4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

少女(Greta Thunberg)我们的未来啊

少女(Greta Thunberg)我们的未来啊

Yicheng · Jun 11, 2025

我们常说:“孩子是我们的未来。”这句话几乎成为全世界父母、教育者、领袖挂在嘴边的金句。然而,在今天这个情感极化、信息混乱、立场先行、暴力泛滥的时代,这句口号已经不再足够,它需要重新被认真地检视,被沉静地质问——孩子究竟会成为怎样的未来? 我们允许孩子任性,因为成长的本质就是从无知到知晓、从冲动到成熟、从盲目到清明。任性是生命在学习面对现实、理解秩序、认知复杂世界过程中的必然产物。一个社会若不能容纳孩子的任性,便是对活力和创造力的压制。 但问题在于,当孩子不再只是任性,而是在无知、偏执、被裹挟之下,主动向恶意、向仇恨、向暴力、向极端学习,甚至成为它们的工具和代言人时,这种任性就不再是青春的火花,而是未来灾难的前兆。 一个时代的悲哀:当“正义”沦为仇恨的外衣 2025年6月9日,国际新闻上一则让人心寒的消息:22岁的瑞典环保少女格蕾塔·通贝里(Greta Thunberg),在驶向加沙的救援船“玛德琳号”上,遭以色列军方强行登船扣押。她头戴巴勒斯坦头巾,成为政治暴力行动的一部分。 这条消息的表象是以巴冲突,又是人道援助行动,但真正引发争议的是格蕾塔本人的身份与所代表的舆论效应。 格蕾塔,曾经是环保、和平、青春正义的象征,一个敢于在联合国讲坛上怒斥全球领袖失责、激励全球青少年关注气候危机的女孩,却在政治极端化浪潮裹挟下,逐渐从环保代言人,滑向某些极端主义团体的舆论工具,公开为暴力站台、为仇恨背书。 这是本世纪舆论操控的经典范例:将青少年的愤怒与善意,包装成正义,将复杂残酷的政治博弈,简化成黑白对立、情绪宣泄,将原本属于良知的社会责任,偷换成群体狂热、立场偏执。 格蕾塔的危险,不是她的环保立场,也不是她的人道主义情怀,而是她所象征的那一代年轻人,正快速在社交媒体、网络舆论、政治极端化中失去判断,失去理性,失去对真实复杂世界的认知,沦为仇恨传播者、情绪制造者、暴力合法化的工具。 我们不能再纵容孩子在仇恨中成长 我们可以原谅孩子在成长中对权威的不满、对现实的愤怒、对不公的质疑。 我们可以接受他们因年少无知而情绪化、冲动、偏激。 但我们不能容忍、也绝不能纵容他们主动投身仇恨,迷恋暴力,崇拜极端,把偏执当理想,把破坏当正义。 世界每一场灾难、每一次社会崩溃、每一场暴力运动的背后,都有一群被极端思想诱导、被偏执情绪点燃、被仇恨绑架的年轻人。 他们本可以是建设者,却被操控成了破坏者;本可以是希望,却成了噩梦。 格蕾塔事件,正是当代社会价值观失守、教育失衡、媒体操纵舆论、社交网络情绪狂热化的典型缩影。 一个原本拥有正义感与善意的年轻人,如何在全球舆论裹挟中,逐渐失去独立判断,滑向极端阵营,为政治暴力提供合法性?这不仅是她个人的悲剧,更是我们这个时代的病症。 谁来守护孩子,谁来守护未来? 孩子是我们的未来。 但未来从不是自动美好的,它必须被教化、被守护、被理性与善良引导。 我们责无旁贷。 社会要教会孩子: 父母、教育者、媒体、国家制度,甚至每一个成年人,都必须承担起这个责任。 在无序喧嚣的时代,理性与良知是最昂贵、却最稀缺的资源。 如果我们放任年轻人在仇恨、偏执、暴力、极端政治狂热中成长,未来将不属于建设者、守护者,而属于煽动者、破坏者。 而这样的未来,是任何文明都无法承受。 最后的话 我们今天看到的是格蕾塔(Greta),但世界各国,都有无数被极端思潮渗透、被网络舆论操控、被虚假正义蛊惑的年轻人。 如果我们再不警醒,再不去教育、去守护、去劝诫,再不去反思价值观的失守、社会舆论的极化、教育的失衡,再过二十年,恐怕这个世界将遍地仇恨、暴力合法、极端泛滥,再无净土。 孩子是我们的未来。 但未来究竟是光明,还是深渊,取决于今天我们为他们种下了什么。 善良可以任性,正义不能沦为仇恨的工具。 成长必须允许迷茫,但社会不能放弃劝诫和引导。 我们不能再失守。 未来是他们,守护未来,是我们的责任。

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization

Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization

Kishou · Jun 11, 2025

This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content