Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: What kind of future are our children actually growing into?

We allow children to be willful because that is part of what growing up means—moving from ignorance to understanding, from impulsiveness to maturity, from confusion to clarity. Willfulness is a natural part of learning to face reality, make sense of rules, and understand a complex world. A society that cannot make space for a child’s willfulness is one that risks suppressing vitality and creativity.

But there is a deeper problem. What happens when children are not just willful, but are influenced by ignorance, hatred, and pressure—when they begin to embrace cruelty, violence, or extremism, even becoming messengers for these forces? At that point, their willfulness is no longer a sign of youth—it becomes a warning sign for the future.

The tragedy of our time: when “justice” becomes a mask for hatred

June 9, 2025 — A chilling piece of international news: Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old Swedish climate activist, was intercepted by Israeli forces aboard the Madelene, a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza. Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, she became part of a political and violent confrontation.

On the surface, this story appears to be just another chapter in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, or a case of humanitarian intervention. But what has truly stirred debate is not the ship or the mission—it is Greta herself, and the influence she exerts.

Once celebrated as a global icon of climate action, peace, and youthful moral courage, Greta was the girl who stood at the UN, boldly calling out world leaders for their inaction on the climate crisis. She inspired millions of young people to speak up for the planet. But now, swept up in the waves of political radicalization, she seems to be drifting away from her original cause. No longer just a voice for the environment, she is increasingly being seen as a mouthpiece for extremist narratives—openly supporting violence, and lending legitimacy to hate in the name of justice.

This is one of the most striking examples of media manipulation in the 21st century: the anger and goodwill of youth are repackaged as “justice”; the harsh and complex realities of political conflict are reduced to simplistic black-and-white narratives; and what should be a call to conscience and social responsibility is replaced by group hysteria and ideological obsession.

The real concern of Greta Thunberg lies in what she has come to symbolize—a generation of young people who, under the influence of social media, online discourse, and political polarization, are rapidly losing their sense of judgment, their ability to reason, and their grasp of the world’s complexity. Instead, they are becoming carriers of hatred, generators of outrage, and tools for the normalization of violence.

We must not let our children grow up in hatred

We can forgive young people for their defiance of authority, their anger at the world, their questioning of injustice—these are natural parts of growing up.

We can understand their impulsiveness, their emotional outbursts, even their moments of extremism, as expressions of youthful ignorance.

But what we must not tolerate—what we absolutely cannot enable—is their voluntary embrace of hatred, their fascination with violence, their worship of extremism. We cannot let them mistake obsession for conviction, or destruction for justice.

Behind every disaster, every collapse of society, every eruption of violence, there is always a group of young people who have been seduced by extremist ideas, inflamed by dogma, and taken hostage by hatred.

These were young people who could have been builders, but were turned into destroyers. They could have been hope, but became a living nightmare.

The Greta incident is not just a headline—it is a reflection of something far deeper: a society losing its values, an education system failing its youth, media shaping public opinion with bias, and social networks driving people into emotional extremes.

How does a young person, once full of idealism and compassion, lose her independent judgment and slide into the arms of extremism, giving legitimacy to political violence? The answer is not just her personal tragedy—it is a symptom of a sick era.

Who will protect the children—who will protect the future?

Yes, children are our future.

But the future is not automatically beautiful. It must be shaped, protected, and guided by reason and kindness.

And that responsibility falls on us—all of us.

Society needs to teach the kids:

  • Kindness is not blind allegiance, but the ability to judge right from wrong independently.
  • Justice is not a mask for violence, but a commitment to fairness and the refusal to harm the innocent.
  • Anger is human—but obsession is dangerous. Questioning authority is healthy, but blindly following extremism is not.
  • True courage means holding on to reason in a world full of complexity—not getting swept away by waves of emotional frenzy.

Parents, educators, the media, institutions, and every single adult must take up this responsibility.

In an age of noise and chaos, reason and conscience are the most precious—and the most scarce—resources.

If we allow our youth to grow up immersed in hatred, obsession, violence, and political fanaticism, the future will not belong to the builders and protectors. It will belong to the agitators and destroyers.

And that is a future no civilization can afford.

A final word

Today, we see Greta. But in every country, there are countless young people who have been influenced by extremist ideologies, manipulated by online narratives, and seduced by the illusion of false justice.

If we continue to sleepwalk through this crisis—if we do not wake up to educate, protect, and guide them—if we do not reflect on the collapse of our values, the polarization of public discourse, and the imbalance in our education systems, then twenty years from now, we may find ourselves in a world consumed by hatred, where violence is justified, extremism is normalized, and no safe ground remains.

Yes, children are our future.

But whether that future is filled with light or swallowed by darkness depends entirely on what we choose to plant in their hearts today.

Kindness may be naïve—but justice must never be twisted into a weapon of hate.

Confusion is part of growing up—but society must never stop offering wisdom and direction.

We cannot afford to lose our way any longer.

The future belongs to them. But protecting that future—that is our responsibility.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「利民」と「利国」の違い──現代国家統治の正道と秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家の存在理由は、スローガンでも領土でも GDP でもない。 国民の基本的権利を保障し、生活の尊厳を守り、幸福度を高めること――これだけが国家の存在意義である。 もし国家が強大でも国民が困窮し、国の栄光が語られても国民が不安に苛まれているのなら、その国家はうわべだけの空洞だ。見た目は繁栄していても、内部には問題が山積している。 したがって、「利国」と「利民」の本質的な違いを明確にし、「利民」を国家統治の唯一の正当性の根拠として確立することこそが、現代国家の安定・公正・持続的繁栄の前提となる。 Ⅰ. 「利国」と「利民」の矛盾とは何か 利国:国家規模の戦略、安全保障、経済成長、軍事的地位、国際的影響力など、システム全体の目標 利民:国民一人ひとりの収入、雇用保障、住宅・医療、言論の自由、司法の公正、公共福祉、人格の尊厳、政治参加の権利 本来であれば両者は一致すべきだが、権力運用と国家意思の実行過程で次のような構造的矛盾が生じやすい: これら構造的矛盾こそが「利国」優先政策の最大の弊害であり、国民にとっての真の敵である。 Ⅱ. 「利国」中心政策が孕む七つのリスク 表面的な国威や外交上の強硬姿勢を保つために、国民の権利を犠牲にする国家も存在する。こうした選択は、やがて七つの重大なリスクの種を撒くことになる: 1.社会的信頼の崩壊 国民が政府・制度・司法を信頼できず、行政命令が形骸化する。 2.貧富の極端な格差 国家戦略を名目に資源を独占した資本集団に富が集中し、貧困層はさらに貧しくなる。 3. 政治的正当性の危機 国家の公信力が失われ、制度への帰属意識が崩壊し、正当性の源泉が枯渇する。 4.社会不安の蔓延 住宅・雇用・教育・老後・医療のコストが高騰し、国民の心理的バランスが崩れる。 5.公共政策の硬直化 少数の特権層が政策を握り、修正メカニズムが働かず、矛盾が雪だるま式に増大する。 6.言論統制の逆効果 メディア抑制が国民の鬱憤を蓄積させ、「表面は静穏、地下では激流」という状況を生む。 7.長期的競争力の損失 イノベーションや文化創造力が枯渇し、国家は徐々に国際競争力を失う。 Ⅲ. 利民型国家の統治中核原則 真に現代的な国家統治には、国民本位の四大原則を確立しなければならない: 1. 民生優先の原則 財政はまず医療・教育・住宅・雇用・年金など、国民の基本的生活水準を保障することを最優先とする。 2. 権利保障の原則 憲法により、知る権利・表現の自由・政治参加権・監視権を明確に保障する。 3. 公共財政の透明原則 予算編成から執行、行政情報まで全面公開し、納税者が全過程を監督できる仕組みを整える。 4. 権力限定の原則 国家権力は法律によって厳格に拘束され、公権力は公共利益のためだけに行使される。私物化・道具化・世襲化を許さない。 Ⅳ. 合理的国家統治構造の全体図 「三元共治・双方制衡」の構造を確立する: 権力主体 機能定位 監督関係 国家政府 国家安全、財政調整、立法、外交 国民・メディア・議会による監督 市民社会 […]

read more

Related Content

Benevolent Dreams and Leadership
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 22, 2024
In any society, the mission of a leader is deeply tied to the direction and hope of its people. The defining trait of a leader is not the resources they command or the extent of their personal abilities but whether they can inspire the collective and the era with a clear and ambitious vision. Dreams […]
Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love
Respecting Others’ Dreams is the Highest Form of Love
Avatar photo
Kishou · Oct 26, 2024
Do not laugh at other people’s dreams, even if you are a hero. Today, I happened to watch an interview with Elon Musk, which inspired me to write this article. Dreams are the deepest and most genuine desires of the human spirit, reflecting our hopes for the future and our search for purpose. However, many […]
Time, history, and how we understand them
Time, history, and how we understand them
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 5, 2025
Since the dawn of human civilization, history has carried people’s collective memory and experience. People have long tried to draw lessons from it, hoping to avoid repeating past mistakes and to push society forward. Yet when we look back across thousands of years, the rise and fall of dynasties, the cycles of war and peace, […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content