Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

Kishou · Jul 2, 2025

前言:一场文明深处的隐性病灶 表面上,日韩、新加坡等东亚儒家文化圈国家,社会井然、治安良好、教育体制严密,被视作现代文明的东方式典范。然而在这光鲜秩序之下,隐藏着一场长期、系统性的文明性塌陷:幼年谋生型教育体系。 这种现象,源于近代以来东亚各国在现代国家化、工业化进程中,将儒家文化片面功利化、等级化、服从化利用,形成一种将儿童过早推向生存竞争、社会责任、现实功利轨道的教育体制。孩子尚未完成人格发育,即被要求谋生、考核、服从、争位,失去梦想与探索的权利,最终沦为制度化社会的“高效工具人”。 一、东亚儒家社会幼年谋生教育的结构性机制 1. 工业国家化进程中的制度化早期社会化 日本、韩国、新加坡,自19世纪末至20世纪中后叶,相继步入工业化和国家治理现代化。为了培养纪律性劳动力与服从型国民,国家将教育体制变为“顺从规范、适应秩序”的训练场。 幼稚园起,儿童被要求独立生活、整理内务、分担班级责任。小学全面实施集体责任制、等级考核、服从教育。教育目标不在于人格养成,而是“尽早适应社会”。 2. 功利性等级价值观主导 东亚儒家文化圈,长期重视“成败分明”“功名晋升”,近代国家化进程中更将此推至极致。学业排名、行为评比、集体规则量化从小学起贯穿教育全过程,孩子被要求“别麻烦他人”“别拖后腿”“为家庭争光”。 个人梦想、兴趣、创造被视为不务正业,价值观高度功利化,谋生能力成为唯一社会通行证。 3. 家庭、学校、社会三方共谋机制 传统儒家文化中的家族责任观与近现代国家治理目标相互叠加,形成家庭—学校—社会三重压力体系。 家长将子女视作家庭未来保障与荣耀载体,教育即“家庭投资”。学校成为选拔与驯化场,社会则是竞争考场。幼年便灌输“进名校”“进大企”“稳定收入”理念,精神成长空间被彻底压缩,教育沦为生存竞争机器。 二、个体层面的深层危害 1.梦想能力与人格自由被剥夺 幼年本应是幻想、好奇、探索、试错的人格发育阶段,东亚幼年谋生教育却强制孩子学会利益计算、欲望压抑、风险规避,扼杀“做梦”的能力。 成年后普遍精神麻木、价值虚无,丧失自我探索与人生追问动力。 2. 情感压抑与内耗人格 “别麻烦他人”“集体优先”“为家族争光”的教育文化,长期抹杀真实情感表达,导致东亚社会青少年普遍不敢表达悲伤、愤怒、恐惧。成年后陷入强迫性工作狂、社交恐惧、自闭症倾向、社畜文化与孤独死问题。 日韩、新加坡均长期处于发达国家青少年自杀率前列。 3. 自我价值感低落 过度依赖他人评价,缺乏内在价值认同,成年后习惯以公司、家庭、社会认同为人生坐标,极易崩溃、自我否定,形成精神空壳化。 三、社会结构层面的文明隐患 1.大规模“工具人化” 批量制造“谋生之孩”,成年后执行力强、创新力弱、价值趋同,成为制度化社会“有效工具”。社会缺少文明进化所需的颠覆性创新与精神活力。 日本“社畜文化”、韩国“过劳死经济”、新加坡“绩优社畜现象”正是典型表现。 2. 精神文明衰退与文化空洞化 东亚社会长期实用功利化教育导致文化创新力下降,年轻人沉溺宅文化、虚拟偶像、手游经济、低欲望生活,“文明空洞”现象日益严重。 日韩近30年经济停滞、文化软实力衰退、新加坡青年抑郁率上升,均源自幼年谋生教育对精神文明活力的蚕食。 四、文明演化视角下的结构性危机 完整公民制度的信仰体系,灵魂信仰保障内在尊严,文明信仰保障外在秩序。两者文明进步依赖有梦想、有创造、有反叛精神的人群,而非单纯执行者。 儒家文化型社会若继续将儿童过早异化为谋生机器,虽表面稳定秩序井然,实则失去文明进化动能。 近30年日韩经济创新力衰退、文化对外影响力式微,正源于此。文明若无“做梦者”,必然走向稳定化→保守化→僵化→退化之路。 五、文明型社会对比 北欧国家(瑞典、芬兰、挪威)教育体系,坚持: 这些国家创新力、幸福指数、青少年心理健康、社会信任度远超东亚儒家文化圈,成为现代文明型社会典范。 六、结语:东亚儒家文化圈社会的文明自救 孩子不该只学谋生。真正的教育,应守护基本生存技能之外,更重要的是保留梦想、质疑、探索、反叛、突破的生命本能。儒家文化型社会若想摆脱文明停滞、创新衰退、精神危机,必须: 否则,继续制造“谋生之孩”,东亚文明将陷入温水慢煮式衰败,终成稳定、无梦、无文化生命力的文明遗骸。 七、附名词解释: 幼年谋生教育(Early Livelihood-oriented Education) 指的是一种将成年社会生存法则、责任体系与功利性价值观,提前强加给学龄前至青少年儿童的教育模式。其核心特征是: 将孩子视为未来劳动力与社会秩序执行者,而非独立人格和梦想实践者,使其过早学会现实妥协、社会谋生、规则服从,而忽视人格养成、情感自由、梦想激发与批判性精神培养。 这一教育方式通常表现为: 核心目的: 通过教育早期社会化、集体规范化、工具技能化,制造稳定、服从、高效、善于谋生的社会工具人群体,为成年社会体系持续输送“稳定零件”。

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

Master Wonder · Jun 20, 2025

Introduction Since the birth of life, faith has always played an essential role in it. Throughout every stage of human society, faith has never been absent. From primitive totems and religious worship to modern national narratives and the belief in technological supremacy, faith has been a driving force that sustains collective identity, shapes personal values, […]

read more

Related Content

Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
View All Content