Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: What kind of future are our children actually growing into?

We allow children to be willful because that is part of what growing up means—moving from ignorance to understanding, from impulsiveness to maturity, from confusion to clarity. Willfulness is a natural part of learning to face reality, make sense of rules, and understand a complex world. A society that cannot make space for a child’s willfulness is one that risks suppressing vitality and creativity.

But there is a deeper problem. What happens when children are not just willful, but are influenced by ignorance, hatred, and pressure—when they begin to embrace cruelty, violence, or extremism, even becoming messengers for these forces? At that point, their willfulness is no longer a sign of youth—it becomes a warning sign for the future.

The tragedy of our time: when “justice” becomes a mask for hatred

June 9, 2025 — A chilling piece of international news: Greta Thunberg, the 22-year-old Swedish climate activist, was intercepted by Israeli forces aboard the Madelene, a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza. Wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh, she became part of a political and violent confrontation.

On the surface, this story appears to be just another chapter in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, or a case of humanitarian intervention. But what has truly stirred debate is not the ship or the mission—it is Greta herself, and the influence she exerts.

Once celebrated as a global icon of climate action, peace, and youthful moral courage, Greta was the girl who stood at the UN, boldly calling out world leaders for their inaction on the climate crisis. She inspired millions of young people to speak up for the planet. But now, swept up in the waves of political radicalization, she seems to be drifting away from her original cause. No longer just a voice for the environment, she is increasingly being seen as a mouthpiece for extremist narratives—openly supporting violence, and lending legitimacy to hate in the name of justice.

This is one of the most striking examples of media manipulation in the 21st century: the anger and goodwill of youth are repackaged as “justice”; the harsh and complex realities of political conflict are reduced to simplistic black-and-white narratives; and what should be a call to conscience and social responsibility is replaced by group hysteria and ideological obsession.

The real concern of Greta Thunberg lies in what she has come to symbolize—a generation of young people who, under the influence of social media, online discourse, and political polarization, are rapidly losing their sense of judgment, their ability to reason, and their grasp of the world’s complexity. Instead, they are becoming carriers of hatred, generators of outrage, and tools for the normalization of violence.

We must not let our children grow up in hatred

We can forgive young people for their defiance of authority, their anger at the world, their questioning of injustice—these are natural parts of growing up.

We can understand their impulsiveness, their emotional outbursts, even their moments of extremism, as expressions of youthful ignorance.

But what we must not tolerate—what we absolutely cannot enable—is their voluntary embrace of hatred, their fascination with violence, their worship of extremism. We cannot let them mistake obsession for conviction, or destruction for justice.

Behind every disaster, every collapse of society, every eruption of violence, there is always a group of young people who have been seduced by extremist ideas, inflamed by dogma, and taken hostage by hatred.

These were young people who could have been builders, but were turned into destroyers. They could have been hope, but became a living nightmare.

The Greta incident is not just a headline—it is a reflection of something far deeper: a society losing its values, an education system failing its youth, media shaping public opinion with bias, and social networks driving people into emotional extremes.

How does a young person, once full of idealism and compassion, lose her independent judgment and slide into the arms of extremism, giving legitimacy to political violence? The answer is not just her personal tragedy—it is a symptom of a sick era.

Who will protect the children—who will protect the future?

Yes, children are our future.

But the future is not automatically beautiful. It must be shaped, protected, and guided by reason and kindness.

And that responsibility falls on us—all of us.

Society needs to teach the kids:

  • Kindness is not blind allegiance, but the ability to judge right from wrong independently.
  • Justice is not a mask for violence, but a commitment to fairness and the refusal to harm the innocent.
  • Anger is human—but obsession is dangerous. Questioning authority is healthy, but blindly following extremism is not.
  • True courage means holding on to reason in a world full of complexity—not getting swept away by waves of emotional frenzy.

Parents, educators, the media, institutions, and every single adult must take up this responsibility.

In an age of noise and chaos, reason and conscience are the most precious—and the most scarce—resources.

If we allow our youth to grow up immersed in hatred, obsession, violence, and political fanaticism, the future will not belong to the builders and protectors. It will belong to the agitators and destroyers.

And that is a future no civilization can afford.

A final word

Today, we see Greta. But in every country, there are countless young people who have been influenced by extremist ideologies, manipulated by online narratives, and seduced by the illusion of false justice.

If we continue to sleepwalk through this crisis—if we do not wake up to educate, protect, and guide them—if we do not reflect on the collapse of our values, the polarization of public discourse, and the imbalance in our education systems, then twenty years from now, we may find ourselves in a world consumed by hatred, where violence is justified, extremism is normalized, and no safe ground remains.

Yes, children are our future.

But whether that future is filled with light or swallowed by darkness depends entirely on what we choose to plant in their hearts today.

Kindness may be naïve—but justice must never be twisted into a weapon of hate.

Confusion is part of growing up—but society must never stop offering wisdom and direction.

We cannot afford to lose our way any longer.

The future belongs to them. But protecting that future—that is our responsibility.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

教你观想:回归清净无垢的本源之相

Master Wonder · Apr 23, 2025

观想是很多修行人的日常功课,它通过专注于某个具体的形象或符号,帮助修行者净化心念,提升意识的层次。通过反复观想,修行者不仅在心中构建出一个具象的形象,更通过这个形象去感悟深层的法界真理。 这个形象,本文称之为”法界原身“,不是某一种肉体形态的投影,而是超越时间、超越生灭的本来面目,是每一位修行者于无始劫以来所具的清净法身。 当我们观想皈依、修习净观、入定自省,其实是在逐步洗净尘垢,回归真实之我。 然而,许多行者在观想中却忽略了一个极其关键的问题:我们所观所念,正在无意中塑造自身的未来形相与能量之态。 一、观想的常见误区:老者观 很多人在修行中会观想皈依的圣者、导师或祖师形象,往往习惯性地将他们设定为慈祥庄重、白发苍苍的长者模样。表面上看,这是出于尊敬与对智慧之年的联想;但实际上,这种“老态”观想模式,会无形中在心识深处投下时间、老朽、衰竭的种子。 心生则法生,心灭则法灭。 观想中所建立的世界,本质上正在塑造我们的“未来身”,特别是在修习密观与坛城相应的行者中尤为重要。 若心常摄取“年老圣相”,那你未来修成的道身、法身,自会朝着这种形态成就。于是便出现了令人啼笑皆非的情况:弟子观想中的自己,比祖师爷还要年迈。 这种形态上的错乱,反映的不是修行进步,而是心识未清,法念未正,观想未圆。 二、正确的观想之道:保持心态年轻 在修行的观想中,我们不妨设定一个年轻、清净、庄严而充满智慧之相。这是对“法界原身”的一种主动呼应—— 年轻,不是对肉体年龄的执著,而是一种永恒的生命力与初心状态。 观想中年轻的自己,不是戏剧化的幻想,而是归于“本初”状态的自性真实。 在法界所见,一些修行者的“心身形貌”,竟比他们所顶礼的古佛还要显得沧桑迟暮。这并非耻辱,而是一种修观错位的显现。 因为你的心识在长年累月中,已经把“苦修、老态、沉重”作为了道的象征,而非“光明、清净、觉照”。 佛陀成道时三十二相圆满,相貌如八尺金身庄严,岂有苍老? 观音现身常为童子、妙龄、青年女相,皆寓意其智慧圆融,能摄万缘。 这不是偶然,而是法性智慧对观想之力的慈悲妙用。 三、法界无年:回归清净本初,证得本来之我 真正的“法界原身”,是无年之身、无垢之身。 它不老不死,不少不多,既非童年,也非老年,而是一种恒常青春的智慧相。 当我们在观想时让自己清净而年轻,实则是在归还自己那一份未被尘世揉皱的光明种子。 如此观想,心中所现非贪非欲,非执相之艳,而是通向更高维度的: 结语:愿诸修行者,早证法身,自现原身 希望所有修行人,在静坐、念咒、观想、礼拜之时,常忆“我是谁”,常照“我当成就何种法身“。 不要让世间的时光束缚了你内在的法界本源,不要让错乱的观想制造出你未来的苍老疲惫之身。 愿诸君: 观自身如清净童子,法身无染。 见皈依者如妙龄大士,慈光灿然。 念念回归初心,步步印证道身。 法界原身,本自不老,本自无垢。 但愿人人观想圆满,修行自在,归于真实之我。 ——谨以此文,献予每一位正行于道上的人。 扩展引导:如何正确进入“法界原身”观修法门

read more

Related Content

Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
In today’s world, where information is overwhelming, it’s easy to feel lost and confused. We’re all trying to find our way, looking to understand ourselves, others, and the world around us. But this process isn’t something that happens overnight. Instead, it takes a lot of time and reflection. In this column, we will share conversations […]
Benevolent Dreams and Leadership
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 22, 2024
In any society, the mission of a leader is deeply tied to the direction and hope of its people. The defining trait of a leader is not the resources they command or the extent of their personal abilities but whether they can inspire the collective and the era with a clear and ambitious vision. Dreams […]
Poverty stems from a disrespect for civilization and discrimination
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
Poverty isn’t merely the evidence of economic deprivation. It is the manifestation of deeper structural issues within society. Around the world, the cause of poverty can mostly be traced back to the violation of civilization, discrimination, and a lack of respect. Civilization is the spiritual and material foundation of humanity. Only when civilization is respected […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content