Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

貧困は、文明への踏みにじり、差別と尊重の欠如から来ています

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

貧困は経済的問題ではなく、社会の深層構造に起因します。文明の破壊、差別、尊重の欠如が貧困を助長します。貧困を解決するには、教育や医療の権利を保証し、差別をなくし、相互尊重を促進する必要があります。これにより、世代間貧困が減少すると期待されます。

贫穷来自于对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重

Daohe · Oct 23, 2024

贫穷并不仅仅是经济匮乏的表现,它是社会深层结构性问题的结果。在全球范围内,许多贫困问题的根源可以追溯到对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重。文明作为人类共同体的精神和物质基础,只有在被尊重和维护的前提下,社会才能健康发展。而当文明遭到破坏,社会中的不平等和贫穷现象就会加剧。 文明的践踏:贫穷的根源 文明的践踏是社会秩序和人类基本价值的破坏。这种践踏可以表现在对法律的蔑视、对人权的忽视、对公共资源的掠夺以及对弱势群体的漠视。贫穷的根源往往来自于这种对文明的系统性摧毁。 例如,在一些战乱地区,战争不仅摧毁了基础设施,还使社会的教育、医疗等公共服务体系瓦解。失去了这些文明的基本保障,社会中的个体尤其是弱势群体被迫陷入长期贫困状态。暴力和不稳定打破了人们通过劳动改变自身处境的可能性,从而形成代际贫困。 歧视:阻断文明发展的桥梁 歧视是对他人基本人权和尊严的侵害,尤其是在性别、种族、宗教和社会阶层等方面的歧视,严重阻碍了个人和群体的上升通道。历史上,许多群体因为歧视而长期处于社会底层,无法享受到与主流社会相同的教育、医疗、就业等机会,这种结构性不平等是贫困持续存在的重要原因。 例如,在许多发展中国家,女性、少数族裔和农村居民往往遭受多重歧视。她们的生存和发展空间被剥夺,无法通过自己的努力摆脱贫困。教育资源的缺乏使得这些群体失去了提升自身能力的机会,而社会的固有偏见又使得她们难以参与经济活动,形成了恶性循环。 缺乏尊重:削弱社会凝聚力 对个体和群体的尊重是文明的基石。每个人的尊严都应得到认可,而当一个社会对某些群体缺乏尊重时,不仅会导致个体的边缘化,还会损害整个社会的凝聚力。那些被忽视的群体,往往是社会中最为贫困的群体。 当人们因阶层、职业或生活方式而遭到社会的忽视甚至贬低,他们的基本需求无法得到满足,社会支持体系对他们缺乏关注。长期的边缘化使得这些人陷入贫困,而这种贫困不仅是物质上的,更是精神上的贫乏。 走向尊重与包容:解决贫穷的关键 要真正解决贫穷问题,必须从维护和尊重文明的角度出发。首先,建立起公平和正义的社会秩序,确保每个公民都能享有基本的教育、医疗和就业权利,这才能为每个人提供摆脱贫困的机会。其次,要打破歧视,创造一个多元包容的社会环境,特别是在性别、种族和社会阶层的平等上,必须进行深度变革。 同时,社会各阶层必须相互尊重,真正看到每一个个体的价值。通过尊重和信任,社会可以增强其凝聚力,共同面对贫穷问题。只有这样,贫困才不会在代际中延续,而是逐步减少,直至消除。 结语 贫穷不是简单的经济问题,它反映了文明在社会中的缺失。对文明的践踏、歧视和缺乏尊重构成了贫穷的深层原因。只有当社会开始尊重每一个个体、消除歧视并维护基本的文明价值,贫困问题才能真正得到解决。

read more

Related Content

Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Three keys to civil society: power, responsibilities, and protection
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 3, 2025
One of the greatest advancements of civilization today is not just the height of technology or the prosperity of cities, but the fact that people are finally being seen as an end rather than a means. When individuals transition from being ruled and managed to becoming thinking, vocal, and responsible members of society, we step […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
View All Content