Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Social Enterprise Finance: Investing in Shaping Future Destiny

Kishou · Nov 16, 2024

Introduction In today’s world, finance has become an integral part of personal and corporate life. However, for most people, financial participation often revolves around wealth preservation or accumulation. While tools like stocks, mutual funds, and cryptocurrencies have democratized access to investment markets, this engagement often remains disconnected from deeper values such as personal fulfillment or […]

社会企業金融:運命を掌握する投資

Kishou · Nov 16, 2024

はじめに 現代社会において、金融は個人や企業の生活に欠かせない要素となっています。しかし、多くの一般市民が金融活動に参加する目的は、まだ財産の増加や保全に限られています。株式や投資信託、仮想通貨といった金融商品が普及したことで、一般人も投資市場にアクセスできるようになりましたが、それらの活動は個人の幸福や社会貢献といった深い価値とはあまり結びついていません。このような現状に対して、新たな金融モデルである社会企業金融が注目を集めています。このシステムは、社会公民と社会企業を結びつけるだけでなく、持続可能な社会の実現に向けた重要な原動力となる可能性を秘めています。 従来の金融システムの限界 資本主義の従来の金融システムの特徴は、不透明性と資本の集中化です。企業は通常、自社の業務プロセスの詳細を外部に公開せず、一般の人々は財務諸表やニュース、アナリストの報告を通じて企業の運営状況を理解するしかありません。このシステムでは、投資する民間人と企業の間に情報の非対称性が存在し、投資判断が限られた情報に基づいて行われることになります。 従来の金融投資の目的は主に利益の最大化です。投資者は企業の収益性や市場シェアなどを基準に投資を行います。近年、一部の企業が社会的責任に関する報告書を公表するようになりましたが、その内容は概略的であり、投資家が企業の社会価値創造の実態を深く理解することは困難です。このような単一的な投資指向は、資本が社会進歩に与える影響にリミッターをかけています。 社会企業金融の登場 従来の金融と異なり、社会企業金融は透明性と多様な価値指向を強調します。このシステムでは、企業のあらゆる業務プロセスが社会に公開され、投資者は企業の運営の各段階を包括的に理解し、自身の価値観に基づいて投資対象を選択できます。社会企業金融の核心は、従来の金融の閉鎖性を打破し、投資を社会的責任や環境の持続可能性といった目標と結びつけることにあります。 また、この新しい金融システムはボーダーレス投資の理念を提唱しています。つまり、投資者は特定の分野や市場に限定されることなく、世界中の投資対象や投資方法を自由に選択できるのです。このボーダーレス投資は、投資の可能性を広げるだけでなく、世界規模での資源の最適配分を促進する役割を果たします。 事例分析:透明経営のチョコレートブランド 社会企業金融の運用モデルの一面を具体的に理解するために、高級チョコレートブランドを例に挙げます。このブランドの業務プロセスには、世界各地からのカカオ豆の調達、発酵や乾燥処理、グレード分けや低温焙煎、パッケージデザイン、マーケティング、店舗やオンラインでの販売などが含まれます。 従来のモデルでは、消費者は製品にしか触れることができず、その背後にある複雑な生産プロセスについてはほとんど知りません。投資家も企業についての情報は公開された財務データや少量の業務情報に限られています。しかし、社会企業金融の枠組みでは、このブランドはデジタルプラットフォームを通じて業務の進行状況をリアルタイムで公開することができます。たとえば: さらに、社会市民はブランド全体に投資するだけでなく、自身の価値観と興味に応じて投資対象を選択することも可能です。例えば: ボーダーレス投資の社会意義 このような分散型で透明性の高い投資手法は、従来の投資の制限を打破し、投資を社会参加と社会的エンパワーメントの手段とします。社会企業金融では、投資家は企業の財務リターンだけでなく、以下のような視点からも評価を行います: この新しい投資思考は、資本の役割を単なる財産の増加から社会の進歩を促進する原動力へと進化させます。投資者は企業運営に参加することで、経済的なリターンだけでなく、社会改善に貢献する達成感を得ることができます。 社会企業金融の将来性 社会企業金融はまだ萌芽期にありますが、その発展可能性は非常に高いです。現在のトレンドを見ても、SDGsを指標とする企業への投資に関心を持つファンドや個人投資家が増えています。この現象は、市場がこの方向性を徐々に受け入れつつあることを示しています。 しかし、このモデルの完全な普及には多くの課題が残されています。まず、一般市民の金融リテラシーと社会責任意識を向上させる必要があります。多くの投資家は、社会企業金融の意義について十分な理解を持っておらず、それが投資参加への積極性や金融システムの進化を制限しています。次に、企業自体も透明性と情報開示レベルを高めることで、より多くの投資者の信頼を得る必要があります。 これらの課題を克服するために、教育機関は金融知識と社会公民理念を普及させることで、一般市民の投資意識と社会責任感を育成することが重要です。また、政府や業界団体は、企業が透明性を向上させるための政策や基準を制定することが求められます。さらに、ブロックチェーン技術などの金融テクノロジーの発展も、情報開示の信頼性と改ざん不可能性を保証する技術的なサポートを提供します。 最後に 社会企業金融は、新しい金融ツールであるだけでなく、社会イノベーションでもあります。投資と社会責任を結びつけることで、公民に自らの運命を掌握する機会を提供します。この仕組みにおいて、金融活動はもはや資本家だけの特権ではなく、全ての人々が参加する社会進歩の運動へと変わります。社会企業金融を通じて、物質的な繁栄と精神的な豊かさが共存する新たな時代の到来が期待されています。これは金融分野の変革にとどまらず、人類社会がより公平で持続可能な未来へと進むための重要な一歩となるのです。

read more

Related Content

A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
View All Content