Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 23, 2025
Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but […]

Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but also leads to the gradual marginalization, and even abandonment, of religion.

This article will delve into the obsolescence of religion and its implications from four perspectives: doctrine, organizational structure, social functions, and spiritual needs, while reflecting on the potential future trajectories of religious development.

I. Rigidity of Doctrine: Inability to Address Modern Issues

Religious teachings are at the heart of religion, but many of these teachings come from a time thousands of years ago. They don’t fit well with today’s complicated world. It’s not that people don’t need faith anymore—it’s that religion hasn’t kept up with the times. This is why many people today feel disconnected from or uninterested in religion.

1. Outdated doctrines

Many teachings of traditional religions originated in ancient societies, where the level of productivity, scientific understanding, and social structures shaped their explanations of the world. For example, religious texts often describe the origins of the universe, natural phenomena, and the meaning of life in ways that lack credibility when examined through the lens of modern science. As people today gain deeper knowledge about the universe and life, these teachings appear increasingly outdated and disconnected from scientific understanding. This disconnect not only weakens their relevance but also leads to frustration or even rejection.

2. Lack of dynamic interpretation

The rigidity of religious doctrine is not only reflected in its outdated content but also in its lack of flexibility in interpretation. Many religious leaders and institutions adhere strictly to traditional explanations, unwilling to adapt their teachings to align with modern culture, science, and philosophy. This resistance prevents religion from offering relevant and practical spiritual guidance to people today.

3. Overlooking the complexity of human nature

In modern society, human needs extend beyond material fulfillment and simple spiritual solace—they now demand a profound understanding of personal worth, free choice, and multicultural coexistence. However, certain religious doctrines continue to judge human behavior through a binary opposition framework (e.g., good vs. evil, salvation vs. damnation), failing to encompass the multifaceted nature of humanity. This oversimplified doctrinal system increasingly struggles to resonate with people, particularly among educated younger generations who prioritize critical thinking and individuality.

II. Closed and Conservative Organizational Structures: The Failure of Religious Authority

In addition to the rigidity of its doctrines, the closed and conservative nature of religious organizations is another core manifestation of their inability to adapt to modern times.

1. Centralization of Power and Corruption

The excessive concentration of power within religious organizations often leads to opaque management structures and even fosters corruption. For instance, some religious leaders exploit the trust of their followers for personal gain or conceal internal scandals to maintain their authority. Such behavior undermines the perceived sanctity and legitimacy of religion, ultimately driving people away from it.

2. Hierarchical Systems and Exclusionary Practices

Many religious organizations maintain rigid hierarchical systems that emphasize obedience and authority. This structure often neglects the individual needs of followers and even suppresses independent thinking. At the same time, some religious groups exhibit strong exclusivity, often refusing to engage in cooperation or dialogue with other faiths, cultures, or belief systems. Such a narrow-minded approach appears increasingly out of place in an era defined by globalization and diversity.

3. The Spread of Formalism

Religious organizations often prioritize formal rituals and doctrines over addressing the genuine spiritual needs of their followers. For example, elaborate religious ceremonies can become a burden rather than a source of spiritual nourishment. The spread of such formalism gradually strips religion of its intrinsic appeal, rendering it hollow and meaningless.

III. Weakening Social Function: Failure to Address Contemporary Issues

While religion historically served as a pillar of meaning for people, its social role has significantly weakened in modern society, even becoming absent in critical areas.

1. Indifference to global issues

In the face of global challenges such as climate change, wealth inequality, migration crises, and gender inequality, religion should ideally play a moral leadership role. However, many religious organizations adopt conservative and narrow-minded attitudes and show little initiative in promoting global cooperation or social responsibility. This indifference diminishes religion’s social influence and, in some cases, even turns it into a source of division.

2. Neglecting mental health and spiritual needs

Many traditional religions struggle to address the challenges of modern society. These religious systems were largely established in social contexts from centuries ago. However, contemporary psychological issues—such as anxiety, stress, and loneliness—far exceed the scope of what religions historically dealt with.

Although religious teachings often emphasize ideas of love and tolerance, they frequently lack practical guidance, especially on how to navigate the challenges of daily life in the modern world. Too often, followers are met with moral exhortations rather than specific psychological support or growth-oriented advice tailored to their situations. Religious organizations frequently remain stuck in abstract sermons and admonitions, thus failing to meet the deeper spiritual needs of people today.

3. Conflict with progressive values

The backwardness of religion is also evident in its resistance to modern values. For instance, some religions continue to oppose progressive social issues such as gender equality and LGBTQ+ rights. Some even position themselves against science and human rights. This hostility toward modern values further weakens religion’s appeal. It is especially true among younger generations. For them, religion has become a symbol of outdated thinking.

IV. The Diversification of Spiritual Exploration

When religion fails to adapt to the times, people’s search for meaning and happiness does not stop—it simply shifts to other domains:

1. The Rise of Science and Philosophy

Science and philosophy have demonstrated remarkable appeal in explaining the universe, life, and human behavior. Many have come to believe that through scientific exploration and philosophical inquiry, they can move beyond traditional religious explanations to find more reliable answers.

2. The Popularization of Psychology and Spirituality

Modern practices like psychology and spirituality offer more personalized and practical paths for spiritual growth. Whether through meditation, mindfulness, or positive psychology, these methods resonate more closely with the needs of modern individuals, gradually becoming substitutes for religion.

3. The Emergence of Humanism and Pluralistic Values

Humanism places humans, rather than deities, at the center of its philosophy. It emphasizes that everyone can achieve happiness and meaning through their own efforts. This perspective, combined with the inclusivity of multiculturalism, allows people to embrace diverse spiritual practices without being confined to a single religious framework.

V. Rethinking Religion’s Future: Pathways to Renewal

The decline of religion is not inevitable. If religious institutions critically address their limitations and adapt to contemporary society, they may still reclaim their relevance:

1. Evolving doctrinal understanding

Religions must reinterpret their teachings to resonate with modern life while honoring tradition. By revitalizing ancient wisdom, faiths can help followers explore deeper self, navigate modern struggles—emotional turmoil, isolation, stress—and foster personal spiritual development.

Religion transcends individual belief. It shapes community bonds, cultural identity, and collective resilience. Rather than focusing solely on moral preaching, religions with the perspective of sociology could expand their role by offering tangible social services and psychological support aligned with today’s needs.

Meanwhile, breaking down barriers between religion, science, and society could spark constructive dialogue. A harmonized relationship between spiritual traditions and advancements in science/humanities might catalyze broader societal and ethical progress.

2. Organizational reform and openness

Religious organizations should establish effective oversight mechanisms for their leaders and introduce more democratic decision-making processes to prevent the concentration of absolute authority in a single individual. Through collective participation by followers, supervision by independent external bodies, and regular public accountability from leaders, they can ensure that the actions of leadership align with the core principles of the religion and the interests of its followers.

At the same time, religious organizations should actively create platforms for dialogue with science, philosophy, culture, and social groups. By organizing regular lectures, seminars, and interdisciplinary collaborative projects, they can promote exchanges and interactions between religion and modern thought, fostering a more inclusive faith environment.

3. Focusing on global issues and social responsibility

sReligious organizations can play a unique role in building global peace. Many religions inherently promote peace through their teachings, such as Christianity’s “love thy neighbor as thyself,” Islam’s emphasis on “peace and tranquility,” and Buddhism’s principle of “non-violence.” These ideas can serve as spiritual forces for resolving conflict and violence, particularly in fostering dialogue between different cultures and faiths. By acting as bridges of understanding and cooperation, religions can facilitate meaningful connections. Through collaboration among international religious leaders, governments, and civil society, they can help mediate disputes and advance global peace.

4. Returning to the essence of the soul

Religion should not merely be a set of behavioral norms, but rather should focus on how to guide individuals towards inner peace and self-transcendence, helping people find their true self and discover profound meaning in the midst of the noisy world. Spiritual growth is not just completed through daily rituals, but rather through the inspiration of doctrines, continuous self-reflection, improvement of behaviors, and spiritual elevation.

Many religious doctrines contain insights about wisdom. Religion can help believers cultivate inner wisdom, and learn to better understand themselves, others, and the world. Through the classic teachings of religion, meditation practices, and collective discussions, believers can constantly enhance their level of self-awareness and discover the true value in their lives.

Conclusion

The backwardness of religion has gradually caused it to lose its dominant position in modern society, but it still carries humanity’s quest and longing for ultimate meaning. Only by breaking free from rigidity and courageously innovating can religion truly emerge from its predicament and march alongside modern civilization. For each individual, faith should not be the exclusive domain of religion either. Whether through religion or other spiritual paths, everyone should find their own source of inner peace and meaning.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

現代における情報植民地主義:市民社会の言論の自由と情報主権を論ず

Daohe · Jun 8, 2025

デジタル時代を迎え、情報は単なる伝達手段という役割から、統治のための資源、認識を操作する武器、そして社会を制御する手段へとその姿を変えた。 言論の自由と情報主権は、現代社会の市民が個人の尊厳、集団のアイデンティティ、そして公権力への監視を維持するための根源的な保障である。しかし今日、これらはデジタル覇権、巨大プラットフォーム資本、そして国家の安全保障装置という複数の力が絡み合う中で、全面的な侵食と剥奪の危機に瀕している。 表面的には、誰もが表現の権利を持ち、情報は至る所に溢れ、世論は活発化しているように見える。だがその裏側では、極めて巧妙かつシステマティックな「現代的情報植民地戦争」が進行しているのだ。 この戦争の目的は、単にデータ資源や経済的利益を奪うことだけではない。それは、人々の認識、思考、信条、感情、そして行動そのものを再構築し、市民社会の独立性と自己省察能力を根底から瓦解させることにある。 一、言論の自由の本質と社会的機能 言論の自由とは、決して個人の表現欲を満たすためだけのものではない。それは、現代民主主義社会における重要な自己防衛メカニズムであり、以下の機能を保障するものである。 ひとたび言論の自由が組織的に抑圧されれば、社会は自己修正能力を失い、政治権力は暴走し、特権階級が生まれ、人々の認識は画一化し、社会から異論が消え、最終的には情報全体主義へと至る。 現代のデジタルプラットフォーム上で謳われる「自由」とは、緻密な計算の上で管理された、制御可能な言論の自由に過ぎない。プラットフォームと当局が共同でルール、言説の境界線、そして世論の「越えてはならない一線」を設定し、「自由で繁栄している」という幻影を作り出す。それは実のところ、「温水でカエルを茹でる」かの如き飼い慣らしに他ならない。 二、情報主権の戦略的価値とグローバル競争 情報主権とは、一国あるいは一社会が、自らのデジタル情報の流通、データ資源、言説の体系、そして認識の枠組みを、自律的に管理・制御する能力を指す。 デジタル時代において、情報主権はもはや付随的な議題ではなく、国家の存亡に関わる問題となっている。 データ資源を制する者が、社会の動向と民衆の感情を予測し、操作し、誘導することができる。国際社会において、情報はエネルギー、金融、軍事に次ぐ新たな戦略資源と化しており、世界規模での情報主権獲得競争は激化の一途をたどっている。 1. 「デジタル覇権国家」 は、データの越境流通の自由化や人権保護を名目に、発展途上国にデータ市場の開放を要求する。その実態は、データ資源を収奪し、世論環境を操作し、政治に介入し、自国の代理人勢力を育成することにある。 2. 「デジタル植民地主義」 は、SNS、検索エンジン、ショート動画プラットフォーム、世論ランキングなどを通じて静かに浸透し、他国民の認識体系を再構築し、その国の政府の信頼性を毀損し、社会の分断と認識の混乱を生み出している。 三、プラットフォーム資本と国家権力の二重の軛 (くびき) 国内に目を向ければ、巨大プラットフォームは情報の伝達者から、世論の支配者、そして認識の操作者へと変質した。彼らはトラフィック収益の最大化という原則に基づき、感情的、対立的、迎合的なコンテンツを意図的に増幅させ、理性的、建設的、批判的な声を抑制し、トラフィック至上主義という全体主義的エコシステムを形成している。 時を同じくして、国家機関は社会の安定維持やイデオロギー防衛を名目に、センシティブワードのリスト化、キーワード監視、AIによる世論パトロール、アカウント凍結、トピックの強制的な非表示化、世論対策チームの設置といった手法を通じて、24時間体制で言論空間を隅々までコントロールしている。 資本と権力のこの共謀関係は、市民を二重の剥奪状態へと陥れる。 このような構造の下、社会の世論は、表面的には賑やかでありながら、実質的には単調で、感情論に満ち、理性を欠き、異論が消え、真実が見えない空虚な風景と化していく。 四、現代デジタル植民地主義の作動メカニズム デジタル植民地主義は、かつての武力による領土拡大や植民地支配とは異なり、以下の四重のメカニズムを通じて完成される。 五、市民の情報権の形骸化 現代社会の市民は、「デジタル時代の従順な民」へと成り下がりつつある。その特徴は以下の通りである。 彼らは、不自由であることを知りながら自由の幻想を抱き、無限の情報奔流の中で真実を見失い、判断力をなくし、次第にプラットフォームという生態系における「デジタル労働者」そして「情報消費財」と化していく。 六、情報主権を回復するための道筋 この現代のデジタル植民地主義を打ち破り、市民が本来持つべき情報主権を取り戻すためには、以下の六つの道筋が極めて重要となる。 結語 情報主権と言論の自由は、抽象的な理念ではない。それは、現代社会の市民が生き残り、デジタル全体主義に抵抗するための武器である。 言論の自由が全面的な検閲に晒され、情報主権が資本と権力のおもちゃに成り下がった時、市民社会は自己を修復し、自己を認識し、自己を解放する能力を完全に喪失するだろう。 今日、私たちが目覚めなければ、未来に自由な社会はなく、そこにあるのはデジタル監獄とトラフィックの奴隷制だけである。 行動を通じてのみ、連帯を通じてのみ、そして闘いを通じてのみ、我々は偽りの自由という幻想を打ち破り、市民自身の手に情報主権を取り戻し、真に自由で公正、かつ多様で理性的なデジタル世界を再建できるのである。

read more

Related Content

The three stages of spiritual awakening
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 19, 2025
The awakening of the soul is the deepest journey of exploration within each individual, a path from confusion to clarity, from constraint to freedom. It is not a sudden leap but a gradual, layered unfolding of self-awareness and transcendence. This process can be divided into three stages, each representing a profound shift in perception, guiding […]
The Biggest Crisis in the World is Spiritual Poverty
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Dec 31, 2024
The world’s biggest crisis is “spiritual poverty.” While material poverty is a measurable lack, spiritual poverty is an intangible, deep crisis. It’s like an inner black hole that erodes individuals’ sense of meaning and happiness and weakens the spiritual foundation of entire societies. Why is spiritual poverty the most severe form of poverty? How does […]
Spiritual Practice is the Continuous Cultivation and Deepening of Goodness
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 28, 2024
Spiritual practice is often seen as a path to inner peace, wisdom, and enlightenment, with goodness as a core principle. But goodness is often misinterpreted—it isn’t merely a single gesture, but a profound inner belief grounded in unconditional love for others and for the world. This love helps us expand and get deeper into goodness, […]
View All Content