Illiterate education is dragging our future onto the wrong path and pushing civilization backward

Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge Introduction Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such […]

Knowledge as a shell, thought as empty: the price of education losing Its edge

Introduction

Education was meant to nurture personal growth and advance human civilization. But when it loses its progressive spirit, it no longer lights the way forward; it becomes a cage for the mind. Instead of cultivating genuine knowledge and wisdom, such education risks producing conformity, rigidity, and a kind of “educated illiteracy”—people who may look well-schooled yet lack critical thinking and independence. And when education is twisted and stripped of its moral foundation, it can even drive people toward destructive paths, normalizing violence, exploitation, and other harmful attitudes. This article asks: when education loses its progressive vision, does it not become not only illiterate education, but even toxic education?

I. What is “progressive thinking”: the soul of education

Progressive thinking means that education should guide students to go beyond existing knowledge frameworks, fostering critical thinking, creativity, and a sense of social responsibility. It not only helps students understand knowledge but also equips them with the ability to think independently, question the status quo, and develop a civil perspective, giving them insight and a sense of social responsibilty. Education without progressive thinking merely accumulates facts, teaching students to absorb information mechanically and turning them into “knowledge slaves” without intellectual freedom. Progressive thinking is the very soul of education; without it, education loses both its dignity and its moral foundation.

II. Why education without progressive thinking is “illiteracy education”

1. The “rote learning” model fosters intellectual conformity

Education that lacks progressive thinking often relies on a rote, “spoon-fed” approach, turning knowledge into mechanical memorization and suppressing students’ curiosity and desire to explore. In such a system, students become accustomed to accepting “standard answers” rather than questioning, understanding, or applying knowledge. This approach stifles critical thinking, leaving students unable to make independent judgments in real life, and ultimately produces individuals who are rich in information but poor in true understanding—intellectual “illiterates.”

2. The suppression of individuality and creativity

Education without progressive thinking often emphasizes uniform standards and rules, ignoring individual differences and uniqueness. In such an environment, students are forced to conform, leaving little room for personal development. Their creativity and individuality are stifled, leading to dependence on rules and fear of innovation. Graduates of this system struggle to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing society; their thinking stagnates, turning them into “domesticated illiterates.”

2. The lack of social responsibility

True education should help students understand their place in society and the impact of social progress on individuals, fostering a sense of responsibility toward others and the community.However, education without progressive thinking often focuses on personal achievement or self-interest, neglecting collective and societal responsibility.Students shaped by such an education may become indifferent to society and others, forming “spiritual illiterates” — individuals who lack understanding and recognition of social justice and moral values.

III. Why education without progressive thinking becomes “toxic education”

1. Blind obedience and suppressed individuality

Education without progressive thinking often produces blind followers. Students are trained not to question or reflect, becoming “obedient conformists” who habitually defer to authority, even obeying unreasonable rules and orders without judgment. When such students enter society, they tend to ignore social issues and may even carry out harmful orders. In essence, this type of education encourages the abuse of power and fosters unethical behavior in society.

2. The rise of a violent culture

Education without progressive thinking tends to foster extremism and violent tendencies, as it lacks tolerance for diversity and difference.Such education fails to teach students to understand and respect differing opinions, favoring instead a rigid “black-or-white” mindset.Individuals shaped by this environment are prone to extreme reactions when confronted with opposing views, often resorting to aggressive or harmful actions. This, in turn, contributes to the spread of rogue or antisocial behavior.

3. Utilitarianism and exploitative mindset

In an education system lacking progressive thought, the focus of learning becomes narrow, often overemphasizing personal gain and material achievement. This environment fosters a utilitarian and exploitative mindset—students pursue their own success without regard for social justice or the welfare of others. To them, sacrificing others’ interests or using improper means to achieve personal goals seems justified. This mentality closely mirrors the essence of antisocial behavior.

IV. Typical manifestations of toxic education

1. Exam-oriented education

Exam-oriented education is a prime example of toxic education. It focuses solely on grades while neglecting students’ interests, personalities, and sense of social responsibility. Students are trained to become exam machines, willing to do whatever it takes for high scores, even cheating or engaging in unfair competition. This approach not only stifles creativity but also fosters a utilitarian mindset, reducing education to a tool for personal gain.

2. Indoctrination of power and hierarchy

Some educational systems uphold rigid hierarchies, instilling obedience and subservience from a young age. Students learn to defer to authority and follow unreasonable rules, cultivating a submissive mindset. When such students step into society, they often lack awareness of equality, tend to suppress others, and may treat vulnerable people unjustly. This phenomenon essentially reflects antisocial behavior, highlighting the moral failure of the education system.”

3. Vocational education lacking humanistic care

Vocational education should cultivate skills and expertise, but if it ignores humanistic values and ethical guidance, students may treat skills purely as tools for profit, without regard for legality or morality. This lack of humanistic care produces individuals in society who lack responsibility and ethical awareness, and may misuse their professional skills, harming social interests.

V. Revitalizing progressive thought in education: preventing “illiteracy” and “toxic” behavior

1. Cultivating Critical and Innovative Thinking

To mitigate the negative effects of “illiteracy” and “antisocial” tendencies in education, it is essential to cultivate students’ critical and creative thinking. Teachers should encourage students to question and explore different perspectives, helping them learn to think independently rather than rely solely on authority. This way, students are better prepared to face complex social challenges and avoid blind obedience or extreme behaviors.

2. Strengthening Moral and Humanistic Education

Education lacking progressive thinking often falls short in moral guidance. Therefore, integrating humanistic and moral education is important to help students understand fairness, respect, and social responsibility. Moral education encourages students to consider the well-being of others and society while pursuing personal goals, reducing tendencies toward exploitation or violence.

3. Creating Diverse and Inclusive Learning Environments

A diverse and inclusive educational environment fosters openness and tolerance, reducing the likelihood of extreme or confrontational behavior. Students who grow up in such environments are more capable of respecting different cultures and viewpoints, helping to prevent the negative consequences of antisocial education.

Conclusion

Education without progressive thinking is a failed form of education. It not only fails to inspire students’ wisdom but can also turn them into “illiterates” who lack independent judgment. Even more concerning, its moral shortcomings and emphasis on authority and hierarchy can produce individuals whose behavior is harmful to society. True education emphasizes the development of progressive thought and moral growth, nurturing citizens with social responsibility, creativity, and independent thinking—ultimately driving the continuous advancement of human civilization.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

一乗公益・法道の会、法を伝える四つの階梯――清明なる生命の道へ

一乗公益・法道の会、法を伝える四つの階梯――清明なる生命の道へ

Yicheng · Aug 1, 2025

この喧騒と変化に満ちた時代において、修行とは、もはや山林に籠る者だけのものではありません。修行とは、人がこの俗世にあって原点に立ち返り、自らの内なる心を見つめ直すための一つの道筋です。それは特定の信仰のレッテルや、煩瑣な儀式、あるいは他人の目から見た修行の深さとは関わりのないものです。 私ども一乗公益・法道の会が伝える法の次第は、仏家の「観心断妄」(心を観じ、妄念を断つ)の智慧を受け継ぎ、道家の「清浄自然」(清らかで、あるがままであること)の根脈をも汲んでいます。修行には段階があり、法には秩序があります。私たちは、修行者が辿る一般的な道のりを、入門、進修、化行、帰真という四つの階梯にまとめました。 一つ一つの階梯は、生命がその本源へと回帰する旅路であり、一つ一つの教えは、教義の注入ではなく、行者が自らを照らし出す手助けとなるものです。 一、入門の法:「善」「徳」を修め、「荷を降ろし」「手放す」こと――心身の束縛からの解放 修行の始まりは、欲望から身を引き、執着から解き放たれることです。初めてこの法門に触れる方々にお伝えするのは、「究極の真理」や「解脱への近道」ではなく、いわば「引き算」の生活調整です。 この段階でお伝えすることは、以下の点に重きを置きます。 この段階の教えは、感受性に強く訴えかける色彩を帯びやすく、言葉は柔らかく、自然に身を委ねることを促し、内なる温かさや帰属感を強調します。しかし、それは「情緒的な伝法」という落とし穴に陥りやすくもあります。例えば、特定の師を過度に神格化したり、「場の空気」や「感覚」を無批判に信じたり、甚だしきは修行を一種の慰めや逃避と見なしてしまうことです。 私たちはこのような状態を「蒸籠の法」と呼びます。湯気は盛んに立ち上るものの、それは真の火ではありません。感覚は満たされますが、本質に深く至ることは難しいのです。この法は、あくまで入り口を示すものであり、深い修行へと導くには十分ではありません。 二、進修の法:「凡」より「聖」へ――自己修練の主体的な過程の始まり 行者が内面の整理をある程度終え、一定の定力と思辨力を備え始めたなら、凡夫から聖者の道へと入る段階に進むことができます。これは修行の中核であり、また最も長く留まりやすい段階でもあります。 この時点での教えの要点は、以下の通りです。 これは「向上」を目指す修行の道であり、修練を積み、段階を上り、自らの力で心を救うことを強調します。多くの修行者にとって、この段階は明確な方向性を与え、精進を続けるための原動力となるでしょう。 しかし、この段階は「聖者になることへの執着」や「悟りの位階への渇望」をも生み出しがちです。「私が修行している」「私には悟れる」「私は道を得たい」という我執を超えられなければ、進修という名の下に、形を変えた自己中心主義に陥ってしまいます。 三、化行の法:「聖」より「凡」へ――道は世を離れず、修行は人を離れず もし行者が、修行の道における「自利の心」を次第に手放し、心が何物にも囚われない境地に至ることができれば、自ずと利他の願いが生まれてきます。この時に伝えられる法は、もはや己を修めるためだけの道ではなく、法を以て世に入り、修行の成果を以て社会に還元する生命の道です。 この段階の教えには、次のような特徴があります。 これは「聖者の還俗」ともいえる境地です。しかし、それは俗世への堕落ではなく、光明を抱いて塵世に入り、人の世の姿を借りて、天地自然の徳を行うことです。仏門ではこれを「菩薩道」と呼び、道家では「道を行じ、世に在る」と称します。この段階の師は、理想の境地を語らず、現実をいかに引き受けるかを説きます。 これこそが修行の社会的な表現であり、文明への深遠なる参与なのです。 四、帰真の法:「凡聖は皆な妄」と伝え、正道は即ち今此処に在り 修行がその終局に近づくとき、凡と聖の境界もまた消解します。全ての「道筋」「段階」「法門」といったもの自体が、人々を導くための方便に過ぎなかったと悟ります。真の覚醒とは、「法」そのものを超越することに他なりません。 この時の教えには、言葉もなければ、沈黙もありません。導きもなければ、表現もありません。なぜなら、 これは虚無主義でも、修行を否定するものでもありません。修行の本質への真の体得、すなわち、修行という名に執着せず、覚醒という姿に執着せず、本来の姿に立ち返り、万物をあるがままに照らし見ることなのです。 この段階において、師は特定の言葉や定まった姿を持ちません。その行いや佇まいそのものが、道となります。自らが「悟りを開いた」と宣言する必要も、「いかに修すべきか」を教える必要もありません。ただ、その静けさ、智慧、そして真実の示現そのものとなるのです。 終わりに:真の伝法とは、無我の伝法である 法の伝承は、言葉がいかに高尚であるかではなく、心がいかに誠実であるかにかかっています。儀式がいかに荘厳であるかではなく、人の心にいかに寄り添えるかにかかっているのです。 真の伝法とは、人を別の世界に連れて行くことではなく、人々がこの世界を新たに見つめ直すのを手伝うことです。 迷信を生み出さず、神秘を煽らず、自らの修行を誇示することもなく――ただ、ありのままに一つの生き方を、一つの生命の澄み切り方を伝えるのです。 一乗公益・法道の会が伝える法は、教条でもなければ、標準的な答えでもありません。それは一つの誘いであり、一筋の灯火であり、修行者たちが互いに灯し合う心の回路なのです。 修行の道を歩む一人ひとりが、自らの今此処において、本来の真実を照らし出し、正しき道を行じられんことを。 ――一乗公益・法道の会 敬白

一乘公益法道小组传法四阶,走向清明生命之道

一乘公益法道小组传法四阶,走向清明生命之道

Yicheng · Aug 1, 2025

在这个喧嚣易动的时代,修行早已不只是山林之事。修行,是人在尘世之中回归本源、照见内心的一种方式。它无关信仰的标签,无关仪式的繁复,更无关他人眼中的修为高低。 一乘公益法道小组所奉行的传法次第,既承接了佛家“观心断妄”的智慧,也涵养了道家“清静自然”的根脉。修行分层,法度有序,我们将修行者常见的路径,归纳为四重阶段:入门、进修、化行、归真。 每一阶段,都是生命的一次回返;每一重传法,都不是灌输教义,而是协助行者照见自己。 一、入门之法:传“善”“德”“减负”“放下”——从身心压迫中脱出 修行的起点,是从欲望中抽身,从执念中解脱。对初入法门的善众而言,我们所传,不是“终极真理”,也不是“解脱捷径”,而是一种减法式的生活调整。 此阶段的传法,着眼于: 这种传法常常带有较强的感性色彩,语言柔和,鼓励顺其自然,强调内在的温暖与归属感。但也容易陷入“情绪型传法”的误区,如对“某位师者”的过度神化,对“场域感应”的不加分辨,甚至将修行视为一种慰藉或逃避。 我们称这类传法状态为“蒸笼法”——热气腾腾,却非真正之火;感受充盈,却难以深入本体。它适合启蒙,却不足以引领深修。 二、进修之法:由“凡”入“圣”——开启自我修行的主体过程 当修行者完成初步的内在整理,开始具备一定的定力与思辨能力,便可进入由凡入圣的阶段。这是修行的核心阶段,也是最容易驻留的阶段。 此时的传法重点在于: 这是一条“向上”的修行路径,强调修为、进阶与心灵的自度。对许多修行者而言,这一阶段提供了明确的方向感,也构筑了持续精进的动力。 然而,这一阶段也容易产生“成圣执着”与“果位迷恋”。如果未能超越“我在修”“我能证”“我欲得道”的执念,就会在进修的名义下,陷入另一种形式的自我中心。 三、化行之法:由“圣”入“凡”——道不离世,修不离人 若行者能够渐次松脱修行路径中的“自利性”,进入心性无执的状态,便会自然产生利他的愿力。这时所传之法,已非修己之道,而是以法入世,以修行反哺社会的生命之路。 这一阶段的传法特征是: 这是“圣者还俗”的境界,但非堕落俗世,而是带着光明而入红尘,借人间之形,行天地之德。佛门谓之“菩萨道”,道家称之“行道于世”。此时传法者,不讲理想境界,而讲现实承载。 这是修行的社会化表达,更是对文明的深层参与。 四、归真之法:传“凡圣皆妄”,正道即此当下 修行走到最后,凡与圣的界限也将瓦解。所有的“路径”、“阶段”、“法门”,本身也只是方便之法。真正的觉悟,乃是对“法”本身的超越。 此时的传法,既无言说,也无沉默。无需指引,也无需表述。因为: 这不是虚无主义,也不是反修行的否定,而是对修行本体的真正体悟:不执着修行之名,不执着觉悟之象,返本归真,照见一切如是。 在这个阶段,传法者无特定语言、无固定姿态,但其所行所示,即是道本身。他不需要宣称自己“已经修成”,也无需教人“怎么去修”。他只是成为那份平静、智慧与真实的示现。 尾声:真正的传法,是无我之传 传法不在于语言多么高深,而在于是否真诚;不在于仪式多么隆重,而在于是否贴近人心。 真正的传法,不是将人带入另一个世界,而是协助人重新看见这个世界。 不制造迷信,不鼓吹神秘,也不标榜修为——只是如实传递一种生活的方式,一种生命的通透。 一乘公益法道小组所传之法,不是教条,不是标准答案。它是一个邀请,是一束灯火,是修行者彼此点燃的回路。 愿每一个走在修行路上的人,都能在自身当下,照见本真,行于正道。 ——一乘公益·法道小组 敬录

read more

Related Content

Beyond Prevention: Creating a Supportive Network to Combat School Bullying
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research and practices regarding the prevention and solution of school bullying, from the application of restorative justice to teaching the children emotional management and conflict resolution. While these efforts all contribute to reducing the phenomenon of school bully, they cannot compare with a systematic response […]
Vision: Education of Civilization and Culture
Vision: Education of Civilization and Culture
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 1, 2024
Education is the foundation of society, shaping lives and future. Beyond knowledge and skills, quality education encompasses culture, civilization, and global citizenship, fostering personal success and societal progress.
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 25, 2025
Traditional education often categorizes learning based on subjects, audiences, and teaching methods, focusing mainly on passing knowledge and developing skills. Quality education, however, takes a broader view. It looks beyond just academic success to focus on personal and social fulfillment, along with long-term happiness and success. It emphasizes not only gaining knowledge but also developing […]
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 3, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
View All Content