Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

漫談:人生における友情のいくつかの段階

Yicheng · Apr 6, 2025

人生という旅路において、友情は鏡のようなものであり、私たちの心の成長と生命の変化を映し出してくれます。幼い頃の無邪気な遊び仲間から、晩年における魂が通じ合った知己に至るまで、友情にも「段階」というものがあります。それは決して不変のものではなく、私たちの認識、価値観、そして人生の状態と共に、絶えず進化していくのです。以下に、人生における友情の主な五つの段階を挙げます。その一つひとつの層が、成長の証なのです。 第一段階:幼少期の遊び仲間——友情の芽生え 幼年期は、人間性が初めて開花する段階であり、友情の種もここで静かに蒔かれます。この段階の友情は、単純で純粋です。利益が絡むこともなく、価値観の一致が求められることもなく、多くは時間や空間の共有と、共通の遊びの楽しさに基づいていました。 第二段階:アイデンティティを共有する仲間——「自分とは誰か」を探して 思春期に入ると、個人は強い自己意識を持ち始めます。この時期の友情は、外的な活動から内面的な感情の交流へと移行し、友人同士は思想や秘密、悩みを分かち合うようになります。 これは、友情が初めて「内面的な自己同一性」と結びついた段階です。私たちは、ただ友人を受け入れるだけでなく、友人を選ぶことを始めるのです。 第三段階:支え合い、協力し合う仲間——共創と相互扶助の友情 成人初期から中年期は、人生で最も責任が重く、社会的な役割が最も多い段階です。友情もまた、単なる付き合いや愚痴を言い合うだけの関係ではなく、仕事や人生において互いに支え合い、共に成長するための資源となっていきます。 この段階の友情には、協力、利益、そして責任といった要素が溶け込み始めます。しかし、人生の厳しさゆえに、このような「苦楽を共にする」友情は、しばしばより強固で、より深いものとなるのです。 第四段階:精神世界を分かち合う仲間——互いを慰める、優しい灯台 中年期を越え、老年期へと入ると、経験と人生の深みが、価値観の昇華をもたらします。この段階の友情は、次第に功利的な側面から離れ、心の共鳴と精神的な安らぎを求めるようになります。 この段階における真の友人とは、「外面的な世界」における協力者ではなく、あなたの「内なる秩序」の共鳴者なのです。 第五段階:魂の伴侶——互いを照らし合う、生涯の知己 これは、友情における最高の段階です。言葉を必要とせず、言葉以上に深い、魂のレベルでの結びつきです。この種の友人は、決して多くはなく、一生のうちに一人出会えれば幸運かもしれません。しかし、その存在は、あなたの人生が無駄ではなかったと、確信させてくれるでしょう。 魂の伴侶とは、歳月が積み重なって初めて出会える可能性のある存在です。彼らは、あなたが自ら選んだ「友人」ではなく、運命が与えてくれた「知己」なのです。 結語:友情は、人生における成熟の縮図である 友情の段階とは、優劣を比べるものではなく、あなたの人生の各段階における必要性と成長を示してくれるものです。幼少期の「遊び仲間」から、晩年の「魂の知己」に至るまで、一つひとつの友情は鏡となり、私たちが世界をどう理解し、他人をどう理解し、そして自分自身をどう理解してきたかを映し出してくれます。。 成熟とは、友人が増え続けることではありません。誰が、本当に共に歩む価値のある人なのかを、あなたが次第に理解していくことです。人生の旅路は、時に孤独かもしれませんが、真の友情とは、広大な人々の海の中で、互いの心の灯火を灯し合うことなのです。

L’amitié à différents stades de la vie

Yicheng · Apr 6, 2025

Tout au long de la vie, l’amitié est comme un miroir qui reflète notre évolution et le chemin parcouru. Des compagnons de jeu insouciants de l’enfance aux compagnons d’âme de nos vieux jours, l’amitié n’est pas statique : elle évolue au fur et à mesure que notre esprit se développe, que nos valeurs changent et […]

read more

Related Content

A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
Inside the “cage trap”: how authoritarian governments maintain control
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Dec 19, 2024
If a regime or government adopts the “Cage Trap” policy, it essentially acts as an extreme mechanism to safeguard privilege and protect class interests. This article offers a multidimensional exploration of this concept. The “Cage Trap” refers to government policies that impose strict controls on citizens’ freedoms, often justified in the name of national security […]
View All Content