处处潜规则,个个带面具 在非公民制度下,人活着的首要目标从来不是“尊严”“价值”“自由”“人格”,而是“安全”“饭碗”“平安度日”。这里没有公民,只有“顺民”“愚民”“奴民”。 所有人都活在权力之下,处在随时可能被碾压的恐惧里。久而久之,苟且偷生便成了全民共识。 这种社会里,法律是挂在墙上的装饰品,权力才是解决问题的最终手段。办事靠关系,升迁靠裙带,生存靠逢迎,个性靠埋藏,良知靠忍耐。所谓“识时务者为俊杰”“明哲保身”“多一事不如少一事”,成了人生圭臬。 每个人都活在层层潜规则里,公开规则没人信,私下规则没人敢明说。表面一团和气,背后尔虞我诈。谁敢坚持原则,谁就活不下去;谁敢据理力争,谁就被当成傻子,甚至被群起而攻之。 二、长期苟且,慢慢腐蚀的不只是尊严,是整个人性 苟且久了,麻木了,不仅不觉得羞耻,反而觉得是“处世之道”。人性本该有的勇气、正义感、责任心,慢慢被小心谨慎、明哲保身、事不关己替代。连人与人之间本应有的信任、善意、温暖,也都在防备、猜疑、算计中消耗殆尽。 具体表现如下: 一个制度的最大罪恶,不是压迫一代人,而是用苟且文化,毁掉几代人的人格和认知。 当所有人都默认苟且是唯一出路,整个民族就陷入了集体麻木,集体怯懦,集体失语。 记得东方之国有一位陈寅恪先生曾经说过一句话:我们这块土地,这些人终其一生大多所行不过“苟且”二字。所谓风光,不过是苟且有术,行路坎坷,不过是苟且无门。 三、公民制度:让人第一次真正像个人一样活着 而一旦进入公民制度,情况就彻底不一样了。公民制度意味着每个人拥有不可剥夺的基本权利,有权发声,有权选择,有权监督,有权参与国家事务,有权批评权力。人与人之间基于平等、规则、法律而存在,而不是靠关系、后台、圈子维系。 在这样的制度下,普通人第一次能带着尊严抬头挺胸活着,不用依附、不用巴结、不用装孙子。敢讲真话,不怕权贵,不用担心一条微博、一句牢骚、一张朋友圈就给自己招来麻烦。人与人之间的交往基于诚意、规则和契约,而不是靠拍马屁、攀关系。 人不再需要苟且偷生,社会不再靠潜规则维持秩序。权力受到限制,官员受公众监督,公民拥有表达权、知情权、选择权、抗争权。规则公开透明,能者上,庸者下,犯错就付代价,行善得尊重。 更重要的是,人性被还原,勇气被唤醒,良知被保护,一个个鲜活有血性的个体得以涌现,而不是一堆面无表情的行尸走肉。 四、愚民惧变,苟且者恨光明,奴性者反对觉醒 可遗憾的是,哪怕公民制度的优越性再明显,依然有大批人排斥它。因为他们早已适应了苟且偷生的环境,变得胆小、自私、麻木,甚至开始反感阳光。用所谓是法律来约束正义的到来,更有甚者把正义直接宣判为违法。 他们害怕透明的制度,害怕平等的规则,害怕说话要负责任,害怕失去特权小圈子,害怕要靠真本事吃饭。 所以一旦有人提出要建立公民制度,他们第一个跳出来反对,说“别折腾”“别学西方那一套”“安稳过日子最重要”。 他们真正害怕的不是制度改革,而是怕被公正公开的阳光照见自己的卑微、怯懦与肮脏。 这种人活得像奴隶,却怕自由,活得像行尸,却恨活人,活得像影子,却厌恶阳光。 五、制度好坏,决定民族兴衰,国运存亡 一个国家真正的兴旺,不是GDP多高,楼盖多大,脸面多好看,而是这个国家里普通人能不能有尊严地活着,有权利地说话,有担当地做人,有信心地子孙后代。而不是直接摆烂躺平。 非公民制度,注定养出一群奴性顺民,社会靠潜规则维持,个体靠虚伪苟且度日,最终毁掉人格、扭曲文化、埋葬未来。 公民制度,养出敢于担当、心有尊严、彼此信任、勇于担当的公民社会,哪怕暂时混乱,也比长久的苟且来得有骨气、有希望。 结语: 世上最深的悲哀,莫过于苟且偷生者久了,开始嘲笑有尊严的人。最恶的制度,不是杀人,而是剥夺人性。真正的国家大计,不是GDP翻番,不是高楼成群,而是让普通人不用苟且偷生,人人能带着尊严荣耀活着。 愿这片土地终有一天,行走其间者无须苟且,开口说话者无须畏惧,人人活得像个堂堂正正的人。

read more

Related Content

Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Friendship in different life stages
Friendship in different life stages
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 6, 2025
On the journey of life, friendship is like a mirror—reflecting how much we have grown and how far we have come. From carefree childhood playmates to soul-level companions in our later years, friendship isn’t static—it evolves as our minds expand, our values shift, and our lives unfold. Like leveling up in a game (but with […]
View All Content