4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

不要因为别人错了,自己也去犯错

Daohe · Jan 4, 2025

一个广为流传的视频中,小女孩因遭遇嘲讽而尊严受损,她本能地动怒,并选择用暴力反击。她的母亲及时阻止了她,说出了那句核心的话:“不要因为别人错了,自己也去犯错。”这句话之所以能触动无数人,因为它精准地指向了文明社会最脆弱,却也最关键的环节:在“失序”发生时,人如何行使自己的选择权。一个社会之所以走向混乱,其根源往往不是因为第一个人犯了错,而是因为绝大多数人选择用同样的错误去回应;一个社会之所以能保持稳定与秩序,则是因为多数成员选择截断这种错误的恶性繁殖。文明,从来不是由少数精英在顶层设计出来的,而是由无数普通人“愿意守住底线”的日常选择,一寸一寸地支撑起来的。 在现代社会结构中,人际的张力与冲突日益增多,其触发点往往是情绪的连锁反应,而非理性的权衡。一个侮辱性的眼神、一句刻薄的言辞、一个莫须有的误会,都足以将个体推向“以牙还牙,以眼还眼”的原始冲动,陷入“以恶制恶”的逻辑深渊。然而,文明之所以为文明,恰恰在于它超越了这种原始的反应模式。文明社会并非没有冲突,而是建立了一套更高级的冲突处理机制。 “不要因为别人错了,自己也去犯错”,这不仅是一句朴素的生活劝诫,更是现代文明赖以维系的结构性底线。它既是上帝(或曰“超越性的道德法则”)对人性中“自由意志”的终极考验,也是个体公民对社会契约的无声承诺,更是制度文明对所有成员的根本期待。 1. 不以恶制恶,是文明的基石 法治文明存在的全部意义,不是为了让“恶”与“恶”在丛林法则中相互抵消,而是为了确保“恶”最终被制度所终结。当我们选择“以恶制恶”时,我们实际上是在用行动否定社会赖以运作的全部规则,我们成为了我们所反对的“恶”的同谋。 一个社会文明的成熟度,不在于它是否能杜绝冲突,而在于冲突被以何种方式处理:是让情绪支配行为,使个体退化为本能的奴隶?是让暴力诱发暴力,使社会陷入冤冤相报的循环?还是以制度回应不公,以理性约束愤怒,以程序重塑正义? 当一个社会的大多数成员都开始用错误对抗错误,社会秩序必然会滑向“谁的拳头更硬,谁的嗓门更大,谁就掌握真理”的原始状态。在那样的状态下,法律被践踏,道德被瓦解,正义将成为最昂贵的奢侈品。因此,不以恶制恶,绝非软弱,而是一种最高形式的文明力量。它代表着一种清醒的战斗方式——用高一级的秩序(法治与理性)来终结低一级的混乱(情绪与暴力)。一个文明能够延续,不是因为它能彻底消灭人性的幽暗,而是因为绝大多数人愿意相信:正义的实现,最终不依靠私人的拳头,而依靠公共的制度。 2. 面对不公,是公民责任的试金石 上帝(或曰“宇宙法则”)赋予人自由意志,其最高贵的体现,不是让人随心所欲地发泄,而是在面临严峻考验时,依然有能力选择光明。而“选择光明的能力”,最能体现在个体面对不公与侵害的时刻。任何人都可以在风平浪静时谈论道德与宽容,但只有在承受愤怒、痛楚、屈辱与误解时,仍能坚守原则、克制报复冲动的人,才是真正意义上的文明公民。 面对不公,我们至少有三类选择:沉默与逃避:这看似无害,实则是对恶的纵容,让不公得以“得寸进尺”。以恶制恶:这是最本能、最解气的选择,但它让恶像病毒一样循环扩大,最终吞噬所有人。坚持规则、保持善意、合法维权:在保护自身的同时,坚定地维护公义的程序。第三种选择无疑最难,因为它要求极高的理性和韧性。但这恰恰是唯一能够推动社会健康运转、走向良性循环的选择。这并非懦弱,而是个体自觉地承担起“公民”这一身份的重负。因为我们不是孤立的原子,我们的每一个行为都在塑造社会的走向,我们的每一次选择都在为下一代示范“何为正义”。上帝(或“命运”)让我们在黑暗中经受灵魂的考验,其目的不是为了让我们成为黑暗的一部分,而是为了让我们证明自己有能力成为黑暗中的光。 3. 公民权力的使用,是社会进步的力量 文明的真正进步,其驱动力绝非来自情绪的宣泄,而是来自公民主动地、有序地、合法地行使自己手中的权力。当我们遭遇不公时,我们拥有远比走向暴力更丰富、更强大的路径:用法律的武器捍卫自身权利,启动正义的程序;用理性的沟通与论述影响他人,凝聚共识;用积极的公民参与推动制度的完善,弥补漏洞;用持久的社会行动促成法规的更新与文化的变迁。 历史上确实不乏以武力抗争换取变革的例子,但这些例子无不伴随着巨大的社会撕裂、深重的代价损耗,且其结果往往充满不确定性。真正可持续的、稳固的社会进步,最终必须落实在制度改革、法规更新与文化变迁上。情绪是火,但制度才是光 火能烧出一瞬间的亮光,却极易失控,将整座城市化为灰烬;光能穿透最深的黑暗,照亮前路,却从不毁灭世界。纵观人类文明的伟大变革者——甘地、曼德拉、罗莎·帕克斯——他们都不是“以恶制恶”的信徒。他们恰恰是用至高的道义、对法律的坚信、对制度的耐心去打破不义的枷锁。他们用行动证明了一个事实:当一个人选择以成熟的公民方式行动时,他所激发的道德力量,远比暴力的物理力量更持久、更深远、更具文明的重量。 4. 善良与正义,是我们共同的责任 善良,不是一种转瞬即逝的情绪,而是一种基于原则的理性选择;正义,不是一种高高在上的姿态,而是一种必须践行的日常行动。当我们因为他人的错误而选择放弃自己的善良、放弃对法律的信仰、放弃对正义的追求时,我们就等于亲手把这个世界的主导权让渡给了“恶”。反之,当我们坚持善良、坚守法治、坚持公义时,我们就在暗夜的海面上点亮了灯塔,让更多迷航的人看到正确的航道。一个文明社会的底色,不是由极少数圣人的高尚决定的,而是由无数普通人在关键时刻的“选择”叠加而成的。你选择理性,社会就多一分光;你选择公义,制度就多一分力量;你选择坚守原则,文明就多一分稳固。 正如《圣经·弥迦书》所言:“世人哪,耶和华已指示你何为善。他向你所要的是什么呢?只要你行公义,好怜悯,存谦卑的心,与你的神同行。”这是一个公民与超越性的道德法则之间,最庄严的契约。我们行公义,不是因为别人行了公义;我们好怜悯,也不是因为别人值得怜悯。我们这样做,是因为这是我们作为“人”的责任。 […]

समाज में बच्चों के बेहतर भविष्य के योग्य होने के 4 कारण

Daohe · Jan 1, 2025

A child’s success depends not just on their innate talents or personal effort. In reality, how far they can go is mostly decided by the opportunities and environment that society creates for them. When society provides the right support and room for growth, children’s potential can be fully unlocked for a better future. In essence, […]

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content