Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル

「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル

Daohe · Aug 7, 2025

——文明政治の制度的指針と歴史的必然 一乘公益 作品 真に国を愛する者たちへ 一、序論:真の国家統治は、誰に帰属するのか? 今日、世界のほぼすべての国家が、その政治宣言に「人間本位」や「法治国家」といった壮大なスローガンを刻み込んでいます。それらの言葉を掲げるだけで、自らが文明の頂点にいるかのような正当性を得られる、とさえ考えられているかのようです。 しかし、真実は往々にしてその逆です。これらの言葉は、特定の体制を正当化し、あるいは特権構造を維持するためのレトリックとして機能することが多く、その根底にある論理は万人のためではなく、ごく少数の者たち——すなわち政権エリート、資本家オリガーキー、あるいは文化エリート——に奉仕しているのが実情です。 今こそ、我々は長らく回避されてきた問いを立てなければなりません。国家統治は、一体誰を中核に据えるべきなのか。それこそが正しく、効率的で、文明的な道なのであると。 答えはおそらく複雑ではありません。国家の真の主人は、政治、経済、社会、そして文化における共同統治権を持つ、一人ひとりの「完全な市民」でなければならないのです。 本稿は、理論的論理と現実の事例に基づき、偽りの「人間本位」と偽りの「法治」の実態を解き明かし、未来の文明進化の方向性に合致する制度的パラダイムとして「『完全な市民』を中核とする統治モデル」を提示するものです。 二、偽りの「人間本位」と偽りの「法治」:制度という仮面の下の真実 (一) 「人間本位」とは、実際には誰のためか? 我々は「人間本位」というスローガンだけで、その国家が文明的であるかを判断することはできません。なぜなら、ここで言う「人間」とは、普遍的な意味での市民個人ではなく、特定の集団から選ばれた少数者であることが多いからです。 これらのモデルの共通点は、統治の論理において「人間」の地位が、完全な「政治的権利、経済的権利、社会的権利を持つ自律した個人」として明確に定義されておらず、単に統治される「客体」として、穏健な言葉で覆い隠されている点にあります。 スローガンは数あれど、国民の地位は常に曖昧なままです。いわゆる「人間本位」とは、国家管理者が社会から正当性を得るためのレトリックであり、制度としての「市民本位」ではないのです。 (二) 「法治国家」とは、一体何を治めているのか? 「法治国家」は近代的な国家統治の理性的成果に見えます。しかし、その実態は真の統治パラダイムというより、既存の制度を維持するためのメカニズムであることが多いのです。たとえ法体系が完備され、手続きが規範化されていても、その国家が「良く統治されている」とは限りません。なぜなら、 言い換えれば、「法治」は秩序を維持できますが、それ自体が正義を生み出すわけではないのです。市民という主体が不在の法治は、いわば「血を流さない専制」とも呼べる、権力の穏健な外装となり得ます。 同時に、「法治」は近代国家統治の基本的なコンセンサスではありますが、それ自体が統治モデルを構成するわけではありません。それは方向性を決定するのではなく、秩序を維持するための、いわばシステムの操作マニュアルに近いのです。 これは以下の事実を示唆しています。 要するに、法治は目的ではなく、手段です。「完全な市民」を中核とする制度的価値がなければ、法そのものが「合法的専制」の道具と化す危険性をはらんでいるのです。 三、真の出口:「完全な市民」を中核とする統治モデル 「『完全な市民』を中核とする統治モデル」とは何でしょうか。それはスローガンではなく、制度の論理であり、社会統治構造の全面的な再構築です。そこには五つの核心的特徴があります。 (一)「完全な市民」とは何か? 「完全な市民」とは、単に「身分証明書を持つ者」ではありません。国家統治において、構造全体への参加権、決定権、そして分配権を持つ者を指します。その権利には、少なくとも以下が含まれます。 次元 市民権の内容 政治的権利 選挙権、リコール権、公共政策提案権、参加型立法権、国民投票による拒否権 経済的権利 国家の富の分配への共同参加権、公共データの利益分配、国家資本の配当権、労働利益の協議権 社会的権利 基礎的福祉保障、教育・医療への公正なアクセス、社会協議メカニズムへの参加 文化的権利 言論の自由、精神的空間の自由、教育カリキュラム設計への参加権 「完全な市民」は抽象的な記号ではなく、国家制度において実在する統治の力なのです。 これらの権利が制度化され、実行可能となり、公開されて初めて、市民は真に国家の主人となるのです。 (二)「市民を中核とする」五大制度原則 四、制度進化の歴史的論理:臣民から市民へ、統治から共治へ 統治のあり方は一夜にして形成されるものではなく、歴史の中で絶えず進化してきました。 段階 統治モデル 主体関係 特徴 古代封建 君主至上主義 君主ー臣民 法は君主の命令 神権政治 教会または神の権威 権威ー信者 教義による統治 立憲君主制 […]

以完整公民为核心的治国模式

以完整公民为核心的治国模式

Daohe · Aug 7, 2025

——文明政治的制度方向与历史必然 一乘公益 出品 写给那些真正爱国的人。 一、开篇:真正的国家治理,属于谁? 当今世界,几乎所有国家的政治宣言中都镌刻着“以人为本”、“依法治国”之类的宏伟口号。仿佛一旦贴上这些标签,就自动站到了文明的制高点。然而,真相往往相反:这些术语更多成为粉饰专制或维持特权结构的制度话术,其底层逻辑并非服务于所有人,而是服务于少数人——政权集团、资本寡头或文化精英。 而今,我们必须提出一个被长期回避的问题:治国,究竟该以谁为核心?才是正确、高效、文明的。 答案也许并不复杂:国家的真正主人,必须是每一位拥有政治、经济、社会与文化共治理权的“完整公民”。 本篇文章将从理论逻辑与现实案例出发,系统驳斥伪“以人为本”与伪“依法治国”之荒诞,并提出“以完整公民为核心的治国模式”这一符合未来文明演进方向的制度范式。 二、伪“以人为本”与伪“依法治国”:制度假面下的真实运作 (一)“以人为本”,实际是谁为本? 我们不能仅凭“以人为本”的口号判断一个国家是否文明。因为这个“人”,往往不是普遍意义上的公民个体,而是特定集团中被选中的少数人。 这些模式的共通点在于:治国逻辑中“人”的地位从未明确为具备完整“政治权利、经济权利、社会权利的自主个体”,而是一种被统治的“对象”,只不过被用温和语境加以包装罢了。 口号虽多,人民地位始终模糊。实际上,所谓“人本”,只是国家管理者从社会获取合法性的一种话术包装,而不是制度上的“以公民为本”。 (二)“依法治国”,究竟在治什么? “依法治国”看似是现代国家治理的理性成果,但实质上,它更多是一种制度维护机制,而非一种真正的治国范式。一个国家即使法律体系完备、程序规范,也并不代表它“治理得好”。因为: 换句话说,“依法治国”只能维持秩序,却无法生成正义。缺乏公民主体参与的法治,是权力温和化的外壳,是不流血的专制。 同时“依法治国”是现代国家治理的基本共识,但它本身并不能构成治国模式。它更像是一个系统操作标准:维持秩序,而非决定方向。 这说明: 简言之,法治不是目的,只是手段。没有以完整公民为核心的制度价值,法本身就可沦为“合法暴政”的工具。 三、真正的出路:以完整公民为核心的治国模式 什么是“以公民为核心的治国模式”?这不是一句口号,而是一种制度逻辑、一种社会治理结构的全面重构。它有五大核心特征: (一)什么是“完整公民”? 完整公民并非指“有身份证”的人,而是指在国家治理中具有全结构参与权、决定权与分享权的人,其权利至少包含: 维度 公民权内容 政治权 选举权、罢免权、公共事务提案权、参与式立法权、公投否决权 经济权 共同参与国家财富分配权、公共数据红利分享、国家资本股权分红、劳动红利协商权 社会权 基本福利保障、教育医疗公平获取、社会协商参与机制 文化权 言论自由、精神空间自由、教育课程参与设计权 完整公民不是抽象符号,而是国家制度中实际存在的治理力量。 只有当这些权利制度化、可行化、公开化,公民才真正成为国家的主人。 (二)“以公民为核心”的五大制度原则: 四、制度演化的历史逻辑:从臣民到公民,从统治到共治 治国方式并非一夜形成,而是历史不断进化的结果: 阶段 治理模式 主体关系 特征 古代封建 君主至上 臣民 法即皇命 神权-君权 教会或神授权威 信众 依教治国 君主立宪 贵族与资产阶级分享权力 纳税人 权利有等级 […]

read more

Related Content

How Kindness Can Revive Civilization
Avatar photo
Daohe · Jan 24, 2025
Early human civilization originated from the connection and mutual assistance between humans. At that time, it was the goodwill and cooperation among individuals that enabled them to survive together and move toward prosperity in the face of natural threats. From the collaborative hunting efforts of primitive societies to the public irrigation systems of agricultural civilizations, […]
How to Change the Fate of Modern Slaves
How to Change the Fate of Modern Slaves
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Feb 3, 2025
Societal problems are problems in life In modern society, workers, as a key force driving economic development, often face challenges such as low wages, long working hours, high pressure, and a lack of opportunities for advancement, which gradually makes them passive “modern slaves.” Their plight not only reflects deep-rooted issues within the social structure but […]
Understanding Social Enterprises: Beyond Traditional Business Models
Understanding Social Enterprises: Beyond Traditional Business Models
Avatar photo
Kishou · Oct 18, 2024
At its core, a social enterprise is fundamentally different from traditional businesses that prioritize profit. Instead, social enterprises are established with the primary goal of addressing social issues, aiming for self-sufficiency and sustainable development.<br>
The Loss or Renunciation of Civil Rights and Consequences
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Jan 26, 2025
Civil rights are not only a symbol of an individual’s legal identity within the state, but also a crucial mechanism for ensuring personal dignity and the fair distribution of societal resources. These rights encompass participation in social governance, access to public services, and legal protection, all while carrying the responsibility of fulfilling social duties. However, […]
View All Content