Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Don’t let a narrow mindset hinder the journey of good deeds

Yicheng · Jan 17, 2025

On the journey of advancing public welfare, we often encounter the criticism: “Your charity seems too religious.” This is a classic example of a narrow perspective—one that is influenced by bias, limitations, or even misunderstanding, and fails to truly consider the viewpoint of those involved in charitable efforts. To better explain our original intentions, it […]

不要让个人的“窄目”,耽误了自己的行善之旅

Yicheng · Jan 17, 2025

在推动公益的道路上,我们常常听到这样一种声音:“你们的公益宗教化太重了。”这是一种典型的“窄目”式评价,它带着偏见、局限甚至某种误解,却从未真正站在公益行动者的角度去了解和思考。为了更好地阐明我们的初衷,我们有必要对此作一个解释,也希望每一位读者能以更开阔的视野来看待善良的行程。 一、公益的初衷:为人类谋幸福,为世界谋文明 我们公益组织的誓言从一开始便十分清晰:为所有人谋福利,谋幸福,为这个世界谋文明。 从开始的那一天起,到今天,我们所做的一切,始终坚持这样的信念。然而,令人深思的是,在历经多年的发展中,我们所有的资金和支持,毫无例外地来源于信仰者的力量——那些愿意将信仰的爱与善化为实际行动的人们。他们用真诚与坚持支持我们的公益事业,推动着幸福和文明的传播。 可遗憾的是,迄今为止,我们从未获得所谓“文明者”或“无信仰者”的支持。这样的支持,可以说是为“零”。 二、为什么善良需要信仰的支撑? 善良的道路,从来不是一条平坦的大道。它需要坚韧的信念、内心的力量和无私的奉献,而这些恰恰是信仰所赋予的。一个没有信仰支撑的善意,往往缺乏持久的动力,也难以承受来自现实的压力和挑战。 我们公益的支持者,正是因为怀有深沉的信仰,才愿意在这个复杂的世界中坚持行善。他们深知,公益并非易事,甚至可能面临牺牲,却依然愿意承担这份重任。 这里想分享一个故事。 一位画家接受了一位主持人的采访。主持人直言不讳地对他说:“我一点都不喜欢你的画,也不觉得你画得好。” 画家坦然一笑,回答说:“你说得对,这正是我需要不断努力的理由。” 这个故事告诉我们,面对外界的质疑与不理解,重要的不是争辩,而是坚定自己的信念,并用实际行动去回应。我们的公益事业,正如这位画家的创作,或许不被所有人理解,但这并不会阻碍我们追求幸福与文明的脚步。质疑声不仅不会让我们止步,反而成为我们不断努力和完善自己的动力。 三、不要用你的“窄目”评判我们的世界 在公益的道路上,有时我们需要面对的不只是困难,还有外界的不理解甚至恶意攻击。有些人试图用自己的经历、想法和逻辑来推导我们的世界和社会情况,但这样的推理往往是站不住脚的。 公益的真相远比他们的想象复杂。在某些地方,做一件利世之事,随时可能面临生命结束的威胁。这不是危言耸听,而是许多公益行动者需要面对的现实。因此,用个人的思维逻辑来推断公益的本质,忽略了公益背后深厚的信仰力量和使命感,只会得出偏颇的结论。 四、让善良突破“窄目”的束缚 面对这些误解,我们不能放弃,也不会退缩。我们相信,真正的善良不受个人狭隘目光的局限,而是一种能够打破偏见、跨越界限的力量。 公益行动需要的不只是信仰者的支持,更需要所有人的理解与参与。每个人都可以选择用开放的心态去了解公益的真实样貌,而不是用“窄目”去批判与否定。 无论外界如何评价,我们依然会用信仰支撑的力量,坚守行善的道路。就像画家回答主持人时的那份坦然,质疑只会让我们更加努力,而不是退却。 公益的意义在于为所有人谋幸福,为世界谋文明。我们希望通过自己的行动,唤起更多人对善良的认同与实践,不论他们是否拥有信仰,因为善良本应是超越一切界限的普世价值。 结语 不要让个人的“窄目”成为善良的阻碍,更不要因为偏见和误解否定那些为公益而付出的人。这个世界需要更多理解、支持和信仰的力量,去共同推动人类的幸福与文明的进步。 我们依然在路上,即使这条路荆棘密布,我们的信念依旧不变:为所有人谋福利,为这个世界谋文明。因为我们深信,真正的善良,是一种无惧质疑、无惧牺牲的光芒,它将穿透一切狭隘,点亮整个世界。

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content