Serving the people vs serving the state: what is the right path of modern governance

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 10, 2025
Why do nations exist? Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers. The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life. If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public […]

Why do nations exist?
Not for slogans, not for borders, and not for GDP numbers.

The true purpose of a nation is to protect basic human rights, uphold the dignity of its people, and improve their quality of life.

If a country appears powerful but its people are suffering—if there is national pride but public anxiety—then that country is just an empty shell. It may look strong on the outside, but inside it is full of deep problems.

That is why it is essential to understand the difference between “serving the state” and “serving the people.” A modern government must see serving its people as the only true source of legitimacy. Only then can a nation remain stable, fair, and truly prosperous.

I. The conflict between serving the state and serving the people

“Serving the state” usually means focusing on national goals like economic growth, military power, global influence, and national security.

“Serving the people” means protecting individual rights—fair income, stable jobs, affordable housing and healthcare, free speech, fair justice, public welfare, dignity, and political participation.

These two goals should go hand in hand. But in practice, especially in how governments use power, there are often structural conflicts:

  • Resource conflict: Governments spend more on big projects or military and choose to cut public welfare spending.
  • Unequal participation in decision making: National strategies are decided by a small elite; ordinary citizens have little say.
  • Different values: Power wants control and unity, while people need freedom and choices.
  • Unfair benefits: “National interest” often serves the rich and powerful, while citizens are left behind.

These deep conflicts are the biggest problem with “state-centered” policies—and the real threat to the people.

II. What are the risks of “state-centered” policies?

Some governments, in order to protect national image or appear strong in foreign affairs, choose to sacrifice the rights and wellbeing of their citizens. Over time, this leads to seven major risks, with consequences that are hard to ignore:

1. Collapse of social trust

Citizens lose trust in the government, the legal system, and institutions. As a result, policies lose effectiveness.

2. Widening wealth gap

Powerful capital groups take advantage of national strategies to control resources. Wealth becomes concentrated among the few, while the poor get poorer.

3. Crisis of political legitimacy

Public confidence in the government fades. People no longer believe in the system, and the state’s legitimacy begins to erode.

4. Rising social anxiety

High costs of housing, jobs, education, healthcare, and retirement create widespread stress and insecurity.

5. Rigid policymaking

Decision-making is dominated by a small elite. Without public input or checks and balances, policies become outdated and tensions build up.

6. Backlash from media control

When free speech is suppressed, public frustration grows beneath the surface, creating a false sense of peace while unrest brews underneath.

7. Decline in long-term national strength

A society without freedom and fairness loses its creativity, innovation, and energy. In the long run, the nation’s global competitiveness will suffer.

III. Core principles of a people-centered government

A truly modern government must be guided by four key principles that serve the people:

1. People’s wellbeing comes first

Government spending must first support basic needs—healthcare, education, housing, jobs, and retirement.

2. Protection of rights

The constitution must guarantee citizens’ rights to know, to speak, to participate, and to hold power accountable.

3. Transparency in public finances

Budgets, spending, and government decisions must be fully transparent. Taxpayers have the right to monitor how public funds are used.

4. Limits on state power

State power must be bound by law, used only for the public good—not for personal gain, private interest, or political inheritance.

IV. A balanced structure for national governance

To build a fair and effective system, We need three-pillar governance model with dual-level counterbalance.

Power Holder Core Role Supervision Mechanism
State government National security, fiscal control, legislation, diplomacy Supervised by citizens, media, and parliament
Civil society Industry regulation, community affairs, NGOs Bound by law, holds the right to join public decision-making
Individual citizens Voting, oversight, right to information Directly supervises state power, takes part in governance

V. Reforming the civil service: new standards for a modern era

A truly modern civil servant must meet the following criteria:

1. Public-first mindset: serve the interests of taxpayers, not just follow orders from above.

2. Performance-based evaluation: measured by public well-being, citizen satisfaction, and policy implementation results.

3. Lifetime accountability: retirement does not exempt one from responsibility for past actions.

4. Public reporting system: regularly report achievements and problems to citizens, and accept public questioning.

5. Separation from business interests: strict bans on collusion with capital groups; assets must be declared and transparent.

VI. A mature model of tripartite governance

In a fully modern state, governance should evolve to the following form:

  • Reduced government scope: government is limited to macro coordination, national defense, foreign affairs, justice, and legislation.
  • Full autonomy of social organizations: sectors like healthcare, education, academia, and community affairs are managed by self-governing bodies.
  • Comprehensive citizen oversight: establish citizen assemblies, policy referendum days, and annual government satisfaction voting.
  • Public budgeting under citizen control: national budgets must be approved by a citizen assembly each year.
  • Transparent public projects: major national projects require open proposals, public opinion surveys, and third-party evaluations.

VII. Conclusion: serving the people is the foundation of the state

A country may appear strong, but if its people suffer, that strength is hollow and unstable.

A country may seem powerful, but without public trust, it cannot last.

The only rightful path to national governance is to build a people-centered modern system—rooted in citizen rights, focused on quality of life, guided by people-first budgeting, protected by limited and transparent power, and secured through open and participatory institutions.

Only then can a nation achieve lasting peace, public trust, and sustainable development.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

世间三种祸害

Master Wonder · Mar 24, 2025

把世界上的三种祸害,大白于天下 在生活中常常见到这三种人,让我绝望的无话可说。 每一个时代,每一个社会,都存在某些特定的危机,它们并非来自外部的天灾,而是源于人性自身的缺陷。这些缺陷不仅影响个体命运,当成为社会常态时,则是会让社会腐败和衰退。 本文将浅谈三类人: 这三种人是全人类要共同警惕的对象。我们要不断改善社会中的教育和其他系统,避免培养出这些败类。为此,我们需要看清楚他们的行为和根源。 一、无耻之徒 人类社会能够世代延续靠的不止是生存资源和个体的奋斗,还有团结与互助。但我们有时也会看到,有些人对他人的疾苦时视而不见,甚至冷嘲热讽。这种行为不仅是冷漠,更是一种赤裸裸的无耻。 无耻是对人性的背叛,是自甘堕落的体现。当一个社会大量出现无耻之徒,就如同有一股黑暗的力量拉着整个社会下坠。 历史上,统治者对人民疾苦的冷漠,往往是国家走向衰亡的重要原因。例如,清朝末年的统治阶级,对百姓的贫困与外敌的侵略视而不见。当白银大量流出、鸦片泛滥成灾时,朝廷中仍有大臣沉迷于权力斗争,甚至为了维护自己的利益,不惜牺牲国家的未来。这种对疾苦的无视,最终导致了大清帝国的崩溃。 而在现代社会,这种无耻的现象依然存在。举一些例子: 无耻的人不一定是恶人,但他们的冷漠却能让人间变得更加残酷,如同地狱一般。 二、无德之人 “无德”并不是指缺乏基本的礼貌或教养,而是指丧失了道德上的判断力,甚至主动选择站在错误的一方。他们明知某些人冷酷无情、剥削他人,却仍然崇拜他们,甚至希望自己也能成为这样的人。 历史上,不乏一些人明知统治者残暴无道,却仍然拥护他们,只因为自身的懦弱或者贪婪。这样的人太多了,在此不加以赘述。他们的漠然和助纣为虐是苦难的根源。 现代社会的无德之行也不少,而且还会被合理化,比如: 无德之人之所以可怕,是因为他们不仅自己丧失道德,还会影响整个社会的价值观,使得无耻者更加猖獗。 三、愚笨之人 人类有独立思考的能力,但并非所有人都愿意使用它。有些人面对谎言和欺骗,宁愿选择相信,而不是去质疑和求证。这种愚笨是个人命运悲剧的根源,还往往将身边的人一同拖入深渊,影响社会。 一些历史案例: 现代社会的愚笨现象体现在对网络谣言的不加辨别传播,以及对权威人物的盲目信任。许多人轻信虚假信息,甚至不惜为其辩护,直到被现实打脸;即使事实已证明某些权威错误,一些人仍拒绝承认。 盲目相信无耻之人,不仅害己,也让整个社会陷入愚昧。 结语 社会的进步,依赖于人们的觉醒。 我们要警惕那些对苦难视而不见的无耻之人,要避免成为崇拜他们的无德之人,更要避免盲目相信他们成为愚笨之人。唯有保持清醒,勇于质疑,社会才能走向真正的公正与文明。

사회에서 불평등이 작동하는 방식에 대한 현실적인 고찰

Master Wonder · Mar 24, 2025

사적 소유와 권력 구조가 개입되기 시작하면, 불평등은 단순한 시스템의 오류가 아니라 곧 시스템 그 자체가 된다. 고대부터 오늘날의 금융 중심 사회에 이르기까지 착취의 본질은 변하지 않았으며, 단지 그 모습만 바뀌었을 뿐이다. 현대의 착취는 더 깨끗하고 조용하며, 눈에 잘 띄지 않게 숨어 있다. 하지만 계급 착취는 단순히 누가 더 많은 돈이나 영향력을 가지고 있느냐의 문제가 아니다. […]

read more

Related Content

4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Cowardice and brutality in Chinese education: a warning and threat to global civilization
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 9, 2025
I. Why are cowardly and brutal styles of education so common in Eastern societies, especially in China? To understand these two distorted educational patterns, we must go beyond blaming individual parents or schools. Instead, it is necessary to examine the deeper cultural and historical roots—particularly the long-standing authoritarian structure of Chinese civilization. For centuries, Chinese […]
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Education in Free Societies vs. Authoritarian Regimes
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 17, 2025
Every step forward in civilization has been guided by the light of education. Education does more than shape individuals—it molds entire eras. It is the foundation that determines whether a society remains stable or transforms, whether power is balanced or abused. In free and democratic societies, education is seen as the key to awakening public […]
View All Content