When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation

Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 2, 2025
“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute. Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters […]

“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute.

Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters more than our differences.” On the surface, they seem kind, wise, even morally superior. But behind that charming smile and polished language often hides one of the most dangerous forces in modern civilization: the subtle poison that dulls our sense of justice, the devil dressed in the clothing of righteousness.

Recently, I listened to a Harvard graduate named Jiang Yurong give a speech at her commencement. It reminded me of those who, throughout history, stood beside tyrants—softening the blow of violence with talk of love and unity, helping to silence the cries of the oppressed by urging “understanding” and “tolerance.”

That is why this article must be written.

“Transcending beliefs and values”? It is moral cowardice.

Our beliefs and values are the very foundation of civilization.They are the hard-earned boundaries of right and wrong, forged through centuries of suffering, struggle, and reflection.They tell us what is just, what is unjust, what must be defended, and what must never be allowed.

To speak of “going beyond beliefs and values” is, in plain terms, to abandon moral clarity. It is to stop naming evil, to stop standing for what is right. It means letting the powerful get away with cruelty, letting the wicked commit harm, letting tyrants flourish—while still asking you to “understand them,” to “be inclusive,” and become their servant, pray and tool.

This is not tolerance. It is betrayal. This is not open-mindedness. It is a slow erosion of the soul.

The dangerous kindness that serves power

Anyone who preaches “something deeper than belief” or “moving beyond ideology” may appear to be advocating peace and compassion. But in reality, they are clearing the path for oppression and dressing power in the robes of righteousness. They weaponize language—using words like “love” and “humanity” to blur the lines between victim and perpetrator, to place justice and injustice on the same moral footing, and to wash away the crimes of power by reminding us that “everyone bleeds the same.”

Yes, we are all human, but that does not make us equal. The hunter and the prey do not stand on common ground. When “shared humanity” is used to silence the truth of oppression, it becomes a second wound to those already bleeding.

This is the darkest kind of persuasion: telling the lamb that the butcher loves it; teaching the chained to mistake rust for warmth.

Social difference goes far beyond gender and culture

Discussions of gender equality, racial equity, and cultural respect are common. But the most fundamental and violent division in society is class. It is class that determines who sets the terms, and who must submit to them. Who wields the power to decide, and who is left powerless in the outcome.

So when someone talks only of “shared humanity,” “empathy,” or “transcending ideology” without addressing class, they are tying the oppressed and the oppressor together with the same moral rope. For the powerful, it is a performance of mercy. For the powerless, it is a death sentence.

They say, “We are all connected.” Well, I once said the same thing to a turkey on Thanksgiving.
The turkey did not quite grasp the beauty of that connection—but in today’s world, many of the hunted are smiling through the slaughter.

The devil’s flute

The call to “transcend ideology and belief” is nothing more than a flute in the devil’s hand. It plays a sweet, seductive tune—one that lulls people into thinking there is no real evil in the world, that everything can be solved through dialogue, connection, and reconciliation.

But once you put down your convictions—your beliefs, your principles—you also lower your guard. You lose your ability to judge, to resist, to draw lines. In the end, you become part of a compliant crowd: easy to control, easy to consume—grateful, even, to be served as someone else’s feast.

Conclusion

Ideas can evolve, and faith can grow deeper. But they must never be erased, abandoned, or overrided. They are the anchor of civilization, the sword of justice, and the dignity of humanity.

Those who speak of “moving beyond ideology and belief,” no matter how gentle their tone or how innocent their face, are fighting for the devil’s right to define justice. We can be kind, but we will not be fools. We have empathy, but we will not applaud hypocrisy.

Remember—some voices may sound warm and gentle, but they are nothing more than the executioner’s decree, disguised in the costume of compassion.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

思维返祖

Daohe · Jan 24, 2025

思维返祖现象的思考:从思维逻辑与习惯重置的角度深度剖析 一、何为思维返祖? “思维返祖”并非单纯的倒退,而是指在复杂认知环境中,个体或群体因无法适应思维深度与广度的要求,选择回归更简单、更低阶的思维模式。这种现象既是一种应激反应,也是长期思维习惯重置的结果,其核心表现在于:用简单化的直觉与二元对立逻辑取代了多层次分析与系统化思考。 在现代社会的信息压力下,这种现象愈加普遍:个体往往在短期高效与长期深入之间选择前者,结果导致原本的深度思维能力被反复重置,逐渐形成“浅层认知化”的趋势。这种趋势不仅限制了人类分析问题的能力,更可能削弱社会整体的思维创新潜力。 二、思维返祖的核心逻辑 思维返祖现象的背后,隐含着几个重要的逻辑特征: 1. 逃避复杂性,偏向单一性 现代问题往往具有复杂的多维特征,但思维返祖的人更倾向于将问题简单化,追求单一视角下的快速答案。这种逻辑可以用“二元对立模式”来概括,即将世界划分为非黑即白、非对即错的简单格局。这种模式看似直接有效,却忽略了现实的多样性与矛盾性。 例如,在面对社会争议时,人们更容易选择“支持/反对”的立场,而不愿花时间去分析背后的原因与细节。这种简化逻辑削弱了系统性思考的可能性,让复杂问题变得表面化、情绪化。 2. 惯性思维的强化与固化 思维习惯的形成具有强烈的路径依赖性。返祖现象往往建立在一种“省力机制”之上:大脑习惯选择曾经快速解决问题的思维模式,从而避免耗费更多的认知资源。长期如此,个体的逻辑思维能力会逐渐退化,变得机械且僵化。 例如,教育模式中过度强调固定答案的标准化考试,会让学生形成依赖“唯一正确答案”的惯性,而非追求问题多解的思维模式。这种惯性强化导致深度思维和开放性思维的缺乏,让人们更倾向于走“最简单”的旧路,而不愿探索新路。 3. 情绪优先于理性,第一反应优先于逻辑 返祖式思维常以情绪为驱动核心,表现为用感性判断替代理性分析。人类的情绪反应通常比逻辑分析更快、更直接,这让人们在面对压力或复杂问题时,容易用简单的情绪化方式处理问题,而非从逻辑层面深度思考。例如,愤怒、恐惧等情绪往往会促使人们快速得出结论,而不顾问题的全貌。这种“情绪至上”的倾向进一步限制了思维链条的延展性。 三、思维习惯重置与分析能力的退化 1. 思维习惯重置的本质:短期效率与长期能力的矛盾 思维习惯的重置本质上是一种“效率优先”的认知策略。当大脑面对高强度信息输入时,优先选择“快捷通道”解决问题,而非“深度通道”。这种思维模式看似是一种资源优化,但实则削弱了长期的分析与创新能力。 神经科学中的神经可塑性概念表明,随着经验和学习的变化,大脑会通过改变神经连接来调整思维模式。因此,当人们频繁依赖快捷的思维通道时,原有的深度思考能力会逐渐减弱,进而影响更高阶的认知功能,如创新与批判性思维。尽管这种“快速反应”策略可以应对短期信息处理需求,但它限制了人类思维的灵活性,减少了思维的多样性。 具体而言,这种重置过程包含以下几个阶段: 2. 分析能力退化的表现 四、思维返祖的现代社会诱因 1. 信息过载与认知疲劳 现代社会的信息密度远超历史任何时期,人们必须在短时间内处理大量复杂信息。这种情况下,大脑倾向于选择快捷的处理方式,即“返祖式思维”。久而久之,深度思维的激活成本变得过高,浅层思维逐渐成为主流。 2. 碎片化环境的负面影响 社交媒体、短视频等碎片化信息环境进一步加剧了思维的表面化倾向。这些平台通过情绪化内容刺激短期注意力,强化了快速决策而非深度分析的思维模式。 3. 教育与社会文化的局限 在一些社会文化中,教育往往更注重知识的输入与标准化,而忽视对逻辑思维与分析能力的训练。例如,考试以快速解答为导向,忽略问题推导的深度过程,这进一步推动了思维返祖的习惯形成。 五、打破思维返祖的路径 1. 延展思维链条,培养复杂性容忍度 2. 限制碎片化刺激,回归深度思考 3. 引导教育改革,关注思维过程 结语 思维返祖现象的本质在于人类对复杂性的逃避,而习惯重置则是这种现象的放大器。面对这一趋势,我们需要主动抵抗碎片化与表面化的思维环境,重新培养深度思考的能力与习惯。只有通过系统的训练和自我调整,人类才能从“返祖”的惯性中摆脱,走向更加全面、深刻的思维进化之路。

How Kindness Can Revive Civilization

Daohe · Jan 24, 2025

Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]

read more

Related Content

Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Self-discovery involves understanding ourselves, others, and the world around us
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
In today’s world, where information is overwhelming, it’s easy to feel lost and confused. We’re all trying to find our way, looking to understand ourselves, others, and the world around us. But this process isn’t something that happens overnight. Instead, it takes a lot of time and reflection. In this column, we will share conversations […]
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Education should not be limited only in school or in class
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 11, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future
Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025
We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]
View All Content