Rethinking Civilization: From Exclusion to Inclusion

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Nov 26, 2024
The reason why people are unhappy is because they are excluded in certain civilization systems in the society.

Reflection One: People are often excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Two: The reason people are unhappy is because they are excluded by the civilization systems in society.

Reflection Three: Yicheng Commonweal strives to identify and break the barriers of civilization, allowing everyone to share the fruit of civilization and societal progress.

The civilizational system in modern society governs management, order, and growth. Beyond systems and technology, it encompasses cultural values, social norms, and power structures, influencing individuals’ survival, happiness, and societal integration.

As a result, what appear to be highly efficient and advanced systems often exclude many, marginalizing them in a society that preaches fairness. Such exclusion is a violation of individual rights and a question to the meaning of civilization itself.

The Paradox of Civilization Systems

The progress of civilization is often accompanied by the neglect of certain groups, especially in the highly organized and technological context of modern society. lt leads to their “silent” existence within these civilization systems.

1. Exclusivity of Rules and Standards

At the heart of civilization systems lies a framework of rules and standards. However, the widespread application of these rules often overlooks the inherent differences between members of society. 

A clear example of this is the education system. Educational systems typically operate on a standardized talent-selection mechanism, aiming to provide equal opportunities for competition. In practice, however, this system favors families with cultural capital and educational resources, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups who lack such resources.

For those from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, the scarcity of educational resources makes it difficult for them to compete with mainstream society. This gap often begins in early childhood, as they lack access to quality cultural experiences and struggle to acquire the same education and skills as their wealthier counterparts. 

2. The Indifference of Technological Progress

While technology has driven the rapid progress of civilization systems, it has also deepened the sense of alienation between individuals and the systems that govern them. For instance, the widespread digital public services has boosted efficiency, but it has also overlooked those unable to access or adapt to new technologies—particularly the elderly and economically disadvantaged groups. This “indifference” of technology has pushed them further to the fringes of society, creating a divide known as technological exclusion.

3. Cultural Dominance and Its Hidden Hegemony

Civilization systems are often underpinned by the value orientations of mainstream culture, which tend to suppress diverse perspectives. In the era of globalization, many cultural and social systems struggle to accommodate different values and cultural expressions effectively. Immigrants, ethnic minorities, and groups with diverse genders and sexual orientations frequently face marginalization due to their cultural backgrounds, lifestyles, and beliefs.

This exclusion goes beyond laws and policies, manifesting in everyday life through subtle social biases and the rejection of other cultures. While modern society advocates for inclusivity and diversity, mainstream cultural norms and values often impose constraints on minorities. This creates barriers to their full integration into society and leaves them disadvantaged when it comes to accessing cultural and economic resources.

The Impact of Exclusion in depth

1. Psychological Challenges for Individuals

Excluded groups often experience feelings of powerlessness and isolation. This exclusion is not only reflected in the lack of material resources and opportunities but also profoundly affects an individual’s psychology and sense of identity. Those who remain in lower social strata for long periods frequently lack access to quality education, cultural activities, or social networks. This absence of cultural capital and social experience widens the perceived gap between them and mainstream society, gradually eroding their trust in and sense of belonging to the larger community.

For example, low-income workers who face prolonged unemployment often find themselves overwhelmed by the complexities of social welfare application processes. This sense of frustration can lead them to withdraw entirely, further entrenching their marginalization. Over time, the accumulation of such exclusion can result in serious psychological challenges, including self-doubt, depression, and anxiety, creating a vicious cycle that exacerbates their isolation.

2. Triggers of Social Instability

Exclusion not only harms individuals but can also pose a threat to social stability. Groups that are excluded by the system often form subcultures. While these groups may appear non-mainstream or marginalized on the surface, they represent deeper issues and contradictions within the social structure. 

For instance, impoverished communities in urban areas may become breeding grounds for gang organizations, where members may resort to illegal activities as a means of asserting their social presence. As this opposition accumulates, it can lead to larger-scale social conflicts. A clear example of this is the rise of populism, where the dissatisfaction of lower-income groups is often exploited by political forces, resulting in a rebellion against the “mainstream” class.

3. Internal Drain and Decline of Civilization Systems

When a portion of the population is excluded from the civilization system, this exclusion itself intensifies resource waste and reduces the system’s efficiency. Groups that are unable to fully participate in social and economic activities cannot contribute their potential labor and creativity to society, ultimately becoming a burden. 

For instance, a large number of children who are not in school represents a loss of future labor, and gaps in the social security system can lead to higher management costs. This not only hampers the overall development of civilization but also weakens social cohesion.

Ethical Reflections on Civilizational Exclusion

On the surface, exclusion seems to stem from imbalances in the distribution of resources and rights. However, on a deeper level, it unveils the ethical misalignment and value confusion embedded within the progress of civilization.

1. The Flaws of Efficiency-Driven Systems

Modern civilization systems prioritize efficiency as their core objective. This focus has undeniably driven social progress, enhancing productivity and optimizing resource use. Yet, an efficiency-first approach often disregards the diversity and unique needs of individuals. When systems operate through standardized and centralized mechanisms, they risk sidelining those who don’t conform to “mainstream” norms or who lack sufficient empowerment. 

For instance, urban development frequently prioritizes large commercial hubs and economic projects while neglecting the fundamental needs of grassroots communities. Although the pursuit of efficiency has its merits, if left unchecked, it may sacrifice individual rights and destabilize the equilibrium of broader societal development.

2. The Double-Edged Sword of Instrumental Rationality

Modern civilization systems inevitably rely on instrumental rationality, which treats individuals as measurable, analyzable, and controllable entities. While this approach has improved the organization and efficiency of social systems, it risks oversimplifying the complexity of human nature and ignoring people’s spiritual and emotional needs.

The labor market treats human resources as production units to maximize efficiency, but often neglects workers’ dignity and well-being. The dominance of instrumental rationality has led systems to become cold and mechanized in their pursuit of efficiency.

3. Structural Neglect of “the Other”

As philosopher Emmanuel Levinas said, the existence of the “Other” is the starting point of morality. However, in the fast pace of civilization’s development, biases often marginalize voices outside the mainstream. Immigrants and minority groups, for instance, are frequently overlooked, with their rights and quality of life starkly differing from the majority, and the system lacks adequate mechanisms for inclusion and balance.

This neglect is not intentional but stems from the system’s inability to accommodate minority perspectives in its pursuit of efficiency and standardization. As a result, these “Others” are marginalized, sometimes deliberately ignored, deepening social inequality and eroding the diverse values of the civilizational system.

Ways to Resolve the Problem

1. Redefining Human-Centered Systems

The design of civilizational systems should shift from serving the “majority” to serving “everyone”, with a focus on the needs of vulnerable groups. By including individual growth in social decisions, we can better support citizens’ well-being, reduce social unrest, and foster sustainable development. 

For instance, the government might introduce diverse educational assessments to provide suitable pathways for students of varying backgrounds, and the healthcare system should strengthen community outreach to address the health concerns of marginalized populations.

2. Structural Reforms for Systemic Inclusivity

To tackle exclusion, it is crucial to implement comprehensive and structural reforms, particularly in the areas of legal protections and the universal accessibility of public services. Reforms should ensure that the basic rights of all groups, particularly marginalized ones, are legally protected. Moreover, public service processes should be optimized to guarantee that everyone—especially vulnerable populations—can equally access societal resources.

3. Cultural Identity and Social Dialogue

The foundation for dismantling cultural hegemony lies in acknowledging diversity and creating platforms for dialogue between mainstream and minority cultures. For example, promoting multicultural education and spreading the values of inclusivity and understanding through media and community initiatives. 

One such example is Canada’s policy of integrating multicultural education at all levels of schooling, ensuring that students are exposed to diverse cultural backgrounds, knowledge, and histories.This policy not only increases social acceptance of minority groups but also reduces the cultural tensions that often lead to social exclusion and discord.

In addition, it is essential to listen to the voices of marginalized communities. Their experiences and needs should be considered as a vital part of social and cultural progress, driving us toward a more inclusive and cohesive society.

Rebuilding Social Consensus

The exclusion inherent in civilization systems reflects not only institutional shortcomings but also the fragmentation of social consensus. Therefore, addressing this issue requires the reconstruction of a social consensus based on mutual support and coexistence.

1. A Multidimensional Definition of Civil Progress

Traditional definitions of civil progress are often tied to economic growth and technological progress, but these metrics fail to encompass the needs of all members of society. Civil progress should be redefined as advancements that respect and accommodate individual differences, rather than simply a measure of material advancement or cultural export. In this new framework, the presence of marginalized groups is not seen as an anomaly but as an integral and enriching component of civilization’s broader meaning.

2. Reshaping Social Structure for Balance

The inclusivity of civilization systems can only be realized through adjustments in social structure. At present, the distribution of social resources is heavily skewed towards a small elite and power centers, while the general public and marginalized groups are systematically overlooked. To address this, policy measures such as progressive taxation and universal basic income programs should be introduced to ensure that vulnerable groups can also benefit from the advances of civilization.

3. Changing Societal Values

Overcoming exclusion in civilization demands a deep transformation in societal values. Education and cultural institutions should guide the public to recognize that everyone’s right to exist and dignity deserves respect, regardless of identity, background, or ability.

For instance, community collaboration projects, public welfare activities, and cross-cultural exchanges can be used to foster greater understanding and trust between different social groups, thereby reducing societal division and opposition.

From Exclusion to Symbiosis: A Vision for the Future of Civilization

Addressing the exclusionary aspects of civilization systems is a complex challenge that requires a fundamental shift in society—from awareness to action. The civilization of the future should be a symbiotic system, where every individual is valued as an essential part of the whole.

1. Building an Open System

The civilization system of the future must be open, able to actively absorb diverse voices and quickly adapt to the varied needs of society. In this process, more social organizations and individuals should be involved in decision-making on public affairs, ensuring that the design and operation of the system account for the interests of a wider range of groups and generate greater social welfare. Public policies should not rely solely on experts and bureaucrats but should actively seek input from all levels of society, especially the voices of marginalized groups.

2. Spiritual Dimensions of Civilization

A truly civilized society is not only materially prosperous but also spiritually fulfilled. Future civilization should focus more on people’s inner needs—such as security, belonging, and self-actualization—by integrating human-centered principles into system design.

Encouraging social participation and individual expression, and providing opportunities for interaction, will help everyone feel needed and recognized. Social groups should promote public cultural activities and volunteer projects, ensuring that everyone benefits from social welfare and contributes to the development of community and civilization.

3. Reconciliation between Civilization and Nature

The exclusionary tendencies of civilization are not only social but also environmental. As modern civilization advances, it often overlooks the damage to ecosystems and the overuse of natural resources. If future civilizations fail to address these issues, they risk undermining the well-being of all humanity. Therefore, ecological sustainability should be a central focus of future civilizations, promoting a balance and harmony between human development and the natural world.

Conclusion

The exclusion present in our civilization systems highlights a core problem: although civilization is meant to serve everyone, it often fails to do so in practice. To address this, we must approach the challenge with greater courage and wisdom, redesigning civilization to create a genuine, inclusive home for all. The true purpose of civilization is not to enforce perfect rules, but to accept and nurture imperfect lives. Only when every individual can experience dignity and belonging within society can we truly claim to have achieved a civilized world.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

思考停止社会の形成:反文明的進化を遂げる「反知性社会」の包括的分析

Yicheng · Jun 9, 2025

文明の進化とは、常に人類が蒙昧から理性へ、盲従から自立へ、迷信から科学へ、そして部族的な社会から多様性のある社会へと向かうプロセスでした。その核心は、権威という幻想、神権政治、封建的な神話、集団的な狂熱を絶えず打ち破り、個人の意志を解放し、集団の知性を引き出すことにあります。 しかし、今日の世界では、この文明の進化に逆行する、反知性的な社会モデルが静かに形成されつつあります。それが「閉鎖社会」です。この社会は、現代テクノロジーの利便性を逆用し、集団的な思考停止を体系的に創り出し、民衆の理性を削ぎ、文明進歩の原動力を瓦解させ、古くからの愚民化政策を復活させています。そして、デジタル化、情報戦、娯楽化といった手段を駆使し、国家全体を「高度な科学技術+政治的閉鎖+文化的孤立+精神的自由の剥奪+歪んだ経済」という五位一体の「現代的な思考停止の時代」へと推し進めているのです。 その本質は、組織的かつ計画的な反知性プロジェクトであり、反文明的な進化のプロセスをシステムとして実行することに他なりません。 一、反知性的な情報統制:認知の自律性から、集団的な思考力の低下へ 文明社会の進歩は、情報の自由な流動、多様な思想の衝突、そして議論の中で真理が生まれることに依存しています。しかし、反知性社会は、「国家安全保障」「民族の尊厳」「イデオロギーの浸透防止」といった名の下に、外部からの情報を遮断し、内部の議論を封鎖し、一方向的な世論空間を創り出します。 デジタル技術による「壁」、世論における「鉄のカーテン」、そしてアルゴリズムによる検閲を通じて、一見すると賑やかに見えながら、その実態は極めて知的水準の低い情報環境が形成されます。 このような環境に長期間置かれることで、人々の認知能力は急激に衰え、判断力は萎縮し、批判精神は消滅していきます。民衆は、情報の受動的な受信者、そして無条件の信奉者へと成り下がり、文明が進歩するために最も核心的となる要素——認知的な自律性——を完全に喪失するのです。 これこそが、デジタル時代の反知性社会における第一の特徴、「理性の放棄、判断の放棄、懐疑の放棄、証明の放棄」です。 二、反知性的な文化体系:内向きの神話と、外向きの敵意 文明の進化は、文化の多様性、思想の自由性、そして価値観の多元性に依存しています。 しかし、反知性社会は、閉鎖的で単一的な文化構造を体系的に形成し、異なる意見を持つ者は社会から排除し、批判する者は断罪し、自律的な個人は周縁化します。 社会で生み出される文化コンテンツは、極めて均質化します。 普遍的人権、自由主義、個人の独立、科学的合理性、民主的な抑制と均衡といった、外部の進んだ文明思想は、すべて「敵対勢力による浸透」「文化侵略」「国を滅ぼす思想」として汚名を着せられます。 民衆の精神世界は、閉じられたループの幻想へと改造され、文明的な視野は著しく狭まり、価値観は単一で低俗なものとなり、文化的なソフトパワーは崩壊し、文化的に孤立した反知性社会が形成されるのです。 三、反知性的な政治構造:忠誠心のある凡人による統治 文明の進化は、権力の抑制と均衡、独立した制度、公衆による監督、そして能力に基づく人材登用によって支えられます。反知性社会は、「安定の維持を最優先する」という大義名分の下、独立した機関を体系的に破壊し、監督メカニズムを弾圧し、国外にいる知識人を排斥します。 能力の代わりに忠誠心を用い、賢者の代わりに凡人を登用し、独立した人格を消滅させ、思想的な異論を排除し、「原稿を読むのが得意で、果敢に称賛し、上官の意向を忖度することに長けた」シニカルな政治家と、能力の低い官僚を選抜し、閉鎖的な権力機構を組織します。 その結果、意思決定は盲目的になり、政策は現実から乖離し、不正事件が頻発し、腐敗はシステム化し、イノベーションは途絶え、制度的な愚かさが国策となります。真に理性的な精神、批判能力、国際的な視野、そして制度に関する理想を持つ人材は、汚名を着せられ、弾圧され、排斥され、監視されるのです。 これこそが、反知性的な政治の核心的メカニズム、「文明的なエリート層から主体性を奪い、権力に隷属する人々を育成すること」です。 四、反知性的な信仰への抑圧:精神的自由の剥奪 文明進化のもう一つの核心は、信仰の多様性と精神的な自由であり、個人が物質、権力、現実を超越する精神的な次元を持つことを保障することにあります。 反知性社会は、宗教、哲学、倫理、歴史の語りを厳格に管理し、あらゆる超越的な精神の体系を、国有化、ラベリング、そして形骸化させます。 民衆は長期にわたり精神的な支えを欠き、虚無的な功利主義に陥り、物質と利益が至上となります。そして、民族的な狂熱や権力への迷信が信仰の代替物となり、個人の心は普遍的に空虚化し、社会倫理は崩壊します。 これこそが、反知性社会による、文明の精神的次元の体系的な剥奪なのです。 五、反知性的な経済構造:歪んだ経済と内需循環の罠 文明の進化は、市場の開放、富の分かち合い、イノベーションによる駆動、そして階層間の流動性を要求します。しかし、反知性社会は、強権的な経済操作を利用し、権力と結びついた経済、寡頭独占、そして内循環の罠を形成します。 表面上は繁栄しているように見えても、内実は脆弱です。長期にわたって民衆の経済的な自主性、革新能力、そして富を増やそうとする意欲を抑制し、消費を低レベルに留め、「生存のための疲弊+思考の麻痺」という、経済的な反知性構造を創り出すのです。 六、反文明的進化の総体像:現代的な思考停止社会 最終的に、この全面的な反知性化の操作は、一つの逆説的な現象を創り出します。 民衆は、普遍的に、独立した理性、判断力、創造力を喪失し、デジタル娯楽、民族的狂熱、盲目的な信仰、そして権威への崇拝といったものが渦巻く、思考停止社会へと陥っていくのです。 これこそが、反文明的な進化がもたらした、体系的な成果、すなわち「反知性化された社会形態」なのです。 結語:文明が体系的に思考停止に陥る危機への警鐘 もしこのモデルが継続するならば、世界の科学技術文明は形骸化し、精神文明は衰退し、個人の価値は消滅し、集団の知恵は退化し、最終的に人類文明は「デジタル独裁+集団的思考停止+技術的暗黒時代」へと陥ることは必至でしょう。 ただ、情報の自由を回復し、文化的な封鎖を打破し、精神的な信仰を解放し、権力崇拝を打ち破り、権力の抑制と均衡を再建し、人材の自由な流動を活性化させることによってのみ、人類文明は、この全面的な思考停止の罠を回避し、前進し続けることができるのです。  

封闭社会的弱智时代已经形成 :一种反文明进化式反智社会的全面剖析

Yicheng · Jun 9, 2025

文明进化,始终是人类从愚昧走向理性、从盲从走向独立、从迷信走向科学、从部落走向多元的过程。其核心在于不断破除权威幻象、宗教神权、封建迷思、集体狂热,解放个体意志,激发群体智慧。 而当今世界,却悄然孕育出一种反文明进化的反智社会模型——封闭社会。它依靠现代科技之便,系统性制造群体弱智,削弱民众理性,瓦解文明进步动能,复活古老的愚民术,并借助数字化、信息战、娱乐化手段,将整个国家推进智能科技+政治封闭+文化隔绝+信仰阉割+经济畸形五位一体的“现代化弱智时代”。 其本质,即是有组织、有计划的反智工程,是反文明进化过程的系统化实施。 一、反智的信息控制:从认知自主到集体弱能 文明社会进步,依靠信息自由流动,思想多元碰撞,真理在争鸣中产生。反智社会则以“国家安全”“民族尊严”“意识形态防渗透”为名,切断外部信息,封闭内部讨论,制造单向度舆论空间。 通过数字高墙、舆论铁幕、算法审查,塑造一种看似喧嚣,实则低智的信息环境: 长期处于这种环境,人群认知能力急剧衰退,判断力萎缩,批判精神消亡。民众沦为信息被动接收者与无条件信仰者,彻底丧失文明进步最核心的——认知自主性。 此即数字化反智社会的第一特征:去理性、去判断、去怀疑、去证明。 二、反智的文化体系:本土神话与外来妖魔 文明进化依靠文化的多样性、思想的自由性、价值观的多元性。 反智社会却系统性塑造封闭单一的文化结构,凡异见者封杀,或清算批判者,或边缘化自主者。 文化输出内容高度同质化: 外来先进文明思想,如普世人权、自由主义、个人独立、科学理性、民主制衡,皆被污名为“敌对渗透”、“文化侵略”、“亡国论调”。 民众精神世界被改造为闭环幻觉,文明视野严重狭隘,价值观单一低劣,文化软实力崩解,形成文化隔绝型反智社会。 三、反智的政治结构:忠诚型庸才治国 文明进化依赖权力制衡、独立制度、公众监督与人才择优。反智社会以“维稳优先”为纲,系统性摧毁独立机构,打压监督机制,排斥流亡有识之士。 用忠诚替代能力,以庸才取代贤能,消灭独立人格,清除思想异议,选拔一批“会念稿、敢歌颂、善揣摩”的犬儒政客与低能官僚,组成闭环权力机器。 决策盲目,政策脱节,弊案层出,腐败系统化,创新绝迹,制度性愚蠢成为国策。真正具有理性精神、批判能力、国际视野、制度理想的人才,被污名、打压、排斥、监控。 此即反智政治的核心机制:阉割文明精英,培养权力奴才。 四、反智的信仰压制:去除信仰 文明进化的另一核心,是信仰多元与精神自由,保障个体超越物质、权力、现实之精神维度。 反智社会严控宗教、哲学、伦理、历史叙事,将一切超验精神体系国有化、标签化、阉割化。 民众长期缺乏精神寄托,陷入虚无功利,物质和利益至上,民族狂热与权力迷信替代信仰,个体心灵普遍空洞化,社会伦理崩溃。 此即反智社会对文明精神维度的系统抽离。 五、反智的经济结构:畸形经济与内循环陷阱 文明进化要求市场开放、财富共享、创新驱动、阶层流动。反智社会却利用强权经济操控,形成权贵经济+寡头垄断+内循环陷阱: 表面繁荣,内在虚弱,长期抑制民众经济自主性、创新能力和财富增长欲望,维持消费低端化,制造“生存疲惫+思维麻木”的经济反智结构。 六、反文明进化的总体现象:现代化弱智社会 最终,这种全面反智化操作制造出一种悖论现象: 民众普遍丧失独立理性、判断力、创造力,陷入数字娱乐+民族狂热+盲目信仰+权威崇拜的弱智社会。 这正是反文明进化的系统性成果:反智化社会形态。 结语:警惕文明系统性弱智化危机 若此模式持续,必将导致全球科技文明空壳化,精神文明衰败,个体价值消亡,群体智慧退化,最终人类文明陷入数字专制+群体弱智+技术黑暗时代。 唯有恢复信息自由,打破文化封锁,解放精神信仰,破除权力崇拜,重建权力制衡,激活人才自由流动,人类文明方可避免全面弱智化陷阱,继续向前。

read more

Related Content

Friendship in different life stages
Friendship in different life stages
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 6, 2025
On the journey of life, friendship is like a mirror—reflecting how much we have grown and how far we have come. From carefree childhood playmates to soul-level companions in our later years, friendship isn’t static—it evolves as our minds expand, our values shift, and our lives unfold. Like leveling up in a game (but with […]
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Cultivating Happy and Successful Citizens: The Diverse Categories of Quality Education
Avatar photo
Daohe · Feb 25, 2025
Traditional education often categorizes learning based on subjects, audiences, and teaching methods, focusing mainly on passing knowledge and developing skills. Quality education, however, takes a broader view. It looks beyond just academic success to focus on personal and social fulfillment, along with long-term happiness and success. It emphasizes not only gaining knowledge but also developing […]
View All Content