Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

缺乏“思想脊梁”的民族注定落后与愚昧

Yicheng · Jan 6, 2025

思想是人类文明的灵魂,是推动社会进步的原动力。没有思想自由和独立思考,就没有真正的创新,也没有长久的繁荣。然而,纵观人类历史,有许多国家或民族因为忽视思想的力量,甚至长期对思想者施以压制,最终陷入停滞与衰退之中。 思想脊梁不仅是个体在追求真理与探索未知时的勇气,更是一个国家或民族在面对内外挑战时的精神基石。缺乏思想脊梁的民族注定在风浪中迷失方向,而长期镇压思想者的民族,则可能永远失去思想现代化的能力,陷入落后与愚昧的深渊。 一、什么是“思想脊梁”? 思想脊梁是指支撑一个民族文化与社会发展的核心精神力量。这种力量体现在两个方面: 1. 独立思考的能力 一个拥有思想脊梁的社会,能够直面问题,批判现状,并寻找解决方案。独立思考既是创新的源泉,也是民族不断突破边界、迈向未来的关键。 2. 思想的传承与发展 思想脊梁不仅仅属于一代人,而是贯穿历史的文化基因。它在一代代思想者的努力下不断被塑造、深化,最终成为民族精神的一部分。失去思想传承的社会,就像断了根的树,无力向上生长,更无法抵御外界的风雨冲击。 二、长期镇压思想者:打断民族思想脊梁的行为 纵观世界历史,许多国家或民族都曾因为对思想者的长期镇压,造成无法弥补的思想空白与文化断层,最终陷入落后与迷茫的深渊。 1. 镇压思想者的深远后果 历史上,对思想者的镇压表现形式多种多样: 镇压思想者的行为不仅是对个体的摧毁,更是对社会精神生态的破坏。思想者是民族的灵魂塑造者,他们的独立思考和创新精神能够为社会提供方向感。一旦镇压成为常态,社会便会逐渐丧失对真理的渴望,甚至对批判性思维产生恐惧。 2. 思想现代化的不可逆缺失 思想现代化,是一个国家或民族融入全球文明、形成现代社会治理与文化发展的核心。它强调独立、开放、多元和创新的精神。然而,长期镇压思想者的社会会面临以下严重后果: 3. 打断思想脊梁:从短期镇压到长期落后 思想脊梁的断裂是民族精神的永久伤痛。一旦独立思考和思想传承被中断,这种损失将世代延续。后代在思想贫瘠的环境中成长,逐渐丧失质疑权威、探索真理的能力。最终,这个民族将陷入愚昧与短视的泥潭,甚至被时代抛弃。 三、思想脊梁缺乏的社会特征 长期缺乏思想脊梁的民族,往往呈现以下特征: 1. 对权威的盲从 当社会缺乏独立思想时,权威会被视为不可质疑的存在削弱了公民表达观点和追求真理的权利,同时也导致社会的健康运行受到严重阻碍。首先,没有自由思考的社会无法培养多元化的声音,创新与变革的动力被窒息。其次,缺乏反馈机制的权威体系会陷入信息闭塞的困境,无法及时洞察问题、调整策略,从而加剧系统性错误,削弱社会的自我修复能力。 2. 创新力的严重不足 科学技术需要质疑与探索的精神,文化艺术需要多元与表达的自由。一个缺乏思想脊梁的社会,无法孕育真正的科学突破与文化繁荣。相反,它只会成为模仿和复制的追随者。当自由思考被抑制,个体的创造潜力得不到释放,思想的火花无法点燃,社会的发展也随之陷入停滞。 3. 文化的荒漠化 没有思想传承的社会,其文化会逐渐失去深度与包容性,变得浮躁而单调,最终失去吸引力与生命力。当社会不再重视思想的积淀与代际间的精神对话,文化创作就容易陷入单调的重复和短视的趋同,失去持续创新的动力与多元共存的魅力。 4. 无法把握自身命运 自上而下地被动依赖于外界,是思想脊梁缺失的民族注定难以摆脱的宿命。不管是个体还是整个民族,都无法形成独立的价值观和判断力。个体在面对不公平的社会规则时,倾向于服从而非抗争。而民族在面对全球化的激烈竞争时,往往只能充当规则的服从者,而非制定者。因此,无论是个人还是社会,都无法主导自身的命运,处于依赖与服从的被动状态。 这种依赖常常表现为: 四、如何重建思想脊梁? 思想脊梁的断裂虽然带来深远的破坏,但历史也证明,每个民族都有机会通过深刻的反思与变革,重新建立自己的思想体系。以下是重建思想脊梁的几个核心路径: 1. 保障思想自由:解放思想的基础 任何社会若想重塑思想脊梁,必须首先为思想者提供一个安全自由的环境。思想自由是所有创新与发展的前提。 2. 尊重思想者:让思想的火种重新点燃 思想者是社会的灵魂守护者。一个尊重思想者的民族,才能长久保持思想的活力。 3. 重视教育:培养独立思考的下一代 教育是思想脊梁重建的根本途径。重视教育的关键,不是填鸭式的知识传授,而是培养学生的批判性思维与独立判断能力。 4. 直面历史:反思镇压思想的代价 一个民族只有真正认识到过去的错误,才有可能避免历史的重演。对曾经镇压思想者的行为进行反思与公开讨论,不仅是对历史的负责,也是对未来的警醒。 5. 构建思想自由的文化氛围 思想脊梁的重建需要整个社会共同努力,营造一种尊重思想、激励创造的文化氛围。 五、结语:思想的力量是一个民族的未来 […]

read more

Related Content

A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
View All Content