Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Social Quality Education Will Break the Monopoly of Knowledge and Education and lead to a Shared Future

Daohe · Oct 29, 2024

In recent decades, education has gradually shifted from traditional book-based learning to technology-based education, with the rise of artificial intelligence adding to the momentum. Knowledge is now easier to access, and global democratization is becoming more evident. In this context, focusing solely on the gaining of knowledge and skills no longer meets future needs. There […]

未来教育的魅力:社会素质教育将打破知识垄断和教育垄断,实现共享未来

Daohe · Oct 29, 2024

人工智能技术的普遍崛起,把人类从书本教育逐渐进入信息技术教育。 获取知识的方式变得前所未有的简单高效,而且全球民主化的进程也越来越显而易见。 在AI技术和民主化的双重推进之下,传统教育体系对知识的专注已无法适应未来发展的需求。打破知识垄断和教育垄断将越来越受到人们的广泛关注与赞同,于是社会素质教育应运而生。与传统模式不同,素质教育不仅关注知识的传授,更将重心转向文化和文明视角的培养,致力于培养具备文化视角和社会责任感的下一代。 在社会素质教育中,知识被视为一种基础性的保障。在过去,知识的稀缺性使得掌握知识的人在社会中占据优势,形成了“知识精英”的垄断地位。然而,随着人工智能和其他技术的进步,知识获取的途径变得多样化且门槛降低。这一变化意味着,教育的核心不再是简单的知识积累,而是如何将知识应用于实际,如何培养学生的批判性思维和创造性解决问题的能力。素质教育的目标是让学生在坚实的知识基础上,更加注重如何思考、理解世界,从而具备应对未来挑战的能力。 社会素质教育与现行教育的根本区别在于对文明教育的重视。素质教育帮助学生树立理性的文明价值观,使他们理解社会文明程度对个体和集体生活质量的影响。通过深入探讨自由、民主、公正和共享等核心价值观,学生将意识到这些价值在社会发展中的重要性。这种理解不仅让他们在面对复杂的社会问题时能够做出理性的判断,还帮助他们在个人利益与他人利益之间找到平衡,做出更加明智的决策。 在此基础上,社会素质教育中的文化教育进一步丰富了学生的视野,促进了他们对多样性的欣赏与对不同文化背景的尊重。素质教育不仅要求学生掌握知识,更希望他们能够热爱自己、他人以及世界,深入理解并融入多元文化的社会,进而引领社会文化的发展。这样的文化熏陶拓宽了学生的视野,提升了他们的跨文化沟通能力,使他们在未来的生活和职业生涯中能够积极推动社会发展和人类共同体的成长。 素质教育的实施将通过多元化和个性化的学习方式,有效打破教育的垄断。它不仅推动地区教育资源的共享与合作,使得资源短缺地区的学生也能获得优质教育,还通过个性化学习路径和社会支持体系,消除经济条件带来的机会不平等。此外,素质教育鼓励多样化的教育模式,包括在线学习、社区教育和职业培训,以适应不同地区的需求,减轻对少数市场的依赖。最终,素质教育致力于改善科技与网络资源的差异,为每个学生提供平等的学习机会,奠定一个更加开放和共享的教育体系的基础。 随着素质教育的推行,社会结构也将迎来变革。通过培养具备文明视角的领导者,社会将更有效地应对复杂挑战,实现可持续发展。未来的领导者将不仅具备丰富的知识和技能,还会拥有深厚的社会责任感和道德判断力。他们将关爱他人与社会,明白推动社会进步对于人们获得幸福的重要性,因此愿意主动承担社会责任。此外,这些领导者不再局限于知识与技能的发展,而是更加注重多元的联系与合作,追求共享与共赢的理念。在全球化背景下,他们将促进不同文化间的对话与合作,为构建一个更加公正、和平的世界贡献力量。 总之,素质教育的崛起标志着知识垄断与教育垄断的最终终结。随着知识的普及,素质教育将重心转向文化和文明的培养,培养出具备社会责任感和人文视角的下一代。这种教育模式不仅改变了教育的本质,更为实现一个共享共赢的未来奠定了基础。在这样的未来中,每个人都能在教育中获得成长和发展,社会将更加繁荣与公正。

read more

Related Content

Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content