Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

3 Awakening Of The Soul Pursuit To Happiness

Master Wonder · Dec 25, 2024

The moment the soul awakens, it is like humanity seeing the world for the first time — so vivid and clear that the thought of returning to ignorance and suffering is unbearable. Origin of the Article: This article comes from Ms. Luo, who is seeking her awakening of the soul in pursuit of true happiness […]

灵魂的双目

Master Wonder · Dec 25, 2024

当灵魂睁开双眼的那一刻,就如同人类第一次真正看清世界,从此再也无法忍受闭上眼睛所带来的无知与痛苦。 文章缘起: 这篇文章来源于一位罗女士:她正在为自己的灵魂觉醒,谋求真正的幸福与未来。 灵魂的觉醒,是生命中最深刻的震撼之一。这一刻,超越了语言、知识和情感的边界,直达生命的本源。就像第一次离开黑暗的洞穴,迎接阳光的照耀,灵魂的双眼睁开的那一瞬间,所有曾经隐藏的真相、被遮蔽的美好以及潜藏的黑暗,都无情地涌入意识中。这不仅是一次内在的觉醒,也是对世界、对自我、对家庭、对宇宙关系的彻底反思。 这样的觉醒是福是祸呢?为什么人类一旦睁开眼睛,便再也无法忍受原先无知的状态?灵魂觉醒的意义与代价应该如何衡量呢? 哲学家笛卡尔在他的沉思中说:“我思故我在。”但真正的觉醒不仅仅是思考的开始,而是“看见”的能力觉醒。当灵魂的双眼睁开时,人会意识到自己长期以来的视角是多么局限:许多过去视为“理所当然”的事物,实际上只是人为建构的假象,经不起深究;而许多未曾注意的细节,却开始有了全新的意义。 灵魂睁眼的那一刻,也是一个人与真实的世界初次交汇的时刻。这种看见,不仅仅是对外界的观察,更是对内在的探索——我们开始看见自己真正的欲望、情绪和行为背后的种种动机。这一刻,人突然发现自己过去的视角如此局限:因为我们常常被社会、文化、家庭乃至自身的懒惰所遮蔽,而失去了对是非、善恶的正确判断。正如柏拉图在《洞穴寓言》中描述的那样,离开洞穴的旅程虽然痛苦,但却是通往真理唯一的道路。 无知的痛苦:为何觉醒后无法忍受闭上双眼? 一个人如果觉醒,就再也无法忍受闭上双眼。尚未觉醒的人们可能认为无知的状态是幸福的,我们常常听人说“傻人有傻福”,这是因为无知让人免于面对复杂的真相,避免真相带来的扎心。但这种“幸福”更像是一种假象,一种用盲目掩盖痛苦的麻木。事实是,灵魂一旦觉醒,就再也无法退回那种盲目的状态,因为与其活在虚假与麻木中,觉醒的灵魂更愿意拥抱真相,哪怕代价是短期的痛苦。 许多人在无知的状态中活得疲惫却浑然不觉,他们感到空虚,却找不到源头。当灵魂睁开双眼时,我们终于明白,这种空虚并非来自外界,而是源自对自我真实的压抑。闭眼生活的人,为了逃避内心的痛苦,往往会通过物质追求、娱乐和繁忙的生活填补空白。然而,这些手段只会让人陷入更深的迷失。 闭眼生活的人,往往把握不住时间的流逝,总认为“还有明天”,以至于荒废了今天。而灵魂觉醒的人深刻理解生命的短暂与无常,他们意识到每一刻都不可浪费,因为未来可能并不存在。这种对无常的理解,使得灵魂觉醒后的人无法再容忍将生命浪费在无意义的事情上。 觉醒的灵魂不仅会看到自我的真实,也会开始看到他人的痛苦和世界的不公。当我们意识到自己与他人息息相关,意识到自己的每个行为都会对周围产生影响时,责任感便油然而生。闭上双眼或许可以暂时避免负担,但觉醒后,我们再也无法对他人的苦难视而不见。 看清世界的代价:真相为何如此刺痛? 灵魂的觉醒是一场蜕变,但这场蜕变并非毫无代价。从黑暗进入光明的眼睛需要时间适应,我们的意识也需要时间接纳真相的重量。许多人在觉醒之初会经历灵魂的暗夜,因为光明不仅揭示了真相,也让我们直面隐藏的黑暗。 觉醒后,我们开始意识到,人性并非纯粹的善或恶,而是一种复杂的混合体,善恶皆由人创造。这样的认知让人既感到无助,也感到敬畏,因为这意味着我们既有改变世界的潜力,也有可能成为破坏的力量。 看清世界后,我们发现许多事物是需要改变的,而这些改变往往从挑战自身的舒适区开始。无论是放下既有的偏见,还是承担新的责任,这都需要极大的勇气。 觉醒后的人常常感到孤独,因为他们的视角可能与身边的人格格不入。在一片麻木的世界里,一个觉醒的灵魂很容易被视为异类,也很容易感到无法与他人链接。这种孤独感虽然痛苦,但也正是灵魂成长的重要部分。 灵魂觉醒后的蜕变:从孤独到超越 尽管觉醒伴随着痛苦,但这种痛苦并非毫无意义。觉醒后的灵魂,会经历从孤独到超越的过程。他们不仅会接受自己的局限性,还会超越自我,真正拥抱世界。 觉醒的人最终会在真相中找到平静。他们不再逃避恐惧,而是接受它;他们不再试图控制一切,而是学会与无常共舞。这种平静并非来自外界,而是内心的力量。 当我们看清了自己的痛苦,也就更容易理解他人的痛苦。觉醒的灵魂会带着爱和慈悲去对待世界,因为他们知道,所有的生命都是彼此交织的。 觉醒的人会开始追求超越个体的意义。他们的生命不再局限于个人的得失,而是扩展到对社会和世界的贡献。他们相信,灵魂的成长正是为了承担更大的使命。 结语:觉醒是一条孤独而光明的路 当灵魂睁开双眼的那一刻,我们便踏上了一条无法回头的旅程。这是一条通向真理的道路,充满挑战,但也充满希望。尽管无知的生活看似简单,但它无法带来真正的满足;尽管觉醒伴随着痛苦,但它却让生命焕发出无限的光芒。 愿我们每一个人都能有勇气睁开灵魂的双眼,直面真相,超越恐惧,走向内在的自由与外在的爱。唯有如此,生命的意义才能真正绽放。

read more

Related Content

A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content