Law or morality: which is the true measure of a civilized society?

Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 21, 2024
This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection […]

This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection of social welfare. Only by building systems and institutions that safeguard and enhance the well-being of society as a whole can we foster a healthy interaction between individuals and communities, leading humanity toward a future that is happier, fairer, and more dignified.

I. The limits of law and morality

Law, as the foundation of social governance, emphasizes rules and order. Yet it cannot cover the full complexity of human life, nor can it directly address individual happiness. While law can restrain harmful behavior, it cannot cultivate kindness or compassion. For example, the law may punish theft, but it cannot legislate that everyone must help the poor.

Morality, on the other hand, rests on personal conscience and shared social values. Its weakness lies in the absence of enforceability and universal application. Moral understanding differs across cultures, education, and personal experience, which makes it difficult for morality to serve as a consistent guide in diverse societies.

Relying solely on morality also risks hypocrisy. Some people even stand on a moral high ground and place moral demands on the most vulnerable, using morality as a tool to exploit others. History has shown many such cases, and the same patterns still appear today—for example, when victims are judged and blamed instead of being supported. This shows that relying only on morality to guide society is not enough; in fact, it can sometimes do real harm.

II. Social welfare: the true measure of a civilized society

A truly civilized society is not defined by how laws and morals balance or clash, but by whether it can generate social welfare. Social welfare meets people’s basic needs, improves their quality of life, and fosters a deeper sense of well-being. This is what allows a society to keep moving forward.

1. Creating social welfare

The creation of social welfare is the first step toward a more advanced society. With innovative policies and systems, we can provide fair opportunities for more people. For example, ongoing improvements in universal education and comprehensive healthcare are signs of real progress. Of course, many current education and healthcare systems still fall short. That is why people must keep pushing for fairness in access and excellence in outcomes, instead of simply accepting the status quo. Only by continuously creating conditions for genuine happiness can individuals thrive, and only then can society rise to a higher level of civilization.

2. Producing social welfare

Producing social welfare is the key step that turns ideas into reality. It is the continuation of welfare creation and includes expanding access to education, building more healthcare facilities, and providing standardized social services. For example, in many developed countries, public funding combined with the participation of social enterprises has built efficient and diverse systems of welfare delivery. This not only gives people real, practical support but also drives the overall progress of society and civilization.

3. Social welfare protection

Social welfare protection ensures that everyone can meet basic needs when facing risks such as illness, unemployment, or aging. It is not just about caring for individuals, but also about maintaining social stability. For example, a well-designed pension system allows the elderly to enjoy their later years while easing the financial burden on younger generations. Such welfare protection marks a key stage in human civilization, moving from “survival of the fittest” to a model of cooperation and shared prosperity.

III. A happy society built on social welfare

When a society places the creation, delivery, and protection of social welfare at its core, law and morality no longer stand in opposition—they become complementary tools serving the same goal. Law provides the enforcement and security needed to implement welfare, while morality adds warmth and care to its creation. At Yicheng Commonweal, we continue to study and analyze this approach.

For example, the social welfare systems in Nordic countries are often hailed as models of modern civilization. Through policies such as free education, universal healthcare, and childcare subsidies, these nations have built highly developed welfare societies grounded in both law and morality. Such societies allow every individual to live with dignity while raising the overall standard of living. However, Nordic welfare systems primarily focus on maintaining basic living standards and lack mechanisms for the ongoing creation and production of welfare. They rely heavily on continuous government funding and taxpayer contributions. If mechanisms for welfare creation and production were incorporated at the source, these systems could generate social value continuously, moving beyond the current model that depends so heavily on fiscal input.

IV. Yicheng Commonweal: Cultivating the Welfare of Our Civilization

At Yicheng Commonweal, we understand that true happiness and civilization stem from the comprehensive development of social welfare. That is why we are committed to driving welfare creation, improving welfare production, and ensuring fair access through innovative public initiatives. We believe that civilization is not an abstract concept—it is the tangible experience of well-being, the cultivation of kindness, and the nurturing of responsibility.

By establishing inclusive public-benefit organizations, commonweal union, and social enterprises, we continuously introduce services that create, produce, and safeguard social welfare. In doing so, we cultivate well-being in people’s lives, offering hope and support to those in need. This sowing of welfare not only transforms individual lives but also fundamentally elevates the overall happiness and civility of society.

Conclusion

Social happiness and civilization come from creating, providing, and protecting social welfare. Through a well-developed social welfare system, the value of law and morality can be fully realized, ensuring both individual quality of life and overall social progress.

The measure of civilization does not lie in abstract theoretical debates, but in the tangible sowing of welfare through action. Every innovation in social welfare and every improvement in individual lives pushes society toward a brighter future. The true source of happiness and civilization is the welfare society we collectively create, produce, and protect.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

台湾の大規模罷免運動:私たちは彼らを選べても、罷免は決してできないのか?

台湾の大規模罷免運動:私たちは彼らを選べても、罷免は決してできないのか?

Kishou · Jul 24, 2025

一乗公益 寄稿 私たちは、世界の民主主義制度における深いレベルの改革というテーマに、引き続き注目していきます。 付録:台湾の罷免制度に関する10の修正提案 序論: 多くの民主主義国家において、国民は「投票で代表者を選ぶ」権利を持つ一方で、「任期中に罷免する」ことは極めて困難です。 これは偶然ではなく、制度設計に「内在する障壁」が組み込まれているからです。近年、台湾で相次いで発生した罷免運動を例にとれば、その制度が実際には機能不全に陥り、民意が制度的に冷遇され、政治的責任追及がほぼ不可能になっている様子が明確に見て取れます。 この背景には、より深い民主主義の問いがあります。 罷免権を持たない民主主義は、制御不能な委任に過ぎません。 有効な罷免メカニズムを持たない制度は、単なる見せかけの政治に過ぎません。 一、台湾における罷免の苦境:現実レベルの「合法的な無効化」 √ 事例1:陳柏惟氏の罷免案(2021年) × 事例2:黄捷氏の罷免案(2021年) × 事例3:鍾東錦氏の罷免案(2024年) これらの事例が示すのは、制度が罷免の道を開きながらも、実際には「罷免阻止の仕組み」を構築しているということです。 二、なぜ罷免制度は「形骸化」しているのでしょうか?台湾における5つの制度的障壁 1. 手続きが複雑で、ハードルが極めて高い 問題は、制度が「罷免」を専門的な闘争に変えてしまい、一般市民が関与しにくい点にあります。 2. 政党による乗っ取りと政治的二極化、罷免を「選挙戦の延長」に貶める 罷免の本質は制度の自浄作用であるはずが、政党が互いに攻撃する道具として利用されています。 3. 市民の動員構造の解体、行動力が高度に分散 現代の民主社会では、個人は「自由」であると同時に「孤立」しています。 4. メディア環境の異質化、言論空間が「偽の民意」を生成 メディアはもはや市民の判断を導くのではなく、政党の方針を固めるのを助ける役割を担っています。 5. 罷免後の制度的な後始末がなく、市民が混乱を恐れる 市民が求めるのは「責任ある是正メカニズム」であり、混乱後の政治の空転ではありません。 三、民主主義には「完全な罷免制度」が不可欠です もし民主主義が公共の列車だとすれば、選挙は乗車であり、罷免はブレーキです。 ブレーキシステムを持たない民主主義は、自由な制度ではなく、制度的な制御不能に陥っています。 ▶ 完全な罷免制度は、以下の5つの要素を含むべきです。 構成要素 機能 台湾の現状 改善提案 ① 容易な発動 市民が発起でき、政党の支援は不要であるべきです。 極めて高いハードルです。 第1段階のハードルを0.5%にまで引き下げます。 ② 公正な審査 署名、資格、公文書のプロセスがすべて公開されるべきです。 行政権による審査が曖昧です。 超党派の独立罷免委員会の設立。 ③ 政党による操作の排除 […]

台湾大罢免:我们能选他们,却永远罢不掉他们?

台湾大罢免:我们能选他们,却永远罢不掉他们?

Kishou · Jul 24, 2025

一乘公益 出品 我们将持续关注世界民主制度的深层改革议题。 附:台湾罢免制度的十大修正建议 引言: 在多数民主国家,人民拥有“投票选人”的权利,却极难“中途罢人”。 这不是偶然,而是制度设计上的“内建屏障”。以台湾近年来接连爆发的罢免案为例,我们可以清晰地看到:罢免制度在操作上几近瘫痪,民意被制度性冷处理,政治责任几乎无法追究。 这背后,是一个更深刻的民主命题: 没有罢免权的民主,是失控的授权; 没有有效罢免机制的制度,只是表演性的政治。 一、台湾的罢免困局:现实层面的“合法无效” 案例1:陈柏惟罢免案(2021) 案例2:黄捷罢免案(2021) 案例3:钟东锦罢免案(2024) 这些案例说明:制度虽开罢免口子,实际却构建了“防罢免机制”。 二、为什么罢免制度“名存实亡”?台湾的五重制度性障碍 1. 程序复杂,门槛奇高 问题在于:制度把“罢免”变成了专业战争,普通人难以介入。 2. 政党绑架与政治极化,令罢免沦为选战延长线 罢免的本义是制度自清,却被政党当作政治互打工具。 3. 民众动员结构解体,行动力被高度分散 现代民主社会里,个体虽“自由”,但“孤立”。 4. 媒体生态异化,言论空间制造假民意 媒体不再引导公民判断,而是在协助政党定调。 5. 罢免之后,无制度性善后,导致民众恐惧动荡 民众需要的是“负责任的纠错机制”,不是混乱后的政治空转。 三、民主必须有“完整的罢免机制” 如果民主是一辆公共列车,选举是上车,罢免就是刹车。 一个没有刹车系统的民主,不是自由的制度,而是制度性失控。 ▶ 完整的罢免机制应包含五个构件: 构件 功能 台湾现状 优化建议 ① 易启动 民众能发起,无需政党支援 极高门槛 降低第一阶段门槛至0.5% ② 公正审查 联署、资格、公文全程公开 行政权审查模糊 建立跨党独立罢免委员会 ③ 非政党操控 去党化动员 政党完全主导罢免动员 限制政党使用行政资源介入罢免 […]

read more

Related Content

Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It
Growth Mindset: Why It Matters and How to Develop It
Avatar photo
Daohe · Mar 25, 2025
Two Roads for One Pair of Legs: Choosing Between Fixed and Growth Mindsets The way people perceive the world shapes their growth and life path, especially when they encounter difficulties, failures, and challenges. Different mindsets lead to distinct outcomes. No matter where you start or how talented you are, having a growth mindset keeps you […]
Human morality will always stand above workplace rules
Avatar photo
Kishou · Oct 30, 2024
This article explores the relationship between workplace rules and human morality, emphasizing that moral values stand above regulations. While rules help ensure work efficiency, they cannot replace the ability to discern right from wrong. The article calls for integrating morality into professional practice in order to foster deeper human care and promote social harmony.
The Significance and Value of Enhancing Civilizational Awareness for Humanity
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
Enhancing civilizational awareness is essential for all of humanity. Civilization serves as a symbol of social progress and reflects the elevation of human intellect, culture, and behavior, shaping our lifestyles, social structures, and the future of the world. Its essence includes the accumulation and advancement of morality, law, culture, and technology, all of which together […]
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
5 Interesting Facts of Regressive Thinking and Simplicity
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
The phenomenon of thinking regression: A deep analysis from the perspective of cognitive logic and the resetting of habits. I. What is Regressive Thinking? Regressive Thinking is not merely backwardness but refers to a phenomenon where individuals or groups, because of their inability to adapt to the demands of deep thinking in a complex cognitive […]
View All Content