Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

現代における情報植民地主義:市民社会の言論の自由と情報主権を論ず

Daohe · Jun 8, 2025

デジタル時代を迎え、情報は単なる伝達手段という役割から、統治のための資源、認識を操作する武器、そして社会を制御する手段へとその姿を変えた。 言論の自由と情報主権は、現代社会の市民が個人の尊厳、集団のアイデンティティ、そして公権力への監視を維持するための根源的な保障である。しかし今日、これらはデジタル覇権、巨大プラットフォーム資本、そして国家の安全保障装置という複数の力が絡み合う中で、全面的な侵食と剥奪の危機に瀕している。 表面的には、誰もが表現の権利を持ち、情報は至る所に溢れ、世論は活発化しているように見える。だがその裏側では、極めて巧妙かつシステマティックな「現代的情報植民地戦争」が進行しているのだ。 この戦争の目的は、単にデータ資源や経済的利益を奪うことだけではない。それは、人々の認識、思考、信条、感情、そして行動そのものを再構築し、市民社会の独立性と自己省察能力を根底から瓦解させることにある。 一、言論の自由の本質と社会的機能 言論の自由とは、決して個人の表現欲を満たすためだけのものではない。それは、現代民主主義社会における重要な自己防衛メカニズムであり、以下の機能を保障するものである。 ひとたび言論の自由が組織的に抑圧されれば、社会は自己修正能力を失い、政治権力は暴走し、特権階級が生まれ、人々の認識は画一化し、社会から異論が消え、最終的には情報全体主義へと至る。 現代のデジタルプラットフォーム上で謳われる「自由」とは、緻密な計算の上で管理された、制御可能な言論の自由に過ぎない。プラットフォームと当局が共同でルール、言説の境界線、そして世論の「越えてはならない一線」を設定し、「自由で繁栄している」という幻影を作り出す。それは実のところ、「温水でカエルを茹でる」かの如き飼い慣らしに他ならない。 二、情報主権の戦略的価値とグローバル競争 情報主権とは、一国あるいは一社会が、自らのデジタル情報の流通、データ資源、言説の体系、そして認識の枠組みを、自律的に管理・制御する能力を指す。 デジタル時代において、情報主権はもはや付随的な議題ではなく、国家の存亡に関わる問題となっている。 データ資源を制する者が、社会の動向と民衆の感情を予測し、操作し、誘導することができる。国際社会において、情報はエネルギー、金融、軍事に次ぐ新たな戦略資源と化しており、世界規模での情報主権獲得競争は激化の一途をたどっている。 1. 「デジタル覇権国家」 は、データの越境流通の自由化や人権保護を名目に、発展途上国にデータ市場の開放を要求する。その実態は、データ資源を収奪し、世論環境を操作し、政治に介入し、自国の代理人勢力を育成することにある。 2. 「デジタル植民地主義」 は、SNS、検索エンジン、ショート動画プラットフォーム、世論ランキングなどを通じて静かに浸透し、他国民の認識体系を再構築し、その国の政府の信頼性を毀損し、社会の分断と認識の混乱を生み出している。 三、プラットフォーム資本と国家権力の二重の軛 (くびき) 国内に目を向ければ、巨大プラットフォームは情報の伝達者から、世論の支配者、そして認識の操作者へと変質した。彼らはトラフィック収益の最大化という原則に基づき、感情的、対立的、迎合的なコンテンツを意図的に増幅させ、理性的、建設的、批判的な声を抑制し、トラフィック至上主義という全体主義的エコシステムを形成している。 時を同じくして、国家機関は社会の安定維持やイデオロギー防衛を名目に、センシティブワードのリスト化、キーワード監視、AIによる世論パトロール、アカウント凍結、トピックの強制的な非表示化、世論対策チームの設置といった手法を通じて、24時間体制で言論空間を隅々までコントロールしている。 資本と権力のこの共謀関係は、市民を二重の剥奪状態へと陥れる。 このような構造の下、社会の世論は、表面的には賑やかでありながら、実質的には単調で、感情論に満ち、理性を欠き、異論が消え、真実が見えない空虚な風景と化していく。 四、現代デジタル植民地主義の作動メカニズム デジタル植民地主義は、かつての武力による領土拡大や植民地支配とは異なり、以下の四重のメカニズムを通じて完成される。 五、市民の情報権の形骸化 現代社会の市民は、「デジタル時代の従順な民」へと成り下がりつつある。その特徴は以下の通りである。 彼らは、不自由であることを知りながら自由の幻想を抱き、無限の情報奔流の中で真実を見失い、判断力をなくし、次第にプラットフォームという生態系における「デジタル労働者」そして「情報消費財」と化していく。 六、情報主権を回復するための道筋 この現代のデジタル植民地主義を打ち破り、市民が本来持つべき情報主権を取り戻すためには、以下の六つの道筋が極めて重要となる。 結語 情報主権と言論の自由は、抽象的な理念ではない。それは、現代社会の市民が生き残り、デジタル全体主義に抵抗するための武器である。 言論の自由が全面的な検閲に晒され、情報主権が資本と権力のおもちゃに成り下がった時、市民社会は自己を修復し、自己を認識し、自己を解放する能力を完全に喪失するだろう。 今日、私たちが目覚めなければ、未来に自由な社会はなく、そこにあるのはデジタル監獄とトラフィックの奴隷制だけである。 行動を通じてのみ、連帯を通じてのみ、そして闘いを通じてのみ、我々は偽りの自由という幻想を打ち破り、市民自身の手に情報主権を取り戻し、真に自由で公正、かつ多様で理性的なデジタル世界を再建できるのである。

read more

Related Content

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
View All Content