The Property Divide: Women’s Rights and the Fight for Equality in the Family

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 5, 2025
Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent): In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting. Many parents, despite having money, […]

Recently, I saw a friend post the following content on a social media platform (the post was shared with her consent):

In China, many only daughters may seem like the sole heirs in their families, but unlike the only sons, they have never been raised with the expectation of inheriting.

Many parents, despite having money, become tight-fisted when it comes to buying a house or sending their daughters abroad for study. They never discuss the family’s financial situation or planning with their daughters. Furthermore, from a young age, women are burdened with the societal expectation to view money as insignificant, to place the needs of others above their own, and to work hard without expecting material rewards.

Over time, the energy of money never truly reaches women. They are left without any real power, while bearing the weight of societal expectations and responsibilities.

I consider myself someone who pursues a life of intellect and idealism. After becoming a Buddhist, it felt as though the religion also expected me to be altruistic and to scorn materialism. But isn’t it true that idealists need money to turn their dreams into reality? What a painful realization!

I later discovered that in the original Buddhist scriptures, the Buddha’s teachings for lay followers place a strong emphasis on material matters. After all, he was a Taurus.

He believed that for lay followers to attain happiness in this life, they must have a good relationship with money. In this aspect, he was very pragmatic. “All wealth, once obtained… should be carefully protected, so that kings, thieves, water, and fire do not take it away or cause it to be lost. Those who do not guard it well will lose it.” This shows that safeguarding one’s wealth is considered an important lesson of spiritual practice.

For women, in order to shed that burden, they need to recognize what property rights truly belong to them.

Regarding the issue of women’s rights mentioned in the article, Yicheng Commonweal has engaged in thoughtful discussion and analysis. Below are our interpretations and proposed solutions to this matter.

1. Women’s lack of financial power is a structural problem

The phenomenon discussed in this article is a clear example of a widespread social issue, highlighting the unique challenges women face within family and societal structures. Many only daughters, despite being the apparent sole heirs of family wealth, are not raised as true successors due to traditional beliefs. This issue not only reflects the gender biases of the feudal landowning system but continues to be reinforced in modern society through cultural norms, education, and social practices.

One of the most concerning aspects is how women are often taught to undervalue money and prioritize spiritual pursuits, even to the extent of ‘selflessly dedicating’ themselves to ideals and altruism. This cultural ‘spiritual façade’ keeps women in a vulnerable position when it comes to financial matters: they struggle to claim their rightful property and lack the awareness to protect their resources. This not only deprives women of their fair share in family wealth distribution but also limits their opportunities for economic independence and the realization of their dreams in society.

At the heart of this issue is a profound civilizational problem. When society burdens women with excessive moral obligations, it fails to provide the necessary resources and support in return. As a result, women’s rights are left unprotected, and even basic respect becomes difficult to achieve.

2. Gender Inequality as a Sign of Underdeveloped Civilization

This issue stems from the level of civilizational and cultural development. In feudal societies, family property was passed down primarily through men, who were seen as the carriers of the family legacy, while women were assigned roles of support and service. Although this gender-based division started to loosen with the rise of industrial society, it remains deeply ingrained in many families.

Modern civic culture highlights individual rights and equality, particularly in the distribution of resources, where gender should not be a restricting factor. As society matures into a fully developed civic culture, gender equality will become an unquestionable norm. Women will no longer need to endure or compromise to claim their rights, but will naturally be recognized as equal holders of property rights. If gender bias persists, it would represent a regression in civilization. Humanity as a whole must remain alert to this backward slide.

Modern society’s progress is not just shown through economic development and technological innovation. It is also seen in the pursuit of fairness and justice. This pursuit requires us to reassess gender issues in wealth distribution, discard traditional views, and fight for women’s rightful rights. In doing so, we will advance human civilization even further.

3. The limits of Buddhism on women‘s rights

The article mentions that the author seeks guidance on wealth distribution through Buddhism, which reflects a deeper need for spiritual solace. It turned out that the Buddhist tradition’s attitude towards wealth is not one of outright denial. In the teachings of early Buddhism, the Buddha clearly instructed lay followers to learn how to manage and protect their property.

As lay practitioners, managing wealth properly is not only a fulfillment of personal responsibility but also a necessary condition for maintaining happiness in this life. The Buddha’s pragmatic view offers important insights for today: wealth management is not in conflict with spiritual pursuits, but rather a part of life. It forms the foundation for personal growth and fulfilling societal responsibilities.

However, the post clearly points out that there are limitations in Buddhist teachings when it comes to wealth management, particularly in addressing the needs of modern civilization. This is not due to a lack of wisdom in Buddhist doctrine, but because the social context during the Buddha’s time was vastly different from today’s modern society. As a result, traditional teachings cannot fully meet the awakening of women’s economic rights in the modern world. This issue is also present in other religions.

Modern women need more than just guidance on how to protect their property. They require a clear system of support and cultural backing to help them claim their rightful wealth and achieve economic independence.

4. The Shared Origin of all Faiths: a road towards gender equality

The idea of ‘the Shared Origin of all Faiths’ blends insights from multiple schools of thought, providing a fresh framework for tackling the complex issues of modern society. When it comes to wealth and gender rights, “the Shared Origin of all Faiths” promotes a more balanced and systematic approach to civilization and happiness:

  • Understanding: Eradicating gender bias begins with awareness

Gender inequality in wealth distribution often stems from cultural habits and biased beliefs. Understanding emphasizes that through communication and education, family members and social institutions must reconsider the traditional gender division of labor. Only by recognizing the necessity and legitimacy of women’s fight for property rights can we lay the foundation for resolving this issue.

  • Unity: Pursuing Equality in Rights and Responsibilities

Under the framework of the Shared Origin of all Faiths, wealth is not only a material resource but also a symbol of rights. Both family and society need to achieve equality of rights between genders, ensuring that women have the same status as men in property inheritance and resource distribution. Only with equal rights can women truly fulfill their social roles and realize their self-worth.

  • Integration: Integrating individual rights into societal progress

Integration is not just about the realization of individual rights, but also about embedding these rights within the larger framework of societal development. Women’s involvement and contributions are indispensable, whether in wealth distribution or the advancement of civilization and happiness. Only by incorporating the awakening of women’s rights into the broader vision of civilization can society achieve true harmony and progress.

5. Women’s Rights Awakening: From Property to Shaping Civilization

The fight for women’s property rights goes beyond being a personal issue, as it is directly tied to the future of social civilization. Wealth is fundamentally a resource, and its distribution often shapes the power dynamics in society. In the past, women’s lack of access to wealth led to their marginalization. Today, the awakening of women’s property rights represents a vital step toward achieving social justice and fairness.

From managing household wealth to achieving gender equality in society, women need to challenge traditional beliefs and actively fight for control over resources. At the same time, society should reach a consensus on the creation of a fair environment through institutional support and cultural promotion to ensure women have equal opportunities.

The Shared Origin of all Faiths centers on human happiness and offers a vital path for women to claim equal rights by integrating wealth, spirituality and civilization. Wealth and happiness are not in opposition. Only with a strong material foundation can women truly manifest their self-worth and fulfill their ideals.

6. Conclusion: Toward a more civilized future

Money and power are unavoidable core issues in social relations. Women’s property issues are the result of the clash between traditional views and modern civilization, and a necessary challenge in the progress of society. We must acknowledge that fair wealth distribution is not only essential for individual happiness but also the foundation of social justice and harmony.

The Shared Origin of all Faiths offers an integrative perspective beyond religion and culture, reminding us that the development of civilization requires not only technological progress but also the elevation of values. As half of humanity, the awakening and realization of women’s rights is an essential demand for the overall improvement of human happiness.

When every woman has equal access to wealth and rights in both the family and society, a truly civilized society will be achieved. This future represents not just the awakening of women, but also the path to collective well-being for all humanity.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル

「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル

Daohe · Aug 7, 2025

——文明政治の制度的指針と歴史的必然 一乘公益 作品 真に国を愛する者たちへ 一、序論:真の国家統治は、誰に帰属するのか? 今日、世界のほぼすべての国家が、その政治宣言に「人間本位」や「法治国家」といった壮大なスローガンを刻み込んでいます。それらの言葉を掲げるだけで、自らが文明の頂点にいるかのような正当性を得られる、とさえ考えられているかのようです。 しかし、真実は往々にしてその逆です。これらの言葉は、特定の体制を正当化し、あるいは特権構造を維持するためのレトリックとして機能することが多く、その根底にある論理は万人のためではなく、ごく少数の者たち——すなわち政権エリート、資本家オリガーキー、あるいは文化エリート——に奉仕しているのが実情です。 今こそ、我々は長らく回避されてきた問いを立てなければなりません。国家統治は、一体誰を中核に据えるべきなのか。それこそが正しく、効率的で、文明的な道なのであると。 答えはおそらく複雑ではありません。国家の真の主人は、政治、経済、社会、そして文化における共同統治権を持つ、一人ひとりの「完全な市民」でなければならないのです。 本稿は、理論的論理と現実の事例に基づき、偽りの「人間本位」と偽りの「法治」の実態を解き明かし、未来の文明進化の方向性に合致する制度的パラダイムとして「『完全な市民』を中核とする統治モデル」を提示するものです。 二、偽りの「人間本位」と偽りの「法治」:制度という仮面の下の真実 (一) 「人間本位」とは、実際には誰のためか? 我々は「人間本位」というスローガンだけで、その国家が文明的であるかを判断することはできません。なぜなら、ここで言う「人間」とは、普遍的な意味での市民個人ではなく、特定の集団から選ばれた少数者であることが多いからです。 これらのモデルの共通点は、統治の論理において「人間」の地位が、完全な「政治的権利、経済的権利、社会的権利を持つ自律した個人」として明確に定義されておらず、単に統治される「客体」として、穏健な言葉で覆い隠されている点にあります。 スローガンは数あれど、国民の地位は常に曖昧なままです。いわゆる「人間本位」とは、国家管理者が社会から正当性を得るためのレトリックであり、制度としての「市民本位」ではないのです。 (二) 「法治国家」とは、一体何を治めているのか? 「法治国家」は近代的な国家統治の理性的成果に見えます。しかし、その実態は真の統治パラダイムというより、既存の制度を維持するためのメカニズムであることが多いのです。たとえ法体系が完備され、手続きが規範化されていても、その国家が「良く統治されている」とは限りません。なぜなら、 言い換えれば、「法治」は秩序を維持できますが、それ自体が正義を生み出すわけではないのです。市民という主体が不在の法治は、いわば「血を流さない専制」とも呼べる、権力の穏健な外装となり得ます。 同時に、「法治」は近代国家統治の基本的なコンセンサスではありますが、それ自体が統治モデルを構成するわけではありません。それは方向性を決定するのではなく、秩序を維持するための、いわばシステムの操作マニュアルに近いのです。 これは以下の事実を示唆しています。 要するに、法治は目的ではなく、手段です。「完全な市民」を中核とする制度的価値がなければ、法そのものが「合法的専制」の道具と化す危険性をはらんでいるのです。 三、真の出口:「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル 「『完全な市民』を中核とする統治モデル」とは何でしょうか。それはスローガンではなく、制度の論理であり、社会統治構造の全面的な再構築です。そこには五つの核心的特徴があります。 (一)「完全な市民」とは何か? 「完全な市民」とは、単に「身分証明書を持つ者」ではありません。国家統治において、構造全体への参加権、決定権、そして分配権を持つ者を指します。その権利には、少なくとも以下が含まれます。 次元 市民権の内容 政治的権利 選挙権、リコール権、公共政策提案権、参加型立法権、国民投票による拒否権 経済的権利 国家の富の分配への共同参加権、公共データの利益分配、国家資本の配当権、労働利益の協議権 社会的権利 基礎的福祉保障、教育・医療への公正なアクセス、社会協議メカニズムへの参加 文化的権利 言論の自由、精神的空間の自由、教育カリキュラム設計への参加権 「完全な市民」は抽象的な記号ではなく、国家制度において実在する統治の力なのです。 これらの権利が制度化され、実行可能となり、公開されて初めて、市民は真に国家の主人となるのです。 (二)「市民を中核とする」五大制度原則 四、制度進化の歴史的論理:臣民から市民へ、統治から共治へ 統治のあり方は一夜にして形成されるものではなく、歴史の中で絶えず進化してきました。 段階 統治モデル 主体関係 特徴 古代封建 君主至上主義 君主ー臣民 法は君主の命令 神権政治 教会または神の権威 権威ー信者 教義による統治 立憲君主制 […]

以完整公民为核心的治国模式

以完整公民为核心的治国模式

Daohe · Aug 7, 2025

——文明政治的制度方向与历史必然 一乘公益 出品 写给那些真正爱国的人。 一、开篇:真正的国家治理,属于谁? 当今世界,几乎所有国家的政治宣言中都镌刻着“以人为本”、“依法治国”之类的宏伟口号。仿佛一旦贴上这些标签,就自动站到了文明的制高点。然而,真相往往相反:这些术语更多成为粉饰专制或维持特权结构的制度话术,其底层逻辑并非服务于所有人,而是服务于少数人——政权集团、资本寡头或文化精英。 而今,我们必须提出一个被长期回避的问题:治国,究竟该以谁为核心?才是正确、高效、文明的。 答案也许并不复杂:国家的真正主人,必须是每一位拥有政治、经济、社会与文化共治理权的“完整公民”。 本篇文章将从理论逻辑与现实案例出发,系统驳斥伪“以人为本”与伪“依法治国”之荒诞,并提出“以完整公民为核心的治国模式”这一符合未来文明演进方向的制度范式。 二、伪“以人为本”与伪“依法治国”:制度假面下的真实运作 (一)“以人为本”,实际是谁为本? 我们不能仅凭“以人为本”的口号判断一个国家是否文明。因为这个“人”,往往不是普遍意义上的公民个体,而是特定集团中被选中的少数人。 这些模式的共通点在于:治国逻辑中“人”的地位从未明确为具备完整“政治权利、经济权利、社会权利的自主个体”,而是一种被统治的“对象”,只不过被用温和语境加以包装罢了。 口号虽多,人民地位始终模糊。实际上,所谓“人本”,只是国家管理者从社会获取合法性的一种话术包装,而不是制度上的“以公民为本”。 (二)“依法治国”,究竟在治什么? “依法治国”看似是现代国家治理的理性成果,但实质上,它更多是一种制度维护机制,而非一种真正的治国范式。一个国家即使法律体系完备、程序规范,也并不代表它“治理得好”。因为: 换句话说,“依法治国”只能维持秩序,却无法生成正义。缺乏公民主体参与的法治,是权力温和化的外壳,是不流血的专制。 同时“依法治国”是现代国家治理的基本共识,但它本身并不能构成治国模式。它更像是一个系统操作标准:维持秩序,而非决定方向。 这说明: 简言之,法治不是目的,只是手段。没有以完整公民为核心的制度价值,法本身就可沦为“合法暴政”的工具。 三、真正的出路:以完整公民为核心的治国模式 什么是“以公民为核心的治国模式”?这不是一句口号,而是一种制度逻辑、一种社会治理结构的全面重构。它有五大核心特征: (一)什么是“完整公民”? 完整公民并非指“有身份证”的人,而是指在国家治理中具有全结构参与权、决定权与分享权的人,其权利至少包含: 维度 公民权内容 政治权 选举权、罢免权、公共事务提案权、参与式立法权、公投否决权 经济权 共同参与国家财富分配权、公共数据红利分享、国家资本股权分红、劳动红利协商权 社会权 基本福利保障、教育医疗公平获取、社会协商参与机制 文化权 言论自由、精神空间自由、教育课程参与设计权 完整公民不是抽象符号,而是国家制度中实际存在的治理力量。 只有当这些权利制度化、可行化、公开化,公民才真正成为国家的主人。 (二)“以公民为核心”的五大制度原则: 四、制度演化的历史逻辑:从臣民到公民,从统治到共治 治国方式并非一夜形成,而是历史不断进化的结果: 阶段 治理模式 主体关系 特征 古代封建 君主至上 臣民 法即皇命 神权-君权 教会或神授权威 信众 依教治国 君主立宪 贵族与资产阶级分享权力 纳税人 权利有等级 […]

read more

Related Content

Spiritual Practice is the Continuous Cultivation and Deepening of Goodness
Avatar photo
Daohe · Oct 28, 2024
Spiritual practice is often seen as a path to inner peace, wisdom, and enlightenment, with goodness as a core principle. But goodness is often misinterpreted—it isn’t merely a single gesture, but a profound inner belief grounded in unconditional love for others and for the world. This love helps us expand and get deeper into goodness, […]
Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?
Why Has Religion Failed? Do Modern People No Longer Need Faith?
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 23, 2025
Religion has long served as a vital cornerstone in human history, providing fundamental support for spiritual beliefs, moral norms, and social order. However, with the rapid advancement of modern civilization, religion appears increasingly outdated and rigid, struggling to adapt to the demands of the new era. This lag not only leaves people feeling disoriented but […]
Exploring The Relationship Between Faith and Personality Traits
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Oct 23, 2024
Faith is not only a choice of religious practices and cultural identity, it is also a profound spiritual force that significantly influences human psychology and lifestyle. Each belief system has its own unique characteristics, attracting individuals with varying personality traits. Research in psychology and religious studies has shown that the alignment between a person’s personality […]
View All Content