Understanding Civilization: The Dynamic Evolution of Human Morality

Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 26, 2025
Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining […]

Civilization isn’t just about accumulating wealth or advancing technology。 It is an ongoing journey that stretches throughout human history, shaped by our constant search for good, justice, fairness, and order. While religion, philosophy, law, and social structures are visible aspects of civilization, the true force driving its evolution is humanity’s continuous questioning, refining, and redefining of morality.

Civilization is not a finished product but a dynamic, ever-evolving process.

This article will take a closer look at the development of human morality and the transformation of civilization, offering a deeper understanding of what civilization truly means.

1. Prehistoric era: the natural emergence of morality

In early hunter-gatherer societies, morality was not a product of philosophy but a necessity for survival. Early humans had to cooperate, divide labor, and share resources to survive in harsh natural environments. Acts of mutual aid, caring for the weak, and respecting elders gradually evolved from strategic survival tactics into shared moral principles within the group.

The cave paintings found in France’s Lascaux Caves show groups of people hunting together. These images are not just early art; they also show how humans began to work together socially.

The “flower burial” discovered in Neanderthal graves reveals their respect for death and appreciation for life. This basic understanding of the supernatural and the meaning of life was the first step toward the development of morality.

2. Ancient Civilizations: The Formation of Systematic Moral Frameworks

With the rise of agricultural civilizations and the establishment of city-states, moral systems began to become more organized and institutionalized. Various ancient civilizations developed unique ethical systems through religion, law, and philosophy.

  • In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi institutionalized the principle of justice, setting clear rules for punishment and rewards to maintain social order.
  • In ancient Egypt, the goddess Ma’at symbolized truth and order, requiring everyone to follow justice in life in order to pass through judgment and achieve eternal life.
  • In India, the founder of Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), established compassion, patience, and discipline as the moral foundation through the “Four Noble Truths” and the “Eightfold Path,” emphasizing the law of cause and effect on actions.
  • Ancient Greek philosophy elevated morality to a rational pursuit, with Socrates claiming that “virtue is knowledge,” Plato emphasizing that “justice” is the ultimate goal for both the state and the individual, and Aristotle defining “the golden mean” as the core principle of moral practice.

During this period, human civilization shifted from a survival-based existence to a more rational order, with morality becoming a vital foundation for governing states and maintaining societies.

3. The Middle Ages: The Rise and Contradictions of Religious Morality

During the Middle Ages, religion became the absolute center of moral systems. Christianity shaped a new social order in Europe, where everything—from personal ethics to state laws—was based on the Bible. The Church not only established moral guidelines but also promoted social cohesion through religious education, charity, and welfare. However, the Church’s overwhelming authority led to rigid doctrines and religious wars, with the Crusades serving as an extreme example of religious morality in practice.

In the Islamic world, Sharia law regulated economic, justice, family relationships, and personal behavior, while charity was considered a religious duty. During the Abbasid Caliphate, religious ethics did not suppress knowledge but coexisted with scientific prosperity, creating a golden age where culture and morality intertwined.

Buddhism in medieval East Asia played a dual role in both imperial politics and popular ethics. It influenced rulers’ concepts of “benevolent governance” while also serving as a moral force in everyday life.

Yet, religious moral systems were not without contradictions. While they provided a framework for regulating human behavior, they also became tools of control and persecution. Religious trials and the burning of heretics are dark chapters in the moral journey of human civilization.

4. Modern Era: The Awakening of Reason, Human Rights, and Social Justice

The Renaissance and Enlightenment freed morality from the constraints of religion, placing reason and human rights at the center of ethical thought.

  • Immanuel Kant proposed that “moral law exists in the human heart,” asserting that individuals are self-disciplined moral agents.
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau emphasized the “social contract,” arguing that the legitimacy of the state comes from the will of the people.
  • The U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen were the first to establish freedom, equality, and human rights as the foundation of morality and law at the national level.

However, the Industrial Revolution brought about capital expansion, labor exploitation, child labor, and rising wealth inequality, once again posing a moral challenge. The rise of workers’ movements and Marxist thought proposed ideas like “distribution according to labor” and “abolition of exploitation,” which place social justice back at the heart of moral discourse.

Thus, modern civilization transitioned from religious rule to rational governance and, eventually, to a focus on social justice. Yet, this shift also planted the seeds of conflict between capitalist logic and social responsibility.

Modern Civilization: Globalization and the Multidimensional “National Citizen” Moral System

Modern civilization has entered an era of globalization and rapid technological development, which presents profound challenges to both traditional religious moral systems and early rational moral frameworks.

  • Globalization has broken down national borders, while technology has removed the constraints of time and space. Modern citizens are no longer just subjects of national law. They are also members of a global ethical community. A new moral system for national citizens, built on the foundation of law, centered on human rights, and driven by creativity and public responsibility, is emerging.
  • Globalization compels humanity to confront cross-cultural ethical issues, with challenges such as environmental protection, global trade fairness, climate change, and data privacy no longer confined to a single nation’s perspective.
  • Documents like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Paris Agreement, and global governance frameworks are gradually building an international ethical consensus. Countries must now seek a balance between their national interests and global ethical responsibilities.

The modern moral system for national citizens is built upon four key pillars:
a. Legal protection and moral self-awareness: Citizens are not only required to follow the law but also to internalize self-discipline and moral responsibility.
b. Unity of personal creativity and social responsibility: Innovation must balance the pursuit of personal achievement with consideration for the greater social good.
c. Diversity and conflict resolution mechanisms: The system incorporates strategies to address the conflicts arising from cultural differences and promote inclusivity.
d. Continuous reflection and moral innovation: Given the rapid pace of technological and societal change, the moral system must have the capacity for self-correction and adaptation.

At the same time, the modern moral system faces several challenges: conflicts between national interests and global ethics are becoming more apparent, capitalism is widening the wealth gap, cultural globalization is threatening local identities, and technology is advancing faster than our ethical guidelines. Issues like AI ethics, gene regulation, and data sovereignty are pushing us to create a flexible, ever-evolving global ethics platform.

Looking ahead, global ethical unity will be the goal, and national moral systems will expand beyond borders, forming a shared responsibility framework for “global citizens.”

In the future, moral decision-making will be more democratic, public well-being will be a key measure, and ethical systems will be designed to self-correct and adapt to changes. These will be the hallmarks of future civilizations.

Conclusion

Looking back on human history, morality has always been the invisible force driving societal progress. From primal survival instincts to religious ethics, from rational legal systems to the moral framework of global citizens, humanity has constantly asked, “What is justice? What is good?”

However, each era’s moral system has faced its own limitations. Religious morality brought about doctrinal rigidity and persecution; rational ethics couldn’t fully resolve issues like capital exploitation; globalization has introduced new conflicts over fairness and sovereignty.

The modern moral system for national citizens is humanity’s latest attempt in the context of globalization and technological revolution. It is both the highest product of civilization and an unfinished experiment.

Only through continuous reflection, self-correction, and the collective participation of all humanity can this system evolve towards perfection, ultimately becoming a guiding light for a more just, harmonious, and sustainable future for human civilization.

Share this article:
LEARN MORE

Continue Reading

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

人类历史社会发展价值观下的“粪便人生”

Daohe · Sep 12, 2025

叙谈人生的意义与价值–看清粪便人生 历史是一条奔涌的长河,浩浩荡荡,不以个人意志为转移。在这个历史长河中,每一个人都身处于时代巨轮的碾压之下。有人燃烧自己,成为引擎的燃料,推动文明向前;有人则蜷缩在角落,不愿承担任何责任,最终被抛弃、被腐化,成为这个时代的粪便。前者留下力量,后者只剩恶臭。粪便,本是身体代谢的废物,不再具有营养和能量,只能被排出体外。若套用到人的一生,不论其自认为多么清高、多么善良,若未曾为时代的前行贡献力量,便注定被历史的胃肠道消化后丢弃。 一、动力的价值:文明的唯一尺度 在个人价值与社会价值的衡量中,道德、善恶、名誉,往往只是幻影。真正被历史认可的标准,只有一个:你是否提供了动力。动力不是抽象的,它体现在:  科技的探索者,让世界的认知边界不断拓展;科技动力:牛顿、爱因斯坦改变人类认知;硅谷创业者推动世界进入数字时代。 制度的建设者,让社会秩序更加稳固和公平;制度动力:美国宪法、法国人权宣言、北欧福利制度,让公民的权利被制度化。 文化的创造者,让人类的精神生活不断丰盈;文化动力:莎士比亚、陀思妥耶夫斯基、鲁迅,用文字刺破人心,点燃新的思想火种。 公益的践行者,让弱者也能在光中行走。公益动力:白求恩、特蕾莎修女、无数志愿者,在苦难之地让文明的光照亮弱者。 社会组织事业的践行者,让人都在组织中成长。社会动力:只有社会组织才是我们最小的社会单位,任何人在组织中才能发出最灿烂的创造之光。 动力是文明的燃料。哪怕只是一点火星,投入时代引擎,也能点亮无数未来。而没有动力的人,不是中立者,而是沉重的负担。 二、粪便的命运:无所作为者的归宿 在这个时代,许多人自以为善良,认为“不作恶就是好人”。然而,历史的标准从不以“善恶”来衡量一个人,而是以“贡献”来审视其价值。对应到人类社会,就是那些只消耗时代供养,却从不回馈时代的人。 无所作为的好人:他们自诩清白,不作恶,但也从不创造。他们的存在就像空气中的浮尘,随风消散,毫无痕迹。 自我沉溺的坏人:他们或许搅起浪花,但并未推动历史,只是被历史冲刷后腐烂。 冷漠的旁观者:他们不愿承受任何责任,以“中立”为借口,其实等同于自动退出文明进程。 历史不会因为你是“好人”就留名,也不会因为你“不坏”就赦免。论善恶,只要不提供时代动力,最终都将成为社会机器的排泄物,被淘汰,被遗忘,被历史嫌弃。 三、善恶之外:价值的真正判断 我们习惯把人分成“好人”和“坏人”,但历史的眼睛并不这样看。 一些所谓“坏人”,因推动了制度反思,反而间接成为动力。拿破仑虽是战争贩子,却带来《民法典》,成为现代法治的基石。 一些“好人”,因缺乏行动,反而湮没无闻。二战时期,欧洲数百万旁观者看着犹太人被屠杀,却无人伸手相助。他们或许“善良”,但历史只记住了抵抗者与解放者。 动力推动才文明的真正标准,而非善恶。历史要的,不是“道德标签”,而是“动力效应”。谁能让时代进步,谁就被铭记;谁若只消耗空气与粮食,就会化作粪便,随文明代谢被冲走。 四、历史的铁律:粪便总被冲走 纵观古今中外,粪便人生的命运早已昭示: 秦末农民:多数人选择苟且偷生,最终与暴政一同被湮没,唯有陈胜、吴广敢举义,才进入史册。 工业革命时期:成千上万工人机械般消耗生命,却毫无主体性,被机器和资本吞噬。最终,他们成了“被时代代谢”的一代,而提出工人权利的推动者,才被铭记。 二十世纪的冷漠者:无数国家里,那些既不反抗压迫,也不建设社会的人,活着如草芥,死后无一人记起。 文明只记住推动者,而不会记住无所作为的旁观者。   五、当代的警告:粪便人生正在泛滥 今天的世界,看似繁荣,却充斥着“粪便人生”: 把一生浪费在短视频麻醉与无意义消费上的人; 只顾个人安逸,却对公共事务冷漠的人; 只追求“清白”或“小确幸”,却拒绝承担责任的人。 他们或许自我感觉良好,甚至自诩为“好人”。但在文明视角下,他们与时代的引擎毫无关系,注定被未来冲走。 六、避免粪便人生的路径 东方中国两汉时期,司马迁在《报任安书》言:人固有一死,或重于泰山,或轻于鸿毛,用之所期、趋利异也。也给出了人生的价值取决于所追求的目标与意义,实际方法并不玄妙:1. 贡献哪怕一点点:在你的岗位上留下改进的痕迹,就是动力。2. 参与公共事务:哪怕只是为一次社区决策投票,也比冷漠旁观要强。3. 学习与创造:学习是吸收动力,创造是释放动力,两者缺一不可。4. 推动哪怕微小的文明进步:帮人守住诚信、传播知识、支持公益,支持社会组织事业都是点亮未来的火种。 哪怕贡献渺小,只要进入时代引擎,你的人生就有意义。唯有拒绝贡献的人,才会落得“粪便”的命运,被冲入下水道,臭气熏天,却无人愿再提起。 结语: 生命的意义,不在于你是否善良,不在于你是否清白,而在于你是否曾经给这个时代注入过哪怕一丝能量。动力有层级,但没有人被禁止提供。微小贡献的总和,正是文明前行的真正力量。 燃料之生,虽耗尽也光荣;粪便之生,虽自洁也卑贱。唯有成为动力,生命才能被文明吸收;否则,你只是历史的排泄物,臭气熏天,却无人再记起。

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

公務員の「制度の駒」としての人生:グローバルな制度進化における犠牲者の論理

Daohe · Aug 30, 2025

――歴史、文明、制度を横断する、制度的統制の罠―― 序論:世界的な悲劇、制度的な設定 現代の多くの国々において、それが民主国家であれ、権威主義体制であれ、あるいは新興の政体であれ、「公務員」という集団の役割は、危険かつ逆説的な構造の中に囚われています。 忠誠を求められながら、清廉潔白でいられる余地を与えられない。 権力を与えられながら、その人格の尊厳は保障されない。 秩序を維持するよう求められながら、いつでも身代わりの羊(スケープゴート)にされうる。 このような「制度の駒として使われる人生」は、東洋特有のものでも、権威主義体制の専売特許でもありません。これは、世界の制度文明が長期にわたって進化してきた副産物であり、行政官僚システムそのものに固有の、犠牲を生み出すメカニズムなのです。そして、それは世界的な普遍性と、制度としての継承性を持っています。 一、古代帝国から植民地体制へ:公務員の「犠牲となる」性質の世界的起源 1. 古代ローマとペルシャ帝国:忠実な道具 vs. 権力による収穫 古代ローマ帝国は、世界で最も初期の巨大な文官システムの一つを確立しました。しかし、このシステムの核心的な論理は、「実行者に権限はなく、責任は全て負わされる」というものでした。地方総督が治安維持、徴税、軍糧供給をできなければ、元老院に弾劾され、職務怠慢で追放され、時には街頭で処刑される可能性さえありました。 ペルシャ帝国も同様で、その「帝国の目」と呼ばれた監察官は、高い地位にありながら、皇帝の「耳目」であると同時に「生贄」でもありました。一度でも忠誠心に疑いを持たれれば、まず処刑され、その後に責任が問われる、という具合でした。 2. 中世の教会権力と王権のシステム:官僚が置かれた高圧的な苦境 中世西ヨーロッパの王権と教会権力が並立していた時代、王室の書記官や教皇庁の助祭長は、最高位の公務員でありながら、最も高いリスクを背負う者たちでもありました。主君のために働いた多くの高級行政官が、権力闘争、責任転嫁、そして世論による断罪の中で命を落としました。 イングランドのトマス・ベケットのように、忠臣でありながら、最終的には「政治的な死体」となる例は少なくありません。 3. 植民地システム:派遣された官僚が陥る二重の牢獄 イギリス、フランス、オランダ、スペインといった植民地帝国は、世界中に多くの植民地行政官を派遣しました。彼らは「現地住民を平定し、税を搾り取る」一方で、本国の議会や現地の資本家の機嫌を損ねるわけにはいきませんでした。彼らは、植民地での危機、反乱の失敗、経済の衰退といった事態において、しばしば「最初の犠牲者」となったのです。 世界の植民地史における「不運な総督たち」の記録は、制度が人材をいかに「燃料」として消費してきたかを、最も如実に物語っています。 二、近代国家の「行政機械」:権力の中で人格を奪われる人々 1. ナチス・ドイツとソビエト体制:制度の消耗品としての究極形態 全体主義制度の下では、公務員はほとんど制度の消耗品と化します。 このような政体における公務員は、表向きは国家を代表していますが、実態は高圧的な権力システムにおける最初の犠牲者集団なのです。 2. 民主国家におけるスケープゴート構造:世論の下での切り捨てメカニズム 制度が成熟した民主国家においてさえ、公務員は「切り捨てられる運命」から逃れられてはいません。 民主制度が必ずしも穏やかであるとは限りません。ただ、公務員を切り捨てる方法が、より「文明的」であるに過ぎないのです。 三、現代における「制度の駒」としての人生の五大特徴:世界共通の「統制パッケージ」 どの国においても、今日の公務員システムは、非常によく似た、管理しやすい「制度の駒」としての構造的特徴を示しています。 1. 権力と責任の著しい非対称性 限られた実行権しか持たないにもかかわらず、政策の失敗、世論の批判、予算の危機に対して責任を負わなければなりません。真の意思決定者は「法的に免責」され、実行者は「手続きに則って問責」されます。 2. 収入と期待の著しい乖離 世界の多くの国で、公務員の収入は、その仕事の過酷さや公衆からの期待に見合うものではありません。その結果、合法的な範囲外のインセンティブ、すなわち「グレーな収入」を生み出す土壌となります。 3. 忠誠と独立した人格の両立不可能性 多くの国で、「政治的中立」と「制度への忠誠」はしばしば矛盾します。ある公務員があまりに独立して思考すれば、「非協力的な人物」と見なされやすく、逆に従順すぎれば、社会からの信頼を失います。 4. 制度によって腐敗へと誘導され、そして制度によって粛清される 制度は、表向きは清廉潔白を奨励しますが、実際には管理・統制の手段として、多くの「腐敗の余地」を残しています。そして、一度、粛清の必要が生じると、その中から「スケープゴート」を選び出し、不満を鎮めるのです。 5. 最終的に社会の怒りの受け皿となる 貧富の格差、統治の失敗、官僚主義的な作風に対する民衆の不満は、最終的に、資本家や体制の上層部ではなく、「無能で、腐敗し、怠慢で、愚かで、何もしない」公務員へと集中砲火のように浴びせられます。 四、なぜ制度は常に「切り捨て可能な実行部隊」を必要とするのか? 制度は、常に三つの重要な難題を解決しなければなりません。 問題 制度対策 実行効率をいかに維持するか? 体制に従順で、依存的な人々を育成する。 制度の安定性をいかに延長するか? […]

read more

Related Content

Why systems matter more than tech
Why systems matter more than tech
Avatar photo
Kishou · Jun 13, 2025
This passage emphasizes that the key to civilizational progress lies in systems, not technology. A system defines how social resources are organized and how power is structured. Its flexibility determines whether institutions can improve and whether technology can be used effectively—ultimately shaping the direction of civilization. A healthy system drives prosperity; a rigid one leads to collapse. Technology only serves the system.
4 Why’s Diversity is Key for Better Global Democracies
Avatar photo
Kishou · Dec 24, 2024
After witnessing the horrors of totalitarian regimes in the 20th century and the deep critiques of capitalist systems in the 21st, post-2024 democratic governments will inevitably take on a new form. They will no longer replicate the military or social autocracies of the past, nor will they serve as mere instruments of economic and financial […]
The Real Enemy of Civilization
The Real Enemy of Civilization
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Apr 10, 2025
Yicheng Commonweal has written over a hundred articles, aiming to awaken the public’s fundamental understanding of goodness, virtue, civilization, ignorance, love, and progress. We originally thought that many misunderstandings and indifference stemmed from a lack of awareness. However, after engaging with more people, we discovered that for some, their evil is intentional, a disguise crafted […]
The Two Sides of Living: Democracy or Slavery
The Two Sides of Living: Democracy or Slavery
Avatar photo
Yicheng · Mar 28, 2025
To be human is not just about biological survival, but about the growth of our spirit and soul. However, the meaning of “living” varies greatly at different stages of history and civilization. Some live in fear, oppression, and deception, simply striving to survive in chaotic times, indifferent to right or wrong. Others live in awakening, […]
View All Content