Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

让慈善回归真爱,回归慈悲

Yicheng · Nov 4, 2024

背离慈悲的慈善,沦为善良的花样表演 作为一名公益成员,有些事情深深的刺痛了我,让我不断思考从而写了这篇文章。 在当今社会,慈善活动无处不在,从捐款、捐物到志愿服务,越来越多人通过慈善表达善意。然而,伴随着慈善事业的快速发展,我们也常常看到一些乱象:过度包装的慈善、商业化的慈善,甚至以慈善为名获取个人利益的现象时有发生。这样的慈善,失去了原本应有的纯粹性。要让慈善真正帮助他人、惠及社会,我们必须让它回归真爱,回归慈悲,才能避免走向歧途。 一、慈善的核心:发自内心的真爱与无私的慈悲 慈善的根本应当是发自内心的真爱。真爱,是一种不求回报的情感,是对他人无条件的关怀。慈悲,则是一种包容与接纳,不仅体现在减轻他人痛苦,更体现在一种深刻的平等心。这样的慈善,不是居高临下的施舍,而是源于对受助者尊严的理解与关心。真正的慈善应当是平等的、温暖的,不因施善者的身份、地位而变质。 在中国传统文化中,“仁”与“慈”都是慈善的重要核心。孔子提倡“仁者爱人”,这种“仁”是一种博爱的关怀,涵盖了对所有人的爱与善意。佛教中的“慈悲”也是如此,倡导对众生的平等之心,帮助他们脱离苦海而不求回报。因此,慈善若要避免误入歧途,必须回到“真爱”和“慈悲”这一核心。 二、慈善的歧途:形式化与功利化的偏差 遗憾的是,许多慈善活动在实施过程中逐渐偏离了初衷,陷入了形式化与功利化的误区。 1. 形式化的慈善:一些慈善活动表面上看起来声势浩大、形式完备,实则缺乏对受助者的真正关怀。比如,有些活动只是简单地发放物资、组织捐款,却未真正了解受助者的需求,甚至不顾受助者的感受进行大规模宣传。这种缺乏深度的形式化慈善,往往忽视了慈善的真正意义,只关注活动的完成度而非实质的帮助,让受助者成为被展示的对象,被迫为了生计进行表演,失去尊严和主体性。 2. 功利化的慈善:有些慈善行为背后掺杂了施善者的功利性目的,慈善成为一种品牌宣传或个人形象的营销手段。企业在捐赠后迅速通过媒体曝光,以获得社会认可;个人在施善时往往关注“捐了多少”“收获多少掌声”,而非实际帮到了谁。这种以利益为驱动的“慈善”行为,容易让人们对慈善的本质产生怀疑,甚至可能让受助者感觉自己被利用,损害了慈善本应带来的温暖与信任。 三、让慈善回归真爱与慈悲:走向持久的善意 要避免慈善走上歧途,真正发挥其温暖人心、改变社会的作用,我们必须让慈善回归真爱与慈悲。这种回归体现在动机、方式和效果三个方面:  1. 从真爱出发,发自内心的关怀:慈善的初衷应当是对他人的关怀,而非功利的计算。真正的慈善行为源自对他人痛苦的同理心,而不是对自身形象的关注。因此,无论是个人还是组织,参与慈善时应多问自己:这是否真正帮助了对方?慈善的过程是否符合对方的尊严?当我们以真爱为出发点,慈善将不再是浮于表面的数字,而是触及人心的温暖。  2. 尊重受助者,赋予他们主体性:慈善不应当是单方面的给予,而是彼此的平等互动。受助者并非施舍的对象,他们是有尊严、有感情的个体。因此,慈善活动应当从受助者的实际需求出发,关注他们的想法与感受。通过倾听他们的声音,让他们在慈善过程中发挥主动性,慈善才能真正尊重受助者的人格与独立性。 3. 注重长效,避免短期的“一次性善意”:许多短期的慈善行为只能暂时缓解困难,无法从根本上改变受助者的生活。要让慈善产生持久的影响,我们应当从教育、职业培训、医疗保障等方面入手,为受助者提供自立的机会与能力。这样的慈善,不仅仅是简单的物资援助,更是助人“自助”的支持,帮助受助者在长期中摆脱困境,拥有改变生活的能力。  4. 行善,不追求形式化的包装:慈善的价值在于温暖他人心灵,而非博取社会的关注。我们可以选择行善,不要太追求曝光与赞誉,而是默默地将爱传递给需要帮助的人。这样的慈善不带特别的自我展示的成分,而是单纯地关注如何有效帮助受助者,让他们感受到真正的关怀。 结语 慈善的真义不仅在于物质上的帮助,更在于心灵的关怀。当慈善回归真爱和慈悲,它不仅能够缓解个体的痛苦,更能让整个社会感受到爱与温暖。慈善是一种心灵的联系,是人与人之间深层的理解与支持,而不仅仅是冷冰冰的数字或表面的宣传。通过真爱与慈悲,我们不仅改变了受助者的生活,也净化了我们自己的内心,让善意如涓涓细流,持久地滋养社会。 让慈善回归真爱,回归慈悲,我们将避免走上功利化与形式化的歧途。在未来的慈善道路上,让我们用真诚去传递爱,用无私去感化心灵,让每一个善举都能温暖人心,为社会带来持久的和谐与善意。

The Gap in Education is the Gap in Civilization

Daohe · Nov 4, 2024

Thinking on Education Gap Introduction Throughout different historical periods, disparities in education have consistently reflected gaps in civilization. Education is the cornerstone for shaping the qualities of individuals, building social culture and values, and driving technological innovation. Differences in educational levels directly affect the degree of civilization within a society. A review of human history […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
View All Content