Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]

Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining of morality.

Civilization is not a finished product but a dynamic, ever-evolving process.

This article will take a closer look at the development of human morality and the transformation of civilization, offering a deeper understanding of what civilization truly means.

1. Prehistoric era: the natural emergence of morality

In early hunter-gatherer societies, morality was not a product of philosophy but a necessity for survival. Early humans had to cooperate, divide labor, and share resources to survive in harsh natural environments. Acts of mutual aid, caring for the weak, and respecting elders gradually evolved from strategic survival tactics into shared moral principles within the group.

The cave paintings found in France’s Lascaux Caves show groups of people hunting together. These images are not just early art; they also show how humans began to work together socially.

The “flower burial” discovered in Neanderthal graves reveals their respect for death and appreciation for life. This basic understanding of the supernatural and the meaning of life was the first step toward the development of morality.

2. Ancient Civilizations: The Formation of Systematic Moral Frameworks

With the rise of agricultural civilizations and the establishment of city-states, moral systems began to become more organized and institutionalized. Various ancient civilizations developed unique ethical systems through religion, law, and philosophy.

  • In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi institutionalized the principle of justice, setting clear rules for punishment and rewards to maintain social order.
  • In ancient Egypt, the goddess Ma’at symbolized truth and order, requiring everyone to follow justice in life in order to pass through judgment and achieve eternal life.
  • In India, the founder of Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), established compassion, patience, and discipline as the moral foundation through the “Four Noble Truths” and the “Eightfold Path,” emphasizing the law of cause and effect on actions.
  • Ancient Greek philosophy elevated morality to a rational pursuit, with Socrates claiming that “virtue is knowledge,” Plato emphasizing that “justice” is the ultimate goal for both the state and the individual, and Aristotle defining “the golden mean” as the core principle of moral practice.

During this period, human civilization shifted from a survival-based existence to a more rational order, with morality becoming a vital foundation for governing states and maintaining societies.

3. The Middle Ages: The Rise and Contradictions of Religious Morality

During the Middle Ages, religion became the absolute center of moral systems. Christianity shaped a new social order in Europe, where everything—from personal ethics to state laws—was based on the Bible. The Church not only established moral guidelines but also promoted social cohesion through religious education, charity, and welfare. However, the Church’s overwhelming authority led to rigid doctrines and religious wars, with the Crusades serving as an extreme example of religious morality in practice.

In the Islamic world, Sharia law regulated economic, justice, family relationships, and personal behavior, while charity was considered a religious duty. During the Abbasid Caliphate, religious ethics did not suppress knowledge but coexisted with scientific prosperity, creating a golden age where culture and morality intertwined.

Buddhism in medieval East Asia played a dual role in both imperial politics and popular ethics. It influenced rulers’ concepts of “benevolent governance” while also serving as a moral force in everyday life.

Yet, religious moral systems were not without contradictions. While they provided a framework for regulating human behavior, they also became tools of control and persecution. Religious trials and the burning of heretics are dark chapters in the moral journey of human civilization.

4. Modern Era: The Awakening of Reason, Human Rights, and Social Justice

The Renaissance and Enlightenment freed morality from the constraints of religion, placing reason and human rights at the center of ethical thought.

  • Immanuel Kant proposed that “moral law exists in the human heart,” asserting that individuals are self-disciplined moral agents.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the “social contract,” arguing that the legitimacy of the state comes from the will of the people.
  • The U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen were the first to establish freedom, equality, and human rights as the foundation of morality and law at the national level.

However, the Industrial Revolution brought about capital expansion, labor exploitation, child labor, and rising wealth inequality, once again posing a moral challenge. The rise of workers’ movements and Marxist thought proposed ideas like “distribution according to labor” and “abolition of exploitation,” which place social justice back at the heart of moral discourse.

Thus, modern civilization transitioned from religious rule to rational governance and, eventually, to a focus on social justice. Yet, this shift also planted the seeds of conflict between capitalist logic and social responsibility.

Modern Civilization: Globalization and the Multidimensional “National Citizen” Moral System

Modern civilization has entered an era of globalization and rapid technological development, which presents profound challenges to both traditional religious moral systems and early rational moral frameworks.

  • Globalization has broken down national borders, while technology has removed the constraints of time and space. Modern citizens are no longer just subjects of national law. They are also members of a global ethical community. A new moral system for national citizens, built on the foundation of law, centered on human rights, and driven by creativity and public responsibility, is emerging.
  • Globalization compels humanity to confront cross-cultural ethical issues, with challenges such as environmental protection, global trade fairness, climate change, and data privacy no longer confined to a single nation’s perspective.
  • Documents like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement, and global governance frameworks are gradually building an international ethical consensus. Countries must now seek a balance between their national interests and global ethical responsibilities.

The modern moral system for national citizens is built upon four key pillars:
a. Legal protection and moral self-awareness: Citizens are not only required to follow the law but also to internalize self-discipline and moral responsibility.
b. Unity of personal creativity and social responsibility: Innovation must balance the pursuit of personal achievement with consideration for the greater social good.
c. Diversity and conflict resolution mechanisms: The system incorporates strategies to address the conflicts arising from cultural differences and promote inclusivity.
d. Continuous reflection and moral innovation: Given the rapid pace of technological and societal change, the moral system must have the capacity for self-correction and adaptation.

At the same time, the modern moral system faces several challenges: conflicts between national interests and global ethics are becoming more apparent, capitalism is widening the wealth gap, cultural globalization is threatening local identities, and technology is advancing faster than our ethical guidelines. Issues like AI ethics, gene regulation, and data sovereignty are pushing us to create a flexible, ever-evolving global ethics platform.

Looking ahead, global ethical unity will be the goal, and national moral systems will expand beyond borders, forming a shared responsibility framework for “global citizens.”

In the future, moral decision-making will be more democratic, public well-being will be a key measure, and ethical systems will be designed to self-correct and adapt to changes. These will be the hallmarks of future civilizations.

Conclusion

Looking back on human history, morality has always been the invisible force driving societal progress. From primal survival instincts to religious ethics, from rational legal systems to the moral framework of global citizens, humanity has constantly asked, “What is justice? What is good?”

However, each era’s moral system has faced its own limitations. Religious morality brought about doctrinal rigidity and persecution; rational ethics couldn’t fully resolve issues like capital exploitation; globalization has introduced new conflicts over fairness and sovereignty.

The modern moral system for national citizens is humanity’s latest attempt in the context of globalization and technological revolution. It is both the highest product of civilization and an unfinished experiment.

Only through continuous reflection, self-correction, and the collective participation of all humanity can this system evolve towards perfection, ultimately becoming a guiding light for a more just, harmonious, and sustainable future for human civilization.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

Previous Article
Next Article
AI时代下应试教育的灾难性后果

AI时代下应试教育的灾难性后果

Daohe · Jan 30, 2026

前言:当AI照亮未来,人类却在倒退 人工智能(AI)的浪潮,本应预示着一个人类文明的“奇点”时刻:知识的获取成本趋近于零,工具的效能被无限放大,个体的创造力被尊崇为最高价值的生产力。然而,一个深刻的讽刺正在上演:当机器以前所未有的速度“进化”时,我们(尤其在许多国家)的教育体系却似乎在加速“退化”。 我们仍在使用源自工业时代的陈旧框架——一个以“标准化考试成绩”为唯一标尺的筛选体系——来塑造我们的下一代。这个体系的目的不是启迪,而是规训;不是释放潜力,而是制造“标准化产品”。 当AI的强光正在穿透社会结构的每一层,我们却固执地用应试教育的阴影来笼罩本该面向未来的孩子。这不是一种迟滞,这是一种背叛。一场关乎文明存续的灾难,其根基已在当下被悄然筑牢。 一、应试教育在AI时代的“错位”:原本不该存在的制度延迟 应试教育并非一开始就是错误的,它只是一个特定时代的产物。它的诞生服务于两个清晰的场景: 工业时代流水线对“标准化工人”的需求; 科层制官僚体系对“标准化管理者”的大规模选拔。 在那个时代,效率压倒一切。而应试教育的底层逻辑,就是为了实现这种效率:它剔除个性、压制差异,将每一个鲜活的个体打磨成可替换、可预测、可管理的“零件”。它追求的是“均好”,而非“卓越”;是“服从”,而非“开创”。 然而,AI时代的底层逻辑与此截然相反。 AI的本质,就是对“标准化”的终极实现与超越。它将接管一切重复性、流程化、可预测的劳动,无论是体力的还是脑力的。 因此,这个时代所呼唤的,是机器无法替代的一切:是“非标准化”的创造者、是洞察复杂系统的整合者、是提出终极问题的思考者。 一个巨大且致命的结构性错位由此产生: 时代需要的是拥有独特灵魂的个体,而我们的教育却在继续批量制造认知统一的“木偶”。 这种“错位”不再是简单的“制度延迟”,而是一种文明发展方向上的根本性对抗。它构成了我们这个时代最大的内耗,也是对未来最沉重的拖拽。 二、被应试教育塑造的“新时代木头人” 在AI的映照下,被应试教育长期浸泡、塑造出来的“高分低能”者,不再是能力是否“充足”的问题,而是其能力结构是否“相关”的问题。他们呈现出令人忧虑的共同特征——他们不是准备不足,而是正在被时代直接淘汰,如同被抽去灵魂的木头人,在未来的洪流中无法动弹。 1. 失去思考:AI能回答的题目,人类却依旧在背诵 应试教育的核心,不是点燃思维的火焰,而是填满记忆的仓库。它用“标准答案”取代了“批判性思维”,用“解题套路”置换了“第一性原理”。 但这是一个悲哀的事实:在记忆的广度、检索的速度、分析的精度和运算的强度上,任何最优秀的人类学生,在AI面前都已溃不成军。 一个将“博闻强记”和“快速运算”作为核心竞争力的孩子,他为之奋斗的全部技能,都将是AI一分钟内即可超越的领域。当教育系统奖励那些“更像机器”的行为时,它就在系统性地惩罚那些“更像人”的品质——好奇心、怀疑精神、以及对复杂性的探求。人类最宝贵的深度思考能力,就这样在“刷题”的噪音中被一点点磨平。 2. 失去表达:不会提问,不懂沟通,不敢对话 应试教育制造的是“答案的人”,而不是“问题的人”。它要求学生在预设的框架内给出“正确”的回答,而不是鼓励他们跳出框架,去质疑预设本身。 然而,在AI时代,答案是廉价的,甚至可能是过剩的。而真正稀缺的,是提出“好问题”的能力。未来社会最重要的能力,不再是“如何解决”,而是“定义什么值得解决”;不是机械背诵,而是与不同个体、不同文化、乃至与AI本身进行深度沟通;不是迎合标准,而是清晰地表达自我独特的见解。 木头人不需要嘴,只需要执行被输入的程序。而应试教育,正把一代代本该生机勃勃的孩子,训练成沉默、被动、等待指令的生物程序。 3. 失去方向:只剩服从与恐惧,没有自我与渴望 应试教育的隐形课程,远比它的显性课程更具塑造力。它是一种制度性的心理塑形——在“分数决定一切”的单一评价体系中,孩子被迫内化了三大生存(而非发展)特征: 不敢犯错: 错误意味着扣分,意味着失败。 害怕责任: 承担责任意味着可能犯错。 只会等待命令: 只有标准答案和老师的指令是安全的。 这种“服从型人格”在工业时代是“美德”,但在AI时代却是致命的。 因为AI最擅长替代的,恰恰是“服从型劳动”。而AI永远无法替代的,是源自内心的渴望、是对价值的自主判断、以及敢于承担风险的“主体意识”。 结果是:AI越是进步,这些被规训得“完美”的木头人,就越是无处可去。他们失去了在不确定性中寻找方向的能力。 4. 失去创造力:所有非标准答案被制度扼杀 未来的灵魂,是创造力——是连接“不相关”、是“无中生有”。 但应试教育的评价体系从根本上敌视创造力。它冷酷地告诉孩子: “你的见解再深刻,你的表达再优美,只要不是‘采分点’,就是零分。” 这不仅是对个体天赋的扼杀,更是对一个文明进化能力的系统性削弱。 创造力源于差异性。当一个社会被训练成“只认一个标准答案”的认知单一群体时,它就失去了思想的“生物多样性”。这样的文明,如同一个基因单一的物种,在面对环境剧变(例如AI)时,是极其脆弱、缺乏韧性和进化能力的。 三、为什么AI时代,应试教育将带来灾难性后果? 如果说在过去,应试教育的弊端只是“发展问题”,那么在AI时代,它将直接演变为“生存问题”。其后果是系统性的,且可能是不可逆的。 1. 大规模就业结构崩塌 AI技术革命的本质,是“标准化”的终结者。它取代的,正是那些规则清晰、边界明确、可被量化的“标准化工作”。 而应试教育培养的,恰恰是“标准化人才”。 这意味着,被应试教育训练得越好、越“成功”的人,越有可能处在被AI全面淘汰的“重灾区”。这不是简单的“失业”,这是“结构性淘汰”。他们会成为新时代的“结构性冗余人口”,他们过去十几年所学的一切,无法为他们提供任何面向未来的竞争力,甚至无法为他们提供一个“再出发”的支点。 2. 社会创新能力断崖式下降 […]

AI时代下应试教育的灾难性后果

AI时代下应试教育的灾难性后果

Daohe · Jan 30, 2026

前言:当AI照亮未来,人类却在倒退 人工智能(AI)的浪潮,本应预示着一个人类文明的“奇点”时刻:知识的获取成本趋近于零,工具的效能被无限放大,个体的创造力被尊崇为最高价值的生产力。然而,一个深刻的讽刺正在上演:当机器以前所未有的速度“进化”时,我们(尤其在许多国家)的教育体系却似乎在加速“退化”。 我们仍在使用源自工业时代的陈旧框架——一个以“标准化考试成绩”为唯一标尺的筛选体系——来塑造我们的下一代。这个体系的目的不是启迪,而是规训;不是释放潜力,而是制造“标准化产品”。 当AI的强光正在穿透社会结构的每一层,我们却固执地用应试教育的阴影来笼罩本该面向未来的孩子。这不是一种迟滞,这是一种背叛。一场关乎文明存续的灾难,其根基已在当下被悄然筑牢。 一、应试教育在AI时代的“错位”:原本不该存在的制度延迟 应试教育并非一开始就是错误的,它只是一个特定时代的产物。它的诞生服务于两个清晰的场景: 工业时代流水线对“标准化工人”的需求; 科层制官僚体系对“标准化管理者”的大规模选拔。 在那个时代,效率压倒一切。而应试教育的底层逻辑,就是为了实现这种效率:它剔除个性、压制差异,将每一个鲜活的个体打磨成可替换、可预测、可管理的“零件”。它追求的是“均好”,而非“卓越”;是“服从”,而非“开创”。 然而,AI时代的底层逻辑与此截然相反。 AI的本质,就是对“标准化”的终极实现与超越。它将接管一切重复性、流程化、可预测的劳动,无论是体力的还是脑力的。 因此,这个时代所呼唤的,是机器无法替代的一切:是“非标准化”的创造者、是洞察复杂系统的整合者、是提出终极问题的思考者。 一个巨大且致命的结构性错位由此产生: 时代需要的是拥有独特灵魂的个体,而我们的教育却在继续批量制造认知统一的“木偶”。 这种“错位”不再是简单的“制度延迟”,而是一种文明发展方向上的根本性对抗。它构成了我们这个时代最大的内耗,也是对未来最沉重的拖拽。 二、被应试教育塑造的“新时代木头人” 在AI的映照下,被应试教育长期浸泡、塑造出来的“高分低能”者,不再是能力是否“充足”的问题,而是其能力结构是否“相关”的问题。他们呈现出令人忧虑的共同特征——他们不是准备不足,而是正在被时代直接淘汰,如同被抽去灵魂的木头人,在未来的洪流中无法动弹。 1. 失去思考:AI能回答的题目,人类却依旧在背诵 应试教育的核心,不是点燃思维的火焰,而是填满记忆的仓库。它用“标准答案”取代了“批判性思维”,用“解题套路”置换了“第一性原理”。 但这是一个悲哀的事实:在记忆的广度、检索的速度、分析的精度和运算的强度上,任何最优秀的人类学生,在AI面前都已溃不成军。 一个将“博闻强记”和“快速运算”作为核心竞争力的孩子,他为之奋斗的全部技能,都将是AI一分钟内即可超越的领域。当教育系统奖励那些“更像机器”的行为时,它就在系统性地惩罚那些“更像人”的品质——好奇心、怀疑精神、以及对复杂性的探求。人类最宝贵的深度思考能力,就这样在“刷题”的噪音中被一点点磨平。 2. 失去表达:不会提问,不懂沟通,不敢对话 应试教育制造的是“答案的人”,而不是“问题的人”。它要求学生在预设的框架内给出“正确”的回答,而不是鼓励他们跳出框架,去质疑预设本身。 然而,在AI时代,答案是廉价的,甚至可能是过剩的。而真正稀缺的,是提出“好问题”的能力。未来社会最重要的能力,不再是“如何解决”,而是“定义什么值得解决”;不是机械背诵,而是与不同个体、不同文化、乃至与AI本身进行深度沟通;不是迎合标准,而是清晰地表达自我独特的见解。 木头人不需要嘴,只需要执行被输入的程序。而应试教育,正把一代代本该生机勃勃的孩子,训练成沉默、被动、等待指令的生物程序。 3. 失去方向:只剩服从与恐惧,没有自我与渴望 应试教育的隐形课程,远比它的显性课程更具塑造力。它是一种制度性的心理塑形——在“分数决定一切”的单一评价体系中,孩子被迫内化了三大生存(而非发展)特征: 不敢犯错: 错误意味着扣分,意味着失败。 害怕责任: 承担责任意味着可能犯错。 只会等待命令: 只有标准答案和老师的指令是安全的。 这种“服从型人格”在工业时代是“美德”,但在AI时代却是致命的。 因为AI最擅长替代的,恰恰是“服从型劳动”。而AI永远无法替代的,是源自内心的渴望、是对价值的自主判断、以及敢于承担风险的“主体意识”。 结果是:AI越是进步,这些被规训得“完美”的木头人,就越是无处可去。他们失去了在不确定性中寻找方向的能力。 4. 失去创造力:所有非标准答案被制度扼杀 未来的灵魂,是创造力——是连接“不相关”、是“无中生有”。 但应试教育的评价体系从根本上敌视创造力。它冷酷地告诉孩子: “你的见解再深刻,你的表达再优美,只要不是‘采分点’,就是零分。” 这不仅是对个体天赋的扼杀,更是对一个文明进化能力的系统性削弱。 创造力源于差异性。当一个社会被训练成“只认一个标准答案”的认知单一群体时,它就失去了思想的“生物多样性”。这样的文明,如同一个基因单一的物种,在面对环境剧变(例如AI)时,是极其脆弱、缺乏韧性和进化能力的。 三、为什么AI时代,应试教育将带来灾难性后果? 如果说在过去,应试教育的弊端只是“发展问题”,那么在AI时代,它将直接演变为“生存问题”。其后果是系统性的,且可能是不可逆的。 1. 大规模就业结构崩塌 AI技术革命的本质,是“标准化”的终结者。它取代的,正是那些规则清晰、边界明确、可被量化的“标准化工作”。 而应试教育培养的,恰恰是“标准化人才”。 这意味着,被应试教育训练得越好、越“成功”的人,越有可能处在被AI全面淘汰的“重灾区”。这不是简单的“失业”,这是“结构性淘汰”。他们会成为新时代的“结构性冗余人口”,他们过去十几年所学的一切,无法为他们提供任何面向未来的竞争力,甚至无法为他们提供一个“再出发”的支点。 2. 社会创新能力断崖式下降 […]

read more

Related Content

Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Political sovereignty and the foundation of an autonomous civil society
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jun 3, 2025
Without citizen sovereignty, there can be no true citizen state. 1. What is a state? What is a citizen? A state is not merely a set of borders, institutions, regimes, or ruling authorities. In its modern form, a state is a political community voluntarily formed by a group of social citizens, organized around shared interests, […]
The Loss or Renunciation of Civil Rights and Consequences
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 26, 2025
Civil rights are not only a symbol of an individual’s legal identity within the state, but also a crucial mechanism for ensuring personal dignity and the fair distribution of societal resources. These rights encompass participation in social governance, access to public services, and legal protection, all while carrying the responsibility of fulfilling social duties. However, […]
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
A Glorious Beginning: When Reason and Compassion Return to the World
Avatar photo
Yicheng · May 10, 2025
A nation’s real strength doesn’t come from its economy or military power, but from having cultural ideals people can believe in. When people can tell right from wrong, stand up to power and temptation, and come together for justice and self-respect, that society has a future. Civilization doesn’t arise by chance. It takes effort and […]
Civic Studies: Transforming Civic Life for a Better Tomorrow
Avatar photo
Daohe · Nov 6, 2024
As an important concept in the history of human society, “citizen” signifies not just individual identity, but a collective responsibility and social awareness. Revolving around this awakening, civic studies explore how cooperation, participation, and responsibility undertaken among citizens can build a better society for all. Throughout history, humanity has moved from the production of individual labor […]
View All Content