4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

幼年谋生之殃:近代东亚儒家社会教育的隐形困局与文明隐患

Kishou · Jul 2, 2025

前言:一场文明深处的隐性病灶 表面上,日韩、新加坡等东亚儒家文化圈国家,社会井然、治安良好、教育体制严密,被视作现代文明的东方式典范。然而在这光鲜秩序之下,隐藏着一场长期、系统性的文明性塌陷:幼年谋生型教育体系。 这种现象,源于近代以来东亚各国在现代国家化、工业化进程中,将儒家文化片面功利化、等级化、服从化利用,形成一种将儿童过早推向生存竞争、社会责任、现实功利轨道的教育体制。孩子尚未完成人格发育,即被要求谋生、考核、服从、争位,失去梦想与探索的权利,最终沦为制度化社会的“高效工具人”。 一、东亚儒家社会幼年谋生教育的结构性机制 1. 工业国家化进程中的制度化早期社会化 日本、韩国、新加坡,自19世纪末至20世纪中后叶,相继步入工业化和国家治理现代化。为了培养纪律性劳动力与服从型国民,国家将教育体制变为“顺从规范、适应秩序”的训练场。 幼稚园起,儿童被要求独立生活、整理内务、分担班级责任。小学全面实施集体责任制、等级考核、服从教育。教育目标不在于人格养成,而是“尽早适应社会”。 2. 功利性等级价值观主导 东亚儒家文化圈,长期重视“成败分明”“功名晋升”,近代国家化进程中更将此推至极致。学业排名、行为评比、集体规则量化从小学起贯穿教育全过程,孩子被要求“别麻烦他人”“别拖后腿”“为家庭争光”。 个人梦想、兴趣、创造被视为不务正业,价值观高度功利化,谋生能力成为唯一社会通行证。 3. 家庭、学校、社会三方共谋机制 传统儒家文化中的家族责任观与近现代国家治理目标相互叠加,形成家庭—学校—社会三重压力体系。 家长将子女视作家庭未来保障与荣耀载体,教育即“家庭投资”。学校成为选拔与驯化场,社会则是竞争考场。幼年便灌输“进名校”“进大企”“稳定收入”理念,精神成长空间被彻底压缩,教育沦为生存竞争机器。 二、个体层面的深层危害 1.梦想能力与人格自由被剥夺 幼年本应是幻想、好奇、探索、试错的人格发育阶段,东亚幼年谋生教育却强制孩子学会利益计算、欲望压抑、风险规避,扼杀“做梦”的能力。 成年后普遍精神麻木、价值虚无,丧失自我探索与人生追问动力。 2. 情感压抑与内耗人格 “别麻烦他人”“集体优先”“为家族争光”的教育文化,长期抹杀真实情感表达,导致东亚社会青少年普遍不敢表达悲伤、愤怒、恐惧。成年后陷入强迫性工作狂、社交恐惧、自闭症倾向、社畜文化与孤独死问题。 日韩、新加坡均长期处于发达国家青少年自杀率前列。 3. 自我价值感低落 过度依赖他人评价,缺乏内在价值认同,成年后习惯以公司、家庭、社会认同为人生坐标,极易崩溃、自我否定,形成精神空壳化。 三、社会结构层面的文明隐患 1.大规模“工具人化” 批量制造“谋生之孩”,成年后执行力强、创新力弱、价值趋同,成为制度化社会“有效工具”。社会缺少文明进化所需的颠覆性创新与精神活力。 日本“社畜文化”、韩国“过劳死经济”、新加坡“绩优社畜现象”正是典型表现。 2. 精神文明衰退与文化空洞化 东亚社会长期实用功利化教育导致文化创新力下降,年轻人沉溺宅文化、虚拟偶像、手游经济、低欲望生活,“文明空洞”现象日益严重。 日韩近30年经济停滞、文化软实力衰退、新加坡青年抑郁率上升,均源自幼年谋生教育对精神文明活力的蚕食。 四、文明演化视角下的结构性危机 完整公民制度的信仰体系,灵魂信仰保障内在尊严,文明信仰保障外在秩序。两者文明进步依赖有梦想、有创造、有反叛精神的人群,而非单纯执行者。 儒家文化型社会若继续将儿童过早异化为谋生机器,虽表面稳定秩序井然,实则失去文明进化动能。 近30年日韩经济创新力衰退、文化对外影响力式微,正源于此。文明若无“做梦者”,必然走向稳定化→保守化→僵化→退化之路。 五、文明型社会对比 北欧国家(瑞典、芬兰、挪威)教育体系,坚持: 这些国家创新力、幸福指数、青少年心理健康、社会信任度远超东亚儒家文化圈,成为现代文明型社会典范。 六、结语:东亚儒家文化圈社会的文明自救 孩子不该只学谋生。真正的教育,应守护基本生存技能之外,更重要的是保留梦想、质疑、探索、反叛、突破的生命本能。儒家文化型社会若想摆脱文明停滞、创新衰退、精神危机,必须: 否则,继续制造“谋生之孩”,东亚文明将陷入温水慢煮式衰败,终成稳定、无梦、无文化生命力的文明遗骸。 七、附名词解释: 幼年谋生教育(Early Livelihood-oriented Education) 指的是一种将成年社会生存法则、责任体系与功利性价值观,提前强加给学龄前至青少年儿童的教育模式。其核心特征是: 将孩子视为未来劳动力与社会秩序执行者,而非独立人格和梦想实践者,使其过早学会现实妥协、社会谋生、规则服从,而忽视人格养成、情感自由、梦想激发与批判性精神培养。 这一教育方式通常表现为: 核心目的: 通过教育早期社会化、集体规范化、工具技能化,制造稳定、服从、高效、善于谋生的社会工具人群体,为成年社会体系持续输送“稳定零件”。

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

The Two Beliefs of a Complete Citizen

Master Wonder · Jun 20, 2025

Introduction Since the birth of life, faith has always played an essential role in it. Throughout every stage of human society, faith has never been absent. From primitive totems and religious worship to modern national narratives and the belief in technological supremacy, faith has been a driving force that sustains collective identity, shapes personal values, […]

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content