Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

善良的举动,就是文明的重新开启

Daohe · Jan 24, 2025

文明的诞生源于人类彼此的联结和互助。早期人类社会在面对自然威胁时,正是因为彼此之间的善意和合作,才能够共同生存并迈向繁荣。从原始社会的狩猎合作,到农业文明的公共灌溉体系,善良是推动人类进步的内在动力。这些历史事实提醒我们,文明从未脱离人性深处的善意而存在。 然而,随着社会的复杂化,文明的外壳逐渐厚重,技术、制度和经济发展似乎取代了善良成为文明的核心。人类开始习惯于通过冷漠或效率来处理人际关系。然而,正是在危机时刻,每一个善良的举动都会让我们意识到,文明并非单靠规则或技术构筑,它更依赖于人类对彼此生命价值的承认与守护。善良不仅是文明的初心,更是它在断裂后得以重建的契机。 一、善良的力量:重新连接人性与社会 现代社会的高效率和高度分工让人与人之间的关系变得疏远甚至冷漠,个体开始被视为数字或工具。然而,善良的举动能打破这种疏离感,重新连接彼此,赋予社会温度和意义。 1. 善良创造信任 信任是社会文明运行的基础,而善良则是信任的开端。每一个发自内心的善举,都是一种信任的表达——信任人性、信任社会的可能性。例如,在日本,无人售货摊被视为社会信任的象征,人们可以自主购买农产品,并将钱放入指定的容器。这些小型善举传递着人与人之间的基本信任,也形成了一种社会文明的自我循环。 2. 善良缓解冲突 善良是一种化解矛盾的力量,能够在人际或社会冲突中创造新的可能性。当我们在对立中选择善意,而非冷漠或对抗,往往能为彼此开辟一条通向和解的道路。 一个现实的例子是,在南非的种族隔离制度结束后,善良和宽恕成为重建社会的重要基石。德斯蒙德·图图领导的“真相与和解委员会”鼓励施害者坦白真相,并得到受害者的原谅。这种宽容与善意不仅避免了暴力报复,还让社会在包容互助的氛围中开启文明的新篇章。 3.善良的行动推动社会变革 善良不仅修复冲突,更能够推动社会的变革。当社会处于动荡或变革时期,善良作为一种核心价值,可以引领社会走向新的文明篇章。善良的行动能够改变传统的权力结构、打破社会壁垒,为弱势群体提供声音与机会。激发社会集体的责任感。一些由个体善举引发的行动,最终能演变为社会性的变革。 例如,“乐施会”(Oxfam)最初由一群英国公民发起,用于帮助战时饥饿的希腊民众,而这种小规模的善举随着更多人的参与,发展成为全球性的人道主义组织。善良的力量在于它能够激发共鸣,将个人的微光汇聚成影响深远的社会运动。 二、善良是文明重启的契机 历史证明,每当人类文明遭遇危机,善良总是成为引领社会走向复兴的关键力量。在天灾、人祸或社会动荡的背景下,善良不仅是短期的救济,更是长远的文明重塑。 1. 善良修复文明裂痕 当灾难或冲突使社会关系撕裂,善良便是填补裂缝的力量。例如,在2004年印度洋海啸后,无数国际志愿者涌入受灾地区,协助重建家园、提供物资援助和心理支持。他们的无私行动,不仅重建了灾区的物质环境,还让幸存者重新感受到被关怀和被连接的力量。这样的善举也激发了受灾者自身的信心与力量,成为他们重建生活的支撑。 2. 善良推动文明升级 善良不仅是灾后的修复力量,更能够为社会带来新生与升级。当善良成为群体的共同选择,便会催生新的社会模式和文明形态。 例如,芬兰的全民基本收入实验,其背后的理念正是基于对社会成员的善意:不让任何人被抛弃在社会体系之外。虽然实验仍有争议,但它体现了人类对善良的另一种制度化探索,试图通过政策化的方式实现社会文明的进一步发展。 四、善良的践行:从个体到制度 善良不是抽象的理想,而是可以通过行动不断实践的价值。如何从个体到社会,推动善良成为一种社会习惯和文明基石。 1. 个体善行的力量 每一个微小的善良行为,都是社会文明的养分。无论是为陌生人提供帮助,还是在公共空间自觉维护秩序,这些举动虽小,但却能在人群中形成“善意的连锁反应”。 心理学研究表明,当人们看到善行时,往往会被激发出更多的善意行为。这意味着,一个人的善良能够潜移默化地影响周围环境,甚至改变整个社会的风气。 2. 善良的制度化探索 善良不能仅停留在个体层面,更需要通过制度和政策的保障,形成长久的社会支持。例如,荷兰的“邻里援助”计划(Neighbors Helping Neighbors),鼓励居民在日常生活中互助,为老人、残疾人和其他弱势群体提供支持。这种善良的制度化设计,不仅增强了社区成员的归属感,还提升了整个社会的凝聚力。 3. 善良教育的代际传递 善良的力量需要代际传递,而教育是其最重要的途径。在瑞典和芬兰等国家,学校课程中强调“社会情感学习”(SEL),通过培养孩子的同理心、协作能力和社会责任感,让善良成为个人成长和社会文明的核心部分。通过这样的教育模式,善良不仅成为一种行为习惯,更内化为一种价值观念,推动文明代代相传。 五、结语:善良点燃文明的未来 善良是一种最朴素却又最深刻的力量。当世界面对孤立、冷漠或分裂时,善良是我们重建联系、修复社会裂痕的唯一希望。每一个善良的举动,都是文明的重新开启,是人类走向更高层次的发展的起点。 文明的真正高度,不在于技术的进步或财富的累积,而在于人类能否始终以善意面对彼此,以善良为基础塑造社会。善良是人性最本真的表达,也是文明的真正支柱。每一个善良的举动,都在为更美好的未来奠基;而每一次善良的延续,都在为人类开启新的文明篇章。 让我们相信并践行善良,因为它不仅是解决当下问题的答案,更是我们构筑未来的基石。

Comment la finance peut-elle profiter à tous ?

Comment la finance peut-elle profiter à tous ?

Kishou · Jan 24, 2025

Les activités financières comportent de nombreux risques, et une poignée de capitalistes en concentre la majeure partie des bénéfices. En rendant les connaissances en investissement plus accessibles, en favorisant la transparence, en encourageant les investissements ouverts à tous et en défendant les principes de l’investissement responsable, notre objectif est de bâtir un écosystème financier plus juste et inclusif, au bénéfice de tous.

read more

Related Content

Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
View All Content