Brand new world: the origin and future of humanity’s ultimate form of civilization

アバター画像
大乗道師 · 5月 18, 2025
1. The historical roots of the brand new world Many people today believe that the modern world is chaotic and […]

1. The historical roots of the brand new world

Many people today believe that the modern world is chaotic and fragmented, and that civilization seems to be heading nowhere. But in truth, the current state of the world did not appear out of nowhere. From the very beginning, human society has moved forward through struggles over power and resources. Through countless cycles of rise and fall, people gradually built systems, organizations, and institutions to bring some order to life.

In its earliest stage, almost every society was shaped by feudal systems. Land, power, and social status were tightly bound to bloodlines and aristocratic hierarchies. The privileges of a few depended on the hard labor of the many. Though primitive, this was the first step toward institutionalized society—it laid the groundwork for social order.

Later, as capital began to rise, wealth started to surpass bloodline in importance. This gave birth to the era of the nation-state driven by capital. The state was no longer just an extension of royal power. It became the central force in managing the economy and directing the flow of capital. The state turned into the largest capitalist entity—blending power and wealth to create a new kind of rule.

In modern times, the Western world tried to repackage its reality using ideals like “democracy” and “freedom.” This gave rise to a new form: the nation-state governed by both state and citizen capital. In this system, citizens gained certain rights, and their living standards improved. On the surface, it appeared open and progressive. But in reality, state capital—backed by powerful elites—remained the dominant force behind the scenes. What we call a “free economy” today is the result of a constant tug-of-war between state capital and citizen capital

Now, Western countries are quietly evolving toward a higher stage. The structures of capital, forms of social organization, and models of governance are all slowly shifting. A new kind of system is taking shape: the citizen-capital nation-state, where the influence of organized civil society and distributed ownership begins to challenge the older centralized powers. History does not move through sudden breaks—it moves through transitions. Modern Western nations may appear purely capitalist, but they are actually a hybrid—part feudal, part state-capitalist, part citizen-driven.

2. The true meaning of a new world: reshaping the fate of our time

The “ brand new world” is not some imagined utopia—it is the ultimate form of human civilization that we are bound to reach. It represents a complete citizen-based society, where being a citizen is no longer a symbolic title, but a real status with full rights and responsibilities.

In this new world, power is no longer held by a privileged few, wealth is no longer concentrated in the hands of oligarchs, and resources are no longer used as tools by dominant nations. Instead, every citizen should become an active participant in the governance of society. Capital becomes a shared asset of the people. Means of production, essential resources, political power, and public welfare are all distributed according to clear rules, based on each citizen’s rights and responsibilities.

This is not just a reform of political systems—it is a higher evolution of civilization itself. It marks both an end and a beginning: the end of autocracy, monopolized capital, and false democracy; and the beginning of a new era built on shared citizenship, collective ownership of capital, and collaborative governance. It aims to erase the scars of the past and bring an end to the ancient chain of power, wealth, and suffering that has shaped human life for millennia.

3. A complete vision of the citizen-capital society

The citizen–capital nation-state is built on three core principles: shared ownership by citizens, collaborative governance, and joint capital management. Unlike current models based on state capital or state–citizen hybrids, this system deconstructs the traditional nation-state into a social community, redefines capital as a public means of production, and transforms power into a self-governing network of citizens.

In this framework, the means of production are collectively owned through public investment by the citizens themselves—though privately owned large-scale capital may still exist. All key sectors tied to resources, infrastructure, and public welfare are placed under a citizen-led capital management system. Profits from these major enterprises are taxed according to each citizen’s share of investment. Citizens who invest socially are not only the managers and supervisors, but also the beneficiaries of the system.

In this new model, the state is no longer a coercive force standing above society. It exists only by the mandate of a citizen-led assembly, with all power originating from and returning to the people. Political rights are equally shared by all citizens. Governance is carried out through a combination of public deliberation, collective decision-making, rotating leadership, direct elections, and transparent oversight. Citizens are no longer mere voters—they are active participants in policymaking, management, and implementation.

Social welfare is funded through the surplus of public capital. Healthcare, education, elder care, housing, and infrastructure are all guaranteed through a universal citizen welfare system that ensures basic living rights for everyone. Wealth inequality is naturally regulated through mechanisms of capital redistribution. Extreme poverty is eliminated, and the phenomenon of extreme wealth concentration becomes a thing of the past.

Economically, this society functions under a fully citizen-driven free market system, organized along three tracks: citizen economy, state-supported economy, and civil society economy. The free citizen economy fosters individual initiative and innovation by citizens, public institutions, and social organizations alike. At the same time, essential sectors—those tied to national livelihood—are strategically coordinated through citizen capital planning, ensuring that public needs and wellbeing are met for all.

Conclusion: The destined destination of human civilization

The Brand New World is not a triumph of any ideology, but the inevitable outcome of humanity’s own development. As productivity reaches new heights, the unchecked expansion of capital inevitably triggers social crises. The extreme concentration of power leads to rigid governance. And the people’s genuine desire for freedom, justice, and equality will eventually surpass what existing systems can provide. These tensions compel civilization to evolve, giving rise to a higher form of social organization. This new form is a rejection of feudalism, a correction of capitalism, as well as an elevation of citizenship—it is the long-anticipated community-based society that humanity has envisioned across centuries.

At Yicheng Commonweal, we call this brand new world because it transcends the outdated framework of the nation-state. It moves toward a citizen-based global society, bound by shared social capital, and aiming for a global community of civilizational destiny.

We stand at the brink of a full civilizational rebirth.
This is the origin and vision of the New World—
And it is where human civilization is ultimately headed.

 

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

Daohe · 9月 12, 2025

叙谈人生的意义与价值–看清粪便人生 历史是一条奔涌的长河,浩浩荡荡,不以个人意志为转移。在这个历史长河中,每一个人都身处于时代巨轮的碾压之下。有人燃烧自己,成为引擎的燃料,推动文明向前;有人则蜷缩在角落,不愿 […]

read more

Related Content

「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル
「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル
アバター画像
Daohe · 8月 7, 2025
——文明政治の制度的指針と歴史的必然 一乘公益 作品 真に国を愛する者たちへ 一、序論:真の国家統治は、誰に帰属するのか? 今日、世界のほぼすべての国家が、その政治宣言に「人間本位」や「法治国家」といった壮大なスローガン […]
投票と意思決定を語ろう ——制度の本質と文明秩序における分業ロジック
アバター画像
Kishou · 6月 11, 2025
本稿では、投票と意思決定の本質的な違いについて考察しました。投票はあくまで権力や利害の分布を映す鏡にすぎず、意思決定は戦略的判断力を持つ少数の人々が担うべき行為であると指摘しています。<br>この二つが混同されると、短期的かつ感情的な判断が横行し、<br>権力のバランスが崩れ、最終的には社会の統治機能に深刻な影響を及ぼすおそれがあります。
制度は鏡:映し出される、ある民族の文明的成熟度
制度は鏡:映し出される、ある民族の文明的成熟度
アバター画像
Daohe · 7月 12, 2025
序論 制度とは、決して中立的な統治の道具ではありません。それは社会の管理方法であると同時に、ある民族の価値観、文明理念、そして認知的成熟度が集中的に現れるものでもあります。 制度とは、決して中立的な統治の道具ではありませ […]
View All Content