Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

了解自己、了解他人、了解世界,是我们不断探索自我的过程

了解自己、了解他人、了解世界,是我们不断探索自我的过程

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

在这个信息纷繁复杂的时代,我们时常感到迷茫和困惑。每个人都在寻找自我的道路上前行,希望能够看清自己、理解他人、认知世界。然而,这一过程并非一蹴而就,而是需要我们持续地反思和探索。因此,本栏目将通过杂谈与人物故事,为大家展现不同生命的独特之处,启发我们在自我探索的旅途中更好地理解人性和世界。 了解自己:从内心出发 了解自己是一个永无止境的过程。它不仅仅意味着认识到我们的兴趣、爱好和长处,更重要的是深入探讨内心的动机、情感和价值观。我们经常会因为社会的期望、他人的评价,甚至是外部环境的影响而迷失自己。要在这样的环境中保持清醒,我们需要学会倾听内心的声音,勇敢地面对自己的缺点与脆弱。 在自我探索的道路上,我们会发现不同时期的自己对世界有着不同的认知和期待。青少年时期,我们渴望被认同,努力在群体中找到归属感;成年后,我们更多地关注个人的成长和成就;而到了晚年,生命的意义变得更加重要。通过对自己不同阶段的认知进行总结与反思,我们能够更好地看清自己,理解为何会做出某些决定,以及那些决定背后真正的动机是什么。 了解他人:同理心与共情的力量 在与他人相处的过程中,学会换位思考和理解对方的情感和立场是非常重要的。了解他人并不仅仅停留在知道对方的背景和经历,更深层次的了解需要通过同理心去感受对方的情绪和心境。这样,我们不仅能更好地与他人沟通,也能在无形中增强对自己和他人关系的理解。 通过人物故事的分享,我们希望能打破刻板印象,展示多样化的生命体验。无论是普通人还是名人,每个人的生命历程中都充满了挑战和成长的故事。当我们学会从他人的经历中汲取经验,反思自己的人生,我们会更有能力去尊重和包容不同的生活方式与观点。 了解世界:扩大视野与跨文化理解 世界是广阔而多样的,每个人生活在其中的角度和视野都是独特的。要真正理解世界,我们需要不断地拓宽自己的视野,接触不同文化、社会和背景的人。只有通过多元的视角,我们才能看到世界的复杂性,并在不断变化的时代中找到自己的立足点。 我们不仅仅需要了解各个国家的风土人情和文化习俗,还要深入探讨影响世界进程的重大事件和趋势。通过对不同文化和社会现象的观察与思考,我们可以发现人类文明的发展脉络,从而更深刻地理解人类在历史长河中的共同命运。 展示生命的独特之处:从故事中汲取力量 在这个栏目中,我们将通过杂谈与人物故事,展现每个人生命中的独特之处。有些故事可能看似平凡,但却蕴藏着打动人心的力量;有些经历或许充满波折,但正是这些起伏赋予了生命更深的意义。无论这些故事来自何种背景的人群,它们都能启发我们去思考生命的多样性和人类的共同情感。 每一个生命都是一个独立的世界,它们彼此交织,共同构成了丰富多彩的人类社会。我们希望通过分享这些多样化的生命故事,帮助读者在探索自我和理解他人的过程中找到共鸣,进而更好地适应和改变自己所处的世界。 结语 了解自己、了解他人、了解世界,是一个持续的自我探索过程。在这个过程中,我们不断更新对生命的认知,丰富自己的内心世界,也更加深刻地感受到人类的共情和世界的广阔。希望这个栏目能为大家带来启发,激励每个人在生命的旅途中继续前行,寻找属于自己的独特价值。

周星驰是艺术中的技术大师

周星驰是艺术中的技术大师

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

周星驰,被誉为“喜剧之王”的导演与演员,以其独特的技术运用和创新在华语影坛中取得了非凡成就。他的作品不仅展现幽默,还通过视觉特效和叙事手法实现情感表达,推动电影艺术的进步,成为真正的电影革新者。

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
View All Content