Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: What kind of future are our children actually growing into?

We allow children to be willful because that is part of what growing up means—moving from ignorance to understanding, from impulsiveness to maturity, from confusion to clarity. Willfulness is a natural part of learning to face reality, make sense of rules, and understand a complex world. A society that cannot make space for a child’s willfulness is one that risks suppressing vitality and creativity.

But there is a deeper problem. What happens when children are not just willful, but are influenced by ignorance, hatred, and pressure—when they begin to embrace cruelty, violence, or extremism, even becoming messengers for these forces? At that point, their willfulness is no longer a sign of youth—it becomes a warning sign for the future.

The tragedy of our time: when “justice” becomes a mask for hatred

June 9, 2025 — A chilling piece of international news: Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old Swedish climate activist, was intercepted by Israeli forces aboard the Madelene, a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza. Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, she became part of a political and violent confrontation.

On the surface, this story appears to be just another chapter in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, or a case of humanitarian intervention. But what has truly stirred debate is not the ship or the mission—it is Greta herself, and the influence she exerts.

Once celebrated as a global icon of climate action, peace, and youthful moral courage, Greta was the girl who stood at the UN, boldly calling out world leaders for their inaction on the climate crisis. She inspired millions of young people to speak up for the planet. But now, swept up in the waves of political radicalization, she seems to be drifting away from her original cause. No longer just a voice for the environment, she is increasingly being seen as a mouthpiece for extremist narratives—openly supporting violence, and lending legitimacy to hate in the name of justice.

This is one of the most striking examples of media manipulation in the 21st century: the anger and goodwill of youth are repackaged as “justice”; the harsh and complex realities of political conflict are reduced to simplistic black-and-white narratives; and what should be a call to conscience and social responsibility is replaced by group hysteria and ideological obsession.

The real concern of Greta Thunberg lies in what she has come to symbolize—a generation of young people who, under the influence of social media, online discourse, and political polarization, are rapidly losing their sense of judgment, their ability to reason, and their grasp of the world’s complexity. Instead, they are becoming carriers of hatred, generators of outrage, and tools for the normalization of violence.

We must not let our children grow up in hatred

We can forgive young people for their defiance of authority, their anger at the world, their questioning of injustice—these are natural parts of growing up.

We can understand their impulsiveness, their emotional outbursts, even their moments of extremism, as expressions of youthful ignorance.

But what we must not tolerate—what we absolutely cannot enable—is their voluntary embrace of hatred, their fascination with violence, their worship of extremism. We cannot let them mistake obsession for conviction, or destruction for justice.

Behind every disaster, every collapse of society, every eruption of violence, there is always a group of young people who have been seduced by extremist ideas, inflamed by dogma, and taken hostage by hatred.

These were young people who could have been builders, but were turned into destroyers. They could have been hope, but became a living nightmare.

The Greta incident is not just a headline—it is a reflection of something far deeper: a society losing its values, an education system failing its youth, media shaping public opinion with bias, and social networks driving people into emotional extremes.

How does a young person, once full of idealism and compassion, lose her independent judgment and slide into the arms of extremism, giving legitimacy to political violence? The answer is not just her personal tragedy—it is a symptom of a sick era.

Who will protect the children—who will protect the future?

Yes, children are our future.

But the future is not automatically beautiful. It must be shaped, protected, and guided by reason and kindness.

And that responsibility falls on us—all of us.

Society needs to teach the kids:

  • Kindness is not blind allegiance, but the ability to judge right from wrong independently.
  • Justice is not a mask for violence, but a commitment to fairness and the refusal to harm the innocent.
  • Anger is human—but obsession is dangerous. Questioning authority is healthy, but blindly following extremism is not.
  • True courage means holding on to reason in a world full of complexity—not getting swept away by waves of emotional frenzy.

Parents, educators, the media, institutions, and every single adult must take up this responsibility.

In an age of noise and chaos, reason and conscience are the most precious—and the most scarce—resources.

If we allow our youth to grow up immersed in hatred, obsession, violence, and political fanaticism, the future will not belong to the builders and protectors. It will belong to the agitators and destroyers.

And that is a future no civilization can afford.

A final word

Today, we see Greta. But in every country, there are countless young people who have been influenced by extremist ideologies, manipulated by online narratives, and seduced by the illusion of false justice.

If we continue to sleepwalk through this crisis—if we do not wake up to educate, protect, and guide them—if we do not reflect on the collapse of our values, the polarization of public discourse, and the imbalance in our education systems, then twenty years from now, we may find ourselves in a world consumed by hatred, where violence is justified, extremism is normalized, and no safe ground remains.

Yes, children are our future.

But whether that future is filled with light or swallowed by darkness depends entirely on what we choose to plant in their hearts today.

Kindness may be naïve—but justice must never be twisted into a weapon of hate.

Confusion is part of growing up—but society must never stop offering wisdom and direction.

We cannot afford to lose our way any longer.

The future belongs to them. But protecting that future—that is our responsibility.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

空性是什么?从空智与达摩祖师的对话说起

Master Wonder · Feb 12, 2025

在《达摩传》中,有这样一则意味深长的片段。 一日,僧人空智来到少林寺,恭敬地向达摩祖师顶礼,并请教佛法的空性。他拱手问道: “大师是达摩祖师吧?贫僧空智,对佛法的理解尚浅,愿请大师指点。心、佛以及众生,三者皆空。现象的执性亦是空,无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶,一切皆空。这般见解,可对?” 达摩静静地看着他,忽然伸手,在他头上重重敲了一下。空智被打得生疼,立刻皱眉道:“大师,你为什么打人?” 达摩微微一笑,淡然说道:“你既然说一切皆空,那何来痛苦?” 空智愣住,陷入沉思。片刻后,他喃喃道:“既然一切皆空,为何我仍然感到疼痛?若连痛苦都不能超越,这‘空’又有何意义?” 达摩缓缓说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。” 空智顿时领悟,合十叩拜。 何为“空”? 空智之所以困惑,是因为他落入了“理空”的执着。所谓“理空”,是从概念上理解空性,而未能亲证。 当他说“一切皆空”时,他所理解的“空”仍停留在语言之中,停留在“否定有”的层面。因此,当痛觉袭来,他的心识立刻生起“痛”的分别,反映出他的“空”并未真正落实。 “空”不是虚无,而是“无自性”。 佛法中的“空”并不等于虚无,而是指诸法无自性。世界上的一切事物,包括心、佛、众生,并非独立存在,而是相互依存、因缘和合之生灭显现。因此,所谓的“痛”也并非绝对存在,而是缘起而生。若执着“痛”为实有,则堕入实有论;若执着“痛”为虚无,则落入顽空论。 达摩的痛击,正是要破除空智的顽空见,令他直面自身的执着。真正的“空”并非否定“痛”的存在,而是超越“痛”所带来的分别。若能见到“痛”无自性,则“痛”即不碍“空”,“空”亦不碍“痛”。 “空”是一种超越对立二元的智慧 达摩所言:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物。”这一番话正是指向空性之实相。 “空”即自在,随缘不执 空智之“空”是消极的,他以为空性是否定一切的多元性。只要在概念上否定“我是我”,“痛不是痛”,就是契入空性。 然而,真正的空是超越、是圆融,是“无碍”的智慧。它不否定世间法,而是于世间法中自在无碍。就如同我是父亲,可我还可以是男人,老板、牧师、教师等等,这一切的身份和社会关系并不会束缚我。 譬如水,无形无相,因器成形,随缘而变。这正是“空”之妙用——它不是破坏存在,而是让存在不受束缚。 当空智执着于“无圣无凡、无善无恶”,他仍未超越对立。真正的“空”并不是去否定善恶,而是了知善恶皆缘起无自性,在缘起中自如行持。 正如六祖惠能所言:“前念不生即心,后念不灭即佛。”念起即随,念灭不留,即是随缘不执,空而不空。 达摩的一击,是慈悲的棒喝 达摩这一击,是顿悟之机,是破除概念之障。空智若仅停留在理论上探讨空性,便始终无法超越。唯有当他真正直面自心,感受“痛”之生灭,才能了知“空”不碍“痛”,“痛”亦即是“空”。 这正是禅门直指人心的风格——不落言诠,直入本源。若执着“空”而拒绝现象,便落入偏见;若执着“有”而迷失本性,亦是妄念。唯有“空”与“有”双融,才能真正契入佛法的智慧。 正如《心经》所言:“色即是空,空即是色。” 再谈达摩这一击,是禅门棒喝,是不假言辞的直接点悟。空智因痛而惊,显然,他的“空”仍停留在概念之中,未能真正超越世俗分别。这一击,让他不得不重新思考:“何谓空?为何痛?如果一切皆空,为何我仍在执着?” 空并非虚无,而是无自性 佛法所言的“空”,并不是对一切的否定,也不是单纯的“无”。若将空理解为“什么都不存在”,便堕入“断灭空”,此非正见。真正的空,是“无自性”——世间一切事物皆因缘和合而生,无独立不变的本体。 譬如水,若无风,它静如明镜;若风起,它便波涛汹涌。水的“相”在变,但水的“本质”却从未消失。世间万象皆如是——它们是暂时的显现,而非绝对的存在。 空智的错误,在于他仅仅停留在否定层面,以为“一切皆空”就是不承认圣凡、善恶、施受。然而,真正的空,不是去“否定”这些现象,而是超越对它们的执着。达摩这一击,便是要让空智看到,他所说的“空”并未真正融入自心。 在这里说明一下,空智、达摩与佛陀,无二无别,切不可认为空智修行低,而达摩就高,不要让相法迷惑自己的自性圆融无碍。 空的两重境界:理空与证空 1. 理空——概念上的理解 这是初学者常见的阶段,以思辨的方式去理解空性。例如,空智所言的“无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶”,正是典型的“理空”——从理论上否定对立,认为万法皆空。 然而,光靠概念无法破除执着。达摩之所以一击,是因为空智仍在“理”上,而未能亲身体验“空”。如果空智真的证悟空性,他即使感知到痛,也不会生起对痛的执着,更不会质问达摩“你为何打我?” 2. 证空——超越概念的直接体验 证空,并不是通过逻辑推演得出的结论,而是通过直观的觉悟——直接体认到“痛亦是空,空不碍痛”。换句话说,不是去否定痛的存在,而是从中看到痛的无自性、不可得。 证悟空性的境界,犹如镜子——它照见一切,但不执著于所映之像。圣人、凡夫,善恶、施受,皆如水中月、镜中花,有因缘便现,因缘灭则不留痕迹。 比如,想象你在一场暴风雨中行走,雨水拍打在你脸上,寒冷刺骨,然而你并不因此生气或痛苦。你知道,这场风雨只是暂时的,终会过去。你不再执着于那股冷风和雨水,而是安然接受它们的存在,感知它们的瞬息万变。 世间的是非、苦乐,不过是幻影,终将过去。若执着于这些,就如同在水上写字,终究徒劳无功。 达摩所言:看、听、知的真正含义 达摩最后说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。”这句话,正是对“空”最深刻的阐释。 在《维摩诘经》中,文殊菩萨问众菩萨:“如何入不二法门?”众菩萨各自回答,皆未彻底。最后,维摩诘默然不语。文殊叹道:“是乃真入不二法门。” 不落言说,才是究竟。不以分别心求空,而是自然安住于空,这才是“看、听、知”的真实境界。 如何践行空性? 佛法讲空,不是让人逃避现实,而是让人超越现实的束缚,活得更自在、圆融。真正的空性,是让人在生活中随缘而行,却不被境遇所困。《般若波罗蜜多心经》就是这样的书籍,让心灵觉悟,自性自觉。 1. 生活中的“空” 空,并不意味着消极无为,而是随缘不执。 面对困境时,若能看到“一切无自性,终归变化”,便能不沉溺于烦恼之中。 当有人批评你、欺骗你、误解你时,不执著于这些现象,你就不会生嗔恨心,亦不会因其而痛苦。 2. […]

The soul falls through ignorance, character through selfishness

Master Wonder · Feb 11, 2025

The Shared Origin of All Faiths is not just a theory but a path of cultivation and practice. Human growth is a process of awakening and a refinement of character. The soul descends into darkness through ignorance, while character erodes through selfishness. Ignorance is the absence of truth, a loss of clarity, while selfishness is […]

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
The burden of livelihood in childhood: the hidden crisis of Confucian education in modern East Asia
The burden of livelihood in childhood: the hidden crisis of Confucian education in modern East Asia
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jul 2, 2025
Introduction: A hidden disease at the heart of civilization On the surface, Confucian-influenced societies such as Japan, South Korea, and Singapore appear to embody a successful Eastern model of modern civilization—orderly, safe, and built upon a tightly run education system. But beneath this polished exterior lies a deep, systemic fracture in their civilizational foundation: an […]
Time, history, and how we understand them
Time, history, and how we understand them
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 5, 2025
Since the dawn of human civilization, history has carried people’s collective memory and experience. People have long tried to draw lessons from it, hoping to avoid repeating past mistakes and to push society forward. Yet when we look back across thousands of years, the rise and fall of dynasties, the cycles of war and peace, […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content