Law or morality: which is the true measure of a civilized society?

Avatar photo
Kishou · Nov 21, 2024
This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection […]

This question may sound profound, but in reality it is a false proposition. The relationship between law and morality is certainly important, yet both are tools and means, not the ultimate goal of a civilized society. True happiness and civilization do not lie in law or morality alone, but in the creation, production, and protection of social welfare. Only by building systems and institutions that safeguard and enhance the well-being of society as a whole can we foster a healthy interaction between individuals and communities, leading humanity toward a future that is happier, fairer, and more dignified.

I. The limits of law and morality

Law, as the foundation of social governance, emphasizes rules and order. Yet it cannot cover the full complexity of human life, nor can it directly address individual happiness. While law can restrain harmful behavior, it cannot cultivate kindness or compassion. For example, the law may punish theft, but it cannot legislate that everyone must help the poor.

Morality, on the other hand, rests on personal conscience and shared social values. Its weakness lies in the absence of enforceability and universal application. Moral understanding differs across cultures, education, and personal experience, which makes it difficult for morality to serve as a consistent guide in diverse societies.

Relying solely on morality also risks hypocrisy. Some people even stand on a moral high ground and place moral demands on the most vulnerable, using morality as a tool to exploit others. History has shown many such cases, and the same patterns still appear today—for example, when victims are judged and blamed instead of being supported. This shows that relying only on morality to guide society is not enough; in fact, it can sometimes do real harm.

II. Social welfare: the true measure of a civilized society

A truly civilized society is not defined by how laws and morals balance or clash, but by whether it can generate social welfare. Social welfare meets people’s basic needs, improves their quality of life, and fosters a deeper sense of well-being. This is what allows a society to keep moving forward.

1. Creating social welfare

The creation of social welfare is the first step toward a more advanced society. With innovative policies and systems, we can provide fair opportunities for more people. For example, ongoing improvements in universal education and comprehensive healthcare are signs of real progress. Of course, many current education and healthcare systems still fall short. That is why people must keep pushing for fairness in access and excellence in outcomes, instead of simply accepting the status quo. Only by continuously creating conditions for genuine happiness can individuals thrive, and only then can society rise to a higher level of civilization.

2. Producing social welfare

Producing social welfare is the key step that turns ideas into reality. It is the continuation of welfare creation and includes expanding access to education, building more healthcare facilities, and providing standardized social services. For example, in many developed countries, public funding combined with the participation of social enterprises has built efficient and diverse systems of welfare delivery. This not only gives people real, practical support but also drives the overall progress of society and civilization.

3. Social welfare protection

Social welfare protection ensures that everyone can meet basic needs when facing risks such as illness, unemployment, or aging. It is not just about caring for individuals, but also about maintaining social stability. For example, a well-designed pension system allows the elderly to enjoy their later years while easing the financial burden on younger generations. Such welfare protection marks a key stage in human civilization, moving from “survival of the fittest” to a model of cooperation and shared prosperity.

III. A happy society built on social welfare

When a society places the creation, delivery, and protection of social welfare at its core, law and morality no longer stand in opposition—they become complementary tools serving the same goal. Law provides the enforcement and security needed to implement welfare, while morality adds warmth and care to its creation. At Yicheng Commonweal, we continue to study and analyze this approach.

For example, the social welfare systems in Nordic countries are often hailed as models of modern civilization. Through policies such as free education, universal healthcare, and childcare subsidies, these nations have built highly developed welfare societies grounded in both law and morality. Such societies allow every individual to live with dignity while raising the overall standard of living. However, Nordic welfare systems primarily focus on maintaining basic living standards and lack mechanisms for the ongoing creation and production of welfare. They rely heavily on continuous government funding and taxpayer contributions. If mechanisms for welfare creation and production were incorporated at the source, these systems could generate social value continuously, moving beyond the current model that depends so heavily on fiscal input.

IV. Yicheng Commonweal: Cultivating the Welfare of Our Civilization

At Yicheng Commonweal, we understand that true happiness and civilization stem from the comprehensive development of social welfare. That is why we are committed to driving welfare creation, improving welfare production, and ensuring fair access through innovative public initiatives. We believe that civilization is not an abstract concept—it is the tangible experience of well-being, the cultivation of kindness, and the nurturing of responsibility.

By establishing inclusive public-benefit organizations, commonweal union, and social enterprises, we continuously introduce services that create, produce, and safeguard social welfare. In doing so, we cultivate well-being in people’s lives, offering hope and support to those in need. This sowing of welfare not only transforms individual lives but also fundamentally elevates the overall happiness and civility of society.

Conclusion

Social happiness and civilization come from creating, providing, and protecting social welfare. Through a well-developed social welfare system, the value of law and morality can be fully realized, ensuring both individual quality of life and overall social progress.

The measure of civilization does not lie in abstract theoretical debates, but in the tangible sowing of welfare through action. Every innovation in social welfare and every improvement in individual lives pushes society toward a brighter future. The true source of happiness and civilization is the welfare society we collectively create, produce, and protect.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

現代における情報植民地主義:市民社会の言論の自由と情報主権を論ず

Daohe · Jun 8, 2025

デジタル時代を迎え、情報は単なる伝達手段という役割から、統治のための資源、認識を操作する武器、そして社会を制御する手段へとその姿を変えた。 言論の自由と情報主権は、現代社会の市民が個人の尊厳、集団のアイデンティティ、そして公権力への監視を維持するための根源的な保障である。しかし今日、これらはデジタル覇権、巨大プラットフォーム資本、そして国家の安全保障装置という複数の力が絡み合う中で、全面的な侵食と剥奪の危機に瀕している。 表面的には、誰もが表現の権利を持ち、情報は至る所に溢れ、世論は活発化しているように見える。だがその裏側では、極めて巧妙かつシステマティックな「現代的情報植民地戦争」が進行しているのだ。 この戦争の目的は、単にデータ資源や経済的利益を奪うことだけではない。それは、人々の認識、思考、信条、感情、そして行動そのものを再構築し、市民社会の独立性と自己省察能力を根底から瓦解させることにある。 一、言論の自由の本質と社会的機能 言論の自由とは、決して個人の表現欲を満たすためだけのものではない。それは、現代民主主義社会における重要な自己防衛メカニズムであり、以下の機能を保障するものである。 ひとたび言論の自由が組織的に抑圧されれば、社会は自己修正能力を失い、政治権力は暴走し、特権階級が生まれ、人々の認識は画一化し、社会から異論が消え、最終的には情報全体主義へと至る。 現代のデジタルプラットフォーム上で謳われる「自由」とは、緻密な計算の上で管理された、制御可能な言論の自由に過ぎない。プラットフォームと当局が共同でルール、言説の境界線、そして世論の「越えてはならない一線」を設定し、「自由で繁栄している」という幻影を作り出す。それは実のところ、「温水でカエルを茹でる」かの如き飼い慣らしに他ならない。 二、情報主権の戦略的価値とグローバル競争 情報主権とは、一国あるいは一社会が、自らのデジタル情報の流通、データ資源、言説の体系、そして認識の枠組みを、自律的に管理・制御する能力を指す。 デジタル時代において、情報主権はもはや付随的な議題ではなく、国家の存亡に関わる問題となっている。 データ資源を制する者が、社会の動向と民衆の感情を予測し、操作し、誘導することができる。国際社会において、情報はエネルギー、金融、軍事に次ぐ新たな戦略資源と化しており、世界規模での情報主権獲得競争は激化の一途をたどっている。 1. 「デジタル覇権国家」 は、データの越境流通の自由化や人権保護を名目に、発展途上国にデータ市場の開放を要求する。その実態は、データ資源を収奪し、世論環境を操作し、政治に介入し、自国の代理人勢力を育成することにある。 2. 「デジタル植民地主義」 は、SNS、検索エンジン、ショート動画プラットフォーム、世論ランキングなどを通じて静かに浸透し、他国民の認識体系を再構築し、その国の政府の信頼性を毀損し、社会の分断と認識の混乱を生み出している。 三、プラットフォーム資本と国家権力の二重の軛 (くびき) 国内に目を向ければ、巨大プラットフォームは情報の伝達者から、世論の支配者、そして認識の操作者へと変質した。彼らはトラフィック収益の最大化という原則に基づき、感情的、対立的、迎合的なコンテンツを意図的に増幅させ、理性的、建設的、批判的な声を抑制し、トラフィック至上主義という全体主義的エコシステムを形成している。 時を同じくして、国家機関は社会の安定維持やイデオロギー防衛を名目に、センシティブワードのリスト化、キーワード監視、AIによる世論パトロール、アカウント凍結、トピックの強制的な非表示化、世論対策チームの設置といった手法を通じて、24時間体制で言論空間を隅々までコントロールしている。 資本と権力のこの共謀関係は、市民を二重の剥奪状態へと陥れる。 このような構造の下、社会の世論は、表面的には賑やかでありながら、実質的には単調で、感情論に満ち、理性を欠き、異論が消え、真実が見えない空虚な風景と化していく。 四、現代デジタル植民地主義の作動メカニズム デジタル植民地主義は、かつての武力による領土拡大や植民地支配とは異なり、以下の四重のメカニズムを通じて完成される。 五、市民の情報権の形骸化 現代社会の市民は、「デジタル時代の従順な民」へと成り下がりつつある。その特徴は以下の通りである。 彼らは、不自由であることを知りながら自由の幻想を抱き、無限の情報奔流の中で真実を見失い、判断力をなくし、次第にプラットフォームという生態系における「デジタル労働者」そして「情報消費財」と化していく。 六、情報主権を回復するための道筋 この現代のデジタル植民地主義を打ち破り、市民が本来持つべき情報主権を取り戻すためには、以下の六つの道筋が極めて重要となる。 結語 情報主権と言論の自由は、抽象的な理念ではない。それは、現代社会の市民が生き残り、デジタル全体主義に抵抗するための武器である。 言論の自由が全面的な検閲に晒され、情報主権が資本と権力のおもちゃに成り下がった時、市民社会は自己を修復し、自己を認識し、自己を解放する能力を完全に喪失するだろう。 今日、私たちが目覚めなければ、未来に自由な社会はなく、そこにあるのはデジタル監獄とトラフィックの奴隷制だけである。 行動を通じてのみ、連帯を通じてのみ、そして闘いを通じてのみ、我々は偽りの自由という幻想を打ち破り、市民自身の手に情報主権を取り戻し、真に自由で公正、かつ多様で理性的なデジタル世界を再建できるのである。

read more

Related Content

What is real success?
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 31, 2024
People are often obsessed with external standards of success, caught up in comparisons and competition, and view success as an end goal. However, for every human being, we are born successful. From the moment life first blooms, our life carries unique meaning and value. Regardless of wealth or status, our existence in this world is […]
Human morality will always stand above workplace rules
Avatar photo
Kishou · Oct 30, 2024
This article explores the relationship between workplace rules and human morality, emphasizing that moral values stand above regulations. While rules help ensure work efficiency, they cannot replace the ability to discern right from wrong. The article calls for integrating morality into professional practice in order to foster deeper human care and promote social harmony.
Individual Effort And Empowering: 6 Interesting Points
Avatar photo
Daohe · Dec 31, 2024
In many societies, the narrative of individual effort reigns supreme. We are taught from a young age that hard work and perseverance are the keys to success. While this belief in the power of personal determination can be empowering, it often comes at the cost of ignoring the broader systemic forces that shape our lives. […]
View All Content