Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

What is real success?

Daohe · Oct 31, 2024

People are often obsessed with external standards of success, caught up in comparisons and competition, and view success as an end goal. However, for every human being, we are born successful. From the moment life first blooms, our life carries unique meaning and value. Regardless of wealth or status, our existence in this world is […]

什么是真正的成功?

Daohe · Oct 31, 2024

人们经常迷失在外在的成功标准中,陷入比较和竞争,把成功当成一个目标。然而,对每一个生命而言,我们本身都是成功。从生命初绽的那一刻,我们就带着独特的意义和价值而来。无论贫富贵贱,生命本身是一种存在的成就。在世间奔波追逐时,也许我们会因外界的标准感到失落,但生命的奇迹和存在的意义从未因他人而黯淡。我们站在这片大地上,每个人的存在即是价值。 对一个追求幸福的生命而言,成功是一条充满丰富风景的旅程。 这条路上,体验的过程往往比到达终点更为深刻。人们渴望幸福,追求自我实现,然而,幸福并非一朝一夕的收获,而是逐步积累的体验。在体验亲情的温暖、爱情的甜蜜、友谊的陪伴、困苦的磨练之中,我们不断成熟、不断丰盈。我们最终发现,真正的幸福并不是得到什么,而是拥有一颗能够感受的心。这种内心的富足,才是追求幸福的人生路上最大的成功。 对一个反抗压迫的生命而言,成功即是争取自由与民主。 在这条道路上,成功并不轻松,而是伴随着抗争与坚守的阵痛。对受压迫者来说,成功不是名誉与财富,而是摆脱不公、挣脱束缚,赢得尊严与平等的权利。历史上无数个体和集体的抗争,使得人类社会的自由之路不断延展。 面对压迫和不平,我们选择发声、抗争、为自己和他人争取自由。正是在这些反抗者的成功中,我们才看见了世界一点一滴地向着平等、尊重、自由的方向迈进。正如曼德拉所说,“我学会了勇敢并非无所畏惧,而是敢于超越恐惧。“在这条抗争的路上,成功即是找到那份突破恐惧的勇气。 对一个拥有公民权利的生命而言,成功是一种对社会的承诺。 当我们拥有了权利,拥有了话语权,真正的成功便不止于此。真正的成功,是将我们的力量用于改善社会的现状,用一己之力去改变身边的点滴,让社区、城市、国家,甚至世界变得更加美好。 这种成功不再是自我成就,而是对他人、对社会的一份承诺。它不再只是个体的成就感,而是为他人带来福祉的无私行动。正如甘地所说,“成为你想要看到的改变。”在为社会进步而奋斗的过程中,成功就是不断推动这个世界向更文明、更幸福的方向发展。 因此,成功是对谁而言的?是因人而异的。它不是静止不变的,而是一个动态的过程。它像一幅不断延展的历史画卷,随着每一个时代的步伐而变化。对某些人来说,成功或许是一份安稳的生活;而对另一些人而言,可能是一场深刻的自我实现、或是为他人争取幸福的行动。它不仅是个人的荣耀,更是一种时代的象征。我们要理解的是,成功没有唯一的定义,它是一个因人而异、不断发展的旅程。 你的成功态度和目标,将决定你的人生方向。 成功不是一成不变的终点,而是随着我们的理解和追求而转变的过程。有些人选择追求物质富足;而有些人选择追求精神自由、社会进步。我们对成功的定义和态度,决定了我们拥有怎样的未来。 那么,今天我们对“成功”的理解究竟是什么呢?在这个全球化和信息化的时代,成功已不再只是个人的成就,而是更多人共同的责任。今天的成功,应是实现“全体人类完整公民”的理想。完整的公民是什么?它不仅仅是国家意义上的身份,而是具有全球意识的社会公民,甚至是全球公民。他们不分地域、不分种族,将全人类的福祉和幸福视为共同的目标。 我们的“一乘公益”,正是基于这一愿景设立的。我们的成功不是个人的光辉,而是每一个个体的幸福与尊严的汇聚。我们致力于推动人类文明和社会幸福的发展,这既是我们的责任,也是我们的使命。 真正的成功,是让每一个生命在这世间,都能够享有幸福与尊严。

read more

Related Content

Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content