The Property Divide: Women’s Rights and the Fight for Equality in the Family

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 5, 2025
Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent): In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting. Many parents, despite having money, […]

Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent):

In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting.

Many parents, despite having money, become tight-fisted when it comes to buying a house or sending their daughters abroad for study. They never discuss the family’s financial situation or planning with their daughters. Furthermore, from a young age, women are burdened with the societal expectation to view money as insignificant, to place the needs of others above their own, and to work hard without expecting material rewards.

Over time, the energy of money never truly reaches women. They are left without any real power, while bearing the weight of societal expectations and responsibilities.

I consider myself someone who pursues a life of intellect and idealism. After becoming a Buddhist, it felt as though the religion also expected me to be altruistic and to scorn materialism. But isn’t it true that idealists need money to turn their dreams into reality? What a painful realization!

I later discovered that in the original Buddhist scriptures, the Buddha’s teachings for lay followers place a strong emphasis on material matters. After all, he was a Taurus.

He believed that for lay followers to attain happiness in this life, they must have a good relationship with money. In this aspect, he was very pragmatic. “All wealth, once obtained… should be carefully protected, so that kings, thieves, water, and fire do not take it away or cause it to be lost. Those who do not guard it well will lose it.” This shows that safeguarding one’s wealth is considered an important lesson of spiritual practice.

For women, in order to shed that burden, they need to recognize what property rights truly belong to them.

Regarding the issue of women’s rights mentioned in the article, Yicheng Commonweal has engaged in thoughtful discussion and analysis. Below are our interpretations and proposed solutions to this matter.

1. Women’s lack of financial power is a structural problem

The phenomenon discussed in this article is a clear example of a widespread social issue, highlighting the unique challenges women face within family and societal structures. Many only daughters, despite being the apparent sole heirs of family wealth, are not raised as true successors due to traditional beliefs. This issue not only reflects the gender biases of the feudal landowning system but continues to be reinforced in modern society through cultural norms, education, and social practices.

One of the most concerning aspects is how women are often taught to undervalue money and prioritize spiritual pursuits, even to the extent of ‘selflessly dedicating’ themselves to ideals and altruism. This cultural ‘spiritual façade’ keeps women in a vulnerable position when it comes to financial matters: they struggle to claim their rightful property and lack the awareness to protect their resources. This not only deprives women of their fair share in family wealth distribution but also limits their opportunities for economic independence and the realization of their dreams in society.

At the heart of this issue is a profound civilizational problem. When society burdens women with excessive moral obligations, it fails to provide the necessary resources and support in return. As a result, women’s rights are left unprotected, and even basic respect becomes difficult to achieve.

2. Gender Inequality as a Sign of Underdeveloped Civilization

This issue stems from the level of civilizational and cultural development. In feudal societies, family property was passed down primarily through men, who were seen as the carriers of the family legacy, while women were assigned roles of support and service. Although this gender-based division started to loosen with the rise of industrial society, it remains deeply ingrained in many families.

Modern civic culture highlights individual rights and equality, particularly in the distribution of resources, where gender should not be a restricting factor. As society matures into a fully developed civic culture, gender equality will become an unquestionable norm. Women will no longer need to endure or compromise to claim their rights, but will naturally be recognized as equal holders of property rights. If gender bias persists, it would represent a regression in civilization. Humanity as a whole must remain alert to this backward slide.

Modern society’s progress is not just shown through economic development and technological innovation. It is also seen in the pursuit of fairness and justice. This pursuit requires us to reassess gender issues in wealth distribution, discard traditional views, and fight for women’s rightful rights. In doing so, we will advance human civilization even further.

3. The limits of Buddhism on women‘s rights

The article mentions that the author seeks guidance on wealth distribution through Buddhism, which reflects a deeper need for spiritual solace. It turned out that the Buddhist tradition’s attitude towards wealth is not one of outright denial. In the teachings of early Buddhism, the Buddha clearly instructed lay followers to learn how to manage and protect their property.

As lay practitioners, managing wealth properly is not only a fulfillment of personal responsibility but also a necessary condition for maintaining happiness in this life. The Buddha’s pragmatic view offers important insights for today: wealth management is not in conflict with spiritual pursuits, but rather a part of life. It forms the foundation for personal growth and fulfilling societal responsibilities.

However, the post clearly points out that there are limitations in Buddhist teachings when it comes to wealth management, particularly in addressing the needs of modern civilization. This is not due to a lack of wisdom in Buddhist doctrine, but because the social context during the Buddha’s time was vastly different from today’s modern society. As a result, traditional teachings cannot fully meet the awakening of women’s economic rights in the modern world. This issue is also present in other religions.

Modern women need more than just guidance on how to protect their property. They require a clear system of support and cultural backing to help them claim their rightful wealth and achieve economic independence.

4. The Shared Origin of all Faiths: a road towards gender equality

The idea of ‘the Shared Origin of all Faiths’ blends insights from multiple schools of thought, providing a fresh framework for tackling the complex issues of modern society. When it comes to wealth and gender rights, “the Shared Origin of all Faiths” promotes a more balanced and systematic approach to civilization and happiness:

  • Understanding: Eradicating gender bias begins with awareness

Gender inequality in wealth distribution often stems from cultural habits and biased beliefs. Understanding emphasizes that through communication and education, family members and social institutions must reconsider the traditional gender division of labor. Only by recognizing the necessity and legitimacy of women’s fight for property rights can we lay the foundation for resolving this issue.

  • Unity: Pursuing Equality in Rights and Responsibilities

Under the framework of the Shared Origin of all Faiths, wealth is not only a material resource but also a symbol of rights. Both family and society need to achieve equality of rights between genders, ensuring that women have the same status as men in property inheritance and resource distribution. Only with equal rights can women truly fulfill their social roles and realize their self-worth.

  • Integration: Integrating individual rights into societal progress

Integration is not just about the realization of individual rights, but also about embedding these rights within the larger framework of societal development. Women’s involvement and contributions are indispensable, whether in wealth distribution or the advancement of civilization and happiness. Only by incorporating the awakening of women’s rights into the broader vision of civilization can society achieve true harmony and progress.

5. Women’s Rights Awakening: From Property to Shaping Civilization

The fight for women’s property rights goes beyond being a personal issue, as it is directly tied to the future of social civilization. Wealth is fundamentally a resource, and its distribution often shapes the power dynamics in society. In the past, women’s lack of access to wealth led to their marginalization. Today, the awakening of women’s property rights represents a vital step toward achieving social justice and fairness.

From managing household wealth to achieving gender equality in society, women need to challenge traditional beliefs and actively fight for control over resources. At the same time, society should reach a consensus on the creation of a fair environment through institutional support and cultural promotion to ensure women have equal opportunities.

The Shared Origin of all Faiths centers on human happiness and offers a vital path for women to claim equal rights by integrating wealth, spirituality and civilization. Wealth and happiness are not in opposition. Only with a strong material foundation can women truly manifest their self-worth and fulfill their ideals.

6. Conclusion: Toward a more civilized future

Money and power are unavoidable core issues in social relations. Women’s property issues are the result of the clash between traditional views and modern civilization, and a necessary challenge in the progress of society. We must acknowledge that fair wealth distribution is not only essential for individual happiness but also the foundation of social justice and harmony.

The Shared Origin of all Faiths offers an integrative perspective beyond religion and culture, reminding us that the development of civilization requires not only technological progress but also the elevation of values. As half of humanity, the awakening and realization of women’s rights is an essential demand for the overall improvement of human happiness.

When every woman has equal access to wealth and rights in both the family and society, a truly civilized society will be achieved. This future represents not just the awakening of women, but also the path to collective well-being for all humanity.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

空性是什么?从空智与达摩祖师的对话说起

Master Wonder · Feb 12, 2025

在《达摩传》中,有这样一则意味深长的片段。 一日,僧人空智来到少林寺,恭敬地向达摩祖师顶礼,并请教佛法的空性。他拱手问道: “大师是达摩祖师吧?贫僧空智,对佛法的理解尚浅,愿请大师指点。心、佛以及众生,三者皆空。现象的执性亦是空,无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶,一切皆空。这般见解,可对?” 达摩静静地看着他,忽然伸手,在他头上重重敲了一下。空智被打得生疼,立刻皱眉道:“大师,你为什么打人?” 达摩微微一笑,淡然说道:“你既然说一切皆空,那何来痛苦?” 空智愣住,陷入沉思。片刻后,他喃喃道:“既然一切皆空,为何我仍然感到疼痛?若连痛苦都不能超越,这‘空’又有何意义?” 达摩缓缓说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。” 空智顿时领悟,合十叩拜。 何为“空”? 空智之所以困惑,是因为他落入了“理空”的执着。所谓“理空”,是从概念上理解空性,而未能亲证。 当他说“一切皆空”时,他所理解的“空”仍停留在语言之中,停留在“否定有”的层面。因此,当痛觉袭来,他的心识立刻生起“痛”的分别,反映出他的“空”并未真正落实。 “空”不是虚无,而是“无自性”。 佛法中的“空”并不等于虚无,而是指诸法无自性。世界上的一切事物,包括心、佛、众生,并非独立存在,而是相互依存、因缘和合之生灭显现。因此,所谓的“痛”也并非绝对存在,而是缘起而生。若执着“痛”为实有,则堕入实有论;若执着“痛”为虚无,则落入顽空论。 达摩的痛击,正是要破除空智的顽空见,令他直面自身的执着。真正的“空”并非否定“痛”的存在,而是超越“痛”所带来的分别。若能见到“痛”无自性,则“痛”即不碍“空”,“空”亦不碍“痛”。 “空”是一种超越对立二元的智慧 达摩所言:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物。”这一番话正是指向空性之实相。 “空”即自在,随缘不执 空智之“空”是消极的,他以为空性是否定一切的多元性。只要在概念上否定“我是我”,“痛不是痛”,就是契入空性。 然而,真正的空是超越、是圆融,是“无碍”的智慧。它不否定世间法,而是于世间法中自在无碍。就如同我是父亲,可我还可以是男人,老板、牧师、教师等等,这一切的身份和社会关系并不会束缚我。 譬如水,无形无相,因器成形,随缘而变。这正是“空”之妙用——它不是破坏存在,而是让存在不受束缚。 当空智执着于“无圣无凡、无善无恶”,他仍未超越对立。真正的“空”并不是去否定善恶,而是了知善恶皆缘起无自性,在缘起中自如行持。 正如六祖惠能所言:“前念不生即心,后念不灭即佛。”念起即随,念灭不留,即是随缘不执,空而不空。 达摩的一击,是慈悲的棒喝 达摩这一击,是顿悟之机,是破除概念之障。空智若仅停留在理论上探讨空性,便始终无法超越。唯有当他真正直面自心,感受“痛”之生灭,才能了知“空”不碍“痛”,“痛”亦即是“空”。 这正是禅门直指人心的风格——不落言诠,直入本源。若执着“空”而拒绝现象,便落入偏见;若执着“有”而迷失本性,亦是妄念。唯有“空”与“有”双融,才能真正契入佛法的智慧。 正如《心经》所言:“色即是空,空即是色。” 再谈达摩这一击,是禅门棒喝,是不假言辞的直接点悟。空智因痛而惊,显然,他的“空”仍停留在概念之中,未能真正超越世俗分别。这一击,让他不得不重新思考:“何谓空?为何痛?如果一切皆空,为何我仍在执着?” 空并非虚无,而是无自性 佛法所言的“空”,并不是对一切的否定,也不是单纯的“无”。若将空理解为“什么都不存在”,便堕入“断灭空”,此非正见。真正的空,是“无自性”——世间一切事物皆因缘和合而生,无独立不变的本体。 譬如水,若无风,它静如明镜;若风起,它便波涛汹涌。水的“相”在变,但水的“本质”却从未消失。世间万象皆如是——它们是暂时的显现,而非绝对的存在。 空智的错误,在于他仅仅停留在否定层面,以为“一切皆空”就是不承认圣凡、善恶、施受。然而,真正的空,不是去“否定”这些现象,而是超越对它们的执着。达摩这一击,便是要让空智看到,他所说的“空”并未真正融入自心。 在这里说明一下,空智、达摩与佛陀,无二无别,切不可认为空智修行低,而达摩就高,不要让相法迷惑自己的自性圆融无碍。 空的两重境界:理空与证空 1. 理空——概念上的理解 这是初学者常见的阶段,以思辨的方式去理解空性。例如,空智所言的“无圣无凡,无施无受,无善无恶”,正是典型的“理空”——从理论上否定对立,认为万法皆空。 然而,光靠概念无法破除执着。达摩之所以一击,是因为空智仍在“理”上,而未能亲身体验“空”。如果空智真的证悟空性,他即使感知到痛,也不会生起对痛的执着,更不会质问达摩“你为何打我?” 2. 证空——超越概念的直接体验 证空,并不是通过逻辑推演得出的结论,而是通过直观的觉悟——直接体认到“痛亦是空,空不碍痛”。换句话说,不是去否定痛的存在,而是从中看到痛的无自性、不可得。 证悟空性的境界,犹如镜子——它照见一切,但不执著于所映之像。圣人、凡夫,善恶、施受,皆如水中月、镜中花,有因缘便现,因缘灭则不留痕迹。 比如,想象你在一场暴风雨中行走,雨水拍打在你脸上,寒冷刺骨,然而你并不因此生气或痛苦。你知道,这场风雨只是暂时的,终会过去。你不再执着于那股冷风和雨水,而是安然接受它们的存在,感知它们的瞬息万变。 世间的是非、苦乐,不过是幻影,终将过去。若执着于这些,就如同在水上写字,终究徒劳无功。 达摩所言:看、听、知的真正含义 达摩最后说道:“看那看不到的东西,听那听不到的声音,知那不知的事物,才是真理。”这句话,正是对“空”最深刻的阐释。 在《维摩诘经》中,文殊菩萨问众菩萨:“如何入不二法门?”众菩萨各自回答,皆未彻底。最后,维摩诘默然不语。文殊叹道:“是乃真入不二法门。” 不落言说,才是究竟。不以分别心求空,而是自然安住于空,这才是“看、听、知”的真实境界。 如何践行空性? 佛法讲空,不是让人逃避现实,而是让人超越现实的束缚,活得更自在、圆融。真正的空性,是让人在生活中随缘而行,却不被境遇所困。《般若波罗蜜多心经》就是这样的书籍,让心灵觉悟,自性自觉。 1. 生活中的“空” 空,并不意味着消极无为,而是随缘不执。 面对困境时,若能看到“一切无自性,终归变化”,便能不沉溺于烦恼之中。 当有人批评你、欺骗你、误解你时,不执著于这些现象,你就不会生嗔恨心,亦不会因其而痛苦。 2. […]

The soul falls through ignorance, character through selfishness

Master Wonder · Feb 11, 2025

The Shared Origin of All Faiths is not just a theory but a path of cultivation and practice. Human growth is a process of awakening and a refinement of character. The soul descends into darkness through ignorance, while character erodes through selfishness. Ignorance is the absence of truth, a loss of clarity, while selfishness is […]

read more

Related Content

The soul falls through ignorance, character through selfishness
Avatar photo
Master Wonder · Feb 11, 2025
The Shared Origin of All Faiths is not just a theory but a path of cultivation and practice. Human growth is a process of awakening and a refinement of character. The soul descends into darkness through ignorance, while character erodes through selfishness. Ignorance is the absence of truth, a loss of clarity, while selfishness is […]
The three stages of spiritual awakening
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 19, 2025
The awakening of the soul is the deepest journey of exploration within each individual, a path from confusion to clarity, from constraint to freedom. It is not a sudden leap but a gradual, layered unfolding of self-awareness and transcendence. This process can be divided into three stages, each representing a profound shift in perception, guiding […]
Spiritual Practice is the Continuous Cultivation and Deepening of Goodness
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 28, 2024
Spiritual practice is often seen as a path to inner peace, wisdom, and enlightenment, with goodness as a core principle. But goodness is often misinterpreted—it isn’t merely a single gesture, but a profound inner belief grounded in unconditional love for others and for the world. This love helps us expand and get deeper into goodness, […]
View All Content