Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

一乗信仰研究より ーー三つの智慧の真言:解悟・開悟・証悟への道筋

Master Wonder · Mar 27, 2025

『摩訶般若波羅蜜大明咒経』、すなわち一般に『般若心経』として知られる経典は、宗教や時間を超えた智慧の結晶です。 しかし、より高次の体系からこれを考察するならば、『般若心経』は孤立した智慧ではなく、一つの広大な「覚りの体系」における一環であると理解することができます。 修行のプロセスは、三つの段階に分けることができます。 解悟(げご) — 束縛を解き、根源を見極める。 開悟(かいご) — 智慧を開き、執着を打ち破る。 証悟(しょうご) — 円満に確証し、自在無碍(じざいむげ)の境地に至る。 「三教帰源(さんきょうきげん))」(ここでは、多様な智慧の流れが一つに合流することを象徴する言葉として用います)の文化的システムにおいて、私たちは三つの智慧の真言(マントラ)を確立し、迷いから悟りへ、そして悟りからその実証へと至る道を構築することができます。 一、解悟の真言:王陽明『真我偈』 二、開悟の真言:『般若心経』 三、証悟の真言:『金剛般若経』 第一段階:解悟の真言 —— 王陽明『真我偈』 多くの人々は、一生を通じて運命、因果、家柄、社会環境といったものに囚われています。開悟に至る以前に、まず旧来の観念や「枷(かせ)」に縛られてしまっているのです。 したがって、修行の第一歩は、すぐさま開悟を目指すことではありません。まず解悟し、これらの目に見えない枷を解き放ち、真の「我」が何であるかを識別することです。 【解悟の真言 — 王陽明『真我偈』】 天意を避け、因果から逃れんとすれば、諸々の枷が真我を縛る。 天意に順い、因果を受け入れれば、今日初めて我は我と知る。(躲天意,避因果,诸般枷锁困真我;顺天意,承因果,今日方知我是我;) 一朝、道を悟りて真我を見れば、何をか懼れん、昔日の旧き枷を。 世間の枷は本是(もとこ)れ夢、無形無相にして、また我も無し。(一朝悟道见真我,何惧昔日旧枷锁,世间枷锁本是梦,无形无相亦无我。 ) 解悟の意味: 1. 「天意を避け、因果から逃れんとすれば」:これは、人が心に抱く不安や、現実から逃避しようとする姿勢を意味します。 2. 「諸々の枷が真我を縛る」:人は、生まれながらにして物事の表面的な姿や、社会的なアイデンティティに囚われやすい、ということを示します。 3. 「今日初めて我は我と知る」:これは、悟りを開くその刹那、過去の身分、家柄、因縁といったものが、実体のない幻影に過ぎなかったと理解する瞬間を指します。 4. 「本是れ夢、無形無相にして、また我も無し」:人間は最終的に空(くう)へと帰し、自己への執着から解放されることを理解する境地です。 解悟とは、「因果への恐怖」「身分という枷」「文化的な束縛」を打ち破り、社会的な役割やレッテルを超越したところにある「真我」を見出すことなのです。 第二段階:開悟の真言 —— 『般若心経』 自らを縛る枷を解き放って初めて、私たちは開悟の段階へと入る条件が整います。 開悟とは何でしょうか。それは、あらゆる現象の本質が「空」であると見極め、所有することに執着せず、失うことを恐れず、過去に溺れず、未来を夢想しないことです。 『般若心経』は、極めて簡潔な言葉で私たちに教えてくれます。「色即是空、空即是色」と。「五蘊は皆空なり」と悟れば、一切の苦厄から解放される、と。 空とは、虚無ではありません。それは、本質的な無常性であり、縁に従いながらも不変であり、執着なく、妨げなき智慧のことです。 開悟とは、生と死、苦と楽を超越し、心の中のこだわりを打ち破り、精神が自由になる状態へと入ることです。 【開悟の真言 — 『摩訶般若波羅蜜多心経』】 観自在菩薩、深く般若波羅蜜多を行じし時、五蘊は皆空なりと照見し、一切の苦厄を度したまえり。 舎利子。色は空に異ならず、空は色に異ならず。色即是空、空即是色なり。受・想・行・識もまたかくの如し。 舎利子。是の諸法は空相にして、生ぜず、滅せず、垢つかず、浄からず、増さず、減らず。 是の故に、空の中には色は無く、受・想・行・識も無し。眼・耳・鼻・舌・身・意も無く、色・声・香・味・触・法も無し。眼界も無く、乃至、意識界も無し。 無明も無く、また無明の尽くることも無し。乃至、老死も無く、また老死の尽くることも無し。 […]

三大智慧咒:解悟咒,开悟咒、证悟咒

Master Wonder · Mar 27, 2025

《摩诃般若波罗蜜大明咒经》(即《心经》)是超越宗教与时间的智慧经典。 但如果我们用更高的体系来看,它并不是孤立的智慧,而是整个“觉悟体系”中的一环。 真正的修行过程,分为三步: 解悟 — 解开束缚,看清根源。 开悟 — 开启智慧,破除执着。 证悟 — 圆满确证,达到自在无碍。 在“三教归源”的文化系统中(此处“三教”代表多种智慧流派之汇聚),我们可以确立三大智慧咒语,构建一条从迷到悟、从悟到证的道路: 一、解悟咒:王阳明《真我偈》 二、开悟咒:《心经》 三、证悟咒:《金刚经》 第一步:解悟咒——王阳明《真我偈》 许多人终其一生被命运、因果、家族背景、社会环境困住,甚至开悟之前,就先被旧有的观念和“枷锁”裹挟。 因此,第一步不是立刻开悟,而是先解悟,解开这些无形枷锁,辨认出真正的“我”。 解悟咒 — 王阳明《真我偈》 “躲天意,避因果,诸般枷锁困真我;顺天意,承因果,今日方知我是我; 一朝悟道见真我,何惧昔日旧枷锁,世间枷锁本是梦,无形无相亦无我。” 解悟之义:    1.    “躲天意,避因果”:意思是人内心的不安与逃避。    2.    “枷锁困真我”:人天然地会被表象和身份认同困住。    3.    “今日方知我是我”:指顿悟之刹那,明白过去的身份、家世、因缘不过是幻影。    4.    “本是梦,无形无相,亦无我”:明白人最终归于虚空,摆脱自我执念。 解悟就是破除“因果恐惧”、“身份枷锁”、“文化束缚”,找到超越角色和标签之外的“真我”。 第二步:开悟咒——《心经》 当我们解开束缚之后,才有条件进入开悟阶段。 开悟是什么?是看清一切现象本质是“空”,不执着于拥有,不恐惧于失去,不沉溺于过往,不幻想于未来。 《心经》用极简的语言告诉我们:色即是空,空即是色。五蕴皆空,度一切苦厄。 空不是虚无,而是本质的无常性,是随缘不变、无执无碍的智慧。 开悟,就是超越生死苦乐、破除内心挂碍,进入心灵自由状态。 开悟咒 — 《摩诃般若波罗蜜心经》 观自在菩萨,行深般若波罗蜜多时,照见五蕴皆空,度一切苦厄。 舍利子,色不异空,空不异色;色即是空,空即是色。受想行识,亦复如是。 舍利子,是诸法空相,不生不灭,不垢不净,不增不减。是故空中无色,无受想行识,无眼耳鼻舌身意,无色声香味触法,无眼界,乃至无意识界。 无无明,亦无无明尽,乃至无老死,亦无老死尽。无苦集灭道,无智亦无得。以无所得故,菩提萨埵,依般若波罗蜜多故,心无挂碍,无挂碍故,无有恐怖,远离颠倒梦想,究竟涅槃。 三世诸佛,依般若波罗蜜多故,得阿耨多罗三藐三菩提。 故知般若波罗蜜多,是大神咒,是大明咒,是无上咒,是无等等咒,能除一切苦,真实不虚。 故说般若波罗蜜多咒,即说咒曰: 揭谛 […]

read more

Related Content

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
View All Content