Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]

Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining of morality.

Civilization is not a finished product but a dynamic, ever-evolving process.

This article will take a closer look at the development of human morality and the transformation of civilization, offering a deeper understanding of what civilization truly means.

1. Prehistoric era: the natural emergence of morality

In early hunter-gatherer societies, morality was not a product of philosophy but a necessity for survival. Early humans had to cooperate, divide labor, and share resources to survive in harsh natural environments. Acts of mutual aid, caring for the weak, and respecting elders gradually evolved from strategic survival tactics into shared moral principles within the group.

The cave paintings found in France’s Lascaux Caves show groups of people hunting together. These images are not just early art; they also show how humans began to work together socially.

The “flower burial” discovered in Neanderthal graves reveals their respect for death and appreciation for life. This basic understanding of the supernatural and the meaning of life was the first step toward the development of morality.

2. Ancient Civilizations: The Formation of Systematic Moral Frameworks

With the rise of agricultural civilizations and the establishment of city-states, moral systems began to become more organized and institutionalized. Various ancient civilizations developed unique ethical systems through religion, law, and philosophy.

  • In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi institutionalized the principle of justice, setting clear rules for punishment and rewards to maintain social order.
  • In ancient Egypt, the goddess Ma’at symbolized truth and order, requiring everyone to follow justice in life in order to pass through judgment and achieve eternal life.
  • In India, the founder of Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), established compassion, patience, and discipline as the moral foundation through the “Four Noble Truths” and the “Eightfold Path,” emphasizing the law of cause and effect on actions.
  • Ancient Greek philosophy elevated morality to a rational pursuit, with Socrates claiming that “virtue is knowledge,” Plato emphasizing that “justice” is the ultimate goal for both the state and the individual, and Aristotle defining “the golden mean” as the core principle of moral practice.

During this period, human civilization shifted from a survival-based existence to a more rational order, with morality becoming a vital foundation for governing states and maintaining societies.

3. The Middle Ages: The Rise and Contradictions of Religious Morality

During the Middle Ages, religion became the absolute center of moral systems. Christianity shaped a new social order in Europe, where everything—from personal ethics to state laws—was based on the Bible. The Church not only established moral guidelines but also promoted social cohesion through religious education, charity, and welfare. However, the Church’s overwhelming authority led to rigid doctrines and religious wars, with the Crusades serving as an extreme example of religious morality in practice.

In the Islamic world, Sharia law regulated economic, justice, family relationships, and personal behavior, while charity was considered a religious duty. During the Abbasid Caliphate, religious ethics did not suppress knowledge but coexisted with scientific prosperity, creating a golden age where culture and morality intertwined.

Buddhism in medieval East Asia played a dual role in both imperial politics and popular ethics. It influenced rulers’ concepts of “benevolent governance” while also serving as a moral force in everyday life.

Yet, religious moral systems were not without contradictions. While they provided a framework for regulating human behavior, they also became tools of control and persecution. Religious trials and the burning of heretics are dark chapters in the moral journey of human civilization.

4. Modern Era: The Awakening of Reason, Human Rights, and Social Justice

The Renaissance and Enlightenment freed morality from the constraints of religion, placing reason and human rights at the center of ethical thought.

  • Immanuel Kant proposed that “moral law exists in the human heart,” asserting that individuals are self-disciplined moral agents.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the “social contract,” arguing that the legitimacy of the state comes from the will of the people.
  • The U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen were the first to establish freedom, equality, and human rights as the foundation of morality and law at the national level.

However, the Industrial Revolution brought about capital expansion, labor exploitation, child labor, and rising wealth inequality, once again posing a moral challenge. The rise of workers’ movements and Marxist thought proposed ideas like “distribution according to labor” and “abolition of exploitation,” which place social justice back at the heart of moral discourse.

Thus, modern civilization transitioned from religious rule to rational governance and, eventually, to a focus on social justice. Yet, this shift also planted the seeds of conflict between capitalist logic and social responsibility.

Modern Civilization: Globalization and the Multidimensional “National Citizen” Moral System

Modern civilization has entered an era of globalization and rapid technological development, which presents profound challenges to both traditional religious moral systems and early rational moral frameworks.

  • Globalization has broken down national borders, while technology has removed the constraints of time and space. Modern citizens are no longer just subjects of national law. They are also members of a global ethical community. A new moral system for national citizens, built on the foundation of law, centered on human rights, and driven by creativity and public responsibility, is emerging.
  • Globalization compels humanity to confront cross-cultural ethical issues, with challenges such as environmental protection, global trade fairness, climate change, and data privacy no longer confined to a single nation’s perspective.
  • Documents like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement, and global governance frameworks are gradually building an international ethical consensus. Countries must now seek a balance between their national interests and global ethical responsibilities.

The modern moral system for national citizens is built upon four key pillars:
a. Legal protection and moral self-awareness: Citizens are not only required to follow the law but also to internalize self-discipline and moral responsibility.
b. Unity of personal creativity and social responsibility: Innovation must balance the pursuit of personal achievement with consideration for the greater social good.
c. Diversity and conflict resolution mechanisms: The system incorporates strategies to address the conflicts arising from cultural differences and promote inclusivity.
d. Continuous reflection and moral innovation: Given the rapid pace of technological and societal change, the moral system must have the capacity for self-correction and adaptation.

At the same time, the modern moral system faces several challenges: conflicts between national interests and global ethics are becoming more apparent, capitalism is widening the wealth gap, cultural globalization is threatening local identities, and technology is advancing faster than our ethical guidelines. Issues like AI ethics, gene regulation, and data sovereignty are pushing us to create a flexible, ever-evolving global ethics platform.

Looking ahead, global ethical unity will be the goal, and national moral systems will expand beyond borders, forming a shared responsibility framework for “global citizens.”

In the future, moral decision-making will be more democratic, public well-being will be a key measure, and ethical systems will be designed to self-correct and adapt to changes. These will be the hallmarks of future civilizations.

Conclusion

Looking back on human history, morality has always been the invisible force driving societal progress. From primal survival instincts to religious ethics, from rational legal systems to the moral framework of global citizens, humanity has constantly asked, “What is justice? What is good?”

However, each era’s moral system has faced its own limitations. Religious morality brought about doctrinal rigidity and persecution; rational ethics couldn’t fully resolve issues like capital exploitation; globalization has introduced new conflicts over fairness and sovereignty.

The modern moral system for national citizens is humanity’s latest attempt in the context of globalization and technological revolution. It is both the highest product of civilization and an unfinished experiment.

Only through continuous reflection, self-correction, and the collective participation of all humanity can this system evolve towards perfection, ultimately becoming a guiding light for a more just, harmonious, and sustainable future for human civilization.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

――歴史、文明、制度を横断する、制度的統制の罠―― 序論:世界的な悲劇、制度的な設定 現代の多くの国々において、それが民主国家であれ、権威主義体制であれ、あるいは新興の政体であれ、「公務員」という集団の役割は、危険かつ逆説的な構造の中に囚われています。 忠誠を求められながら、清廉潔白でいられる余地を与えられない。 権力を与えられながら、その人格の尊厳は保障されない。 秩序を維持するよう求められながら、いつでも身代わりの羊(スケープゴート)にされうる。 このような「制度の駒として使われる人生」は、東洋特有のものでも、権威主義体制の専売特許でもありません。これは、世界の制度文明が長期にわたって進化してきた副産物であり、行政官僚システムそのものに固有の、犠牲を生み出すメカニズムなのです。そして、それは世界的な普遍性と、制度としての継承性を持っています。 一、古代帝国から植民地体制へ:公務員の「犠牲となる」性質の世界的起源 1. 古代ローマとペルシャ帝国:忠実な道具 vs. 権力による収穫 古代ローマ帝国は、世界で最も初期の巨大な文官システムの一つを確立しました。しかし、このシステムの核心的な論理は、「実行者に権限はなく、責任は全て負わされる」というものでした。地方総督が治安維持、徴税、軍糧供給をできなければ、元老院に弾劾され、職務怠慢で追放され、時には街頭で処刑される可能性さえありました。 ペルシャ帝国も同様で、その「帝国の目」と呼ばれた監察官は、高い地位にありながら、皇帝の「耳目」であると同時に「生贄」でもありました。一度でも忠誠心に疑いを持たれれば、まず処刑され、その後に責任が問われる、という具合でした。 2. 中世の教会権力と王権のシステム:官僚が置かれた高圧的な苦境 中世西ヨーロッパの王権と教会権力が並立していた時代、王室の書記官や教皇庁の助祭長は、最高位の公務員でありながら、最も高いリスクを背負う者たちでもありました。主君のために働いた多くの高級行政官が、権力闘争、責任転嫁、そして世論による断罪の中で命を落としました。 イングランドのトマス・ベケットのように、忠臣でありながら、最終的には「政治的な死体」となる例は少なくありません。 3. 植民地システム:派遣された官僚が陥る二重の牢獄 イギリス、フランス、オランダ、スペインといった植民地帝国は、世界中に多くの植民地行政官を派遣しました。彼らは「現地住民を平定し、税を搾り取る」一方で、本国の議会や現地の資本家の機嫌を損ねるわけにはいきませんでした。彼らは、植民地での危機、反乱の失敗、経済の衰退といった事態において、しばしば「最初の犠牲者」となったのです。 世界の植民地史における「不運な総督たち」の記録は、制度が人材をいかに「燃料」として消費してきたかを、最も如実に物語っています。 二、近代国家の「行政機械」:権力の中で人格を奪われる人々 1. ナチス・ドイツとソビエト体制:制度の消耗品としての究極形態 全体主義制度の下では、公務員はほとんど制度の消耗品と化します。 このような政体における公務員は、表向きは国家を代表していますが、実態は高圧的な権力システムにおける最初の犠牲者集団なのです。 2. 民主国家におけるスケープゴート構造:世論の下での切り捨てメカニズム 制度が成熟した民主国家においてさえ、公務員は「切り捨てられる運命」から逃れられてはいません。 民主制度が必ずしも穏やかであるとは限りません。ただ、公務員を切り捨てる方法が、より「文明的」であるに過ぎないのです。 三、現代における「制度の駒」としての人生の五大特徴:世界共通の「統制パッケージ」 どの国においても、今日の公務員システムは、非常によく似た、管理しやすい「制度の駒」としての構造的特徴を示しています。 1. 権力と責任の著しい非対称性 限られた実行権しか持たないにもかかわらず、政策の失敗、世論の批判、予算の危機に対して責任を負わなければなりません。真の意思決定者は「法的に免責」され、実行者は「手続きに則って問責」されます。 2. 収入と期待の著しい乖離 世界の多くの国で、公務員の収入は、その仕事の過酷さや公衆からの期待に見合うものではありません。その結果、合法的な範囲外のインセンティブ、すなわち「グレーな収入」を生み出す土壌となります。 3. 忠誠と独立した人格の両立不可能性 多くの国で、「政治的中立」と「制度への忠誠」はしばしば矛盾します。ある公務員があまりに独立して思考すれば、「非協力的な人物」と見なされやすく、逆に従順すぎれば、社会からの信頼を失います。 4. 制度によって腐敗へと誘導され、そして制度によって粛清される 制度は、表向きは清廉潔白を奨励しますが、実際には管理・統制の手段として、多くの「腐敗の余地」を残しています。そして、一度、粛清の必要が生じると、その中から「スケープゴート」を選び出し、不満を鎮めるのです。 5. 最終的に社会の怒りの受け皿となる 貧富の格差、統治の失敗、官僚主義的な作風に対する民衆の不満は、最終的に、資本家や体制の上層部ではなく、「無能で、腐敗し、怠慢で、愚かで、何もしない」公務員へと集中砲火のように浴びせられます。 四、なぜ制度は常に「切り捨て可能な実行部隊」を必要とするのか? 制度は、常に三つの重要な難題を解決しなければなりません。 問題 制度対策 実行効率をいかに維持するか? 体制に従順で、依存的な人々を育成する。 制度の安定性をいかに延長するか? […]

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

公务员的“制度牛马”人生:全球制度演化下的牺牲者逻辑

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

——跨越历史、文明与制度的制度性操控陷阱 引言:全球性悲剧,制度型设定 在今天的许多国家,不论是民主国家、威权体制,还是新兴政体,“公务员群体”的角色都被困于一种危险而悖谬的结构中: 既要求他们忠诚,却不给他们清白的空间; 既赋予他们权力,却不保障他们的人格; 既要他们维持秩序,却随时能将其当作代罪羔羊。 这种“制度牛马式人生”不是东方独有,也非威权特产,而是全球制度文明长期演化的副产品,是行政官僚体系内部固有的牺牲机制,具有全球普遍性与制度传承性。 一、从古代帝国到殖民体制:公务员的全球“牺牲性”起源 1. 古罗马与波斯帝国:忠诚工具人 vs. 权力收割机 古罗马帝国建立了全世界最早的大型文官系统之一,但这套系统的核心逻辑就是:“执行者无权,责任全责”。地方总督若不能维稳、征税、供应军粮,就可能被元老院弹劾、失职流放,甚至当街处死。 波斯帝国也是如此,其“御使”(即帝国巡查员)虽地位崇高,却是帝王“耳目”与“祭品”合一——一旦被怀疑忠诚动摇,先杀之而后问责。 2. 中世纪教权与王权体系:公务官僚的高压困局 在中世纪的西欧王权与教权共治体系中,王室“书记官”、教廷“执事长”都是顶级公务员,却也是最高风险承担者。许多“替主办事”的高级行政人员死于权斗、背锅与舆情清算。 如英格兰托马斯·贝克特,既是忠臣,也是“政治尸体”。 3. 殖民体系:全球外派官僚的双重囚笼 英、法、荷、西等殖民帝国在全球派驻大量殖民地行政官员,他们既要“平定土著、榨取税收”,又不能得罪母国议会和本地资本。这些人时常在殖民危机、起义失败、经济衰退中成为“第一批牺牲者”。 全球殖民史中的“倒霉总督”,是最真实的制度燃料使用记录。 二、近现代国家的“行政机器”:权力之中被去人格 1. 纳粹德国与苏联体制:制度牲畜的极致形态 在极权制度下,公务员几乎是制度的消耗品: 这种政体下的公务员,表面代表国家,实则是高压权力体系的第一轮牺牲群体。 2. 民主国家的替罪结构:舆情下的抛弃机制 即使在制度成熟的民主国家,公务员也并未逃离“可抛弃性命运”: 民主制度未必更温和,只是抛弃公务员的方式更“文明”。 三、现代“制度牛马”人生的五大特征:全球通行的“操控套件” 无论是在哪个国家,今天的公务员系统都呈现出一种高度相似的“可操控“制度牛马”系统结构”: 1. 权力与责任严重不对称 拥有有限执行权,却必须对政策失误、舆情崩盘、预算危机负责。真正的决策者“法律免责”,执行者则“程序问责”。 2. 收入与期望严重错位 全球多数国家的公务员收入不足以匹配其工作强度与公众期待,从而滋生合法之外的“灰色激励体系、即灰色收入”。 3. 忠诚与独立人格不可共存 在许多国家,“政治中立”与“制度忠诚”常常矛盾。一名公务员若太独立思考,便容易被视为“不合作份子”;若过度服从,又将失去社会信任。 4. 被制度诱腐,再被制度清算 制度在表面上鼓励清廉,但在实际中留下大量“可腐空间”作为控制手段。一旦需要清洗,就从中选出“替罪羊”以平息不满。 5. 最终成为社会愤怒的集装箱 无论是民众对贫富不均、治理失效、官僚作风的怨恨,最终往往集中喷向公务员无能、腐败、躺平、弱智、不作为,而不是资本权贵或体制高层。 四、为什么制度总要一个“可杀的执行群体”? 制度总要解决三个关键难题: 问题 制度对策 如何维持执行效率? 养一群服从且依赖体制的人 如何延长制度稳定性? […]

read more

Related Content

Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Understanding the culture and civilization of a nation
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 27, 2025
Culture and civilization are the two core forces driving a nation’s development. Culture shapes the character of a nation, while civilization reflects the depth of its moral progress and the path it takes toward higher ethical ideals. By exploring the relationship between culture and civilization, we can gain a deeper understanding of the inner forces […]
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Voting vs. decision-making: Understanding their roles in civilization
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 11, 2025
This article explores the fundamental difference between voting and decision-making. Voting reflects the distribution of power and interests, while decision-making requires a small group of people with strategic competence. When these two are blurred, decisions risk becoming shortsighted and driven by emotion, leading to power imbalances that ultimately weaken social governance.
The Loss or Renunciation of Civil Rights and Consequences
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 26, 2025
Civil rights are not only a symbol of an individual’s legal identity within the state, but also a crucial mechanism for ensuring personal dignity and the fair distribution of societal resources. These rights encompass participation in social governance, access to public services, and legal protection, all while carrying the responsibility of fulfilling social duties. However, […]
View All Content