Law or morality: which is the true measure of a civilized society?

Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 21, 2024
This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection […]

This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection of social welfare. Only by building systems and institutions that safeguard and enhance the well-being of society as a whole can we foster a healthy interaction between individuals and communities, leading humanity toward a future that is happier, fairer, and more dignified.

I. The limits of law and morality

Law, as the foundation of social governance, emphasizes rules and order. Yet it cannot cover the full complexity of human life, nor can it directly address individual happiness. While law can restrain harmful behavior, it cannot cultivate kindness or compassion. For example, the law may punish theft, but it cannot legislate that everyone must help the poor.

Morality, on the other hand, rests on personal conscience and shared social values. Its weakness lies in the absence of enforceability and universal application. Moral understanding differs across cultures, education, and personal experience, which makes it difficult for morality to serve as a consistent guide in diverse societies.

Relying solely on morality also risks hypocrisy. Some people even stand on a moral high ground and place moral demands on the most vulnerable, using morality as a tool to exploit others. History has shown many such cases, and the same patterns still appear today—for example, when victims are judged and blamed instead of being supported. This shows that relying only on morality to guide society is not enough; in fact, it can sometimes do real harm.

II. Social welfare: the true measure of a civilized society

A truly civilized society is not defined by how laws and morals balance or clash, but by whether it can generate social welfare. Social welfare meets people’s basic needs, improves their quality of life, and fosters a deeper sense of well-being. This is what allows a society to keep moving forward.

1. Creating social welfare

The creation of social welfare is the first step toward a more advanced society. With innovative policies and systems, we can provide fair opportunities for more people. For example, ongoing improvements in universal education and comprehensive healthcare are signs of real progress. Of course, many current education and healthcare systems still fall short. That is why people must keep pushing for fairness in access and excellence in outcomes, instead of simply accepting the status quo. Only by continuously creating conditions for genuine happiness can individuals thrive, and only then can society rise to a higher level of civilization.

2. Producing social welfare

Producing social welfare is the key step that turns ideas into reality. It is the continuation of welfare creation and includes expanding access to education, building more healthcare facilities, and providing standardized social services. For example, in many developed countries, public funding combined with the participation of social enterprises has built efficient and diverse systems of welfare delivery. This not only gives people real, practical support but also drives the overall progress of society and civilization.

3. Social welfare protection

Social welfare protection ensures that everyone can meet basic needs when facing risks such as illness, unemployment, or aging. It is not just about caring for individuals, but also about maintaining social stability. For example, a well-designed pension system allows the elderly to enjoy their later years while easing the financial burden on younger generations. Such welfare protection marks a key stage in human civilization, moving from “survival of the fittest” to a model of cooperation and shared prosperity.

III. A happy society built on social welfare

When a society places the creation, delivery, and protection of social welfare at its core, law and morality no longer stand in opposition—they become complementary tools serving the same goal. Law provides the enforcement and security needed to implement welfare, while morality adds warmth and care to its creation. At Yicheng Commonweal, we continue to study and analyze this approach.

For example, the social welfare systems in Nordic countries are often hailed as models of modern civilization. Through policies such as free education, universal healthcare, and childcare subsidies, these nations have built highly developed welfare societies grounded in both law and morality. Such societies allow every individual to live with dignity while raising the overall standard of living. However, Nordic welfare systems primarily focus on maintaining basic living standards and lack mechanisms for the ongoing creation and production of welfare. They rely heavily on continuous government funding and taxpayer contributions. If mechanisms for welfare creation and production were incorporated at the source, these systems could generate social value continuously, moving beyond the current model that depends so heavily on fiscal input.

IV. Yicheng Commonweal: Cultivating the Welfare of Our Civilization

At Yicheng Commonweal, we understand that true happiness and civilization stem from the comprehensive development of social welfare. That is why we are committed to driving welfare creation, improving welfare production, and ensuring fair access through innovative public initiatives. We believe that civilization is not an abstract concept—it is the tangible experience of well-being, the cultivation of kindness, and the nurturing of responsibility.

By establishing inclusive public-benefit organizations, commonweal union, and social enterprises, we continuously introduce services that create, produce, and safeguard social welfare. In doing so, we cultivate well-being in people’s lives, offering hope and support to those in need. This sowing of welfare not only transforms individual lives but also fundamentally elevates the overall happiness and civility of society.

Conclusion

Social happiness and civilization come from creating, providing, and protecting social welfare. Through a well-developed social welfare system, the value of law and morality can be fully realized, ensuring both individual quality of life and overall social progress.

The measure of civilization does not lie in abstract theoretical debates, but in the tangible sowing of welfare through action. Every innovation in social welfare and every improvement in individual lives pushes society toward a brighter future. The true source of happiness and civilization is the welfare society we collectively create, produce, and protect.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「利民」と「利国」の違い──現代国家統治の正道と秩序

Daohe · Jun 10, 2025

国家の存在理由は、スローガンでも領土でも GDP でもない。 国民の基本的権利を保障し、生活の尊厳を守り、幸福度を高めること――これだけが国家の存在意義である。 もし国家が強大でも国民が困窮し、国の栄光が語られても国民が不安に苛まれているのなら、その国家はうわべだけの空洞だ。見た目は繁栄していても、内部には問題が山積している。 したがって、「利国」と「利民」の本質的な違いを明確にし、「利民」を国家統治の唯一の正当性の根拠として確立することこそが、現代国家の安定・公正・持続的繁栄の前提となる。 Ⅰ. 「利国」と「利民」の矛盾とは何か 利国:国家規模の戦略、安全保障、経済成長、軍事的地位、国際的影響力など、システム全体の目標 利民:国民一人ひとりの収入、雇用保障、住宅・医療、言論の自由、司法の公正、公共福祉、人格の尊厳、政治参加の権利 本来であれば両者は一致すべきだが、権力運用と国家意思の実行過程で次のような構造的矛盾が生じやすい: これら構造的矛盾こそが「利国」優先政策の最大の弊害であり、国民にとっての真の敵である。 Ⅱ. 「利国」中心政策が孕む七つのリスク 表面的な国威や外交上の強硬姿勢を保つために、国民の権利を犠牲にする国家も存在する。こうした選択は、やがて七つの重大なリスクの種を撒くことになる: 1.社会的信頼の崩壊 国民が政府・制度・司法を信頼できず、行政命令が形骸化する。 2.貧富の極端な格差 国家戦略を名目に資源を独占した資本集団に富が集中し、貧困層はさらに貧しくなる。 3. 政治的正当性の危機 国家の公信力が失われ、制度への帰属意識が崩壊し、正当性の源泉が枯渇する。 4.社会不安の蔓延 住宅・雇用・教育・老後・医療のコストが高騰し、国民の心理的バランスが崩れる。 5.公共政策の硬直化 少数の特権層が政策を握り、修正メカニズムが働かず、矛盾が雪だるま式に増大する。 6.言論統制の逆効果 メディア抑制が国民の鬱憤を蓄積させ、「表面は静穏、地下では激流」という状況を生む。 7.長期的競争力の損失 イノベーションや文化創造力が枯渇し、国家は徐々に国際競争力を失う。 Ⅲ. 利民型国家の統治中核原則 真に現代的な国家統治には、国民本位の四大原則を確立しなければならない: 1. 民生優先の原則 財政はまず医療・教育・住宅・雇用・年金など、国民の基本的生活水準を保障することを最優先とする。 2. 権利保障の原則 憲法により、知る権利・表現の自由・政治参加権・監視権を明確に保障する。 3. 公共財政の透明原則 予算編成から執行、行政情報まで全面公開し、納税者が全過程を監督できる仕組みを整える。 4. 権力限定の原則 国家権力は法律によって厳格に拘束され、公権力は公共利益のためだけに行使される。私物化・道具化・世襲化を許さない。 Ⅳ. 合理的国家統治構造の全体図 「三元共治・双方制衡」の構造を確立する: 権力主体 機能定位 監督関係 国家政府 国家安全、財政調整、立法、外交 国民・メディア・議会による監督 市民社会 […]

read more

Related Content

How Kindness Can Revive Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]
Life’s Three Levels and Three Mindsets
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 23, 2024
  On the journey of life, everyone faces different choices and pursuits, which often reflect their mindset and level of existence. People can be categorized into three different types based on the way they think. There are three different mindsets among people: the Grassroot Mindset, the Elite Mindset, and the Extraordinary Mindset. Each mindset has […]
Civilization Leaders: Pioneering Leadership for a Brighter Future
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 22, 2024
In a rapidly changing globalized world, the traditional image of leadership—as decision-makers and managers leveraging power, resources, and influence to meet organizational goals—is beginning to feel outdated. As societies grow more complex, future leaders must go beyond administration, fostering collaboration across divides, and charting a path toward a more enlightened and inclusive civilization. They are […]
View All Content