Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

なぜ「チーム意識」がますます人格抑圧の口実になっているのか

なぜ「チーム意識」がますます人格抑圧の口実になっているのか

Daohe · Jun 17, 2025

――誤解されたチーム意識:集団暴政から文明的協働へ はじめに 「チーム意識」――長年にわたり乱用・曲解・歪曲されてきた言葉だ。 数え切れないほどの職場・組織・企業・行政機関・プロジェクトチームで、この五文字は個人の人格を抑え、独立した判断を奪い、集団暴政を覆い隠す布切れとして用いられてきた。チーム意識や集合意識は本来、人類社会が協働し文明を推し進めるしるしであったはずが、いつしか抑圧の道具へと成り下がり、異論を嘲り、個を排斥し、独立した人格を抹殺する暴力手段へと化したのである。 本稿では、広く深く次の点を明らかにする。 Ⅰ.チーム意識の原初的意義――文明的協働の価値論理 人類が原始部族から文明社会へと移行する過程で、チーム協働は生存の必須条件であった。個人は猛獣や過酷な環境に単独で立ち向かえず、狩猟隊・警護隊・生産共同体が生まれた。初期のチームスピリットは次の三本柱で構成されていた。 チーム意識とは、共通目標の下で個々が自発的に協働し、分業・連携する精神規範であった。 古代ローマ軍団、日本の戦国武士団、近代の工業企業――優れたチームは概して次の三要素を備えている。 真に成熟したチーム意識は、個人の意志を奪うものではなく、むしろ参加意識と責任感を呼び覚ますものである。 Ⅱ.誤解されたチーム意識――乱用と変質の五つの現れ 近代社会に入ると、権力機構・企業・組織・官僚体系は効率と統制を追い求めるあまり、「チーム意識」を次のように歪曲し始めた。 こうしてチーム意識は、個の自由を縛り、上層部の支配を維持し、組織責任を回避する道具へと堕した。私たちはチーム内で次のようなフレーズを耳にする。 これはチーム意識ではなく、集団暴政である。歴史上、そして現在においても、それがもたらした害悪は計り知れない。 Ⅲ.チーム意識乱用の歴史的惨禍 乱用されたチーム意識は、しばしば次のような結果を招く。 歴史的典型例 これらの悲劇は、誤解されたチーム意識が増幅し、悪化した産物にほかならない。 Ⅳ.健全なチーム意識──宗旨を核に、個を不可欠の一部に 真のチームスピリットは、次の三原則に従うべきである。 1. 個人の権力ではなく、チームの宗旨を中心に据える チームの核心は目標と宗旨であり、あらゆる意思決定と協働はこの価値基準を中心に行われる。 2. 個人はチームに不可欠な一部である 「私はチームに属している」ではなく「私はチームを構成する唯一無二の一員」である 3.チーム精神は個の潜在力を引き出すものであり、個性を消すものではない 優れたチームとは、多様な個性と多角的な見解を巧みに融合し、メンバーが宗旨に共感したうえでそれぞれの強みを発揮できる場を整えるものであって、抑圧・沈黙の強要・人格的な辱めによって表面的な一致を保とうとするものではない。 Ⅴ.現代文明におけるチーム精神の6大基準 文明的・健全・公正なチームは、少なくとも次の六つを備える。 結語──チーム意識を文明の本義へ取り戻す チーム意識は本来、文明的協働・集団的責任・価値目標の共有を支える精神である。個人を抑圧し、権力暴政を正当化する道具に堕してはならない。 健全で文明的なチームには、次の“清算”が欠かせない。 もし私たちが“誤解されたチーム意識”を黙認し続けるなら、チームは権力操作下の集団暴政に過ぎず、文明社会は真の自由・尊厳・責任・正義を備えた組織を持てないだろう。 本当に信頼でき、持続し、尊重されるチーム――それは共通の宗旨を羅針盤とし、個々の人格を礎とし、責任と信頼を絆とし、異論の権利を安全柵とする、そんな健全な協働共同体にこそ属している。  

为什么越来越多团队精神,变成了压迫人格的借口

为什么越来越多团队精神,变成了压迫人格的借口

Daohe · Jun 17, 2025

——被误解的团队意识:从群体暴政到文明协作 前言 “团队意识”——一个被滥用、被曲解、被歪化了太久的词。 在无数职场、组织、企业、政务机构、项目集体中,这四个字常常成了压制个体人格、剥夺独立判断、实施群体暴政的遮羞布。团队精神、集体意识,原本是人类社会协作文明进步的标志,却一度沦为压迫工具,甚至变成羞辱异见、排挤个体、抹杀独立人格的暴力手段。 这篇文章,正是要广泛而深入地厘清: 一、 团队意识的原初意义:文明协作的价值逻辑 在人类早期部落到文明社会,团队协作就是生存必需。个体无法单独对抗猛兽、恶劣环境,于是出现了狩猎队、守卫队、生产协作群。早期团队精神是: 团队意识原是基于共同目标下,个体主动协作、分工配合的精神准则。 古罗马军团、日本战国武士、近代工业企业,优秀团队都具备三要素: 真正成熟的团队意识,不是让个体丧失意志,而是激发个体参与感与责任感。 二、被误解的团队意识:滥用与变质的五大表现 进入现代社会,权力机构、企业、组织、官僚体系,为了追求效率与控制,开始将“团队意识”歪曲为: 团队意识沦为绑架个体自由、维护上层统治、规避组织责任的工具。有时候我们会在团队中听到这些话: 这不是团队意识,是群体暴政。在历史与现实中,它带来了极其恶劣的后果。 三、滥用团队意识的历史恶果 被滥用的团队意识,常导致: 历史典型例子: 这些悲剧,都是“被误解的团队意识”放大恶化后的产物。 四、 健康的团队意识:以宗旨为核心,个体为血肉 真正的团队精神,应该遵循三大原则: 1. 围绕团队共同宗旨,而非个人权力 团队的核心是目标与宗旨,所有决策、协作围绕这一价值准则。 2. 个体是团队不可或缺的一部分 每个人不是“我在团队”,而是“我是团队中独特、不可替代的一环”。具体表现为: 3.团队精神是激发个体潜力,不是消灭个体个性 优秀的团队,应善于融合多元个性、多样见解,使个体在认同宗旨下发挥所长,而非靠打压、禁言、人格羞辱维系表面一致。 五、现代文明团队精神的六大标准 一个真正文明、健康、正义的团队,应具备以下六项标准: 结语:让团队意识回归文明本义 团队意识本是文明协作、集体担当、共同追求价值目标的精神支撑,绝不该沦为压迫个体、行使权力暴政的工具。 健康文明团队,必须完成这场清查: 如果我们继续纵容“被误解的团队意识”,那么所谓的团队,只是权力操控下的群体暴政,文明社会也将永无真正自由、尊严、责任、正义的集体组织。 而真正值得信赖、持久、尊重的团队,永远属于那些以共同宗旨为准绳、以个体人格为基础、以责任与信任为纽带、以异见权利为护栏的健康协作共同体。  

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content