Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

灵魂的坠落从无明开始,人格的坠落从私利开始

Master Wonder · Feb 11, 2025

三教归源不只是一种学说更是一种修养与修行 人类的成长,是一场认知的觉醒,也是一次人格的淬炼。灵魂的沉沦始于无明,而人格的败坏源自私利。无明,是对真理的无知,对本质的迷失;私利,则是对个人欲望的放纵,对群体价值的背弃。只有认识的不断提高,我们才能从无明中走出;只有博爱的心灵,我们才能摆脱私利的桎梏。 在三教归源的视角下,灵魂与人格的升华不仅关乎个体修行,更关乎人类文明的发展。“通”(认识与理解)、“同”(共融与互达)、“汇”(合一与升华),正是超越无明与私利的重要路径。值得强调的是,三教归源是唯一一个从文明的角度,希望所有人幸福与富裕的修行与学说。它不仅关注个体的精神成长,更关注社会整体的繁荣,致力于让全人类在文明的进程中共同走向幸福与富裕,而不是停留在单纯的信仰层面。 无明的黑暗:灵魂沉沦的起点 在佛法中,“无明”并非单纯的无知,而是一种深层次的认知局限,它让人无法看清世界的本质,困于执念、偏见与幻象之中。无明让人沉溺于错误的认知体系,不仅无法自救,甚至会主动抗拒真理,陷入更深的困境。最典型的例子便是历史上的极端思想、迷信狂热,以及那些因认知偏差而导致的社会灾难。 破除无明,首先需要的是“通”——即认识、理解与沟通。三教归源强调,真正的智慧不是封闭的,而是开放的与多元的。一个人若想从无明中走出,必须愿意接触不同的思想,接受不同的智慧,并在理解中逐步提升自己的认知。 无论是佛教的“缘起性空”,还是道家的“道法自然”,都指向同一个本质:只有当一个人超越自我的局限,真正理解世界的运行法则,才能从无明的深渊中解脱。 自私利的腐蚀:人格堕落的根源 自私利,是人格堕落的核心根源。它不仅关乎金钱、权力等外在利益,更深层次的是一种精神上的狭隘——只关注自身得失,而忽略他人的存在。这种心态,会让人变得冷漠、贪婪,甚至不择手段。 自私利的可怕之处在于,它会扭曲人的价值观,让人逐渐失去同理心,最终形成一种“利己至上”的生存哲学。这种哲学不仅影响个人的道德选择,更会侵蚀社会的基本信任。当人与人之间的关系只剩下利益计算,社会集合便会陷入崩溃的边缘。 要打破自私利的桎梏,关键在于“同”——即共融与互达。当一个人意识到自己并非孤立的个体,而是更大生命网络中的一部分,他便能从狭隘的私利观念中走出,进入更广阔的生命体验。 这种思想其实广泛存在于主流信仰中,是很多宗教的共通点——即一种超越自我中心的视角,让个体的成长与集体的福祉紧密相连。 举个例子,道家讲“无为”,并非让人消极,而是希望人们顺应自然之道,信任与拥抱这个世界,从而回归生命最纯粹的本真。 而佛家讲“慈悲”,则是希望人们能超越自我,以无私的心态面对世界,在关爱众生中找到真正的幸福所在。 广义文明的高度:三教归源的实践之道 许多信仰体系只关注个体的精神解脱,强调超脱红尘、追求彼岸世界的宁静。”三教归源“的修行体系不仅关心个体灵魂的提升,也关心个体现世生活的幸福和社会整体的进步。 三教归源认为,真正的幸福并非建立在苦修与禁欲之上,而是建立在健康的文明秩序与社会结构之上。当人们在物质上得到合理的保障,精神上得到足够的滋养,社会才可能实现真正的和谐与幸福。 因此,三教归源不仅提倡精神的觉醒,更提倡幸福社会的建设,主张通过文明的发展让所有人都能过上富足、幸福的生活。 这便引出了”三教归源“的第二步——”汇“。”汇“不只是简单的信仰融合,而是一种更高层次的文明目标:将不同的智慧体系整合,形成一种既能提升个体灵魂,又能推动社会进步的完整体系。 在这个体系中,经济、文化、教育、信仰等各个领域都能协同发展,最终实现全人类的共同幸福。 走向幸福与富裕的道路 灵魂的救赎,在于觉醒;人格的升华,在于博爱;文明的进步,在于汇聚一切智慧,为全人类创造更美好的世界。 在现实世界中,那些真正推动社会进步的人,往往并非单纯的思想家,而是能够将智慧转化为实践的人。他们不仅关注个体的成长,更关注社会整体的发展。他们知道,真正的幸福不只是个人的解脱,而是所有人的共同幸福;真正的富裕,不是少数人的积累,而是所有人的共享与创造。 这正是三教归源的最终目标——通过“通”去认识与理解世界,通过“同”去融入与互达世界,通过“汇”去合一与升华世界,最终让所有人都走向幸福与富裕。 灵魂的坠落始于无明,人格的堕落始于私利。但只要认知不断提升,爱不断流淌,文明不断进步,我们就能从沉沦中走出,迈向真正的觉醒与超越。 三教归源不只是一种学说,更是每个有追求之人应当共同完成的修养与修行。

Enseñanza Esotérica: la decadencia humana y sus consecuencias

Master Wonder · Feb 9, 2025

Por favor, tener en cuenta que este artículo fue traducido de chino. No te comportes como un animal; y si es inevitable, no te conviertas en una bestia pecaminosa. I. ¿Qué es un ”humano”, un ”animal” o una ”bestia pecaminosa”? Un ser humano se define no solo por su apariencia física, sino también por su […]

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
View All Content