Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

我引以骄傲的孩子成为了一个让人唾弃的人

我引以骄傲的孩子成为了一个让人唾弃的人

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

近年来,越来越多的留学生在国外大学遭遇退学,这一现象令人忧心。这些曾经被寄予厚望的孩子,逐渐从“骄傲”变成了“负担”。为什么这些学生会在国外大学中频频挣扎?答案不仅仅在于个人,更深刻地体现在我们教育体系的缺失上,尤其是文化传统教育与知识教育的双重限制,以及公民教育、理想引导教育和文明素质教育的严重缺失。 首先,教育过度追求成绩,学生们被迫在追求高分的道路上舍弃了其他至关重要的发展。教育体系往往将学术成就作为衡量学生的唯一标准,忽视了他们的全面成长。这种只关注成绩的模式使学生成为了“考试机器”,但他们的创造力、批判性思维和适应能力却未得到有效培养。当这些学生进入西方的教育体系时,他们在适应独立思考和多元文化环境方面表现得极为吃力,往往失去方向感。这种教育模式不仅限制了个体的发展空间,更是在一定程度上以知识“残害”学生,让他们无法在更复杂的现实世界中立足。 其次,不少留学生的失败不仅源于他们的文化教育背景,还在于他们缺乏理想引导、公民教育和文明素质教育。公民教育的缺失让他们难以在国外找到自己的社会角色。西方国家的公民教育注重个体责任与社会贡献,而我们的学生则长期被引导追求个人成功,却很少被教导承担作为社会成员的责任。这使得他们在国外常常显得孤立无援,在缺乏责任感的同时,逐渐被社会边缘化。 文明素质教育的缺乏进一步加剧了这一问题。很多留学生享受着国外优质的教育资源,却没有意识到回馈社会的重要性。有些学生甚至表现出对当地文化的漠视或不尊重,违反社会规则,导致他们在异国他乡被视为“寄生虫”。这种只享受而不贡献的态度,使他们逐渐失去了国外社会的好感,甚至被认为是负担。 然而,真正能够改变这一切的,是社会素质教育。社会素质教育涵盖了文明教育、公民教育和文化教育,能够帮助学生在学术之外,培养应对社会的能力与责任感。这种教育不仅仅是为了提升学生的知识储备,更重要的是塑造他们成为有社会责任感的世界公民。通过社会素质教育,学生可以学会适应多样化的文化,增强跨文化理解力,并为所在社会的发展做出贡献。 文明教育可以帮助学生理解不同文明的多样性,培养他们的文化敏感性。公民教育则能够让学生意识到自己的社会责任,引导他们积极参与社会活动,贡献于社会的进步。而文化教育则帮助他们在全球化的背景下更加开放包容,避免狭隘的民族主义倾向。 总之,中国的教育体系在培养知识方面无疑取得了显著成就,但忽略了理想、责任和社会素质的全面发展。我们的孩子本应成为全球公民,然而由于教育中的诸多缺失,他们成了他国社会中的边缘人。只有通过引入社会素质教育,让学生具备更强的社会责任感和全球视野,我们才能确保他们不仅在学术上取得成就,更能在文化、社会上找到自己的位置,为社会发展做出真正的贡献。

The Significance and Value of Enhancing Civilizational Awareness for Humanity

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

Enhancing civilizational awareness is essential for all of humanity. Civilization serves as a symbol of social progress and reflects the elevation of human intellect, culture, and behavior, shaping our lifestyles, social structures, and the future of the world. Its essence includes the accumulation and advancement of morality, law, culture, and technology, all of which together […]

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Key values of social citizenship: freedom, democracy, happiness
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 29, 2025
Civilizational shift and value reconstruction Human civilization is stepping into the “social citizenship era”—a time when people are more aware, systems are stable, and individual rights truly matter. From obedient subjects to national citizens, and now to social citizens, civilization is no longer measured by empires, power, or flashy technology—it is defined by new values […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
View All Content