Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

社会公民における政治的主権の重要性について

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 一、国家とは何か?社会公民とは何か? 国家とは、抽象的な疆域、制度、政体、あるいは政権の集合体ではありません。近代国家の本質とは、公民が、自らの利益、共同の安全、そして未来へのビジョンを基に、自発的に締結した政治共同体です。公民は、国家が存在するための主体であり、根幹なのです。もし国家に、真の意味での「公民」が存在しなければ、その国は政治共同体としての正当性を失い、単なる統治機関や暴力装置へと成り下がってしまいます。 公民であるということの真の意味は、単に特定の国境内に居住していることでも、その国の身分証明書を所持していることでもありません。それは、政治的主権を享受しているかどうかにかかっています。 政治的主権を持って初めて、個人は真に「国家共同体」における権力の主体となることができます。そうして初めて、国家権力の運営を決定し、監督し、それに関与し、抑制と均衡を図ることができるのです。そして、国家を、一部の少数者の専有物ではなく、「私たちの国家」とすることができるのです。 二、歴史の深層:国家と主権の進化 人類の政治史を概観すると、国家の出現は当初、部族の連合、軍事的な拡大、そして領土の支配に源を発していました。初期の「国家」は、武力と血縁によって維持され、個人に権利はなく、臣民に主権はありませんでした。中世の封建帝国や神権政治も、例外なく政治的主権を国王、教皇、貴族、聖職者といった階層の手に固く握りしめ、人民は家畜のように、その運命は草のように扱われました。 近代的な国民国家が興隆し、啓蒙主義運動、ブルジョア革命、そして近代的な立憲制度が確立されて初めて、「国民主権」や「公民の政治参加」が、国家の政治構造の中に徐々に組み込まれていったのです。フランス革命は「主権は人民に属する」と宣言し、アメリカ合衆国憲法は「人民政府、民選議会」を確立しました。こうして、近代国家の政治的正当性は、初めて「公民の主権」の上に築かれ始めたのです。 しかしながら、今日の世界を見渡しても、真に「公民の政治的主権」を実現している国家は、ごく少数です。大多数の国家は、依然として「見せかけの公民国家」の状態に留まっています。すなわち、名目上は「人民が国家の主である」としながら、実質的には権力は少数の集団に集中し、公民は受動的な服従者や道具に過ぎないのです。 公民が不在であれば、主権もまた不在となり、国家は退化し、文明は停滞します。 三、政治的主権の真の意味 政治的主権とは、形式的に設けられた法律の条文でも、時折行われる選挙投票でもありません。それは、公民が、国家権力の運営、公共の事柄に関する意思決定、公的資源の分配、そして国家の統治構造の設計に、実質的に関与できる権利のことです。 具体的には、以下の権利が含まれます。 もし国家が、形式的な「投票」だけを許し、公民に実質的な政治的主権を与えないのであれば、公民は単なる数字へと成り下がり、国家は寡頭制へと堕落するでしょう。 四、主権なくして、公民という存在は偽りとなる 現実の世界では、多くの国家が自らを「公民国家」と称しながらも、形式的に公民としての身分を与えているに過ぎません。その実質において、公民は主権を持たず、国家の統治に実質的に参加する権利もありません。 彼らは義務を負い、代償を払いながらも、権力構造の外側に置かれ、国家という機械の付属物となっているのです。 それは、以下のことを意味します。 この現象は、深く考察するに値する社会構造を浮かび上がらせます。すなわち、国家は制度設計上、「公民を基本とする」と約束しながら、実践においては、公民が公共の事柄における共同の参加者であるという地位を、真に実現できていないのです。 主権が人々の手から失われる時、国家はもはや民心を引きつける力を持ちません。社会の信頼はそこから瓦解し、文明発展の礎は揺らぎ始めます。最終的に、そのような国家は、全国民のものではなくなり、特権階級の私有財産と化し、その衰退もまた、覆い難いものとなるでしょう。 五、主権の欠如が、国家の運命に与える影響 歴史と現実は、社会公民から主権を奪ったいかなる国家も、最終的には以下の四つの苦境に陥ることを、繰り返し証明しています。 六、文明の未来における、唯一の道 人類文明が持続的に進歩しようとするならば、唯一実行可能な道は、「公民の政治的主権」を全面的に確立した、近代的な国家制度を築くことです。すなわち、 ただ、そうして初めて、国家は真に「公民国家」となり、社会は安定的で、公正で、繁栄し、文明は持続的に進化していくことができるのです。 結語 公民の政治的主権なくして、公民の国家は存在しません。 国家が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それは権力者の支配と暴力装置が残るだけです。 社会が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、そこには抑圧、収奪、そして偽善的なパフォーマンスが残るだけです。 文明が、公民の主権なくして存在するならば、それはやて暗黒、腐敗、そして崩壊へと陥るでしょう。 国家の真の主人たりうるのは、政治的主権をその手に握る、社会公民だけです。未来が真に属するのは自ら目覚め、参加し、権利を求め、そして自らの主権を守り抜く勇気を持つ社会公民なのです。 これこそが、国家が存在するための最低ラインであり、一つの文明が前進し続けられるかどうかを左右する、最後の保証なのです。  

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society

Daohe · Jun 3, 2025

Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]

read more

Related Content

How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
How to build a highly efficient and perfectly oppressive society
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A system where everyone can be deceived, exploited, and oppressed—yet powerless to resist Throughout the course of human civilization, the idea of building a “perfect abyss” has never been a mere fantasy. Its prototypes are scattered across history and present-day society—different in appearance, but strikingly similar in essence. If one were to deliberately design such […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
View All Content