Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

浅谈信仰与性格的契合:不同的信仰与性格之间有什么联系?

浅谈信仰与性格的契合:不同的信仰与性格之间有什么联系?

Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024

信仰不仅仅是一种宗教习惯与文化身份的选择,更是一种深刻影响人类心理和生活方式的精神力量。不同的信仰体系各具特色,吸引着性格迥异的人群。事实上,心理学和宗教学领域的研究表明,性格与信仰的契合度影响着一个人如何与信仰互动、如何从中获得意义和指导。本文将基于性格心理学理论,结合具体实例,探讨哪些性格特点更适合与佛法、基督教、上帝信仰、道教以及伊斯兰教的真神信仰相契合。 1. 佛法与沉静内省的性格 佛教提倡“放下”和“无我”的理念,追求内心的平静和解脱。因此,性格内向、倾向于自我反省和冥想的人往往更容易与佛法产生共鸣。喜欢独处并深入思考人生意义的人,往往能更好地接受佛法中对苦、无常和空性的教义。他们通常善于自我反省和冥想,更倾向于在静思中寻求心灵的安宁。此外,具有高度同情心和关怀他人的性格也与佛教的慈悲理念相契合,因为佛教强调减少他人痛苦,并对所有众生平等看待。例如,现代社会中许多压力过大的人通过禅修找到内心的平静,这反映出佛法在帮助沉静内省者应对生活挑战上的独特作用。此外,心理学家卡尔·荣格(Carl Jung)的性格类型学也提到,内倾型性格的人往往有较强的精神需求,而佛教的自我观照和冥想正契合这种内在需求。 著名的禅宗大师铃木大拙(D.T. Suzuki)就是一个内向且对人生意义有深刻思考的人。他通过将佛教禅修引入西方,帮助了许多内倾型的人找到自我安顿之道。 2. 基督教与开放热情的性格 基督教以“爱”与“宽恕”为核心,鼓励信徒积极与他人建立深厚的关系,传播福音。这使得外向、热情且社交性强的个体容易被其吸引。因此,那些性格外向、热情、乐于助人并且喜欢与人互动的人,往往更容易在基督教信仰中找到归属感。这些人通常善于表达自己的情感,并能够积极参与教会活动和社会服务。此外,喜欢追求明确目标并遵循规矩的人也能从基督教的教义中获得精神支持,因为基督教常提供一套清晰的生活指导原则。根据艾森克(Hans Eysenck)的性格理论,外向型性格更喜欢与人互动,容易从社交活动中获得能量,这类人常能在教会活动和志愿服务中找到归属感。例如,许多传教士都是充满激情的外向型人格,他们不仅擅长传播基督教的爱与宽恕之道,也能从中获得情感上的满足。 特蕾莎修女(Mother Teresa)的例子尤为经典,她不仅以其深刻的信仰感人至深,还通过持续的慈善工作展现了基督教信仰对世界的影响力。她的性格特点正是典型的热情外向,并且具有极强的同理心和奉献精神。 3. 上帝信仰与追求真理的性格 上帝信仰,尤其是在犹太教、伊斯兰教和部分基督教传统中,强调对绝对真理和超越现实的追求。这种信仰体系吸引着具有强烈求知欲、理性思维发达的人群。那些具有强烈好奇心、喜欢探求哲学问题并寻求终极答案的人,往往对上帝信仰表现出浓厚的兴趣。这些人通常富有逻辑思维,能够接受信仰的理性维度。此外,崇尚道德与正义感强烈的性格也与此类信仰相匹配,因为上帝信仰中对伦理道德有着明确的要求。心理学家乔丹·彼得森(Jordan Peterson)指出,那些具有哲学兴趣和逻辑思维能力强的人,往往对上帝信仰表现出浓厚的兴趣,因为他们渴望在混沌世界中找到确定性的答案。 例如,著名的科学家艾萨克·牛顿(Isaac Newton)不仅是一位杰出的物理学家,也是虔诚的基督徒,他的上帝信仰为他的科学研究提供了精神动力。牛顿认为,探索自然规律是理解上帝智慧的方式,这一观点揭示了追求真理的性格与上帝信仰之间的紧密联系。 4. 道教与自然洒脱的性格 性格随和、喜欢自由的个体通常更容易认同道教的理念。这些人往往不喜欢过于复杂的规则,更倾向于顺应自然、享受生活的本真状态。道教主张顺应自然、自我超脱、倡导“无为而治”讲究“天人合一”。因此,那些性格随和、不拘小节且追求内心自由的人,往往与道教有着天然的契合,顺应自然、享受生活的本真状态。道教的思想适合性格中带有“洒脱”和“随性”的人,因为它提倡顺其自然、淡泊名利,不强求外界的成就。道教中注重调养生息、追求长生的教义也适合那些重视身心健康与和谐生活的人。心理学中的“开放性”维度也显示,那些思维开放且崇尚自由的个体对道教的教义更感兴趣,因为道教鼓励人们摆脱社会的束缚,追求自我解放。 例如:老子提出的“道法自然”理念影响深远,其思想不仅被中国古代哲人所推崇,也引起了许多现代西方学者的兴趣,例如英国作家阿尔杜斯·赫胥黎(Aldous Huxley),他在自己的作品中多次探讨道教的思想。 5. 真神信仰与纪律严明的性格 伊斯兰教的信仰生活中充满了严格的宗教仪式和生活准则,如每日礼拜、斋戒和慈善捐赠。这些要求对性格自律、纪律严明的人格类型来说相对容易接受。他们通常有较高的责任感,愿意严格遵循信仰规定. 在伊斯兰教中,对真神的信仰贯穿于生活的各个方面,包括礼拜、禁食和慈善。那些性格自律、重视纪律并善于遵守仪式的人,往往能很好地适应伊斯兰教的信仰要求。这些人具有较强的责任感和社会义务感,能够严格遵循教义的指引。同时,崇尚集体主义、乐于融入群体的性格也符合伊斯兰教的价值观,因为该信仰强调社群的团结和共同的宗教生活。人格心理学中的“尽责性”维度就强调这种性格特点,与伊斯兰教的行为准则契合度较高。 现代社会中,许多穆斯林通过严格的宗教生活找到个人的稳定感和生活意义。如,在一些严格遵守宗教义务的穆斯林国家,社会的团结性和宗教仪式的统一性被视为集体信仰力量的体现。 性格特点与信仰的选择密切相关,适合的信仰能够为人们的精神生活提供支持和引导。理解不同性格适合的信仰特点,不仅可以帮助个人找到最能让自己安心的精神家园,还可以促进不同信仰之间多元化的相互理解和包容。在追求信仰的过程中,重要的是对自己的性格特点有清晰的认识,并选择适合自己心灵成长的信仰之路。希望这篇文章对大家有所帮助。

執迷不悟的修行者

Master Wonder · Oct 23, 2024

有一天,一位來自中國山東的年輕人前來諮詢,向我講述了他遭遇不公的經歷。經過一番觀察,我了解了事情的來龍去脈,以及其中的因果關係。為了警示佛法修行者,我將此事記錄下來。 有些佛法修行者,在去世後,由於對生前師者的深厚情感和執著,選擇不去轉生,而是發願守護師者,振興佛法。這本應是一件好事,但他們未曾意識到,自己無法往生極樂世界,正是因為生前功德有欠缺。然而,由於生前修行尚存善德與佛德,天地神靈敬重佛德,因此特別關照,為他們提供便利。 這些修行者在人間,按照師者的指引,尋找未來的佛菩薩,類似於藏地尋找轉世活佛。然而,他們未能認識到,自己修行佛法的主要缺陷在於未能悟證得「眾生即佛」的真諦。 皈依三寶(佛、法、僧)中,佛為首。佛旨在讓眾生認清無知無明,脫離苦海,達至彼岸,成就一切善果與功德。佛德遍及天下,慈悲為懷,救拔眾生,天地敬仰,人神供養。 然而,這些護持佛法的修行者誤解了師者的指示,早早在人們年幼時便認定他們是自己要尋找的對象,進而不斷提示,數年後甚至上身附體。他們忘記了佛陀的教誨:「眾生皆可成佛。」而把師者的話當作佛旨,未能明白: 一切佛法源自眾生, 一切佛經由眾生傳承, 一切佛皆由眾生而至。 佛陀曾說:「我什麼也沒有說。」這句話已經足夠說明問題。 這些修行者的缺陷,正是因為在生前僅皈依師者或僧侶,而未能真正認識到眾生即佛。如果僅皈依一人,又何必強調三寶的共同勉勵?佛是智慧者、開悟者、解慧者,旨在避免修行者走入誤區。然而,問題還是發生了。 情感上的依賴並非真正的皈依三寶。那些自稱「我師父是佛菩薩」的修行者,尤其需要警醒。 修行有缺,路途受阻,恐難圓滿! 特此提醒:皈依三寶,以道德善,行修菩提之道。

read more

Related Content

Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content