In Quality Education, Every child is an A

Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 27, 2024
The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]

The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process. 

In traditional education, students are often categorized based on grades like “excellent, good, poor” or “A, B, C,” a hierarchical assessment method that is essentially a product of class society, focusing on adherence to fixed standards. However, quality education breaks through this tradition by viewing children’s learning and development as a multidimensional and infinitely evolving process. It advocates for respecting individual differences, granting each child equal status and opportunities, allowing them to continuously expand their abilities and qualities.

Every child is an A

The core concept of quality education is that every child is considered an ‘A,’ which means that every child has equal developmental potential and opportunities. Education no longer labels children as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ based on their scores. Instead, it focuses on inspiring their diverse potentials and individual growth.

Each child has their own unique pace and rhythm in the learning process, and progress should not be measured by a single score but by their positive attitude towards learning, spirit of exploration, overall achievements, and performance in various fields. This approach makes education more diverse and inclusive, allowing each child to find their own shining points in different areas.

The “+” after A

Within the framework of quality education, the “+” after “A” not only symbolizes a student’s academic progress but also represents the extra efforts, positive attitude, and personal growth they demonstrate throughout the learning process. Each “+” signifies their achievements in different areas. For example, some children may not excel academically compared to others, yet they may showcase unique talents in arts, sports, or social activities. Regardless of how many “+” signs a child has, the task of education is to create a diverse growth environment that allows each child to accumulate their own A+ in their own way.

Limitless A+

The concept of “Limitless A+” in quality education means that children’s learning and growth have no fixed endpoint. They are empowered to continuously challenge themselves and pursue higher achievements. This evaluation system breaks away from the traditional score model, emphasizing the continuity of learning and the infinite potential of individuals. 

Limitless A+ is not only a recognition of children’s achievements but also a confidence and expectation for their growth process. It encourages students to continually strive for excellence, whether academically, in skills, or in personal qualities and social responsibility, allowing for ongoing improvement. This educational approach equips children with confidence and motivation when facing future challenges, fostering diverse adaptability.

Everyone is an A

In the values of quality education, the idea that “everyone is an A” not only recognizes children’s learning achievements but also reflects social equality. Quality education posits that the fundamental purpose of education is not to categorize children as superior or inferior, but to stimulate each child’s potential and value by providing equal educational resources and development opportunities. 

Regardless of a child’s talents or areas of interest, education should create a supportive and inclusive environment that allows them to achieve success in their strengths while encouraging them to try new things and explore different possibilities. The concept of ‘Everyone is an A’ aims to eliminate labeling in education, emphasizing respect for individual differences and acceptance of diversity.

Comparison Between Traditional Education and Quality Education

The traditional educational evaluation system tends to rank and categorize students based on fixed standards, a practice that may lead some children to develop feelings of inferiority due to unsatisfactory grades, negatively impacting their interest in learning. In contrast, quality education advocates for a multidimensional assessment system that considers children’s growth from various perspectives. It focuses not only on academic performance but also values their exploration spirit, problem-solving abilities, teamwork, and creativity during the learning process. This differentiated evaluation approach encourages children to focus on their own growth rather than comparing their achievements to others.

Through a multidimensional assessment approach, quality education provides personalized support, helping children achieve greater success in their areas of strength while also inspiring them to explore new learning fields and develop adaptability in facing complex problems. This method not only helps children build self-confidence but also fosters their independent thinking abilities and lifelong learning habits.

Quality Education: A Bridge to Civil Society

The concept of “Every child is an A” in quality education is not only a reform in the educational field but also an important step towards promoting social equality. It aligns with the principles of universal human rights, ensuring that every child has equal opportunities and rights to development in education. This educational approach eliminates the singular pursuit of grades, breaks down the labeling of “failure” and helps to reduce social class differentiation, allowing all children to receive fair treatment and growth opportunities in education.

Quality education nurtures not only knowledgeable and skilled individuals but also focuses on shaping future citizens with a sense of responsibility, social concern, and a global perspective. Through this educational method, children develop a proper civic awareness from a young age, recognizing their own and others’ equal worth, and learning to respect differences and embrace diversity. These qualities will not only enable them to fulfill various roles in future society but also lay the foundation for building a more equitable and democratic civil society.

Conclusion

Quality education advocates the concept that “Every child is an A,” representing an innovation in educational methods and a respect for citizen equality. The ‘+’ after ‘A’ symbolizes the infinite growth potential and continuous progress of children; “Limitless A+” inspires them to pursue excellence and embrace exploration during their development. Through multidimensional assessment and differentiated nurturing methods, quality education provides each child with equal opportunities for development, allowing them to demonstrate their value and potential in a diverse learning environment. 

This educational approach not only shapes individuals who are more adaptable and creative but also drives society towards greater fairness and democracy, laying a solid foundation for the realization of civil society ideals.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

台湾の大規模罷免運動:私たちは彼らを選べても、罷免は決してできないのか?

台湾の大規模罷免運動:私たちは彼らを選べても、罷免は決してできないのか?

Kishou · Jul 24, 2025

一乗公益 寄稿 私たちは、世界の民主主義制度における深いレベルの改革というテーマに、引き続き注目していきます。 付録:台湾の罷免制度に関する10の修正提案 序論: 多くの民主主義国家において、国民は「投票で代表者を選ぶ」権利を持つ一方で、「任期中に罷免する」ことは極めて困難です。 これは偶然ではなく、制度設計に「内在する障壁」が組み込まれているからです。近年、台湾で相次いで発生した罷免運動を例にとれば、その制度が実際には機能不全に陥り、民意が制度的に冷遇され、政治的責任追及がほぼ不可能になっている様子が明確に見て取れます。 この背景には、より深い民主主義の問いがあります。 罷免権を持たない民主主義は、制御不能な委任に過ぎません。 有効な罷免メカニズムを持たない制度は、単なる見せかけの政治に過ぎません。 一、台湾における罷免の苦境:現実レベルの「合法的な無効化」 √ 事例1:陳柏惟氏の罷免案(2021年) × 事例2:黄捷氏の罷免案(2021年) × 事例3:鍾東錦氏の罷免案(2024年) これらの事例が示すのは、制度が罷免の道を開きながらも、実際には「罷免阻止の仕組み」を構築しているということです。 二、なぜ罷免制度は「形骸化」しているのでしょうか?台湾における5つの制度的障壁 1. 手続きが複雑で、ハードルが極めて高い 問題は、制度が「罷免」を専門的な闘争に変えてしまい、一般市民が関与しにくい点にあります。 2. 政党による乗っ取りと政治的二極化、罷免を「選挙戦の延長」に貶める 罷免の本質は制度の自浄作用であるはずが、政党が互いに攻撃する道具として利用されています。 3. 市民の動員構造の解体、行動力が高度に分散 現代の民主社会では、個人は「自由」であると同時に「孤立」しています。 4. メディア環境の異質化、言論空間が「偽の民意」を生成 メディアはもはや市民の判断を導くのではなく、政党の方針を固めるのを助ける役割を担っています。 5. 罷免後の制度的な後始末がなく、市民が混乱を恐れる 市民が求めるのは「責任ある是正メカニズム」であり、混乱後の政治の空転ではありません。 三、民主主義には「完全な罷免制度」が不可欠です もし民主主義が公共の列車だとすれば、選挙は乗車であり、罷免はブレーキです。 ブレーキシステムを持たない民主主義は、自由な制度ではなく、制度的な制御不能に陥っています。 ▶ 完全な罷免制度は、以下の5つの要素を含むべきです。 構成要素 機能 台湾の現状 改善提案 ① 容易な発動 市民が発起でき、政党の支援は不要であるべきです。 極めて高いハードルです。 第1段階のハードルを0.5%にまで引き下げます。 ② 公正な審査 署名、資格、公文書のプロセスがすべて公開されるべきです。 行政権による審査が曖昧です。 超党派の独立罷免委員会の設立。 ③ 政党による操作の排除 […]

台湾大罢免:我们能选他们,却永远罢不掉他们?

台湾大罢免:我们能选他们,却永远罢不掉他们?

Kishou · Jul 24, 2025

一乘公益 出品 我们将持续关注世界民主制度的深层改革议题。 附:台湾罢免制度的十大修正建议 引言: 在多数民主国家,人民拥有“投票选人”的权利,却极难“中途罢人”。 这不是偶然,而是制度设计上的“内建屏障”。以台湾近年来接连爆发的罢免案为例,我们可以清晰地看到:罢免制度在操作上几近瘫痪,民意被制度性冷处理,政治责任几乎无法追究。 这背后,是一个更深刻的民主命题: 没有罢免权的民主,是失控的授权; 没有有效罢免机制的制度,只是表演性的政治。 一、台湾的罢免困局:现实层面的“合法无效” 案例1:陈柏惟罢免案(2021) 案例2:黄捷罢免案(2021) 案例3:钟东锦罢免案(2024) 这些案例说明:制度虽开罢免口子,实际却构建了“防罢免机制”。 二、为什么罢免制度“名存实亡”?台湾的五重制度性障碍 1. 程序复杂,门槛奇高 问题在于:制度把“罢免”变成了专业战争,普通人难以介入。 2. 政党绑架与政治极化,令罢免沦为选战延长线 罢免的本义是制度自清,却被政党当作政治互打工具。 3. 民众动员结构解体,行动力被高度分散 现代民主社会里,个体虽“自由”,但“孤立”。 4. 媒体生态异化,言论空间制造假民意 媒体不再引导公民判断,而是在协助政党定调。 5. 罢免之后,无制度性善后,导致民众恐惧动荡 民众需要的是“负责任的纠错机制”,不是混乱后的政治空转。 三、民主必须有“完整的罢免机制” 如果民主是一辆公共列车,选举是上车,罢免就是刹车。 一个没有刹车系统的民主,不是自由的制度,而是制度性失控。 ▶ 完整的罢免机制应包含五个构件: 构件 功能 台湾现状 优化建议 ① 易启动 民众能发起,无需政党支援 极高门槛 降低第一阶段门槛至0.5% ② 公正审查 联署、资格、公文全程公开 行政权审查模糊 建立跨党独立罢免委员会 ③ 非政党操控 去党化动员 政党完全主导罢免动员 限制政党使用行政资源介入罢免 […]

read more

Related Content

Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 3, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
The Gap in Education is the Gap in Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 4, 2024
Thinking on Education Gap Introduction Throughout different historical periods, disparities in education have consistently reflected gaps in civilization. Education is the cornerstone for shaping the qualities of individuals, building social culture and values, and driving technological innovation. Differences in educational levels directly affect the degree of civilization within a society. A review of human history […]
Vision: Education of Civilization and Culture
Vision: Education of Civilization and Culture
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 1, 2024
Education is the foundation of society, shaping lives and future. Beyond knowledge and skills, quality education encompasses culture, civilization, and global citizenship, fostering personal success and societal progress.
View All Content