Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 23, 2025
Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but […]

Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but also leads to the gradual marginalization, and even abandonment, of religion.

This article will delve into the obsolescence of religion and its implications from four perspectives: doctrine, organizational structure, social functions, and spiritual needs, while reflecting on the potential future trajectories of religious development.

I. Rigidity of Doctrine: Inability to Address Modern Issues

Religious teachings are at the heart of religion, but many of these teachings come from a time thousands of years ago. They don’t fit well with today’s complicated world. It’s not that people don’t need faith anymore—it’s that religion hasn’t kept up with the times. This is why many people today feel disconnected from or uninterested in religion.

1. Outdated doctrines

Many teachings of traditional religions originated in ancient societies, where the level of productivity, scientific understanding, and social structures shaped their explanations of the world. For example, religious texts often describe the origins of the universe, natural phenomena, and the meaning of life in ways that lack credibility when examined through the lens of modern science. As people today gain deeper knowledge about the universe and life, these teachings appear increasingly outdated and disconnected from scientific understanding. This disconnect not only weakens their relevance but also leads to frustration or even rejection.

2. Lack of dynamic interpretation

The rigidity of religious doctrine is not only reflected in its outdated content but also in its lack of flexibility in interpretation. Many religious leaders and institutions adhere strictly to traditional explanations, unwilling to adapt their teachings to align with modern culture, science, and philosophy. This resistance prevents religion from offering relevant and practical spiritual guidance to people today.

3. Overlooking the complexity of human nature

In modern society, human needs extend beyond material fulfillment and simple spiritual solace—they now demand a profound understanding of personal worth, free choice, and multicultural coexistence. However, certain religious doctrines continue to judge human behavior through a binary opposition framework (e.g., good vs. evil, salvation vs. damnation), failing to encompass the multifaceted nature of humanity. This oversimplified doctrinal system increasingly struggles to resonate with people, particularly among educated younger generations who prioritize critical thinking and individuality.

II. Closed and Conservative Organizational Structures: The Failure of Religious Authority

In addition to the rigidity of its doctrines, the closed and conservative nature of religious organizations is another core manifestation of their inability to adapt to modern times.

1. Centralization of Power and Corruption

The excessive concentration of power within religious organizations often leads to opaque management structures and even fosters corruption. For instance, some religious leaders exploit the trust of their followers for personal gain or conceal internal scandals to maintain their authority. Such behavior undermines the perceived sanctity and legitimacy of religion, ultimately driving people away from it.

2. Hierarchical Systems and Exclusionary Practices

Many religious organizations maintain rigid hierarchical systems that emphasize obedience and authority. This structure often neglects the individual needs of followers and even suppresses independent thinking. At the same time, some religious groups exhibit strong exclusivity, often refusing to engage in cooperation or dialogue with other faiths, cultures, or belief systems. Such a narrow-minded approach appears increasingly out of place in an era defined by globalization and diversity.

3. The Spread of Formalism

Religious organizations often prioritize formal rituals and doctrines over addressing the genuine spiritual needs of their followers. For example, elaborate religious ceremonies can become a burden rather than a source of spiritual nourishment. The spread of such formalism gradually strips religion of its intrinsic appeal, rendering it hollow and meaningless.

III. Weakening Social Function: Failure to Address Contemporary Issues

While religion historically served as a pillar of meaning for people, its social role has significantly weakened in modern society, even becoming absent in critical areas.

1. Indifference to global issues

In the face of global challenges such as climate change, wealth inequality, migration crises, and gender inequality, religion should ideally play a moral leadership role. However, many religious organizations adopt conservative and narrow-minded attitudes and show little initiative in promoting global cooperation or social responsibility. This indifference diminishes religion’s social influence and, in some cases, even turns it into a source of division.

2. Neglecting mental health and spiritual needs

Many traditional religions struggle to address the challenges of modern society. These religious systems were largely established in social contexts from centuries ago. However, contemporary psychological issues—such as anxiety, stress, and loneliness—far exceed the scope of what religions historically dealt with.

Although religious teachings often emphasize ideas of love and tolerance, they frequently lack practical guidance, especially on how to navigate the challenges of daily life in the modern world. Too often, followers are met with moral exhortations rather than specific psychological support or growth-oriented advice tailored to their situations. Religious organizations frequently remain stuck in abstract sermons and admonitions, thus failing to meet the deeper spiritual needs of people today.

3. Conflict with progressive values

The backwardness of religion is also evident in its resistance to modern values. For instance, some religions continue to oppose progressive social issues such as gender equality and LGBTQ+ rights. Some even position themselves against science and human rights. This hostility toward modern values further weakens religion’s appeal. It is especially true among younger generations. For them, religion has become a symbol of outdated thinking.

IV. The Diversification of Spiritual Exploration

When religion fails to adapt to the times, people’s search for meaning and happiness does not stop—it simply shifts to other domains:

1. The Rise of Science and Philosophy

Science and philosophy have demonstrated remarkable appeal in explaining the universe, life, and human behavior. Many have come to believe that through scientific exploration and philosophical inquiry, they can move beyond traditional religious explanations to find more reliable answers.

2. The Popularization of Psychology and Spirituality

Modern practices like psychology and spirituality offer more personalized and practical paths for spiritual growth. Whether through meditation, mindfulness, or positive psychology, these methods resonate more closely with the needs of modern individuals, gradually becoming substitutes for religion.

3. The Emergence of Humanism and Pluralistic Values

Humanism places humans, rather than deities, at the center of its philosophy. It emphasizes that everyone can achieve happiness and meaning through their own efforts. This perspective, combined with the inclusivity of multiculturalism, allows people to embrace diverse spiritual practices without being confined to a single religious framework.

V. Rethinking Religion’s Future: Pathways to Renewal

The decline of religion is not inevitable. If religious institutions critically address their limitations and adapt to contemporary society, they may still reclaim their relevance:

1. Evolving doctrinal understanding

Religions must reinterpret their teachings to resonate with modern life while honoring tradition. By revitalizing ancient wisdom, faiths can help followers explore deeper self, navigate modern struggles—emotional turmoil, isolation, stress—and foster personal spiritual development.

Religion transcends individual belief. It shapes community bonds, cultural identity, and collective resilience. Rather than focusing solely on moral preaching, religions with the perspective of sociology could expand their role by offering tangible social services and psychological support aligned with today’s needs.

Meanwhile, breaking down barriers between religion, science, and society could spark constructive dialogue. A harmonized relationship between spiritual traditions and advancements in science/humanities might catalyze broader societal and ethical progress.

2. Organizational reform and openness

Religious organizations should establish effective oversight mechanisms for their leaders and introduce more democratic decision-making processes to prevent the concentration of absolute authority in a single individual. Through collective participation by followers, supervision by independent external bodies, and regular public accountability from leaders, they can ensure that the actions of leadership align with the core principles of the religion and the interests of its followers.

At the same time, religious organizations should actively create platforms for dialogue with science, philosophy, culture, and social groups. By organizing regular lectures, seminars, and interdisciplinary collaborative projects, they can promote exchanges and interactions between religion and modern thought, fostering a more inclusive faith environment.

3. Focusing on global issues and social responsibility

sReligious organizations can play a unique role in building global peace. Many religions inherently promote peace through their teachings, such as Christianity’s “love thy neighbor as thyself,” Islam’s emphasis on “peace and tranquility,” and Buddhism’s principle of “non-violence.” These ideas can serve as spiritual forces for resolving conflict and violence, particularly in fostering dialogue between different cultures and faiths. By acting as bridges of understanding and cooperation, religions can facilitate meaningful connections. Through collaboration among international religious leaders, governments, and civil society, they can help mediate disputes and advance global peace.

4. Returning to the essence of the soul

Religion should not merely be a set of behavioral norms, but rather should focus on how to guide individuals towards inner peace and self-transcendence, helping people find their true self and discover profound meaning in the midst of the noisy world. Spiritual growth is not just completed through daily rituals, but rather through the inspiration of doctrines, continuous self-reflection, improvement of behaviors, and spiritual elevation.

Many religious doctrines contain insights about wisdom. Religion can help believers cultivate inner wisdom, and learn to better understand themselves, others, and the world. Through the classic teachings of religion, meditation practices, and collective discussions, believers can constantly enhance their level of self-awareness and discover the true value in their lives.

Conclusion

The backwardness of religion has gradually caused it to lose its dominant position in modern society, but it still carries humanity’s quest and longing for ultimate meaning. Only by breaking free from rigidity and courageously innovating can religion truly emerge from its predicament and march alongside modern civilization. For each individual, faith should not be the exclusive domain of religion either. Whether through religion or other spiritual paths, everyone should find their own source of inner peace and meaning.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

2025年中国大陸旅行記:文明を蝕む「悪魔」の正体

2025年中国大陸旅行記:文明を蝕む「悪魔」の正体

Kishou · Jul 22, 2025

――文明崩壊現象の下での観察報告 序言:文明の被災地を旅して 2025年7月、私は中国大陸の地に足を踏み入れました。本来の目的は、五千年の歴史を持つこの文化大国を、一人の旅人として訪れることでしたが、予期せず、それは現代の人間性の最も深い部分を観察する旅となりました。 そこは文明の廃墟ではありませんでした。むしろ、文明の対極と呼ぶべき場所でした。あらゆる思考、言語、価値、信仰が、静かに蝕まれていたのです。人々は現代的な衣服を身にまといながら、集団で一種の「洗練された反文明的な人格」を演じているかのようでした。 この旅で私が出会ったのは、想像していたような政治的な圧政者でも、浅薄な娯楽に溺れた人々でもありません。それよりも、さらに恐ろしく、より普遍的で、そして日常の奥深くまで浸透した、ある人格の風景でした。それは、反文明的な集団的人格構造であり、真理を体系的に否定し、労働を辱め、信仰を破壊し、理想を嘲笑することが常態化した社会心理です。 文明の崩壊は、圧政から始まるのではありません。多くの場合、それは人々が心の中で、文明そのものに対して裏切りを始めた時に始まります。 こちらが論理について議論しているつもりが、相手は文明を解体している。 常識を疑っているのだと思えば、実は真理を葬り去ろうとしている。 そして、真の「悪魔」とは、独裁者のことではありません。それは、「あなただって完璧ではないだろう」という言葉を繰り返し使い、理想を瓦解させようとする、一人ひとりの人間なのです。 だからこそ、私はこの記事を書かなければならないと思いました。 誰かを非難するためではありません。制度よりも恐ろしい崩壊、すなわち、人間の知性システム全体の崩壊を記録するためです。 一、反知性的な構造:文明の共通認識を破壊する「詭弁的論法」 中国大陸で私が最も衝撃を受けたのは、文化的な差異ではなく、普通の人々との対話における、ある種の持続的な「思考の罠」でした。 「緑が緑であると、どうやって証明するのですか?」 「1が必ずしも1と等しいとは限りませんよね?文脈が違えばどうですか?」 「100%の答えが出せないのなら、あなたの言っていることは間違いです」 これらの対話において、私が向き合っていたのは、好奇心や知的な探求心ではありませんでした。それは、反知性的な反論のメカニズムでした。このメカニズムは、「すべてを疑う」という口調を巧みに使い、あらゆる知識の基盤、推論の規範、そして言語の共通認識を否定することに長けています。 彼らは「弁証法的唯物論」という言葉で自らを武装していますが、学んだのは物事を解体することだけで、構築することはありません。 彼らは「相対性」を強調しますが、人類のあらゆる進歩が、暫定的な共通認識と、その時点で利用可能な真理の上に成り立っているという事実を無視します。 彼らは、あなたに世界の100%の説明を要求し、それができなければ、あなたの理論は「欠陥だらけ」だと断じます。そして、傍らで「見たまえ、文明なんてものも結局は偽りなのだ」と冷笑するのです。 これは健全な懐疑主義ではありません。知識の解体主義です。 この思考構造の背後には、深層的な無意識が存在します。 「私は真理を探求する責任を負う必要はない。ただ、あなたの不完全な点を指摘しさえすれば、文明は私によって打ち負かされるのだ」と。 これは、言語による知識への裏切りであり、論理を装った偽装であり、人類の理性的な精神に対する内側からの攻撃です。 二、反創造的な心理:学歴崇拝の下での労働への軽蔑と価値の真空 大陸の社会で、私は極度に分裂した現象を目の当たりにしました。 一方では、彼らは知識に対して何の敬意も払いません。しかし、その一方で、「学歴」をこの上なく崇拝しているのです。 「どこの大学出身ですか?」 「あなたに学歴がないのなら、むやみに発言しないでください」 「私たちはエリート大学しか評価しません」 それと同時に、真の労働者、すなわち職人、現場の研究者、第一線の建設者たちは、長期にわたって社会の周縁に追いやられ、その価値を貶められ、道具として扱われています。 この文脈において、労働は価値の体現ではなく、「無能の証明」となります。学歴は、幅広い知識への入り口ではなく、階級制度における身分証明書となるのです。 彼らは、創造性と労働の精神を、完全に引き裂いてしまっています。 この文化構造が破壊しているのは、人々の尊厳だけではありません。社会の持続可能な革新力そのものを扼殺しているのです。 労働を軽んじる民族が、真の文明を持つことはあり得ません。 「誰の学歴が高いか」で全てを決定する社会は、やがて精神的な抜け殻と化すでしょう。 三、反模範的な文化:模範となる人々は否定され、信仰は汚される 私は当初、高度な歴史文明を持つ社会は、思想家を大切にし、信仰を持つ人々を保護し、模範となる人物を尊敬するものだと考えていました。 しかし、それは間違いでした。 この土地では、「見習うべき価値のある」すべての人物が、100%完璧でなければならないという基準によって追い詰められます。 「彼の話は素晴らしいが、娘にはあまり良くない父親だったらしい」 「彼女は多くの本を書いたが、博士号は持っていない」 「彼は学者?それで、家族を養えているのですか?」 これは、最も残酷な精神的メカニズムです。模範となる人物の「人間的な側面」を暴き立てるのは、彼らの価値そのものを完全に否定するためなのです。 一度でもつまずけば、彼らは永遠に立つ資格がないと言います。 一つでも欠点があれば、彼らはそれを使って、全ての貢献を否定します。 信仰があれば、彼らは「嘘つき」「カルト」「役に立たない」と言います。 彼らは、模範を探しているのではありません。全ての模範を消し去りたいのです。 なぜなら、模範が打ち倒された後で初めて、誰もが安心してその場に留まり、前進する必要がなくなるからです。 彼らは、模範を信じていないのではなく、模範を恐れているのです。 もし模範の存在を認めてしまえば、自らの怠惰、凡庸さ、そして自己欺瞞と向き合わなければならなくなるからです。 四、人格メカニズムの全面的な崩壊:隷属性と冷笑の結合 この大陸における思考の危機は、もはや教育の問題でも、道徳の問題でもありません。それは、人格システムそのものの歪みと、社会構造が協調して進化した結果です。 この人格メカニズムの中では、 そして、これら全てを支えているのは、彼らの心の中にある、権力への崇拝、真理への弄び、労働への軽蔑、そして精神的なものへの憎悪です。 […]

2025中国大陆游记:你就是恶魔

2025中国大陆游记:你就是恶魔

Kishou · Jul 22, 2025

——文明崩坏现象下的观察报告 启言:当旅行遇上文明灾区 2025年7月,我踏上中国大陆,原意是以文明旅者的身份探访这片拥有五千年历史的文化古国,却意外地进入了一场对现代人性最深处的观察。 这里不是文明的废墟,而是文明的反面:一切思维、语言、价值、信仰,正在被悄无声息地腐蚀;人们身披现代衣装,却在集体演绎着一种“精致的反文明人格”。 在这段旅行中我没有遇到想象中的政治压迫者,也没有遇到肤浅娱乐中毒者,而是遇到一种更可怕、更普遍、且深入日常的人格景观——一种反文明的集体人格结构,一种系统性否认真理、羞辱劳动、破坏信仰、嘲笑理想的社会心理常态。 文明的倒塌并非从暴政开始,往往始于人民内心对文明本身的背叛。 你以为你在讨论逻辑,他却在拆解文明; 你以为他在怀疑常识,其实他在埋葬真理。 而真正的恶魔,不是独裁者,而是每一个不断用“你也不完美”来瓦解理想的人。 于是,我必须写下这篇文章。 不是为了指责谁,而是为了记录一场比制度更恐怖的崩塌——人类心智系统的整体溃散。 一、反知识结构:文明的共识,正在被“狡辩式逻辑”拆毁 中国大陆最让我震惊的,不是文化差异,而是与普通人交流时一种持续性的“思维陷阱”: “你怎么证明绿色就是绿色?” “1不一定等于1吧?不同语境呢?” “你不能100%回答,那你就是错的。” 在这些对话中,我不是在面对好奇心或求知欲,而是在面对一种反知识性的辩驳机制。这种机制最擅长用“怀疑一切”的语气,否定一切知识基础、推理规范与语言共识。 他们用“辩证唯物主义”的话术武装自己,却只学会了拆解,不会构建; 他们强调“相对性”,却忽略了人类一切进步都建立在暂时共识与可用真理之上; 他们要求你100%解释世界,否则你就是“漏洞百出”,而他们则可在一边冷笑地说:“看吧,文明也是骗人的。” 这不是怀疑主义,这是知识的瓦解主义。 这种思维结构的背后是一个深层潜意识: “我不需要承担探索责任,只需要指出你哪里不完美,文明就可以被我击败。” 这是语言对知识的背叛,是逻辑的伪装,是人类理性精神的反噬。 二、反创造心理:文凭崇拜下的劳动羞辱与价值真空 在大陆社会,我看到一种极度分裂的现象: 一方面,他们对知识毫无尊重;另一方面,却无比崇拜“文凭”。 “你是哪所大学的?” “你没学历,就不要乱说。” “我们只看985、211。” 与此同时,真正的劳动者——工匠、基层科研人员、一线建设者——被长期边缘化、贬低化、工具化。 在这个语境中,劳动不是价值的体现,而是“无能的证明”;文凭不是通识的入口,而是等级制度的牌照。 他们将创造力与劳动精神彻底撕裂: 这种文化结构摧毁的不只是人的尊严,更扼杀了社会的可持续创新力。 一个羞辱劳动的民族,不可能拥有真正的文明。 一个以“谁文凭高”决定一切的社会,终将沦为精神的空壳。 三、反榜样文化:楷模被屠戮,信仰被污名 我原以为一个高度历史文明的社会,会珍视思想者、保护信仰者、敬仰楷模。 但我错了。 在这片土地上,一切“值得效仿的人”都要被100%完美的标准追杀。 “他讲得很好,但听说对女儿不好。” “她写了很多书,但不是博士。” “他是学者?那他养活家人了吗?” 这是最残酷的精神机制:将榜样“人性化”,是为了彻底否定他们的价值。 只要你曾跌倒,他们就会说你永远不配站立; 只要你有短板,他们就能用它否定你全部贡献; 只要你有信仰,他们就能说你“骗人”“搞邪教”“没有用”。 他们不想找楷模,只想杀死所有楷模。 因为只有在榜样坍塌之后,所有人都可以安心躺平,无需前行。 他们不是不信榜样,是怕榜样。 因为一旦榜样成立,就意味着有人要面对自己的懒惰、庸碌、自欺。 四、人格机制的全面崩坏:奴性与冷嘲的完美结合 这片大陆的思维危机,早已不是教育问题,也不是道德问题,而是人格系统的扭曲与社会结构的协同演化。 在这种人格机制中: 而支撑这一切的,是他们内心早已习惯了对权力顶礼膜拜,对真理百般试探,对劳动视若卑贱,对精神满怀仇恨。 […]

read more

Related Content

The True Essence of Love: A Reflection on Self-Love and Compassion
The True Essence of Love: A Reflection on Self-Love and Compassion
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · May 22, 2024
Master Wonder explained the true meaning of love, and Daohe wrote this article based on her own understanding and interpretation. Love, in its truest form, emanates from within oneself. It is not selfishness, but rather a profound sense of care and compassion that starts from within and extends outward. A pervasive false belief is that […]
The Biggest Crisis in the World is Spiritual Poverty
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Dec 31, 2024
The world’s biggest crisis is “spiritual poverty.” While material poverty is a measurable lack, spiritual poverty is an intangible, deep crisis. It’s like an inner black hole that erodes individuals’ sense of meaning and happiness and weakens the spiritual foundation of entire societies. Why is spiritual poverty the most severe form of poverty? How does […]
The Property Divide: Women’s Rights and the Fight for Equality in the Family
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 5, 2025
Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent): In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting. Many parents, despite having money, […]
The three stages of spiritual awakening
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 19, 2025
The awakening of the soul is the deepest journey of exploration within each individual, a path from confusion to clarity, from constraint to freedom. It is not a sudden leap but a gradual, layered unfolding of self-awareness and transcendence. This process can be divided into three stages, each representing a profound shift in perception, guiding […]
View All Content