When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation

Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Jun 2, 2025
“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute. Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters […]

“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute.

Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters more than our differences.” On the surface, they seem kind, wise, even morally superior. But behind that charming smile and polished language often hides one of the most dangerous forces in modern civilization: the subtle poison that dulls our sense of justice, the devil dressed in the clothing of righteousness.

Recently, I listened to a Harvard graduate named Jiang Yurong give a speech at her commencement. It reminded me of those who, throughout history, stood beside tyrants—softening the blow of violence with talk of love and unity, helping to silence the cries of the oppressed by urging “understanding” and “tolerance.”

That is why this article must be written.

“Transcending beliefs and values”? It is moral cowardice.

Our beliefs and values are the very foundation of civilization.They are the hard-earned boundaries of right and wrong, forged through centuries of suffering, struggle, and reflection.They tell us what is just, what is unjust, what must be defended, and what must never be allowed.

To speak of “going beyond beliefs and values” is, in plain terms, to abandon moral clarity. It is to stop naming evil, to stop standing for what is right. It means letting the powerful get away with cruelty, letting the wicked commit harm, letting tyrants flourish—while still asking you to “understand them,” to “be inclusive,” and become their servant, pray and tool.

This is not tolerance. It is betrayal. This is not open-mindedness. It is a slow erosion of the soul.

The dangerous kindness that serves power

Anyone who preaches “something deeper than belief” or “moving beyond ideology” may appear to be advocating peace and compassion. But in reality, they are clearing the path for oppression and dressing power in the robes of righteousness. They weaponize language—using words like “love” and “humanity” to blur the lines between victim and perpetrator, to place justice and injustice on the same moral footing, and to wash away the crimes of power by reminding us that “everyone bleeds the same.”

Yes, we are all human, but that does not make us equal. The hunter and the prey do not stand on common ground. When “shared humanity” is used to silence the truth of oppression, it becomes a second wound to those already bleeding.

This is the darkest kind of persuasion: telling the lamb that the butcher loves it; teaching the chained to mistake rust for warmth.

Social difference goes far beyond gender and culture

Discussions of gender equality, racial equity, and cultural respect are common. But the most fundamental and violent division in society is class. It is class that determines who sets the terms, and who must submit to them. Who wields the power to decide, and who is left powerless in the outcome.

So when someone talks only of “shared humanity,” “empathy,” or “transcending ideology” without addressing class, they are tying the oppressed and the oppressor together with the same moral rope. For the powerful, it is a performance of mercy. For the powerless, it is a death sentence.

They say, “We are all connected.” Well, I once said the same thing to a turkey on Thanksgiving.
The turkey did not quite grasp the beauty of that connection—but in today’s world, many of the hunted are smiling through the slaughter.

The devil’s flute

The call to “transcend ideology and belief” is nothing more than a flute in the devil’s hand. It plays a sweet, seductive tune—one that lulls people into thinking there is no real evil in the world, that everything can be solved through dialogue, connection, and reconciliation.

But once you put down your convictions—your beliefs, your principles—you also lower your guard. You lose your ability to judge, to resist, to draw lines. In the end, you become part of a compliant crowd: easy to control, easy to consume—grateful, even, to be served as someone else’s feast.

Conclusion

Ideas can evolve, and faith can grow deeper. But they must never be erased, abandoned, or overrided. They are the anchor of civilization, the sword of justice, and the dignity of humanity.

Those who speak of “moving beyond ideology and belief,” no matter how gentle their tone or how innocent their face, are fighting for the devil’s right to define justice. We can be kind, but we will not be fools. We have empathy, but we will not applaud hypocrisy.

Remember—some voices may sound warm and gentle, but they are nothing more than the executioner’s decree, disguised in the costume of compassion.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

这方世界昼夜不停的“潮信”

Master Wonder · Jun 12, 2025

在这方世界,最响亮的声音,不是赞美,不是祈愿,不是劝诫,而是嘲笑。 那是一种如影随形、昼夜不息的“潮信”。它不像潮水轰然涌来,而是如窸窣细语般,渗透在每个角落,流淌在每个人心底。它以千百种面孔出现,却只有一个本质——对未知的恐惧,对不属于自身范畴的一切,发自本能的拒斥与戏谑。 麻木者嘲笑觉者。因为觉醒之人,扰乱了麻木之人的幻梦。 当年屈原执笔《离骚》,劝谏楚王,反被群臣讥为“疯癫之徒”;鲁迅弃医从文,揭世疾时,被讽刺“尖刻、偏激、唱衰”;今天,凡是敢指出社会病灶、追问制度深因的人,总被骂作“愤青”“键盘侠”“没事找事”。 世人宁可蜷缩在熟悉的困顿里,享受短暂温饱与虚妄安全,也不愿直视真实破败。于是,当有人指向黑暗,他们便说他疯了;当有人高举火炬,他们便讥他妄想拯救世界。 胆小者嘲笑勇敢。因为勇敢者揭示了他们的不堪。 你看,电影《肖申克的救赎》里,安迪在监狱屋顶争取一瓶啤酒,被讥笑“装英雄”;现实里,每一个站出来为正义发声的人,微博评论区、论坛热帖,少不了“多管闲事”“自寻麻烦”“人家都不管你激动啥”。 世上多少人,口口声声“顺势而为”“保命要紧”,却在暗夜里悄悄羡慕那些敢逆水行舟的人。为了掩饰自己的怯懦,他们嘲弄前行者“徒劳”“自不量力”,把别人失败的可能,当作自己苟活下去的遮羞布。 伪善者嘲笑正义。因为正义之人照出了伪善者的丑陋。 网络上但凡有人为底层疾苦发声,立刻有人跳出来:“别装圣母”“你行你上”。他们常常披着道德外衣,行着自利之事,口口声声“天下苍生”“众生平等”,可真正面对是非之际,转身就与权力、利益同流。 为了避免被正义之光照破,他们宁愿先下手为强,将持守原则的人描绘成极端、偏执、伪君子。 无知者嘲笑学识。因为知识让他们感到自卑。 “你读那么多书有用吗?”“做学问能当饭吃?”“讲道理谁不会?”这些话,常常在饭桌聚会、同事闲聊、短视频评论里听见。 在无知者眼里,复杂思考、不合群见解、对世界规律的探究,都是多余、无用、虚妄。 那些劝人“别太认真,大家都混口饭吃就行了”的,最怕的就是有人真的去较真,真的去思考,真的看清了规则。 苟且者嘲笑光明。因为光明昭示了他们所处的黑暗。 在《辛德勒的名单》里,辛德勒冒险救犹太人时,身边商人讥他“多管闲事”;现实生活中,那些去山区支教、助农直播、救助流浪狗的人,总有人冷笑:“炒作”“作秀”“图热度”。 苟且者不敢承认这个世界可以更好,不愿相信人性有另一种可能,不肯放弃眼前一口残羹冷炙。 他们说:“你太天真了”,仿佛世间唯一成熟,就是随波逐流、见利忘义、认命躺平。 退步者嘲笑正进。因为前行的人,无声地在提醒他们停滞不前。 很多企业里,谁要是主动加班钻研、提出优化方案,总被同事嘲笑“爱表现”“拍马屁”;学术圈里,认真做研究的人,被同行讥“死读书”“不通世务”;就连街头健身、晨跑的人,也会有人挤兑:“这年头还折腾啥”。 一个社会最容易发生的,就是让所有人一起缓慢沉沦,然后将反抗者定性为“异端”。凡是敢于改善的人,便被斥为不安分,凡是渴望改变的人,便成了无事生非。 甚至,贫穷者也嘲笑富裕。 不是因为贫穷多么可敬,而是因为他们不愿承认自己命运里那部分由自身选择决定。于是,凡是富裕者,便被冠以“不义”“走捷径”“靠关系”的标签。“有钱的都没好人”“他那钱怎么来的你不知道?”仿佛一句偏见就能抵消自己所有不作为。 贫穷便成为一种“清高”的勋章,而富裕则沦为一种“可疑”的罪证。 于是,这方世界,昼夜涨落着这种名为“嘲笑”的潮信。它悄无声息地围困每一个灵魂,将人们的棱角磨平,将异类与独行者赶出人群,将光明者逐入黑暗,将敢于反问的人钉上耻辱柱。 而那真正值得警惕的,从来不是嘲笑本身,而是嘲笑背后所藏的那股恐惧——对未知的恐惧,对改变的恐惧,对失去自我幻觉的恐惧。 在这片潮信里,若你想守住自己的火光,便要学会与风浪共眠,与孤独相伴,与讥讽同行。 因为世上的真正强者,从不在乎浪花,而只看向彼岸。

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Greta Thunberg: the girl and our future

Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025

We often hear the phrase, “Kids are our future.” It is something parents, educators, and leaders around the world like to say. But in a time marked by emotional extremes, misinformation, polarized opinions, and rising violence, this comforting slogan is no longer enough. We need to take a step back and ask, calmly and seriously: […]

read more

Related Content

Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 25, 2025
Traditional education often categorizes learning based on subjects, audiences, and teaching methods, focusing mainly on passing knowledge and developing skills. Quality education, however, takes a broader view. It looks beyond just academic success to focus on personal and social fulfillment, along with long-term happiness and success. It emphasizes not only gaining knowledge but also developing […]
In Quality Education, Every child is an A
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 27, 2024
The rise of quality education represents a significant transformation in the educational sector and is one of the important markers of progress in civil society. In the philosophy of quality education, every child is seen as an “A”, which not only recognizes their academic achievements but also affirms their entire growth process.  In traditional education, […]
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Future Education: The Concept of “us” rather than “me”
Avatar photo
Daohe · May 3, 2024
Education has traditionally focused on individual success and competition. The future of education, however, will emphasize collaboration, diversity, and inclusivity. It will shift from a self-centered approach to one that celebrates collective contributions and social impact, empowering individuals to actively shape a better society through their unique talents and strengths.
View All Content