4 Strange Reasons ‘Eye for an Eye’ Does Not Bring Justice”

Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 4, 2025
This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right. In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how […]

This article is inspired by a video featuring a young girl who, after being mocked by her classmates, chose to retaliate with violence to bring justice. Her mother gave her an important lesson: Two wrongs don’t make a right.

In life, we often encounter similar conflicts: when faced with wrongful actions or even injustice, how should we respond? Some choose to compromise, others remain silent, while some believe the best way to defend themselves is “an eye for an eye” to bring justice.

In a society grounded in the rule of law and ethics, every member of society should understand one fundamental truth: just because others make mistakes doesn’t mean one should make mistakes too. This is a test from God and a responsibility each citizen carries while enjoying their rights. It reflects our collective dedication to upholding justice in society.

1. Not combating evil with evil is the cornerstone to bring justice

The essence of the rule of law lies in limiting the abuse of power, restraining wrongdoing with justice, rather than allowing wrongdoings to cancel each other out. As citizens of the state, each of us has the right and responsibility to participate in society. The foundation of this right is the social order, centered on civilization and the rule of law.

The true mark of a civilized society lies in resolving conflicts through reason, dialogue, and structured systems, rather than resorting to violence. When faced with injustice, responding with force may appear justifiable, but it conveys a dangerous message—that violence can triumph over the principles and values that govern a civilized world. This approach ultimately erodes the moral fabric and legal foundation of society.

If everyone retaliated against wrongdoing with more wrongdoing, society would spiral into chaos, and the sound of people striking each other in anger would drown the voice of justice to. Ultimately, it is the members of society who would suffer the most. Violence and harmful actions are often emotional reactions born of pain and anger, rather than thoughtful solutions. They will bring more consequences. Therefore, when facing injustice, we should stick to our principles and defend to bring justice through lawful and righteous means.

2. Injustice is a test of civic duties

God granted us life with the purpose of becoming beacons of light. This light is seen not only in acts of individual goodness but also in our dedication to upholding social justice. As responsible citizens, it is our duty to care about public affairs and defend fairness and righteousness, never compromising our principles because of the misdeeds of others.

When we choose not to align ourselves with wrongdoing, we are not only living out our personal moral convictions but also setting a standard of righteousness for society. This choice is often difficult, as it requires us to endure pressure and misunderstanding from those around us. Yet this is precisely the test God places upon our souls: Are we willing to hold fast to the light in the midst of darkness? Do we have the courage to uphold to bring justice in the face of injustice?

3. Citizen power drives social progress

As citizens of a nation, we must exercise our power by overseeing social injustices, engaging in public affairs, and driving social change. When faced with injustice, we can choose to defend our rights through legal means, influence others’ perspectives through rational dialogue, and advocate for systemic improvement through collective social action.

While history does offer examples of social change driven by armed struggle, true societal progress depends on the improvement of institutions and adherence to rules, rather than actions driven by violence or emotion. Violence may bring about short-term reforms, but without rational planning and broad consensus, such changes are often unsustainable and susceptible to being undone by future turmoil. Anger can serve as a catalyst for action, and not bring justice but lasting transformation requires deep reforms in institutions, laws, and culture to build a more just and stable society.

At times, we may feel that our individual power is too small to change the status quo. Yet history teaches us that many great transformations began with the persistence of a single person. From Gandhi’s resistance to colonial rule to Rosa Parks’ fight for civil rights, they exercised their civic power to inject justice and hope into society. Their actions remind us that, in the face of injustice, the rational and lawful use of our rights is the most powerful weapon a citizen possesses.

4. Kindness Is Our Collective Responsibility to Bring Justice

We cannot justify our own wrongdoing simply because others have acted wrongly. This is not only a personal standard we set for ourselves but also a promise we make to society. When we choose kindness and to bring justice, our actions inspire others, creating a ripple effect of positive social interactions. Such choices bring inner peace and contribute to guiding society toward greater civility and fairness.

As the Bible teaches us, “To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” This is not only God’s guidance but also the attitude we, as citizens, should adopt. Kindness is not a sign of weakness, and to bring justice does not mean compromising. Faced with injustice, every decision we make plays a role in shaping the surrounding society.

Conclusion: Our Peace and Light Bring Justice

This statement is not only a belief, but also a call to action. It reminds us that each of us bears the responsibility of improving society. As citizens of a nation, we must use our power to lawfully and rationally combat injustice, while safeguarding kindness and let the higher authority to bring justice.

God has granted us free will, empowering us to choose to be champions of kindness and light. Let us face injustice with courage, using our wisdom and resolve as citizens to bring about change. Every time we stand firm, we uphold the principles that bind society; every action we take sparks hope for the future. May we all strive to be citizens who stay true to our values, undeterred by the mistakes of others, and may we shine as beacons of light in the world.

Amen!

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation

When I heard the Harvard girl Jiang Yurong speak at graduation

Master Wonder · Jun 2, 2025

“Going beyond ideology and belief”—that is the devil’s flute. Not every gentle voice brings peace—some quietly lead us away from justice. People who often well-dressed and well-educated, speak sweetly about “going beyond beliefs,” “transcending oppositions,” and “celebrating our shared humanity.” They speak of how “we are all the same” and how “our shared humanity matters […]

当我听到哈佛女生蒋雨融在毕业典礼上的讲话

当我听到哈佛女生蒋雨融在毕业典礼上的讲话

Master Wonder · Jun 2, 2025

——超越理念与信仰的做法,就是魔鬼的竹笛 这个时代,总有人打着“超越理念”“超越信仰”的旗号,煞有介事地谈什么“共同人性”“超越对立”“我们都一样”。他们话语温柔、神态可爱、学历光鲜,看上去像是道德化身,实际上却是现代文明最危险的麻醉剂,披着正义外套的魔鬼。 我听了哈佛女生蒋雨融在毕业典礼上的讲话,那种“超越理念与信仰”“我们彼此联结”“制造麻烦的人也是血肉之躯”的温情喊话,让人瞬间联想到那些在人类悲剧与暴政中高唱团结与包容的刽子手助手。 所以,必须写下这篇文章。 超越理念信仰?那是耍流氓 理念与信仰,是文明之基。它们是人类几千年在血与火、苦难与智慧中淬炼出来的价值边界。它们规定了什么是善,什么是恶,什么应当,什么不能。 而所谓“超越理念与信仰”,说白了,就是拒绝判断善恶,拒绝坚守正义,让强者行恶、恶人行凶、暴君作孽,依然堂而皇之地要求你“理解他们”“包容他们”,然后继续做他们的顺民、猎物、工具。 这不是宽容,而是道义背叛。这不是开放,而是精神自残。 那些超越者,本质是为魔鬼争权 凡是鼓吹“超越理念、超越信仰”的人,表面在讲和解、讲包容,实际上是为恶势力开路、为强权正名。他们用人性和爱当作话术,把对立双方虚假等量化,把正义和罪恶强行平衡,掩盖阶级压迫、权力罪行、制度暴力,把那些制造苦难者洗成“也是血肉之躯”。 别忘了,猎人与猎物、主子与奴仆、刽子手与受害者,的确“同是血肉”,但他们的立场、利益、处境天差地别。用“同是血肉”去掩盖阶级本质、压迫逻辑,便是对受害者的二次杀戮。 这是魔鬼式的人性洗脑:让猎物在受宰前感恩,让奴仆在被压迫时感动。 社会差异,远超性别与文化 我们常说“男女平等”“种族平权”“文化互鉴”,但最残酷的社会差别,其实是阶级差异。它决定了谁能掌控规则,谁必须忍受结果;谁能决定他人生死,谁只能乞怜活命。 而当你忽略阶级差异,只谈“血肉相连”“同理心”“超越理念”,你就是把统治者与被压迫者、刽子手与牺牲品强行捆在一条道德绳索上。对强者,这是伪善仁慈;对弱者,这是死亡判决。 他们说:“我们彼此联结”。是的,感恩节我也跟火鸡说过这句话。然后火鸡就成为我餐桌上的美味。这种“联结”,火鸡领悟不了,但现代文明中许多被收割者,已经在笑着配合。 魔鬼的竹笛 所谓“超越理念与信仰”,就是魔鬼手中的竹笛。它吹奏出动听的旋律,让民众相信世界没有绝对恶,仿佛一切都可以对话、联结、和解。 当你放下理念和信仰,你也就放下了警觉、抵抗、判断与底线。最终,你便成了顺从的群体,任人宰割,甘当盘中餐,还感恩赐予自己食物。 结语: 理念可以升级,信仰可以完善,但它们绝不能被篡改、放弃或超越。因为这是文明之锚、正义之剑、人类之尊严。 那些口口声声喊着“超越理念与信仰”的人,不论外表多纯真,话语多柔软,都是在为魔鬼争夺话语权与正义定义权。我们可以善良,但绝不蠢。我们有同理心,但不为伪善鼓掌。 记住:不是所有温情喊话都是仁慈,很多只是刽子手披着可爱皮囊的审判令。

read more

Related Content

Living by the Word: Finding True Spiritual Fulfillment
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 11, 2024
This is an excerpt of a speech originally in Chinese given to Yicheng volunteers. It is slightly edited and revised. The speaker is Daohe. Today we will explore the topic “seeking fulfillment of the soul”. Thank you for your attendance. God bless us. May God be with us. In the Gospel of Matthew, during Jesus’s […]
View All Content